Energy Information
(This page possibly hacked by those who
don't want you to know the facts.)
(Please report broken links to byronwine@byronwine.com)
The Washington Post, Washington Times, Richmond Times Dispatch, New York Times (1), (2), The Oregonian, Potomac News,
Manassas Journal Messenger, Washington Examiner and other
print/radio/TV media outlets will not inform you of this information. The post did respond to another letter.
After you read the following information,
do you wonder why they won't inform you?
To further illustrate how information is suppressed, during September
2004, email was sent to 119 Talk show host. Neglecting automatic responses, one host
responded. When I responded to that host, no response. During
2004-2005 I sent more than 600 email and letters concerning Energy
Information. Most people did not respond
including my Members of Congress.
These, WTOP, WMAL, WJLA (1) (2), WTTG (1) (2), WUSA, NBC and many other TV/Radio media present gloom and doom
stories concerning energy. Yet, they will not inform you of devices that could,
if implemented, greatly reduce our reliance on oil. Do you wonder why?
Do you wonder how long the media has manipulated you?
Read the 2002 preface to
a 1918 book "The Free Press" (ISBN 0-9714894-1-6).
Need further proof that information is suppressed?
See this web site document. You might find the 1980 letter, near the bottom, to an inventor from the
(U.S). Commissioner of Patents interesting. The letter prevents the inventor from
proceeding with his invention on security grounds. Mr. Arthur Stopes, III, does not agree with the letter at the bottom
of the page, his comments are here.
Some members of congress are attempting to obtain access to classified energy patents, the information is here.
In the late 50’s, I met a retired Florida college
physics professor, he had a Patent for a device to run an engine on water. The government had classified his Patent and
this prevented him from developing his device.
For a suggested workaround for the Patent issue see.
A researcher, Gary Vesperman,
has a very informative paper concerning energy
suppression. An expanded paper is here.
A review of the book "The Free Energy Secrets of
Cold Electricity" by Dr. Patrick G. Bailey, President, Institute
for New Energy is here. (Use the functions in Adobe Acrobat to
navigate the review.)
If you can, please help to distribute this
information.
Please send suggestions and comments to: byronwine@byronwine.com
(This article was on the Internet for several years until I changed
Internet provider. The article was modified
to link some documentation and add additional material.)
So you
think we have an energy problem?
No, we have
a political problem.
I want to relate to you some facts concerning various
suppressed energy devices and the difficulty in informing the public of these
devices. I hope that you can add some additional information. Here are some
additional web sites
addressing these issues.
On October 1, 1990, I began to keep a list of people
contacted concerning energy devices. The
list is
now 51 pages long. (The list is no
longer updated.) The list includes
President Clinton
and vice-president. 121 Members of Congress including George Allen (1) (2), Feinstein,
Warner, McCain,
Coburn and
other politicians,
21 government
and state
agencies, 215 members of the print and electronic media, 62 environmental groups, the President of United Auto Workers and 14
other UAW officials, and the President of the American Automobile
Association. A recent correspondence
exchange with AAA is here. Many members of the clergy,
including Mr. Pat Robertson and Christian Science
Monitor. Numerous
other "public
interest" groups.
Most of the people contacted do not respond to communications.
My then Congressman, Representative Frank Wolf, will
not respond to a letter and 182 pages of documentation that I put in his hand
on August 25, 1993. I wonder just who he does
respond to? Could it
be that money talks? My current
congressman, Tom Davis,
also will not respond to my last letter.
Mr. Davis was evidently too busy chairing the congressional baseball
investigation to be concerned with energy issues.
The Governor of Virginia critiqued the president's
recent state of the union speech saying repeatedyl,
"There's a better way." I
commented on the critique;
apparently, the governor's "There's a better way" is to
ignore comments
from Virginia citizens.
In April/06 Secretary Rise testified before congress,
one of her comments concerned relying on technology to resolve energy
issues. The Secretary did not respond to
my letter. Secretary of Transportation Mineta was asked to explain the wide difference between
achieved mpg and the CAFÉ standards.
Secretary Mineta did not respond to my letter.
All House members of The Committee on Energy and Commerce were sent letters and a CD duplicating this web page
(3/2706 version). No response to letters.
All members of Senate Energy & Natural Resources Committee were sent letters
and a CD duplicating this web page (3/27/06 version). Two Senators, Allen and Feinstein responded.
Do you wonder what our tax money is paying for in
these committees?
Donna Wade has written a letter that should be sent to all
"representatives".
This site, http://www.politics1.com,
list political candidates for office and major media for a particular
state. So far, all candidates for
federal office with email, except for sitting members of congress, and where
possible, also media in all states were contacted. Approximately 40 federal candidates and only
2 media responded. Does this tell you anything?
If you want to know the affect oil has on the world, I
suggest you read "The
Prize" (ISBN 0-671-79932-0)
Note: In
several of the following references information is followed by a (?) symbol, or
a statement that the original material was stolen from me in 1986. This is because in those cases I am working
from very poor copies of the original material. In 1986, I was visited by an intern reporter
for the Washington Times who wanted to take my material back to the paper to
make copies. What he did was steal my
material and take it back to college with him. Had it not been for an Editor at the
Washington Times and the Dean at this intern's school, I would have lost a lot
of my collection of energy material.
Do I believe there is a conspiracy of silence
concerning decades-old and current energy technology? Yes, I have experienced this for more than 25
years.
Here is the information. Please verify for yourself.
NOTE: For
those wanting to verify the patents. Go to http://www.uspto.gov, you will find information for viewing patents.
1.
Some folks at
Shell Oil Co. wrote "Fuel Economy of the Gasoline Engine" (ISBN 0-470-99132-1); it was published by John Wiley &
Sons, New York, in 1977. On page 42
Shell Oil quotes the President of General Motors, he, in 1929, predicted 80 MPG by 1939.
Between pages 221 and 223 Shell writes of their
achievements: 49.73 MPG around 1939; 149.95 MPG with a
1947 Studebaker in 1949; 244.35 MPG with
a 1959 Fiat 600 in 1968; 376.59 MPG with
a 1959 Opel in 1973.
The Library of Congress (LOC), in September 1990, did not have a copy of
this book. It was missing from the
files. I bought my copy from Maryland
Book Exchange around 1980 after a professor informed me that it was used as an
engineering text at the University of West Virginia.
·
VPI published a paper, March 1979, concerning
maximum achievable fuel economy. This
paper has several charts illustrating achievable and impossible fuel
economy. About 1980 I contacted the
author concerning conflicts between the paper and
documented achieved "impossible" mpg.
The author said, "I will get back to you." I am still waiting for his response.
2.
The book "Secrets of the 200 MPG Carburetor" is by Allan Wallace and was available, about
198(?), from Premier Distributing, 1775 Broadway, NY, NY, 10019. Page 18
has photocopies of three 1936 tests by the Ford Motor Co. (Canada) of the Pogue
carburetor, U.S. Patent #2,026,798). The worst case test achieved about 171 MP(US)G. In 1972, NASA was granted a patent for a similar
functioning device. I can not provide
any other publishing information from this book. It is among the material stolen from me in
1986. My copy of page 18 is very
poor. (I am grateful to Lee Winslett for a copy of this book and the article from
Colliers.)
·
Collier’s
magazine, in 1929, published an article "300 Miles to the gallon. The 300-MPG statement is attributed to the
president of General Motors.
·
Thanks to Paul
Andrew Mitchell, (http://www.supremelaw.org) for furnishing additional material from Pea Research
concerning Pogue and other devices.
3. Argosy Magazine, August 1977, has a five-page article (text copy here) about Tom Ogle and the
media witnessed test of the "Oglemobile". Tom Ogle, on that test run, achieved more
than 100 MPG in a 4,600 pound 1970 Ford Galaxie. When I attempted to find a copy of that
Argosy Magazine, it was missing from LOC files in 1980. Argosy ceased publication, I was informed, a short time after the Ogle article was published. I could
not find a copy of that Argosy issue at any library within 200 miles of my
home. An Editor at the company that purchased Argosy found and mailed a copy to
me. While attempting to verify statements in the article, I spoke with Doug Lenzini (SP?) with the EL Paso Times. Mr. Lenzini informed
me that he knew Tom Ogle, and the Oglemobile achieved
more than 200 MPG. When I contacted the
El Paso NBC affiliate that filmed the test run described in the Argosy article,
I was informed that the person who had filmed the test had left the station and
taken all the records with him.
A. The Ogle U.S. Patent, #4,177,779,
has this statement: "I have been able to obtain extremely
high gas mileages with the system of the present invention installed on a V-8
engine of a conventional 1971 American made automobile. In fact, mileage rates in excess of one
hundred miles per gallon have been achieved with the present invention."
According to the Argosy article, a Shell Oil Co. representative asked Ogle what
he would do if someone offered him $25 Million for the system. Ogle responded
"I would not be interested" He later said, "I've always wanted
to be rich, and I suspect I will be when this system gets into distribution.
But I'm not going to have my system bought up and put on the shelf. I'm going
to see this thing through--that I promise." According to an article in The
Washington Post Parade Magazine, March 4, 1984, Tom Ogle died of a drug and alcohol
overdose in 1981. Other articles concerning Tom Ogle can be found in the El
Paso Journal, January 16, 1980, and also, The Hamilton Spectator, June 24,
1978.
B.
The Oglemobile, in simplification, ran on fumes extracted from
a heated tank in the trunk (See the Ogle patent.) A very simple method of extracting gasoline fumes is described in a book, published in 1900,
"Gas Engine Construction". This book was reprinted by Lindsay in
1986, ISBN 0-917914-46-5.
● An article received from AAA has
additional information.
4. There
are many U.S. Patents granted for vaporizing gasoline. Some are: NASA Patent
3,640,256, General Electric Co. Patent #3,926,150, Robinson Patent #4,003,969,
Harpman Patent #4,023,538, Butler Patent #4,068,638 and Totten Patent #4,106,457. Pete "The Tree Man" was researching
the Fish carburetor while staying in my home during the early 80's. He later sent me a 6-page list with more than 240 U.S. Patent numbers for
vaporizing gasoline, other fuels and water.
This article
lists 500 patents for vaporizing gasoline.
Here are photographs
of a vaporizing carburetor. Another patent, #5,782,225 has a different approach. The Patent owner was put in prison while
trying to develop his device;
he moved to China for manufacturing, the story is here. Another inventor, who has researched vaporizing
carburetors for over 10 years, wrote this paper in 1992 (revised 2005). The author writes using noms de plume Bart Simpson and Frieda Mind. (The link will open an Acrobat .pdf file, you must use the
functions in Acrobat to navigate the paper.)
5.
During the mid
70's, physicist Don Novak
traveled all over the U.S. lecturing and teaching in his seminars
how to achieve 100 MPG. He also
testified, October 15, 1979, before a Wichita, Kansas, Congressional Committee on "Reinventing the Automobile". I have known Don for many years. Once he brought to my home, in the late 70's,
two carburetors; one
got more than 200 MPG and the other more than 100 MPG. I contacted a local politician, who lives in
my town, and was on the Virginia Energy Subcommittee; I tried to have this politician meet
Don and see the carburetors. The
politician was not interested.
·
Chevron Oil,
1986, offers to
purchase large quantities of carburetors from a manufacturer.
·
A West Virginia
man, in 1990, achieves 58 mpg with an 8 cylinder 1968 Chrysler that used to get
12 mpg.
6. In the London, England, Daily Telegraph, 10/20/83, on page 9, there is an advertisement for a production Peugeot Diesel that gets 52.3 MPG in urban driving. The model 205 Diesel gets 72 mpg at 56 mph. In the Washington Post, 9/19/83, page 37(?) is the 1983 U.S. EPA fuel economy list of various vehicles. The Peugeot USA models get between 21 and 27 MPG. The Washington Times, 8/9/91, published an article, "Gas saving engines hit streets in fall." This article is about two engines, the Mitsubishi MVV engine, and the Honda VTEC-E. According to the company spokesmen, the Mitsubishi will get up to 50 MPG; the Honda, up to 88 MPG. I visited a local Honda dealer and got a brochure on the production automobile with the VTEC-E engine, the specified MPG, as I recall, was 53 MPG. I know of no produced Honda that gets 88 MPG. I have no information on the production Mitsubishi MVV engine. I wonder if there is something that happens to fuel economy when an automobile is transported to the USA. Is it possible that these engines "un-tweak" themselves during transit? In 2002 an English newspaper article reported a 104-mpg Toyota and 94-mpg VW/Audi vehicles. In 2003 another English newspaper tested a 75-mpg Toyota diesel. Do you wonder why these vehicles are not available in the USA? You might ask your Member of Congress for an explanation.
7. The
U.S. Government supported (Grant No. DTNH22-91-Z-06014) a
study of automobile fuel economy by the National Academy of Sciences.
This study, "Automotive Fuel Economy -- How Far Should We Go?" (ISBN 0-309-04530-4), was used by the staff of my then Congressman George Allen, to refute
documentation proving that an automobile had exceeded 376 MPG. Nowhere in this "fuel economy
study" is there any reference to the work of Shell Oil Co. or any other
reference that could refute the conclusion of this report. The report concluded, Page 4, a subcompact
car might achieve between 39 and 44 MPG by model year 2006. This is a difficult position to defend since
Peugeot, in 1983, advertised a 72-mpg vehicle. Many committee meetings were held from May
15, 1991 to December 14, 1991, prior to the April 1992 publication of this
report. Prior to publication of this
report, I previously sent documentation to several participants of these
meetings. The documentation proved that
automobile fuel economies of between 49 and 376 MPG were achieved. None of the participants responded to my
letters. Documentation was sent to:
Jerry R. Curry, Administrator, National Highway Safety Administration, on
3/16/91; Senator Richard H. Bryan, on
3/7/91; Congressman Philip R. Sharp, on
2/18/91; Steve Plotkin,
Office of Technology Assessment, U.S. Congress, on 4/4/91; Charles Mendler,
Energy Conservation Collation, on 11/2/90;
Fred Smith, Competitive Enterprise Institute, on 4/16/91; Brian
O'Neill, Insurance Institute for
Highway Safety, on 10/31/93; Clarence Ditlow, Executive Director, Center for Auto Safety, on
1/6/92. Previous documentation was also
sent to members of organizations participating in these meetings, they
are: John Koenig, Product planning
Manager, Toyota Motor Co., on 3/18/91; Peter Clausen, Union of Concerned
Scientist, on 10/28/90; John Morrill,
American Council for Energy Efficiency, on 10/4/90. None of these people responded to my letters. I know that at least one of my letters was
received. The Union of Concerned
Scientist keeps asking me to financially support their organization.
8. An
article "Automakers Move Toward New
Generation Of Greener Vehicles"
was published in "Chemical & Engineering News", August 1,
1994. This article is about "The
Partnership for a New Generation of Vehicles", a partnership between the
U.S. Government and the auto industry that has a goal of an 80 MPG automobile
by 2002. In 1992 a government-funded study concluded that a subcompact car might get between 39 and 44 MPG
by model year 2006 (See #7 above). In
1994 the goal is 80 MPG by 2002. (Toyota and
VW/Audi exceeded this goal in 2002.) Is
it possible that someone read the Shell Oil book? Or could someone have actually read my
February 13, 1992 letter, and 95 pages of documentation, sent to then Candidate
Clinton. I wrote, September 8, 1994, to Deborah L. Illman, the author of the article, and to the editor,
Michael Heylin of Chemical & Engineering News, on September 11,
1994. No response was received from
them. On September 11, 1994, I also
wrote to Mary L. Good, Under Secretary for Technology,
(USA) Department of Commerce. I received a response from Ms. Good. It was an undated, un-addressed, form letter. I guess the fact that a vehicle could get 376
MPG or burn water for fuel would not be a politically correct finding. How could someone explain to the American
people that it was necessary to send more than 600,000 of our citizens to the
Mid-east to defend oil wells if this information was public knowledge?
9. Hybrid
Diesel/Electric automobiles (A Diesel/Electric locomotive uses the same
principle.) The Manassas Journal
Messenger, April 4, 1981, has an article about a MG sports car converted by San
Diego State University. The car gets 110 MPG. The Steven R. Reed Automobile Manufacturing
Corp., Newport Beach, CA, issued a press release dated February 14, 1983. This release announces the February 23, 1983
showing of the 200-MPG,
two-passenger, II Millennium Cruiser at the Ambassador Hotel. The press release also states that the
company will file "... a major class-action lawsuit involving a
considerable number of giant American corporations within the automotive and
petroleum industries, plus numerous branches and agencies of the U.S.
Government responsible for regulating these companies." Don Novak informed me that when none of the
major news media attended the Millennium show, the company drove the car to CBS
Television, Los Angeles, and parked it on the lawn. No one came out of the building to inspect
the car. Don also stated that the
president of the Steven R. Reed Corp. has been in hiding for some years.
10.
Mother Earth
News, November/December 1977, has an article "Can This Transmission Really
Double Your Car's Mileage?" This
article is about a Ford Granada modified by Vincent Carman of Portland,
Oregon. In simplification, Mr. Carman
removed the transmission and drive shaft from the car and bolted a hydraulic
motor to the differential. He then
bolted a hydraulic pump to the engine to pressurize a storage tank. The storage tank is also pressurized when the
car brakes or slows down. The article
states that the U.S. Post Office is interested in a whole fleet of vehicles
using this principle. In 1990, after
reading an article in "Federal Times", I contacted Mr. Robert St.Francis, U.S. Postal Service, who was searching for
alternative fuels for use by the Post Office.
Mr. St.Francis said that he had never heard of
Mr. Carman. I wrote two letters, October
18 & 21, 1990, to Mr. St.Francis concerning Mr.
Carman's vehicle. I received no
response. Another article in Mother
Earth News, March/April 1978, titled "This Car Travels 75 Miles on a Single Gallon
of Gas", is about a project by the Minneapolis Minnesota's Hennepin
Vocational Technical Center that converted a Volkswagen to a system similar to
that of Mr. Carman. The idea for the
conversion came from a 1920 magazine article.
The car, with a Bradley GT body and a 16-horsepower Tecumseh engine (The
original VW engine was too powerful), achieved more than 75 MPG at 70 MPH. Could we combine the technology of Tom Ogle,
200 MPG, and the hydraulic drive cars and have a 400 MPG 4,600 pound car? See on-line Mother Earth News archives for
Carman:
and Hennepin:
● On a recent Environmental
Protection Agency (EPA) web site,
they write of achievements and patents concerning a hydraulic drive truck. This
site does not mention the more than 28-year old achievements of others.
11. The
St. Paul Pioneer News, August 22, 1990, has an article about a group that 11
years previously modified a Dodge half-ton pickup furnished by a local
dealer. This modified truck got more
than 35 MPG. Test stopped on this modification when a
member of the group was told that he would receive a pair of cement boots if
testing continued.
12. Hydrogen
fuel. There are many U.S. and foreign patents for extracting hydrogen and
oxygen gasses from water for use as a fuel. Some Patents are: July 2, 1935,
Garrett, #2,006,676; April 3, 1945, Klein, #2,373,032; February 25, 1975, Chambrin,
French Patent Request #75 06619; July 6, 1976, Papineau,
#3,967,589 (This is a Patent for an electrical power generator
that burns water); 1976, Horvath, #3,980,053. This statement is on the Horvath patent, "This
invention relates to internal combustion engines. More particularly it is
concerned with a fuel supply apparatus by means of which an internal combustion
engine can be run on a fuel comprised of hydrogen and oxygen gasses generated
on demand by electrolysis of water".;
June 28, 1983, Meyer, #4,389,981. Mr. Meyer has at least eight other patents relating
to hydrogen and oxygen gasses extracted from water for fuel. Awake
magazine 4/6/1980 has two small articles concerning Hydrogen fuel for aircraft.
According to one article an optimistic date for this use is 1985.
A. Popular
Science, about 1978,9(?), published an article "Hydrogen bus could also heat its own garage". This
article is about the work of Dr. Helmut Buchner of
Mercedes-Benz. He is quoted "We are
ready now. We could save our city of
Stuttgart over one million gallons of petroleum fuel a year by converting its
fleet of 300 urban busses to run on hydrogen.
Heating -- and air conditioning -- would be free spin-offs, consuming no
extra energy."
B. Popular
Science, March 1978(?), published an article "Hydrogen -demonstrates fuel
of the future". This article is
about the work of Dr. Billings,
Billings Energy Corp., Provo, Utah, and others.
The article states that a home, all the appliances, and vehicles, can be
run on hydrogen. Dr. Billings converted
a Cadillac Seville for duel fuel use.
This Cadillac, burning hydrogen, was in President Carter's inaugural
parade. I had a photograph of Dr.
Billings drinking the exhaust, water, from one of his engines.
C. A
Japanese inventor, with more than 2000 prior patents, plans to run automobile
engine on water. A
Gulf Oil advertisement in Discover magazine, Feb.19??,
concerning Hydrogen fuel. Note the
statements concerning Hydrogen energy content by Gulf oil in the advertisement
and an article in the same magazine issue. Ballard Power Systems has demonstrated
Hydrogen fuel cell technology for vehicles since 1997. Patents for decomposing water into hydrogen
and oxygen for use as fuel are not new.
See the Boisen Patent #1,380,183
granted in 1921 and a 106-year
old Patent for another process to extract fuel gas from water. A Google search for “Aquafuel”
will list many sites for processes to extract a fuel from water.
D. Do you
remember the NASA 1998 Moon probe that was
looking for water? The plan was to
separate some water into oxygen and hydrogen.
The hydrogen would be used as fuel.
Yet in 2004, the government is
developing a fuel cell that will extract hydrogen from diesel fuel carried by
navy ships. Does this make any sense
when the ship is floating in a mixture of 66% hydrogen? Why not use the method that NASA was going to
use to extract hydrogen from Moon water?
You might ask your Member of Congress for an explanation. My members of Congress will not respond.
E. A
company, AEC Technology, has developed a process to extract hydrogen from water that requires
no input of power. This company has
partnered with UTC Fuel Cell that will
use this process to run devices. One
device, per the web site, will have a reciprocating engine, similar to the one
in your car, generating electricity for your home. UTC Fuel Cell has furnished fuel cells to NASA since the
60's.
F. Approximately
ten years ago, I received a video tape from a company in Florida making Aquafuel. This tape,
among other things, shows 3 people in a closed room breathing the exhaust from
a generator burning Aquafuel. This site www.gasgouging.com/video/aquafuel_0001.wmv has a copy. A
recent Google search for “Aquafuel” returned 812
"hits".
G. The
following is a link to a Quick Time movie about a Philippine inventor who has
been running cars on the components of water since 1969:
http://www.mysticfamilycircus.com/Pages/Community/Projects/xwatercar.html
(A conversion to a Windows Media Player (45-Meg) file
is here.) Listen carefully to the reason given by the
Philippine President for not being interested.
The reason is an agreement with the World Bank. This is another "water car"
link: http://waterpoweredcar.com/1978camero.html. A search
will find more links of this nature.
"They" say we are running out of oil; will "they" also say we are
also running out of water for fuel?
H. This
is a clip,
received from Bruce McBurney (http://www.himacresearch.com), taken from a Fox News program about a Florida
inventor using the components of water for various purposes. He has modified a car to run on these
components and the car will go 100-miles on 4-ounces of water. The inventor was ask,
by our government, to modify a military vehicle to run on these
components. See http://hytechapps.com/technology/index.html for additional information. Screen shots from the proceeding site are here and here. You might
ask your member of congress why this technology is not being implemented for
the general public.
I. This
is another
car running on the components of water.
This is a 5/23/06 clip from
WTTG Washington. How many examples does
our government need before realizing hydrogen technology for consumers is not 20
years away?
J.
Bruce McBurney ( http://www.himacresearch.com ) sent this link:
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-3333992194168790800 to a 16-minute Google video file
about the work of Stanley Meyer. (Conversion to a Windows Media file is here).
Unfortunately, Stanley Meyer was murdered, 1998, before he could fully
demonstrate another car running on the components of water. Meyer, in the video, states he was offered
$1,000,000,000 in cash not to proceed with his inventions. Meyer also states our government has the right
to use his patents in the interest of national security. In the Meyer video above, a NASA scientist
talks about the Meyer's technology. Is
it possible the technology NASA planned to use on the Moon, see "D"
above, was the Meyer technology?
o
Do you think the
national debt could be reduced if our government used water in all the places
that gasoline and other fuels are used?
o
Could your debt
be reduced if the Meyer technology was available to you?
K.
This is a clip from news broadcast, Action 6 News, believed from
WSYX-TV in Columbus, OH. In the clip, information is provided that Meyer can
modify a car to burn the components of water for $1,500.00. He did not live to
offer this modification to the American people.
o
Special thanks
to Gary Franchi and the Lone Lantern Society of
America for posting the videos, in #12-J&K, on their homepage www.lonelantern.org.
L. The gloom
and doom our government is feeding us about hydrogen technology approaches
lunacy. Do they think we can't read?
There are many researchers demonstrating "Home Brew" hydrogen
generators 1, 2, 3 and 4. This researcher used some very advanced
material in construction, egg whisk, apple corer and cheese cutter. Seems that the White House
would have these items in the kitchen if they cared to duplicate this device. Here are some links for
further information.
M. This is a
2004 announcement for another car running on the components of water.
N. This
month, 07/06, the NASA space shuttle delivered an oxygen generator to the space
station. This generator will extract oxygen and hydrogen from water. Evidently
this process won't work on earth because the navy, with a ship floating in a
mixture of 66% hydrogen, only knows how to extract hydrogen from Diesel fuel.
O. This
webpage http://www.keelynet.com/energy/waterfuel.htm has
plans for
building a device to run an engine using the components of water. Do you wonder why no automobile manufacturer
or electricity generating plant is using this technology? Keelynet has lots
of very interesting information.
13. Joe
Cell. An Australian experimenter discovered this phenomena. (For an approximately 2
hour video showing "Joe" experimenting visit http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=5838886797220015378.) The video has
several clips of an automobile running on this device. These are
from two of
many websites with information about the "Joe Cell". The device does not conform to any known
scientific "rules". Basically
it is a set of concentric tubes in a container with water. The device does not require an opening into
the engine. Here are videos 1, 2, and 3 showing the device in operation on additional
vehicles. Several researchers, and their families, have been threatened and
made to stop experimenting. If this
device is a sham, why are people being threatened? Here is a listing of
some websites with information about the Joe Cell.
14.
Completely
sealed reciprocating engines. I visited
the Patent Office years ago, when they still had the open stacks of "shoe
boxes". While there, I read the
application files for the Papp patent, #3,670,494.
Papp applied
for a Patent on his engine, and the Patent Office, after consultation with the
old Atomic Energy Commission, refused to give him a Patent because his device
could not possibly work. Papp responded with test results, photographs and
depositions from, I think, 16 people. Papp said that
maybe the Patent Office didn't know how his device worked, and that they also
didn't know how the atomic bomb worked, but used it anyway. This statement is on his patent: "... 2.
To provide a two-cycle reciprocating engine which does not use fuel
intake valves or exhaust valves, does not require an air supply and does not
emit gasses. 3. To provide a precharged
engine of the character stated in item 2 capable of generating power for a
period of from 2,000 to over 10,000 hours continuously or until mechanical
breakdown without the addition of fuel injection of air or discharge of gasses
...."
A.
Papp has a similar Patent
#4,428,193
granted in 1984.
B.
Britt, August
31, 1976, has a patent, #3,977,191,
for a similar sealed engine. In the
Patent application file, Britt accuses the Patent Office of deliberately
delaying his application to give a major manufacturer time to file on top of
him.
15. Permanent
Magnet Motor. Howard Johnson was granted
U.S. Patent #4,151,431, for a motor that is powered only by permanent
magnets. An interesting thing about the
first page of this Patent is the chart of a magnetic field VS electromechanical
coupling. The chart is from U.S. Patent
#4,151,432 which has nothing to do with the Johnson patent. Science and Mechanics, Spring
1980, published an article "Amazing
Magnet-Powered Motor" about the Johnson patent. The article tells of his difficulties in
having the device patented. The Patent
problem was solved when Johnson took working models of his device to the Patent
Office. The magazine Science 83, May,
published an article ridiculing perpetual motion machines, one of them was the
Johnson motor. The Science article
purports to quote from the prior Science and Mechanics article about
Johnson. Because had both articles, I
compared them, then called the author of the Science
83 article. When I stated that the
information that he quoted was not in the prior article, he hung up saying,
"I will not be interrogated by you."
The editor of Science 83 also declined to
speak with me. Others have informed me
that there are three other permanent magnet motor patents.
o
Japanese
electrical generator,
driven by a magnet assisted motor, has an efficiency of more than 300%. An
Australian company, Lutec, offers to build to your specifications, an electric
generator also more than 300% efficient. Do you think the electric power
companies would be happy if these devices were common knowledge?
15.
The Moray
device. Tom Moray, in the late 20’s, had a device that could sit on a kitchen
table and produce 50,000 Watts of power from a field that surrounds the
earth. The operation of this device was
endorsed by many people. Moray's son, John, after the only copy of his father's
book was stolen, wrote a book "The Sea of Energy in which the
Earth Floats". See the
statement concerning a meeting between Moray and a Soviet Agent in General
Electric office after closing hours.)
The book is about his father's work. During the early 80’s, I visited
many congressional offices in an unsuccessful attempt to have any Member of
Congress do something about the technology hidden from the American
people. When I visited Congressman Ron
Paul's office, a staffer said to me, "I have something that you should read,
come to my residence on Saturday."
This staffer gave me a letter to
Congressman Paul from Tom Bearden, and the 40-page document attached to the
letter. The document is a book that Mr.
Bearden has written. In this book, Mr. Bearden
states that the Moray device could produce 1.5 megawatts of power. Also that
the Russians had adapted the Moray device to power a weapon. The weapon statement is supported by a
drawing from "Aviation Week and Space Technology", July 28, 1980. Do you think that the local Power Company
could justify a price increase if the power came from a field around the earth? This book was also missing from the LOC in
1990.]
o
Tom Bearden,
with others, obtained U.S. Patent #6,362,718 for an Electric
generator with no moving parts.
o
Michael
Faraday’s findings,
in 1831, do not agree with current school teachings concerning generation of
electricity. He found it is not necessary to rotate a magnet or wire against
the other to generate electricity.
17. The
Energy Machine of Joe Newman. I have spoken with Joe many times over several
years. He has recently published the
seventh edition of "The Energy Machine of Joseph Newman" (ISBN
0-9613855-7-7). The book is available
from: Joseph Westly Newman, Route 1, Box 52,
Lucedale, Mississippi, 39452, Phone # (601)-947-7174. I have no doubts that his machine works as he
describes it. To learn of the problems
that this man has had with "The Establishment" read his book. Joe filed suit against the U.S. Patent Office
because they would not grant him a patent. According to
Joe's book, pages 274 to 279, the Court appointed a Special Master, Mr. William
E. Schuyler, a former Commissioner of the U.S. Patent
Office, to advise the Court. The
findings of the Special Master were that Mr. Newman had invented a machine that
had more output than input. The Court
refused to accept the findings. I urge
you to read this 471-page book. This
machine is not "bogus" as stated by others. On February 5, 1996, I was one of several
hundred people, in Mobile, Alabama, to see the Newman Energy Machine in
operation. The machine was pumping water
while running a power meter, similar to the one on your house, backwards.
18. Cold
Fusion. Despite the rejection of some in
the USA, cold fusion is a going operation in other places. The monthly magazine "New Energy
News", P.O. Box 58639, Salt Lake City, Utah 84158-8639, has information on
many successful results in cold fusion. The
magazine also has information on "free energy devices".
19. This
month, 2/06, the Secretary of Energy testified before Congress. One of the things he said was that an oil
company was developing a process to extract oil from coal. We have, according to a USGS report, enough
coal to last "… another few hundred years." The
Secretary of Energy did not inform Congress that a government employee
developed a similar process in the 1920’s or that prior to 1860
more than 50 plants were extracting oil and gasoline
from coal. The secretary also did not
inform Congress that Germany used coal for 75% of the oil needed during WW2.
20.
"The
Energy Non-Crisis" (ISBN
0-89051-068-7), published in 1980 by Worth Publishing Co., P.O. Box, 1243, Wheatridge, CO 80033, is written by Chaplain Lindsey
Williams. (This is only one of the books
he has written.) Chaplain Williams was
on the Alaska Pipeline during the construction and got so fed-up with the
deliberate lies of the media, he came back to tour the "lower 48",
and tell the truth. According to Chaplain Williams, Gull Island has a pool of
oil as big as, and maybe bigger, than Purdhoe Bay.
Our Government ordered ARCO (Page 178) "... to seal
the documents, withdraw the rig, cap the well, and not release the information
about the Gull Island find." A
video tape of a speech that Chaplain Williams gave to a group at Salt Lake
City, about 1980, is possibly available from: The National Center For Constitutional Studies, 1-800-388-4512. Chaplain
Williams stated, in a recent two-hour broadcast, there is enough oil in Alaska
to last the U.S.A. 200-years. The
broadcast is on the Republic
Broadcasting Network site.
Additional book information is here. You can read parts of his book on this
site: http://www.sweetliberty.org/issues/environment/energy. His books and tapes may be ordered here: http://survivalcenter.com/lw.html. One videotape "The Energy Non-Crisis" is worth the approximate
$136.00 cost of the complete set. If you
want documented proof that "our" government has lied to us about oil
availability, see the Williams material.
A This is the audio,
approximately 51-minutes, from the Williams Videotape "The Energy Non Crisis".
I suggest you listen carefully to what Chaplain Williams says, then ask your
members of congress why the United States is importing oil.
B. Need
more documentation that we have been scammed for decades concerning oil
availability? See this recent 11-page email and this 1-page email.
C. The
Energy Information Administration (EIA) is teaching children that oil
and natural gas are the result of decaying plants and animals. A recent NASA discovery is that natural gas
was being created on one of Saturn's barren moons Titian. Is it possible that
we have been deceived concerning oil and natural gas formation?
D. On
Washington post radio, 107.7, 4/30/06 there was a reporter for U.S. News and
World Report
talking (another viewpoint)
about the 2-trillion barrel oil finding in the USA. I called and made a statement about the
200-year supply of oil announced by the governor of Alaska last year (See 19
above). The reporter tried to discredit
the governor's statement by referring to oil consumption before the Alaska
pipeline was built. When attempting to
explain the governor's comment was made last year, I was cut-off. Is it possible this station is deliberately
concealing information? The Department
of Energy website
states, "… has been known for a century." (The 2-trillon barrel oil).
If this is true, why during the first
Gulf War, were all the lives and money wasted defending "our oil" in
the Mideast?
E. Thanks
to Ron Durham for this information concerning "Peak Oil." This link:
http://www.vialls.com/wecontrolamerica/peakoil.html is from www.rense.com. If you follow the links in the
article, too large to reproduce here, you will learn oil is being produced
continuously deep within the earth. A search for "Peak Oil", on www.rense.com/, list 123 results. This link:
http://www.prisonplanet.com/archives/peak_oil/index.htm from www.prisonplanet.com also has information. The above provides proof that we are not
going to run out of oil and "Peak Oil" is just a scam. You might ask your member of congress for
comments concerning the above.
F. Need
more proof "Peak Oil " is a scam? Visit these web pages:
http://wnd.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=46020
http://wnd.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=47687
http://wnd.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=47439
http://wnd.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=47159
http://wnd.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=46888
21. I sent
a previous 90’s Williams tape and a lot of other information to a former Secretary of Energy. The response received, after a second letter,
was essentially, no response. I also
wrote to Dr. Bodman, our current (2005) Secretary of Energy. A response was received, no
response, except acknowledgement, was received for that email. If you wonder how your State legislators
receive information see this document. I emailed
the authors of the document;
no response.
I hope that this information will raise questions as
to why we are dependent on foreign oil. All our government has to do, to take
more money from our pockets, is to have an energy crisis or raise the cost of
energy. The only financial interest that
I have in any of above information is that of a concerned consumer who is tired
of the deliberate lies and cover-ups.
Please do not ask for building plans for any of the
above devices, I do not have any plans.
However, this site
claims to have plans for over unity devices.
Your research might locate the information you are seeking.
Byron Wine byronwine@byronwine.com
May 24, 1996. (Modified August 20, 2006)
The following is not related to energy. However, you might be interested in findings
concerning the Federal Reserve System (FED).
The FED is not a part of the U.S. government. Your telephone book, as does a prior C&P telephone book, will list the FED in the business section, not the
government section. For a legal opinion
see Lewis v. United States. For
information concerning the operation of the FED see Congressman McFadden’s 1934
remarks. Articles by Skousen, 1980, and Larson,
1982, provide further information.
I am grateful for an email bringing to my attention
the "Act of 1871". This document requires very careful study.
For additional Information related to "Act of 1871" see this email.
An organization "Fund to Restore an Educated
Electorate" (FREE) published a listing of congressional, military and corporate members of
the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR) and Trilateral Commission (TC). I wonder if it is possible that the people,
and corporate members, listed might be responsible for our "energy
problem".
Broadcaster Jack McLamb is circulating this information concerning the food additive MSG.
Comments:
You have seen some, an
internet search will find a lot more, documentation for technology that could,
if implemented, greatly reduce our dependence on oil and the domination it
brings. Will you demand that your
members of congress address these issues?
I want to thank the following broadcasters, in
broadcast date sequence, for allowing time on their programs; Jack McLamb http://mp3.rbnlive.com/McLamb05.html, Rick Adams http://mp3.rbnlive.com/Rick05.html, with the Republic Broadcasting Network http://www.rbnlive.com/listen.html, Bill Boshears, WLW http://www.700wlw.com/main.html, and Mike Hagan, KPON http://www.kopn.org/mike-h.htm. Without
their help information circulation as quickly would not have been possible.
There are several websites where my page is accessible,
I don't have a list of them and apologize for not knowing them. Websites I know follow:
My first hosting ISP, http://www1host.com/hosting/accounts/index.cgi, this site is in New Zealand and allowed access that
greatly exceeded the bandwidth allotment for the month. When I inquired of any additional cost they
replied, "Don't worry about it, it's for a worthy cause."
www.gasgouging.com/byron is one of several sites that mirrors
my website. There is also an online
community at http://www.gasgouging.com/community where you can communicate with others concerning energy.
This community is for anyone who is tired of paying
outrageous fuel prices and wants an alternative. If you are tired of the petroleum companies
stealing from your wallet and you are tired of waiting for the government to do
something about it, then this is the site for you. GasGouging.com is now looking for scientists,
inventors, tinkerers, etc. to join this forum and put
their skills and ideas to work. From
adding acetone, to building/modifying carburetors to people who want to have
change and have it now, we NEED you! Let
us know your skills and what you can contribute. The only way things will change is if we do it
ourselves. Join today, it is FREE.
http://www.gorodetzky.com
has a link.
Another local site, www.byronwine.com, is hosted by http://www.Godaddy.com. This host had the site up and running in
about two-hours.