From:     Paul Andrew Mitchell <supremelawfirm@yahoo.com> 
Date:     Sat Oct 25, 2003  1:09 pm
Subject:  [SupremeLaw] John & Lois Knox Case (IRS)

 
Greetings,

I have lost a large number of documents
which I placed in long-term storage,
when I was rendered indigent by clients'
failures to pay my invoices for services
rendered.  As I have already explained,
the official court record was placed
in federal government archives several
years ago (at least prior to the Summer
of 1998, when I visited the district clerk
in San Antonio).

If it hadn't been for the assistance I have
received from local police -- TWICE -- I would
have lost everything, including my electronic
evidence which I was later able to upload
to the Internet, thanks to prompt and
professional police assistance.

I repeat:  when John Knox passed away,
in honor of his passing I took his brief
to our local law library and double-checked
every single citation.  I then edited
only the obvious clerical and punctuation
errors, leaving any substantive errors
entirely intact.  The result of my
editing and double-checking is here:

http://www.supremelaw.org/fedzone11/htm/append-a.htm

Now, if someone is claiming that some
electronic docket is inconsistent in any
way with what John Knox told me, then
I would recommend that the accuser try
his BACKSPACE key:  making changes to
electronic documents is THAT EASY!

Also, if Mrs. Lois Knox is still with us,
I know of no reason why it would be
inappropriate to write her with a request
for confirmation.  Neither John nor Lois
Knox ever gave me any reason to suspect
that they might be lying or misrepresenting
in any way the research and litigation work
which John shared with me at the conference
on tax and monetary reform which he and I
attended in Denver, Colorado in the Fall of 1991.

Judging from the rude ways in which conference
attendees treated him in Denver, John was
quite surprised and happy finally to realize
that I only wanted him to tell his whole story
to me from the beginning.  I happened upon
him when he was telling his story to another
hostile conference attendee, so I arrived
right in the middle of his story, that first
time.  Once I got John to relax, and once I
persuaded him to permit me to interrupt him --
to ask questions -- we got into such a revealing
and dramatic conversation, by the time we were
done there are about 30 people standing around
us, listening intently to the two of us go over
the astounding discoveries which John Knox had
made, on his own, with very little support
from anyone else.

Perhaps it is a telling comment on the state
of our world, that a multitude of attorneys
THROUGHOUT this nation now refuse to acknowledge
that John Knox even existed, much less give him
the enormous credit that his due or
even to cite his case in any way, shape or form.

I am honored to have made his acquaintance,
and I knew of no better way to honor him, after
he succumbed to lung cancer, than to perfect
his brief, add it to Appendix "A" of
"The Federal Zone," and then to upload that
marvelous accomplishment to the Internet,
where the world could have rapid access to it,
for their edification and singular confirmation.

I am looking forward to seeing John Knox once again
in the Kingdom of Heaven.  I am sure we will have a
lot of talk about, and a very long time to enjoy
each other's company and each other's contributions
to the restoration of justice in America.

My memory of John and Lois Knox will always place
both of them on a par with the Founders and Framers of
the Constitution for the United States of America,
and the 6,000 U.S. Marines who died taking the
Island of Iwo Jima during closing months of WWII.
I do not exaggarate.

Thank you.


Sincerely yours,
/s/ Paul Andrew Mitchell
Private Attorney General and Author:
"The Federal Zone: Cracking the Code of Internal Revenue"
http://www.supremelaw.org/fedzone11/index.htm




--- Bowman7a <bowman7a@y...> wrote:
> Is there a true recording of this case in its original version?
>
> Bo
>
> Freedoms_Darkness_2
>
>
>
> REMOVAL INSTRUCTIONS: This message is being sent to you in compliance with
> the current Federal legislation for commercial e-mail (H.R.417
> SECTION101Paragraph
> (e)(1)(A)) AND Bill s.1618 TITLE III passed by the 105th U.S. Congress.
> mailremove6@Bowman7a@y...
>
> ---------------------------------