NOTICE AND DEMAND FOR

PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS

 

 

TO:      Mr. William K. Suter

     c/o Supreme Court of the United States

         Office of the Clerk

         1 First Street, N.E.

         Washington 20543-0001

         DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, USA

 

FROM:    Paul Andrew Mitchell, B.A., M.S.

         Plaintiff/Appellant/Relator

         Mitchell v. AOL Time Warner, Inc. et al., #03-5070

 

DATE:    November 15, 2003 A.D.

 

SUBJECT: Oath of Office required by 28 U.S.C. 951

         and Article VI, Clause 3

 

 

Greetings Mr. Suter:

 

NOTICE

 

You are hereby reminded, if you don’t already know, that the federal statute at 28 U.S.C. 951 specifically requires all clerks of any court of the United States to have executed a proper oath of office.  See also the definition of “court of the United States” at 28 U.S.C. 451, and the constitutional requirement at Article VI, Clause 3.

 

DEMAND

 

Accordingly, formal DEMAND is hereby made of you to deliver a certified copy of your Oath of Office to Me, by placing same in the Priority U.S. Mail envelope enclosed herewith, and by delivering same to Me no later than 5:00 p.m. on Friday, November 28, 2003 A.D.

 

Do not convert or otherwise abscond with the enclosed envelope, Mr. Suter, because I purchased the stamp affixed to it and I am asserting a property right in it.  If you are unwilling or unable to produce a proper Oath of Office, then I do, in that event, hereby demand that you return to Me the enclosed envelope with the stamp affixed and not cancelled or otherwise posted to anyone else or to anything else.

 

Beyond the deadline above, your failure to produce certified evidence of your required Oath of Office will constitute fraud, pursuant to U.S. v. Tweel;  it will activate estoppel, pursuant to Carmine v. Bowen;  and it will give Me probable cause formally to charge you at least with impersonating an officer of the United States in violation of 18 U.S.C. 912, and mail fraud in violation of 18 U.S.C. 1341, both of which are felony federal offenses I am required by 18 U.S.C. 4 to report to a judge or other officer of the United States.

 

Please be advised that I have no intentions of violating 18 U.S.C. 4, Mr. Suter.

 

 

Thank you very much for your timely and professional consideration.

 

 

Sincerely yours,

 

/s/ Paul Andrew Mitchell

 

Paul Andrew Mitchell, B.A., M.S.

Plaintiff/Appellant/Relator

Mitchell v. AOL Time Warner, Inc. et al., #03-5070

http://www.supremelaw.org/cc/aol/index.htm

 

U.S. Mail to:

 

  Forwarding Agent

  c/o UPS PMB #332

  501 W. Broadway, Suite “A”

  San Diego 92101

  CALIFORNIA, USA

 

courtesy copies:

 

  all Justices, Supreme Court of the United States