FINAL NOTICE AND DEMAND


TO:       Lawrence E. Condit
          c/o 376 South Stone Avenue
          Tucson, Arizona state

FROM:     Paul Andrew, Mitchell, B.A., M.S.
          Counselor at Law

DATE:     March 22, 1997

SUBJECT:  FINAL NOTICE AND DEMAND


This is  to remind  you that,  on  three  separate  occasions  --
January 11, 1997, February 11, 1997, and March 11, 1997 -- I have
written to  you requesting  a certified  copy of  your license to
practice  law   in  the   State  of  Arizona,  and  also  written
confirmation that  you have  been retained  by the  Nordbrocks in
civil and/or  criminal matters.   To  date, you have not provided
the requested information.  Copies of those letters are attached.

I am  also in  receipt of  a fax  copy of  your recent  letter to
Richard Scully,  dated March 19, 1997, concerning the offer which
you allege  the Nordbrocks  have  made  to  settle  the  case  of
Mitchell v. Nordbrock, no. 97-3438.  This letter alleges that you
are also "Admitted to Arizona, California, Hawaii and Kansas."

Before it  is possible  for Me  to give  such a letter My serious
consideration, I  hereby demand  that you  produce the  documents
previously requested  of you in writing.  Your failure to produce
the requested  documents, in  response to  My three  (3) previous
letters, is  sufficient cause  for Me  to proceed on the basis of
the presumption  that you cannot produce the requested documents,
for reason(s) which are presently unknown to Me.

For proof  of the  validity of My position in this regard, please
consult the  two decisions:   U.S.  v. Tweel,  550 F.2d  297, 299
(1977) and  Carmine v.  Bowen, 64  A. 932  (1906).   According to
Tweel, silence is fraud where there is a legal or a moral duty to
speak.  If you are an officer of the courts to which you claim to
be admitted,  you are  bound by  your oath  of office  to produce
evidence of  the oath  required of  you by  Article VI, Clause 3.
Moreover,  silence   also  activates  estoppel  by  acquiescence,
pursuant to the Carmine case.


                        DEMAND FOR PROOF

Accordingly, I  hereby demand that you produce certified evidence
of your license to practice law in the State of Arizona (if any),
and certified  evidence of  any power(s) of attorney you may have
received from Mr. and/or Mrs. Neil Thomas Nordbrock.


                       NOTICE OF DEADLINE

Please provide  the requested  documents by  mailing same  to the
lawful mailing  location shown  below, on  or before 5:00 p.m. on
Friday, March 28, 1997.  Fax transmission will not suffice.

Thank you very much for your consideration.


Sincerely yours,

/s/ Paul Andrew Mitchell

Paul Andrew, Mitchell, B.A., M.S.
Citizen of Arizona state and federal witness
c/o 2509 N. Campbell Avenue, #1776
Tucson, Arizona state

email:    supremelawfirm@altavista.net

website:  http://supremelaw.com

copy:     Richard J. Scully


                             #  #  #
      

Return to Table of Contents for

Mitchell v. Nordbrock