Paul Andrew Mitchell, Sui Juris
Citizen of Arizona state
c/o General Delivery at:
2509 North Campbell Avenue
Tucson, Arizona state

In Propria Persona

All Rights Reserved
Without Prejudice





             PIMA COUNTY CONSOLIDATED JUSTICE COURT


Paul Andrew Mitchell,           )  Case Number #CV-97-3438
          Plaintiff             )
                                )  MOTION TO RECONSIDER
     v.                         )  MINUTE ENTRY OF 5/1/97
                                )
Neil and Evelyn Nordbrock,      )
          Defendants            )
________________________________)


COMES NOW  Paul Andrew  Mitchell, Sui Juris,  Citizen  of Arizona

state, expressly  not a  citizen of  the United  States ("federal

citizen") and Plaintiff in the above entitled matter (hereinafter

"Plaintiff"), respectfully  to request  this honorable  Court  to

reconsider its  CIVIL MINUTE  ENTRY, dated  5/1/97 and  mailed on

5/5/97 in the instant case, to wit:

     An attorney  having made  an appearance  the matter is taken
     out of  mediation  (vacate  mediation)  and  assigned  on  a
     permanent basis to Judge W. U. Weber.
                                                 [emphasis added]


     Plaintiff wishes  to  inform  this  Court  that  Plaintiff's

recently filed  NOTICE OF  MOTION AND  MOTION TO  MODIFY ORDER OF

REFERRAL TO  MEDIATION AND TO NAME ANOTHER DEFENDANT (hereinafter

"MOTION TO  MODIFY ORDER") was executed and served less than four

(4) hours  before Plaintiff  first received  this  Court's  CIVIL

MINUTE ENTRY  of 5/1/97.   Based  on all  evidence  available  to

Plaintiff, the  two documents  now appear to have "crossed in the

mail."  Plaintiff apologizes for any confusion this has caused.


          Motion to Reconsider Minute Entry of 5/1/97:
                          Page 1 of 4


     Nevertheless, Plaintiff  submits that  the substance of said

MOTION TO MODIFY ORDER has a direct bearing on this court's CIVIL

MINUTE ENTRY  of 5/1/97.   This  Court has ruled therein that "an

attorney [has] made an appearance ...."

     Said ruling actually assumes facts that are not in evidence.

     Plaintiff's MOTION TO MODIFY ORDER explains how Mr. Lawrence

E. Condit  (hereinafter "Mr.  Condit") has,  to date,  failed  to

produce any  certified proof of either a license to practice law,

or any power(s) of attorney to represent the named Defendants, in

response to  Plaintiff's three  (3) lawful  requests and  also  a

FINAL NOTICE AND DEMAND for same.

     Moreover, Plaintiff  now has  probable cause to believe that

Mr. Condit  has conspired  criminally with Defendants to embezzle

approximately $3,000  from Plaintiff.  Plaintiff hereby offers to

prove that  said sum  was used  to pay  Mr. Condit's retainer, in

whole or  in  part,  for  a  legal  services  contract  by  which

Defendants retained  Mr. Condit  to litigate a quiet title action

on their behalf in the Superior Court of Arizona state.  See Neil

T. Nordbrock  and Evelyn Nordbrock v. Ulan et al., Superior Court

of Arizona, County of Pima, case number #315580.

     As such,  Plaintiff now  has probable  cause to  charge  Mr.

Condit with  aiding and  abetting an embezzlement, and also being

in possession or control of stolen property at the present time.

     Accordingly, Plaintiff  argues that there has been no lawful

appearance by  an officer  of this  Court nor by an attorney duly

licensed to  practice law  in the State of Arizona, and there has

been no  lawful appearance by an attorney with lawful power(s) of

attorney to represent the named Defendants.


          Motion to Reconsider Minute Entry of 5/1/97:
                          Page 2 of 4


     Furthermore, Plaintiff  argues that Mr. Condit's silence has

worked a  fraud upon  Plaintiff, because  Mr. Condit's rebuttable

claim to being an officer of this Court imposes upon Mr. Condit a

legal  and  moral  obligation  to  speak,  that  is,  to  produce

credentials when  challenged.   Silence is  a fraud,  pursuant to

U.S. v.  Tweel, 550  F.2d 297,  299 (1977), and silence activates

estoppel, pursuant to Carmine v. Bowen, 64 A. 932 (1906).


                        REMEDY REQUESTED

     All premises  considered, the matter should not be taken out

of mediation;   the  matter should, instead, be modified so as to

name Mr.  Condit as  another Defendant and to order Mr. Condit to

appear separately  at the  time and  place set  for mediating the

instant matter;   or,  in the  alternative, the  matter should be

modified so  as to  order Mr. Condit to show cause why Mr. Condit

should not be named as another Defendant and appear separately at

the time and place set for mediating the instant matter


                          VERIFICATION

I, Paul  Andrew Mitchell, Sui Juris, hereby verify, under penalty

of perjury,  under the  laws of  the United  States  of  America,

without the "United States", that the above statement of fact and

law is  true and  correct, to the best of My current information,

knowledge, and  belief, so  help Me  God, pursuant  to 28  U.S.C.

1746(1).  See Supremacy Clause.


Dated:  May 7, 1997


Respectfully submitted,

/s/ Paul Andrew Mitchell
_____________________________________
Paul Andrew Mitchell, Sui Juris
Citizen of Arizona state
(expressly not a citizen of the United States)

All Rights Reserved without Prejudice


          Motion to Reconsider Minute Entry of 5/1/97:
                          Page 3 of 4


                        PROOF OF SERVICE

I, Paul Andrew Mitchell, Sui Juris, hereby certify, under penalty

of perjury,  under the  laws of  the United  States  of  America,

without the  "United States," that I am at least 18 years of age,

a Citizen  of one  of the  United States  of America,  and that I

personally served the following document(s):

                      MOTION TO RECONSIDER
                     MINUTE ENTRY OF 5/1/97

by placing one true and correct copy of said document(s) in first

class United  States Mail,  with  postage  prepaid  and  properly

addressed to the following:


Neil and Evelyn Nordbrock
c/o 6642 E. Calle de San Alberto
Tucson, Arizona state

Lawrence E. Condit
c/o 376 South Stone Avenue
Tucson, Arizona state

Dr. and Mrs. Eugene A. Burns
c/o 4500 E. Speedway, #27
Tucson, Arizona state


Executed on May 7, 1997 by:

/s/ Paul Andrew Mitchell
_____________________________________
Paul Andrew Mitchell, Sui Juris
Citizen of Arizona state
(expressly not a citizen of the United States)

All Rights Reserved without Prejudice


          Motion to Reconsider Minute Entry of 5/1/97:
                          Page 4 of 4


                             #  #  #
      


Return to Table of Contents for

Mitchell v. Nordbrock