Subject: Please Forward asap to AG Jeff Sessions: OBJECTIONS Re: 2017-02579 response letter + RETURNED TO SENDER FOR FRAUD
Cc: "Donald J. Trump for President, Inc." <
TO: Hon. Jeff Sessions, Attorney General
Greetings Attorney General Sessions:
Congratulations on your Senate Confirmation
to the superior office of U.S. Attorney General.
I am attempting to contact you in this manner,
because some of my most recent U.S. Mail
is NOT being timely delivered, and the USPS
are responding with suspicious explanations.
Please be properly informed hereby that
The Credential Investigation has not received
one (1) APPOINTMENT AFFIDAVITS (U.S. OPM SF-61)
for any officers or employees of the Federal Bureau of Prisons
("BOP").
If this email message does NOT satisfy my legal obligations
as imposed by 18 U.S.C. 4, please advise.
I am not willing to tolerate any more obstruction of
TENTATIVE RECOMMENDATION:
I will, under protest, consider your bona fide offer
to refer this matter to mediation, arbitration, or other
alternative means of dispute resolution ("ADR")
withOUT requiring that a lawsuit be commenced first.
I honestly believe that DOJ's current ADR policy
requires commencement of a lawsuit, which
appears to defeat the intent of Congress
at 28 U.S.C. 2672 (to settle a tort claim) and
at 5 U.S.C. 573 (definition of "neutral").
When we requested ADR assistance from our
U.S. Representative Peter DeFazio, he responded
by mailing a defamatory letter to our Trustee!
In further satisfaction of 18 U.S.C. 4, please
take formal Executive notice of the following matrix
(scroll to end for list of names and positions)
Hard copies of the latter can be provided to you,
in prompt response to request(s) for same.
Thank you for your timely attention to this
seemingly endless bureaucratic stalling and
obstruction.
Attachment: OBJECTIONS to email
concerning Mr. Dennis M. Wong
as BOP "Western Regional Counsel"
at Stockton, California.
Sincerely yours,
/s/ Paul Andrew Mitchell, B.A., M.S.
Private Attorney General, Civil RICO: 18 U.S.C. 1964;
Agent of the United States as Qui Tam Relator (4X),
Federal Civil False Claims Act: 31 U.S.C. 3729 et seq.
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From:
Paul Andrew Mitchell, B.A., M.S. <supremelawfirm@gmail.com>Date: Tue, Feb 21, 2017 at 9:49 AM
Subject: OBJECTIONS Re: 2017-02579 response letter + RETURNED TO SENDER FOR FRAUD
To:
OGC.Electronic.Freedom.of.Information@usdoj.govCc: OGIS <
ogis@nara.gov>, "
askdoj@usdoj.gov" <
ASKDOJ@usdoj.gov>
OBJECTIONS:
Section 6064 in the California Business and Professions Code
We did not ask if Mr. Wong was "licensed": we requested a true and
correct copy of BOTH SIDES of Mr. Wong's license to practice law
For your information, staff at The State Bar of California have
now finally admitted, after 15+ YEARS, that they do not maintain
custody of licenses to practice law in that State. That admission
complies with Section 6064, to wit:
A
certificate of admission thereupon shall be given to the applicant by
the clerk of the court.
READ: clerk gives certificate to applicant
A "certificate of admission" is synonymous with "license".
See Act of 1851, California Legislature.
Finally, you may inform Mr. Wong that he is now under
investigation on suspicion of mail fraud chiefly because
of false and misleading statements he made in a letter
dated January 26, 2017, and transmitted via Certified
Our Federal Tort Claim, DOJ Standard Form 95,
was mailed to and received by BOP in Washington, D.C.
(delivered on July 11, 2016 at 7:52 AM)
The latter U.S. Mail with our SF-95 was NOT "received on December 29, 2016" [sic]
and it was NOT "in excess of the two-year filing limitation stipulated by law" [sic].
(Perhaps you should inform Mr. Wong that I am not stupid.)
Therefore, someone employed by BOP is lying, and
the evidence in our possession calls for the conclusion
that it is Mr. Wong who is lying in that letter dated
January 26, 2017.
ACTUAL NOTICE OF DEFAULT:
All personnel employed by the Federal Bureau of Prisons
have now failed to produce evidence of APPOINTMENT AFFIDAVITS
as properly requested in late 2014 by several FOIA Requests which can
(due in 20 business days after February 9, 2017)
NOTICE TO PRINCIPALS IS NOTICE TO AGENTS.
NOTICE TO AGENTS IS NOTICE TO PRINCIPALS.
/s/ Paul
Bcc: associates/witnesses
