They do NOT inform
me ahead of time of any upcoming hearings;
no "schedules" are provided to me. Yesterday, first I had heard
of a
fourth hearing was at 6 AM yesterday, when a guard told me I had
"court".
See
"Incarceration Nation" by Fareed Zakaria, Time Magazine
(read UNICOR is a rapidly expanding BUSINESS in the USA):
e.g. I must pay per minute to use
this email subsystem:
just run the numbers.
Yes, if you review
that "indictment" backwards, you get:
(
a )
DEMAND for clerk's credentials is protected by the First Amendment,
and was necessitated by the FOIA exemption for the judiciary: 5 USC 551
(
b
) the middle group of COUNTs all arise from INvalid
"subpoenas" issued by a
panel of federal citizens, but withOUT a
Clerk's authorized signature,
in violation of 28 USC 1691
supremelaw.org/stat/62/
(
c
) the first COUNT falls because of the above e.g. right to contract
with clients to assist them with preparation of their reply(s) to those
defective "subpoenas"
(
d ) case
RIGHT ON POINT is U.S. v. Pignatiello (SEC
Attorney
entered grand jury room withOUT the OATH
required by 28 USC 544).
(
e )
lastly, REQUEST TO APPEAR IN WRITING: 18 USC 1504
is protected by the last sentence of the latter statute:
does not prohibit a request to appear before a grand jury:
try:
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/18/1504.html
(see last sentence)
(
f ) U.S.
Attorneys have an obligation to convey such communications
to the GJ Foreperson: In Re
Grand Jury Application