Gmail

Paul Andrew Mitchell <supremelawfirm@gmail.com>

Report: "U.S. DOJ Launches Google Anti-Monopoly Probe" + Washington State AGO Complaint #359316 re: Google's Project 10^100 (i.e. FRAUD)

ATR-Antitrust - Internet (ATR) <ANTITRUST.ATR@usdoj.gov>

Tue, Jun 4, 2019 at 7:37 AM

To: "Paul Andrew Mitchell, B.A., M.S." <supremelawfirm@gmail.com>

Dear Mr. Mitchell:

 

Thank you for contacting the Antitrust Division of the U.S. Department of Justice.  The consumer protection issues from your complaint are most appropriately raised not with the Antitrust Division, but with the Federal Trade Commission, our sister agency. The FTC specializes in consumer protection issues, such as consumer fraud, false or misleading advertising, and other consumer protection concerns. Please see below for information on how to contact the FTC.

 

We wish you the best in resolving your concerns.

 

Sincerely,

 

Citizen Complaint Center

Antitrust Division

Department of Justice

 

-------

 

Federal Trade Commission

600 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW

Washington, DC 20580

Phone: 1-877-382-4357

Website: http://www.ftc.gov/

Complaint Form: https://www.ftccomplaintassistant.gov/


 

 

From: Paul Andrew Mitchell, B.A., M.S. <supremelawfirm@gmail.com>
Sent: Saturday, June 1, 2019 10:17 PM
To: Angela Stark
Cc:  [redacted]
Subject: Re: Report: "U.S. DOJ Launches Google Anti-Monopoly Probe" + Washington State AGO Complaint #359316 re: Google's Project 10^100 (i.e. FRAUD)

 

Thanks, Angela!

 

They're crooks and thieves, in bed with the CIA and NSA.

 

Not only did they plagiarize the exact language from my Proposal,

they promptly spent millions of dollars launching a

Gigabit Internet business.

 

Things change so fast with computer technology,

2008 seems like a century ago:  in that year,

there was no Gigabit Internet. 

 

The only networking technology that operated at

that speed was hard-wired local area networks ("LAN"),

and super secret military satellite telecom.

 

Today, Gigabit Internet is everywhere -- perhaps

at a premium price, but it's now widely available.

 

So, their "$10M Offer" was not only fraudulent:

they violated their own published terms of that contest,

and they effectively stole my Proposal outright --

by refusing to pay my INVOICEs.

 

 

I'll tell you a funny story:  at one time, I was a

frequent contributor to Tom's Hardware User Forum.

 

One day, I merely posted this question on that User Forum:

 

"Is 'VISTA' an acronym for Virtual Instant Surveillance

Tactical Application?"

 

I was INSTANTLY barred FOR LIFE from that User Forum.

 

So, I went back in with an alias, and after that

I was awarded BEST SOLUTION 33 different times:

 

 

I decided to archive all of those BEST SOLUTION awards,

because many people would refuse to believe me

without proof.


 

Sincerely yours,
/s/ Paul Andrew Mitchell, B.A., M.S.
Private Attorney General, Civil RICO: 18 U.S.C. 1964;

Agent of the United States as Qui Tam Relator (4X),

Federal Civil False Claims Act: 31 U.S.C. 3729 et seq.


http://supremelaw.org/support.guidelines.htm (Policy + Guidelines)

All Rights Reserved (cf. UCC 1-308 https://www.law.cornell.edu/ucc/1/1-308)

 

 

On Sat, Jun 1, 2019 at 6:02 PM Angela Stark wrote:

 

Good for you. I hope you get it.

How could they be so blatantly fraudulent?

 

 

From: Paul Andrew Mitchell, B.A., M.S.

Sent: Saturday, June 01, 2019 4:56 PM

To: The Corbett Report

Cc:  Angela Stark

Subject: Report: "U.S. DOJ Launches Google Anti-Monopoly Probe" + Washington State AGO Complaint #359316 re: Google's Project 10^100 (i.e. FRAUD)

 

 

---------- Forwarded message ---------
From: Paul Andrew Mitchell, B.A., M.S. <supremelawfirm@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, Jun 1, 2019 at 4:54 PM
Subject: Report: "U.S. DOJ Launches Google Anti-Monopoly Probe" + Washington State AGO Complaint #359316 re: Google's Project 10^100 (i.e. FRAUD)
To: <antitrust.atr@usdoj.gov>
Cc: <antitrust.complaints@usdoj.gov>, ATG MI Seattle CRC <seacrc@atg.wa.gov>

 

FYI:  There should be a complete case file

in the Washington State AG's Office in Seattle,

 

 

Contact:

SANDRA M. HATCHER  (I don't know of Ms. Hatcher is still employed there)
Program Specialist 2
Consumer Protection Division
(206) 389-2743

 

---------- Forwarded message ---------
From: Paul Andrew Mitchell, B.A., M.S. <supremelawfirm@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, Jun 1, 2019 at 4:43 PM
Subject: Report: "U.S. DOJ Launches Google Anti-Monopoly Probe" + Washington State AGO Complaint #359316 re: Google's Project 10^100 (i.e. FRAUD)
To: <kander34@gmu.edu>

 

 

---------- Forwarded message ---------
From: Paul Andrew Mitchell, B.A., M.S. <supremelawfirm@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, Jun 1, 2019 at 4:37 PM
Subject: Report: "U.S. DOJ Launches Google Anti-Monopoly Probe" + Washington State AGO Complaint #359316 re: Google's Project 10^100 (i.e. FRAUD)
To: <fdorman@ftc.gov>

 

 

 

---------- Forwarded message ---------
From: Paul Andrew Mitchell, B.A., M.S. <supremelawfirm@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, Jun 1, 2019 at 4:28 PM
Subject: Report: "U.S. DOJ Launches Google Anti-Monopoly Probe" + Washington State AGO Complaint #359316 re: Google's Project 10^100 (i.e. FRAUD)
To: askdoj@usdoj.gov <ASKDOJ@usdoj.gov>
Cc: <mkatz@ftc.gov>

 

Re:

 

Please see also their false "offer" of $10 Million on the 5 "best ideas":

 

http://supremelaw.org/cc/google.inc/  (see "letter.MMMM-DD-YY" folders for relevant correspondence)

 

 

[begin pertinent excerpt]

NOTICE OF RELATED ADMINISTRATIVE COMPLAINT

Relator has been investigating Google, Inc. and its officers, after filing an administrative complaint with the Consumer Protection Division in the Washington State Attorney General’s Office.

The latter office has assigned case number #359316 to said complaint.

On February 11, 2010 A.D., Relator’s explanation of his complaint was briefly summarized to the latter office as follows:

Explanation of complaint:

On or about September 25, 2008, Google, Inc. published on the Internet an evidently bona fide offer of $10 Million, which "will be distributed evenly among the winners" of the best ideas submitted to Google's Project 10^100:

 

http://www.project10tothe100.com/index.html

From Spokane I submitted this idea: "worldwide adoption of the goal and committing all resources necessary to realize 1 Gigabit Internet access everywhere on planet Earth."  In answer to the question: "What initial steps are required to get this idea off the ground?" I replied: "A Policy Proposal circulated widely to IT and government sectors, with a strong PR budget to commence aggressive advocacy of this idea."  Yesterday, Google announced plans that implement this idea almost to the letter:

 

http://googleblog.blogspot.com/2010/02/think-big-with-gig-our-experimental.html

However, Google staff are now saying that "winners" will not receive ANY money, only "good karma", and that the funds offered will be distributed ONLY to organizations, NOT to individuals who submitted winning ideas.  This change strongly suggests false advertising, bad faith and also fraud by Google's management, for having widely distributed this exact language in their original Offer:  "... [T]he $10 million will be distributed evenly among the winners."

 

Subsequently, Relator supplemented the case file in the matter of complaint #359316 supra with much additional documentation, including but not limited to media reports of privacy complaints lodged against Google, Inc. in connection with its “Street View” data acquisition practices;  reports that Google, Inc. have been secretly collaborating with the Central Intelligence Agency (“CIA”), and possibly also the National Security Agency (“NSA”), for purposes of implementing sophisticated electronic surveillance of the American People;  and, related reports that an Italian court convicted three (3) current and former Google executives of privacy violations, and that a French court has convicted Mr. Eric Schmidt of defamation.

On information and belief, Relator regards these news reports to be factual and accurate.

 

[end pertinent excerpt]

 

 

http://supremelaw.org/cc/google.inc/contest.terms/  "Bona Fide Offer" archived here

 

 

 

 

Bcc:  Benefactor

 

 

Sincerely yours,
/s/ Paul Andrew Mitchell, B.A., M.S.
Private Attorney General, Civil RICO: 18 U.S.C. 1964;

Agent of the United States as Qui Tam Relator (4X),

Federal Civil False Claims Act: 31 U.S.C. 3729 et seq.


http://supremelaw.org/support.guidelines.htm (Policy + Guidelines)

All Rights Reserved (cf. UCC 1-308 https://www.law.cornell.edu/ucc/1/1-308)