MEMO TO: All Interested Parties FROM: John E. Trumane Account for Better Citizenship DATE: January 21, 1993 SUBJECT: Mr. Lloyd Bentsen former U.S. Senator As you read the attached materials, please keep in mind the following crucial provision of the Internal Revenue Code (i.e., Title 26, United States Code): Section 7401. AUTHORIZATION. No civil action for the collection or recovery of taxes, or of any fine, penalty, or forfeiture, shall be commenced unless the Secretary authorizes or sanctions the proceedings and the Attorney General or his delegate directs that the action be commenced. [26 USC 7401, emphasis added] Initially, I interpreted this to mean that the Secretary of the Treasury could not delegate an authorization required by Section 7401. I subsequently discovered that this was incorrect, however. The correct interpretation of this section depends entirely upon the IRC definition of "Secretary": (11) Secretary of the Treasury and Secretary. -- (A) Secretary of the Treasury. -- The term "Secretary of the Treasury" means the Secretary of the Treasury, personally, and shall not include any delegate of his. (B) Secretary. -- The term "Secretary" means the Secretary of the Treasury or his delegate. [26 U.S.C. 7701(a)(11)] [emphasis added] Therefore, the term "Secretary" by itself also refers to a delegate of the Secretary of the Treasury. Further clarification is provided at the definition of the term "or his delegate": (12) Delegate. -- (A) In General. -- The term "or his delegate" -- (i) when used with reference to the Secretary of the Treasury, means any officer, employee, or agency of the Treasury Department duly authorized by the Secretary of the Treasury directly, or indirectly by one or more redelegations of authority, to perform the function mentioned or described in the context; .... [26 U.S.C. 7701(a)(12)] [emphasis added] The latest information available to me is that the Office of the Federal Register has issued a statement indicating that Treasury Department Orders 150-10 and 150-37 (regarding taxation) were not published in the Federal Register. Evidently, there are no published orders from the Secretary of the Treasury giving the Commissioner of Internal Revenue the requisite authority to enforce Title 26, the Internal Revenue Code, within the 50 States of the Union. Furthermore, under Title 3, Section 103, the President of the United States, by means of Presidential Executive Order, has not delegated authority to enforce the Internal Revenue Code within the 50 States of the Union. A very good court authority on Section 7401 of the Internal Revenue Code is United States of America v. One 1972 Cadillac Coupe De Ville etc., 355 F.Supp. 513 (1973), to wit: Thus, where the Congress prohibits the commencement of a civil action unless certain specific acts are performed, this Court has no jurisdiction over the subject matter until the requisite conditions are met in fact and such compliance is shown by the pleadings and, where necessary, established by proof. ... [B]ut the mere allegation of facts necessary for jurisdiction without supporting proof is fatally defective. ... This Court holds that 26 U.S.C. Section 7401 requirements constitute facts essential to jurisdiction. The failure to prove jurisdictional facts when specifically denied is fatal to the maintenance of this action. [ibid., page 515, emphasis added] Lloyd Bentsen's Salary Increase, Voted during His Latest Senate Term, Violates 1:6:2 in the U.S. Constitution "No Senator or Representative shall, during the Time for which he was elected, be appointed to any civil Office under the Authority of the United States which shall have been created, or the Emoluments whereof shall have been encreased during such time; .... [Constitution for the United States of America] [Article 1, Section 6, Clause 2, emphasis added] Other relevant laws follow: Salary levels of senior Government officials. Act November 30, 1989, P.L. 101-194, Title VII, Section 703, 103 Stat. 1768, provides: "(a) Salary levels. (1) Executive positions. Effective the first day of the first applicable pay period that begins on or after January 1, 1991, the rate of basic pay for positions in the Executive Schedule shall be increased in the amount of 25 percent of their respective rates (as last in effect before the increase), rounded to the nearest multiple of $100 (or, if midway between multiples of $100, to the next higher multiple of $100)." [5 USC 5318, emphasis added] The "Secretary of the Treasury" is a Level I position in the Executive Schedule, per 5 USC 5312. The salary rate is determined under 2 USC 351 et seq., as adjusted by 5 USC 5318. As of February 10, 1987, positions at level I received $99,500, per 2 USC 358 [see statutory history: Presidential Letter of February 10, 1987, 52 Fed. Reg. 4125] The above evidence proves that Lloyd Bentsen was, indeed, a member of the U.S. Senate when the salary levels of senior government officials were increased 25% on November 30, 1989. The Secretary of the Treasury is a "Level I" position, per 5 USC 5312. The salary rate with respect to such a level is determined by 2 USC 351 et seq. and adjusted by 5 USC 5318. Prior to November 30, 1989, the salary for positions at Level I was $99,500 per 2 USC 358 [see history, Presidential Letter of February 10, 1987, 52 Fed. Reg. 4125]. Lloyd Bentsen's latest senate term began in January of 1989. D R A F T Constitutional Research Associates c/o USPS Post Office Box 550 South Holland, Illinois Republic January 2, 1993 Senator Lloyd Bentsen, Chairman Finance Committee United States Senate Washington, District of Columbia Postal Zone 20510 Subject: NOTICE and DEMAND Dear Senator Bentsen: This is my lawful NOTICE to you that the Constitution for the United States of America strictly bars you from occupying the civil Office of Secretary of the Treasury before the end of your current term as U.S. Senator. Specifically, Article 1, Section 6, Clause 2 reads as follows: No Senator or Representative shall, during the Time for which he was elected, be appointed to any civil Office under the Authority of the United States which shall have been created, or the Emoluments whereof shall have been encreased during such time; and no Person holding any Office under the United States, shall be a Member of either House during his Continuance of Office. [Constitution for the United States of America] [Article 1, Section 6, Clause 2] During a recent telephone conversation with staff in his Washington office, I learned that your colleague, Senator John Glenn, proposes to cure this problem by introducing a Senate Resolution during the next Congress. Senator Bentsen, as one who is sworn to uphold and defend the Constitution, you should know by now that Congress has no power whatsoever to alter or otherwise circumvent the Constitution for the United States of America. The Supreme Court has left absolutely no doubt about the limits of your power in this matter: Congress ... cannot by legislation alter the Constitution, from which alone it derives its power to legislate, and within whose limitations alone that power can be lawfully exercised. [Eisner v. Macomber, 252 U.S. 189] Moreover, the historical record entirely supports my claim that you are presently barred from exercising any of the authorities which are bestowed upon the Office of Secretary of the Treasury. For example, in the year 1889, Congress increased the emoluments for the civil Office of U.S. Minister to Mexico. This made it impossible for a mid-term Senator to occupy that Office: After a senator's term began Congress increased (1889) the emoluments of our Minister to Mexico. Before the expiration of his senatorial term the President appointed him Minister to that country. The Attorney-General ruled that under this provision he was not eligible. [source: The Constitution of the United States:] [Its Sources and Its Application, by Thomas J. Norton] [Boston; Little, Brown, and Co., 1925, pages 32-33] More recently, Senator Robert Byrd opposed Senate action in 1973 which was intended to circumvent this very same restriction. The Senate voted against him, in clear violation of the Constitution, thus rendering the results of that vote null and void ab initio. For further details about this recent history, contact Senator Byrd directly. DEMAND Therefore, Senator Bentsen, this is my lawful DEMAND that you obey the Constitution and that you obey your solemn oath to uphold and defend the Constitution. I hereby DEMAND that you refrain from any attempts to occupy the civil Office of Secretary of the Treasury at any time before the expiration of your current Senate term. I hereby DEMAND that you refrain from any and all acts done under color of Law in that capacity. NOTICE OF PERSONAL LIABILITY Any attempts by you to exercise the authorities endowed upon the civil Office of Secretary of the Treasury, in the face of contrary Law, will be noted and can be used as prima facie evidence of your willingness and deliberate intention to violate the Constitution, and of your willingness and deliberate intention to contravene the unalienable rights secured by that Constitution on behalf of the American people. As the supreme Law of this Land, the United States Constitution is a restraint upon the federal government, purposely ordained and established upon consideration of all the Lawful consequences which it permits and prohibits, making restraints upon government the rights of the governed. You are hereby warned that you can and will be held personally liable for any and all attempts by you to compel our specific performance to discharge any and all third-party debts or obligations incurred by the Congress of the United States, its agencies, assigns or instrumentalities. Any and all acts which you commit under color of the authorities of that civil Office will be null and void ab initio, thereby removing any and all personal immunities which you might otherwise enjoy in the Lawful occupation of that Office. Senator Bentsen, your unlawful attempt to occupy the Office of Secretary of the Treasury will be viewed as a willful and malicious attempt to circumvent the clear and unambiguous constitutional restriction against such an act. Sir, you will now consider yourself warned. Sincerely yours, [not signed] William J. Benson, Sui Juris Sovereign Illinois Citizen all rights reserved without prejudice copies: The White House U.S. Attorney General Senate President Pro Tempore Speaker, House of Representatives Joint Chiefs of Staff, Pentagon WJB/jet # # #
Return to Table of Contents for
Benson v. Bentsen