May 1, 2014

 

 

From Paul:


Right!  As I explored "more deeply" into the duties
of Clerks and Deputy Clerks of Court, it was only
natural to find the statute which authorized
them to "administer oaths and affirmations".

During the "arraignment" I was actually "sworn in"
and it did occur to me afterwards that the
courtroom "clerk" probably also suffered from
missing or defective credentials.

There was also that SUBPOENA IN A CIVIL CASE
to which the Administrative Office is now IN DEFAULT
and IN CONTEMPT:

http://www.supremelaw.org/cc/aouscourts/

So, I believe we have provided sufficient PROOF
that the A.O. is NOT the designated legal custodian
of the OPM SF-61 APPOINTMENT AFFIDAVITS:

http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/5/2906.html
(delivered to the court to which the office pertains)

A.O. is not a "court" -- PERIOD!

It was nice to find MORE authorities which allowed me
to RESCIND that "testimony" because those
Clerk's Office personnel lacked credentials!

So, add "administering oaths" to the list
of Clerk's "duties" as discussed in "Clerks or Jerks?"
As such, "shifting" the focus to Clerks' duties
has turned out to be a very fruitful change of focus --
potentially valuable in all Federal Court cases
throughout the USA.

Thanks again!

 

 

/s/ Paul Andrew Mitchell, B.A., M.S.