Barbara Scott, Sui Juris c/o 2509 N. Campbell, #1776 Tucson, Arizona Republic Postal Code 85719/tdc tel: (520) 624-7220 fax: (520) 323-3922 In Propria Persona IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA People of the Arizona Republic ) No. CIV-96-150-TUC-WDB ) Ex Relatione Barbara Scott, Sui Juris,) MOTION FOR CLARIFICATION ) Plaintiffs ) OF COURT'S ORDER ) v. ) DATED MARCH 11, 1996 ) City of Tucson, Arizona, ) ) Defendant ) ______________________________________) COME NOW the People of the Arizona Republic, Ex Relatione Barbara Scott, Sui Juris, Citizen of Arizona state, proceeding In Propria Persona, to petition this honorable Court for clarification of its ORDER to dismiss the instant case. Said ORDER was issued on March 11, 1996, by United States District Judge William D. Browning, only three (3) days after the original case was filed in the United States District Court for the District of Arizona, on March 8, 1996. Plaintiffs respectfully request the Court to place into the official Court record in this case, and to serve on all interested parties with, a written clarification of its ORDER of March 11, 1996. Motion for Clarification of Court's Order: Page 1 of 3 Specifically, Plaintiffs respectfully request the Court to document, in writing, by what constitutional and statutory authority this honorable Court can dismiss Plaintiffs' PETITION FOR TEMPORARY INJUNCTION FOR VIOLATIONS OF FUNDAMENTAL HUMAN RIGHTS without notice, without motion, and without any hearing of the merits of the instant case. Plaintiffs, as Sovereigns by whom and for whom all government exists and acts, respectfully request this Court to treat this REQUEST FOR CLARIFICATION as an Order from the Sovereign to show cause why this Court did not violate the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the Americans with Disabilities Act, the Due Process and Involuntary Servitude Clauses in the Constitution for the United States of America, as lawfully amended, and two international Treaties, when it dismissed the instant case only three (3) days after its original filing date. Plaintiffs respectfully request the Court to be fully cognizant of the following United States Supreme Court authority: Sovereignty itself is, of course, not subject to law, for it is the author and source of law; but in our system, while sovereign powers are delegated to the agencies of government, sovereignty itself remains with the people, by whom and for whom all government exists and acts. And the law is the definition and limitation of power. [Yick Wo v. Hopkins, 118 U.S. 356, 370 (1886)] [emphasis added] Dated: March 14, 1996 Respectfully submitted, /s/ Barbara Scott Barbara Scott, Sui Juris In Propria Persona and Ex Relatione The People of the Arizona Republic Motion for Clarification of Court's Order: Page 2 of 3 PROOF OF SERVICE I, Paul Andrew, Mitchell, Sui Juris, hereby certify that I am at least 18 years of age, a Citizen of one of the united States of America under jus soli and jus sanguinis, and not a party to the action in the above entitled case. I served the following document(s): MOTION FOR CLARIFICATION OF COURT'S ORDER DATED MARCH 11, 1996 by placing one copy of each in first-class U.S. Mail, with postage prepaid and properly addressed to the following recipient(s): City Attorney City of Tucson 255 West Alameda Tucson, Arizona 85701 Date of Service: March 14, 1996 /s/ Paul Andrew Mitchell Paul Andrew, Mitchell, Sui Juris Citizen of one of the United States of America de jure soli and de jure sanguinis on behalf of the People of the Arizona Republic All Rights Reserved without Prejudice Motion for Clarification of Court's Order: Page 3 of 3 # # #
Return to Table of Contents for
People v. Tucson