TO:       Everett C. Gilbertson
          c/o Federal Public Defender
          Minneapolis, Minnesota state

FROM:     Paul Andrew, Mitchell, B.A., M.S.
          Counselor at Law

DATE:     April 21, 1997

SUBJECT:  Anti-Kickback Act of 1986

Mr. Rosenbaum,

I have  probable cause  to charge  one or more governments actors
who have  touched this  case to date, with one or more violations
of Title  41, United  States Code,  Section 53,  short  title  of
"Anti-Kickback Act of 1986."

I hereby  demand  an  indefinite  stay  of  proceedings,  pending
judicial review  of my  offer to  prove that  I am  in this court
specifically because  of my  previous association  with the Pilot
Connection Society, a First Amendment association.

I am  aware that  one or  more members  of the  Pilot  Connection
Society is currently incarcerated in federal prison, specifically
because of  their association  with this Society.  One or more of
these members  is prepared to testify, under oath, that employees
of the  Justice Department,  and even the President of the United
States, are  receiving upwards  of $25,000, in cash, from the IRS
upon obtaining  federal grand  jury indictments  against "illegal
tax protesters" like me.  These awards have been confirmed by Mr.
Mark L. Zolton, a staff attorney in the U.S. Treasury Department.

These kickbacks  are being  made under  color of  the now defunct
Performance Management  and Recognition  System  ("PMRS"),  which
authority was  repealed in  1993.  See the Performance Management
and Recognition System Termination Act of 1993.

I submit to you, that protest has never been illegal, and that it
is a  sacred, fundamental  Right which is guaranteed by the First
Amendment.   Therefore, the  only lawful  construction which this
court can  make of  the term  "illegal tax protester" is that the
tax is illegal, not the protest, and certainly not the protester.

Accordingly, because  of this  newly  found  evidence,  I  hereby
demand one  or more  thorough hearings  to discover the extent to
which my  indictment was  obtained under  similar  circumstances,
pursuant to the authority for such a review which is found in the
constitutional sections of the Jury Selection and Service Act.

Thank you very much for your consideration.

Sincerely yours,

/s/ Paul Andrew Mitchell

Paul Andrew, Mitchell, B.A., M.S.
Counselor at Law and federal witness
c/o 2509 N. Campbell Avenue, #1776
Tucson 85719/tdc

email:       supremelawfirm@yahoo.com

web site:    http://www.supremelaw.com

                             #  #  #

Return to Table of Contents for

U.S.A. v. Gilbertson, District Court