c/o 2509 N. Campbell, #1776
Tucson [zip code exempt]
ARIZONA STATE
November 19, 1997
NOTICE OF REFUSAL FOR CAUSE, BY AFFIDAVIT
Ms. Laura Brynwood
Office of the City Attorney
c/o P.O. Box 27210
Tucson [zip code exempt]
ARIZONA STATE
Subject: Letter and Attachments dated November 13, 1997
Tucson City Court [sic], case number #9710290512
Dear Ms. Brynwood:
Your letter and all attachments, dated November 13, 1997, are
hereby refused for cause, to wit:
1. None of the documents was certified by anyone, rendering
them all inadmissible as competent evidence of the
authorities in question (see original FOIA request).
2. Unqualified United States Postal Service ("USPS") ZIP codes
are evidence of a foreign municipal jurisdiction to which
the Undersigned is not subject, by Law.
3. The alleged "Loyalty Oath of Office" is fatally defective
for maintaining the false and rebuttable presumption that
the signer is thereby bound to support the Constitution for
the United States of America, as lawfully amended ("U.S.
Constitution") (see enclosed, Preamble, and Preamble to
original Bill of Rights).
4. The intergovernmental agreement authorizing Tucson City
Court [sic] to exist in the first instance, under authority
of the Superior Court of Arizona, has not been renewed as of
the most recent expiration of same (see enclosed).
5. The Tucson City Court [sic] is arraigning criminal
defendants without the benefit of Counsel, in direct
violation of the Sixth Amendment and the holding of the U.S.
Supreme Court in Johnson v. Zerbst, 304 U.S. 458, 468 (1938)
(see 18 U.S.C. 242, 241).
6. The alleged licensed #007752 issued by the State Bar of
Arizona is conclusive evidence of a Title of Nobility which
is prohibited by Article I, Section 10, Clause 1, in the
organic U.S. Constitution and also by the original
Thirteenth Amendment (1819).
7. The document allegedly recorded by one F. Ann Rodriguez is
prima facie evidence of criminal conspiracy by one or more
persons now working in your office, because Ms. Rodriguez is
presently a Principal actively depriving the Undersigned of
My fundamental Right to choose My Representative in the
United States House of Representatives (see attached and
also 18 U.S.C. 2, 3, 4, 241, 242).
8. The State of Arizona and its several employees are
racketeering across state lines by aiding and abetting
criminal conversion of the Manufacturer's Statements of
Origin ("MSO") issued by foreign and domestic automobile
manufacturers, in violation the Racketeering Influenced and
Corrupt Organizations Act ("RICO"), 18 U.S.C. 1961 et seq.
Thank you very much for your consideration in these matters.
Your continued silence will activate estoppel by acquiescence.
See Carmine v. Bowen, 64 A. 932 (1906). Your silence will also
constitute fraud, pursuant to U. S. v. Tweel, 550 F.2d 297, 299
(1977).
VERIFICATION
I, Paul Andrew Mitchell, Sui Juris (hereinafter "Undersigned")
hereby verify, under penalty of perjury, under the laws of the
United States of America, without the United States (federal
government), that the above statements of fact and law are true
and correct, according to the best of My current information,
knowledge, and belief, so help Me God, pursuant to 28 U.S.C.
1746(1).
Respectfully submitted,
/s/ Paul Andrew Mitchell
Paul Andrew Mitchell, Sui Juris
Citizen of Arizona state
(expressly not a citizen of the United States)
all Rights reserved without prejudice
email: supremelawfirm@altavista.net
website: http://supremelaw.com
copy: Office of the City Attorney, Tucson
Office of the City Manager, Tucson
Attorney General, State of Arizona
Judge Alex Kozinski, 9th Circuit (supervising)
Governor, State of Arizona
# # #
Return to Table of Contents for
Arizona v. Mitchell