COMPLAINT FORM
              JUDICIAL COUNCIL OF THE NINTH CIRCUIT
         COMPLAINT OF JUDICIAL MISCONDUCT AND DISABILITY


MAIL THIS FORM TO THE CLERK, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS, P.O.
BOX 193939,  SAN FRANCISCO,  CALIFORNIA 94119-3939/tdc.  MARK THE
ENVELOPE "JUDICIAL  MISCONDUCT COMPLAINT" OR "JUDICIAL DISABILITY
COMPLAINT".   DO NOT  PUT THE  NAME OF THE JUDGE OR MAGISTRATE ON
THE ENVELOPE.


SEE RULE 2(e) FOR THE NUMBER OF COPIES REQUIRED FOR FILING.


1.   Complainant's name: Paul Andrew Mitchell, B.A., M.S.

     Address:            c/o 2509 North Campbell Avenue, #1776
                         Tucson [zip code exempt]
                         ARIZONA STATE

     Daytime telephone:  [redacted]


2.   Judge or magistrate complained about:

     Name:               John M. Roll [sic]
                         United States District Judge [sic]

     Court:              United States District Court
                         Tucson, Arizona state


3.   Does this  complaint concern  the behavior  of the  judge or
     magistrate in a particular lawsuit or lawsuits?
     
          ( X ) Yes  (  ) No

     If "yes"  give the  following information about each lawsuit
     (use the reverse side if there is more than one):

     Court:              United States District Court

     Docket Number:      GJ-95-1-6 (JMR)

     Are (were) you a party or lawyer in the lawsuit?

          ( X ) Party    ( X ) Counsel  (   ) Neither

     If party,  give the  name, address,  and telephone number of
     your Counsel:

                         n/a


            Judicial Complaint Against John M. Roll:
                          Page 1 of 3


     Docket numbers of any appeals to the Ninth Circuit:

          Ninth Circuit No. 96-16145

          (case file is incorporated by reference
           as if set forth fully herein)


4.   Have you filed any lawsuits against the judge or magistrate?

          (   ) Yes      ( X ) No  (not yet)

     If yes,  give the  following information  about each lawsuit
     (use the reverse side if there is more than one):

     Court:    n/a

     Present status of suit:  n/a

     Name, address, and telephone number of your Counsel:

          n/a

     Court to which any appeal has been taken:

          (see above)

     Docket number of appeal:

          (see above)

     Present status of appeal:

          dismissed by 3-judge panel on June 28, 1996,
          by Order of Circuit Judges Noonan, Leavy and Tashima


5.   On separate  sheets of  paper, no larger than the paper this
     form is  printed on, describe the conduct or the evidence of
     disability that  is the subject of this complaint.  See rule
     2(b) and  2(d).   Do not  use more  than 5  pages (5 sides).
     Most complaints do not require that much.

          see attached letter to Federal Bureau of Investigation
          (incorporated by reference as if set forth fully)


6.   You should either:

          (1)  check the  first box  below and  sign this form in
               the presence of a notary public;  or

          (2)  check the  second box  and sign  the form.  You do
               not need  a notary  public if you check the second
               box.

          ( )  I swear (affirm) that --


            Judicial Complaint Against John M. Roll:
                          Page 2 of 3


          (X)  I declare under penalty of perjury --

               I have  read rules  1 and  2 of  the Rules  of the
               Judicial Council  of the  Ninth Circuit  Governing
               Complaints of  Judicial Misconduct  or Disability,
               and the  statement made  in this complaint is true
               and correct to the best of my knowledge.


/s/ Paul Andrew Mitchell
________________________________________________
Paul Andrew Mitchell, B.A., M.S.
Citizen of Arizona state, federal witness,
Counselor at Law, and Vice President for Legal Affairs,
New Life Health Center Company

All Rights Reserved Without Prejudice

Executed on:  November 30, 1996


Note:  Complainant was never terminated from his position as Vice
President for  Legal Affairs of New Life Health Center Company, a
pure trust,  by lawful  action of  a Trustee authorized to do so,
and therefore  He continues  to assert  His lawful  claim to that
office, protestations  by Dr.  Eugene A.  Burns to  the  contrary
notwithstanding.

email:    supremelawfirm@altavista.net

website:  http://supremelaw.com

copies:   Judge Alex Kozinski, Ninth Circuit
          Kenneth Starr, Department of Justice, Washington, D.C.
          U.S. Marshals, Tucson, Arizona
          Federal Bureau of Investigation, Tucson, Arizona
          Attorney General, State of Arizona
          Governor Fife Symington, State of Arizona
          Speaker, Arizona House of Representatives
          President, Arizona State Senate


            Judicial Complaint Against John M. Roll:
                          Page 3 of 3


                             #  #  #

                                      c/o 2509 N. Campbell, #1776
                                         Tucson [zip code exempt]
                                                    ARIZONA STATE

                                               September 13, 1996

Mr. Thomas H. Basham
Supervisory Senior Resident Agent
Federal Bureau of Investigation
U.S. Department of Justice
201 East Indianola
Phoenix, Arizona 85012/tdc

Subject:  Criminal Misconduct by John M. Roll,
          United States District Court, Tucson

Dear Mr. Basham:

     Thank you  very much  for your letter to Me, dated September
9, 1996,  concerning alleged  criminal misconduct  by  a  Federal
District Court Judge in Tucson, Arizona.

     In your  letter, you  stated that  My letter to the FBI does
not contain  sufficient detail  to determine  whether a  criminal
investigation is warranted.  You also requested that I submit, to
the Tucson  office of  the  FBI,  further  documentation  of  the
alleged misconduct,  to include names, dates, and any other facts
that may be pertinent.  To this end, enclosed please find all the
pertinent materials currently in My possession and control.

     The thread of evidence you should follow concerns the events
which occurred  immediately after  a federal  grand jury subpoena
was first  served on  New Life  Health Center  Company in Tucson,
Arizona state ("New Life").  Pay particular attention to the fate
of all  the U.S.  Mail which We transmitted directly to the grand
jury Foreperson in response to their subpoena.

     I was  retained by  New Life  at that  time  to  answer  the
subpoena (see  enclosed PRIVILEGED COMMUNICATION, dated March 20,
1996) and  to assist  New Life  with their  civil defense.   This
PRIVILEGED COMMUNICATION  was mailed to the Grand Jury Foreperson
via Registered  U.S. Mail, return receipt and restricted delivery
both requested.   The  enclosed  evidence  will  show  that  this
PRIVILEGED COMMUNICATION  was illegally  intercepted by  John  M.
Roll, who  handed it  to Robert  L. Miskell  in the office of the
United States Attorney in Tucson.

     After investigating on Our own, and with the able assistance
of the  Postmaster, We  decided to  prepare  and  mail  a  FORMAL
REQUEST FOR INVESTIGATION  to  the same federal grand jury.  This
request was  mailed to  the Foreperson  on April  28,  1996  (see
enclosed).   This FORMAL  REQUEST was also intercepted by John M.
Roll, who also handed it to Robert L. Miskell.  We have reason to
believe that the federal grand jury never saw this FORMAL REQUEST
either.

     At  a  subsequent  hearing  on  the  matter,  John  M.  Roll
admitted, on  the official  court record, that he had intercepted
this FORMAL REQUEST.  He also said that he had not opened it, but
that he had given it to Robert L. Miskell.  At that same hearing,
Robert L.  Miskell admitted, on record, that he had received this
FORMAL REQUEST  from John  M. Roll, and that the mail in question
simply contained  a formal  request that  the federal  grand jury
investigate possible  violations of  federal  law  by  Robert  L.
Miskell.   We inferred  from  Miskell's  comments  that  he  had,
indeed, opened  this mail,  because  he  was  correct  about  its
contents.

     At this  point, We  felt  it  was  necessary  to  place  the
Foreperson of the federal grand jury on the Proof of Service list
for all  subsequent pleadings  which We  planned to  file in that
case.   All together,  some twenty-five  (25) different pleadings
were then  filed under  My signature, or under signatures of Mine
and Dr. Eugene A. Burns.  Some of these pleadings are affidavits.
All  pleadings   currently  in  My  possession  and  control  are
enclosed, for your review.

     Counting all  25  pleadings,  the  PRIVILEGED  COMMUNICATION
(26), and  the FORMAL  REQUEST FOR  INVESTIGATION (27),  none  of
which were ever delivered to the federal grand jury Foreperson to
whom they  were mailed,  We count  27 counts  of mail  fraud,  27
counts of  jury tampering,  27 counts  of obstruction of justice,
and 27 counts of conspiracy to commit all of the above, committed
by a conspiracy of persons including, but not limited to, John M.
Roll,  Janet   Napolitano,  Robert  L.  Miskell,  and  Evangelina
Cardenas.   Other likely  accessories  to  these  crimes  include
Robert A. Johnson, Richard H. Weare, and William M. McCool.

     At another  hearing on  the matter,  John M. Roll complained
that he  had some  14 inches  of pleadings  to read in this case.
But then,  he immediately  called a recess, and huddled for quite
some time  with his staff, both inside and outside the courtroom.
When he  came back  into session,  John  M.  Roll  qualified  his
earlier statement by saying that he really had only 6 or 7 inches
of pleadings  in this  case, but  that he  guaranteed, if  We had
filed them, he had read them.  This statement was witnessed by Me
and by My assistant Counsel, Neil Thomas Nordbrock, who is also a
federal witness  to perjury  of oath  by  Robert  L.  Miskell  in
another case.   Neil  Nordbrock and  I took  his qualification to
mean that John M. Roll had, in fact, intercepted all 25 pleadings
which We  had mailed  to the  grand jury  Foreperson.    You  can
measure their thickness yourself.

     I hope this response to your letter is satisfactory.  If you
should need  any additional  information, permit  Me to recommend
that you  first contact Dr. Eugene A. Burns, Managing Director of
New Life  Health Center  Company, 4500  East Speedway,  Suite 27,
Tucson, Arizona  state.   As of the moment I vacated the premises
at New  Life, Dr.  Burns was in possession and control of all the
documentary  exhibits   which  were   attached  to  the  enclosed
pleadings.   These documentary exhibits include, for example, the
Postmaster's response to our FOIA request for a certified copy of
the Standing  Delivery Order  (USPS  Form  3801)  signed  by  the
federal grand  jury Foreperson  in  the  New  Life  case.    This
response stated  that there  was no  such document  in existence,
proving that  the Foreperson  had never authorized anyone else to
accept or sign for U.S. Mail addressed to him/her.

     Thank you very much for your consideration.


                          VERIFICATION

     I, Paul  Andrew, Mitchell,  B.A., M.S.,  Citizen of  Arizona
state and  federal  witness,  hereby  verify,  under  penalty  of
perjury, under  the laws of the United States of America, without
the "United  States," that the above statements of fact are true,
correct, complete,  and not misleading, to the best of My current
information, knowledge,  and belief,  so help Me God, pursuant to
28 U.S.C. 1746(1).

Further Affiant sayeth naught.


Respectfully submitted,

/s/ Paul Andrew Mitchell

Paul Andrew, Mitchell, B.A., M.S.
Citizen of Arizona state and federal witness

attachments:  to FBI, Tucson

email:    supremelawfirm@altavista.net

website:  http://supremelaw.com

copy:     Bruce J. Gebhardt
          Special Agent in Charge

copy:     Thomas H. Basham
          Supervisory Senior Resident Agent
          c/o Federal Bureau of Investigation
          1 South Church Avenue, Suite 600
          Tucson, Arizona state 85701/tdc

copy:     Postmaster
          U.S. Post Office
          Downtown Station
          Tucson, Arizona


                             #  #  #


MEMO

TO:       Cathy A. Catterson
          Office of the Clerk
          U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
          c/o P.O. Box 193939
          San Francisco, California state
          Postal Zone 94119-3939/tdc

FROM:     Paul Andrew, Mitchell, B.A., M.S.
          Counselor at Law

DATE:     December 20, 1996

SUBJECT:  Complaint of Judicial Misconduct No. 96-80380


Thank you  very much, Ms. Catterson, for your letter to Me, dated
December 16,  1996, confirming  the Ninth  Circuit docket  number
#96-80380 now  assigned  to  My  previously  filed  Complaint  of
Judicial Misconduct by United States District Judge John M. Roll.

I was  a bit  puzzled by your references to "Chief Judge Hug" and
"Chief Judge  Broomfield."  I was of the understanding that there
is only one Chief Judge at any moment in time.  Am I mistaken?

Also, for  the convenience  of future  clients, I  have taken the
liberty of  entering the  names of all judges currently presiding
on the  Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals.  May I impose upon you to
check the  spelling of  their names  on the attached proof sheet,
and return any corrections in the SASE enclosed?

Thanks very  much, Cathy,  and please  have a  wonderful  Holiday
Season!  I will look forward to meeting you some day.


Sincerely yours,

/s/ Paul Andrew Mitchell

Paul Andrew, Mitchell, B.A., M.S.
Counselor at Law and federal witness
c/o 2509 N. Campbell, #1776
Tucson, Arizona state
Postal Zone 85719/tdc

email:    supremelawfirm@altavista.net

website:  http://supremelaw.com


                             #  #  #


MEMO

TO:       Cathy A. Catterson
          Office of the Clerk
          U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
          c/o P.O. Box 193939
          San Francisco, California state
          Postal Zone 94119-3939/tdc

FROM:     Paul Andrew, Mitchell, B.A., M.S.
          Counselor at Law

DATE:     February 25, 1997

SUBJECT:  Complaint of Judicial Misconduct No. 96-80380


I have  been reviewing  the Rules  of the Judicial Council of the
Ninth Circuit  Governing Complaints  of  Judicial  Misconduct  or
Disability.  My review led Me to the section entitled "Commentary
on Rule 4:  Expeditious Review."  Quoting now:

     The statute  requires the  chief judge to review a complaint
     "expeditiously."   It should  be a  rare case  in which more
     than a  month is  permitted to elapse from the filing of the
     complaint to the chief judge's action on it.


Your original  correspondence to  Me in  this matter assigned the
above docket  number on December 16, 1996.  My original complaint
was dated  and mailed  on November  30, 1996.  Thus, almost three
(3) months  have elapsed  and, with  the sole  exception of  your
December 16  letter, I  have heard  nothing from you, or from the
chief judge,  in the  matter of the criminal misconduct of United
States District Judge John M. Roll of which I have complained.

I respectfully  request immediate  review of  My complaint by the
chief judge, as outlined in Rule 4:  Review by the Chief Judge.

Thank you very much for your prompt consideration.


Sincerely yours,

/s/ Paul Andrew Mitchell

Paul Andrew, Mitchell, B.A., M.S.
Counselor at Law and federal witness
c/o 2509 N. Campbell Avenue, #1776
Tucson, Arizona state
Postal Zone 85719/tdc

email:    supremelawfirm@altavista.net

website:  http://supremelaw.com

copy:     Procter Hug, Chief Judge, Ninth Circuit


                             #  #  #
      


Return to Table of Contents for

In Re Grand Jury Subpoena