NOTICE OF REFUSAL FOR FRAUD

NOTICE OF REFUSAL FOR FRAUD

(cf. “Fraud” in Black’s Law Dictionary)

TO: Kevin Krebs as Assistant Director

Executive Office for U.S. Attorneys

600 “E” Street, N.W., Suite 7300 BICN

Washington 20530

District of Columbia, USA

FROM: Paul Andrew Mitchell, B.A., M.S.

c/o Trustee

P.O. Box 3097

Winston 97496

Oregon, USA

DATE: February 21, 2017 A.D.

SUBJECT: credentials required by 5 U.S.C. 2906, 3331, 3332, 3333

your “Request Number: FOIA-2017-00975”

Mr. Krebs:

Your letter dated February 7, 2017 is hereby refused for reasons including but not limited to fraud and all of the following:

(1) My FOIA Request dated November 21, 2016 A.D. does not involve “many voluminous records”: a proper response should disclose two (2) pages at most;

(2) My FOIA Request dated November 21, 2016 A.D. does not require consultation with another agency/component, because 5 U.S.C. 2906 designates your offices as the legal custodian of the requested credentials required of Ms. Lois G. Lerner;

(3) My FOIA Request dated November 21, 2016 A.D. should not be “assigned to the complex track” because doing so attempts to obscure the fact that your office failed timely to assign a unique Request Number;

(4) My FOIA Request dated November 21, 2016 A.D. was mailed via first class U.S. Mail on or about that date, therefore your claim that it was received on January 3, 2017 is hereby specifically denied as false and misleading (see also enclosed PROOF OF SERVICE dated October 11, 2016 A.D.); and,

(5) the scope of my FOIA Request dated November 21, 2016 A.D. does not need to be modified or narrowed, because it is already sufficiently specific, as demonstrated by numerous historical replies we have received from DOJ’s Office of Information Policy.

If you simply can’t resist signing your name to pages upon pages of smelly horse manure, kindly find someone else who is either sufficiently stupid or ignorant enough not to know any better.

But, when you are being paid by a demonstrably corrupt organization, aiding and abetting the protection racket brilliantly described by Paul Craig Roberts in his essay entitled “The Justice System is Criminal,” it is painfully obvious why applicable laws make absolutely no difference to your day-to-day behavior and habitual bureaucratic machinations.

Sincerely yours,

/s/ Paul Andrew Mitchell

Paul Andrew Mitchell, B.A., M.S., Damaged Party;

Private Attorney General, Civil RICO: 18 U.S.C. 1964; and,

Agent of the United States as Qui Tam Relator (4X),

Federal Civil False Claims Act: 31 U.S.C. 3729 et seq.

U.S. Mail:

Supreme Law Firm

c/o Trustee

P.O. Box 3097

Winston 97496

Oregon, USA