Paul Andrew Mitchell <>

Private Attorney General discloses DOJ and DHS corruption

to Sheriff Joe Arpaio, Maricopa County, Arizona, USA

Paul Andrew Mitchell <>

Tue, Dec 20, 2011 at 11:27 AM



---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Paul Andrew Mitchell <>
Date: Tue, Dec 20, 2011 at 11:17 AM
Subject: Private Attorney General discloses DOJ and DHS corruption to Sheriff Joe Arpaio, Maricopa County, Arizona, USA
To:  (bouncing)

Greetings Sheriff Arpaio, Deputy Sheriffs and All Staff:

Please allow us to itemize for your official consideration
a small sampling of reasons why the U.S. Department of Justice
and Department of Homeland Security are corrupt and
motivated to retaliate corruptly against your office:

(1)  our ongoing investigation of missing credentials required of
all Federal government officers has confirmed that counterfeit
circulating widely among recently hired Federal "employees";
see 5 U.S.C. sections 2903, 2906 and 3331:

(2)  that "bootleg" form is a counterfeit because it lacks the OMB control number
that is absolutely required by the Paperwork Reduction Act ("PRA");
it also lacks
the paragraph at the bottom which cites 5 U.S.C. 2903 supra
defining the persons who are authorized to administer Standard Form 61 ("SF-61");
in such cases, the Public Protection Clause of that PRA is rather explicit:  (b)

(b) The protection provided by this section may be raised in the form of a

complete defense, bar, or otherwise at any time

during the agency administrative process or judicial action applicable thereto.

(3)  in line with our ongoing investigation described above,
you are hereby formally notified that the SF-61 APPOINTMENT AFFIDAVITS
for Eric H. Holder, Jr. are also fatally defective, for the same reasons:

Here are our original Freedom of Information Act ("FOIA") Requests for Holder's SF-61:

In addition to the counterfeit credential above, the related correspondence we received
is archived here:

Accordingly, the existence of valid credentials for Eric H. Holder, Jr.
assumes facts not in evidence and, therefore, he is not and cannot be
a duly authorized Attorney General of the United States, nor can he
as such delegate any authority to any subordinates within DOJ.

(Frankly, I have more authority than he does at present.

See 18 U.S.C. 1964;  Rotella v. Wood.)

(4)  Janet Napolitano has already been charged with multiple Federal offenses
in connection with a Federal Grand Jury "subpoena" which the late
U.S. District Judge John M. Roll authorized my office to litigate
in defense
of the Arizona trust which had been served with same:

[begin excerpt]

Ms. Janet Napolitano with:


(1)  aiding  and   abetting  the  obstruction  of  correspondence

     transmitted  via  first  class,  certified,  and  registered

     United States  mail, under  color of law, in violation of 18

     U.S.C. 2 and 1702 (twenty-five (25) counts);


(2)  aiding and  abetting the  act of  tampering with  a  federal

     grand jury,  in violation  of 18  U.S.C. 2 and 1512 (twenty-

     five (25) counts);


(3)  aiding and  abetting obstruction of criminal investigations,

     in violation  of 18  U.S.C. 2  and  1510  (twenty-five  (25)


(4)  deprivation  of  fundamental  Rights  under  color  of  law,

     specifically the  Right  to  Petition  a  lawfully  convened

     federal grand  jury for a formal investigation, in violation

     of 18 U.S.C. 242 (twenty-five (25) counts);


(5)  conspiracy to  commit all  of the  above, in violation of 18

     U.S.C. 241 and 371 (twenty-five (25) counts);


(6)  impersonating an  officer of the United States, in violation

     of 5 U.S.C. 3331 and 18 U.S.C. 912 (one (1) count each).


[end excerpt]

We also have reasons strongly to suspect that Ms. Napolitano was also complicit
for failing to do anything but obstruct and stonewall our part-time investigation into the
whereabouts of 2,500 missing children -- and young adults -- who had reportedly
into Arizona's Child Protective Services:

(cf. 42 U.S.C. 1986:  action for neglect to prevent and/or failure to remedy)

(5)  lastly, and arguably of equal or greater severity, for many years DOJ
has been commencing ALL civil and criminal lawsuits in the U.S. District Courts
on behalf of one or the other of 2 defunct Delaware corporations named
"UNITED STATES OF AMERICA" [sic];  when we brought this fact to the
attention of the Delaware Secretary of State, both corporate charters
were promptly REVOKED!

We recommend that you make official contact with the Arizona Secretary of State
to confirm that neither defunct corporation has ever registered to do business
inside the State of Arizona, as we have already confirmed with the
Secretaries of State for California and several other large States of the Union:  (e.g. New York State = the heart of "The Conspiracy")

We elaborate the all important differences between the "United States"
and the "United States of America" here:
(read "NOT a corporation":  U.S. v. Cooper Corp.)

If we can be of any further assistance to your offices in this matter,
please direct one of your capable Staff to initiate contact with me here, via email,
and we can take it from there.

We are standing by, Sheriff Arpaio.

Bcc:  Arizona Attorney General, Crime, Fraud and Victim Resource Center






Sincerely yours,
/s/ Paul Andrew Mitchell, B.A., M.S.
Private Attorney General, 18 U.S.C. 1964 (Home Page) (Support Policy) (Client Guidelines) (Policy + Guidelines)

All Rights Reserved without Prejudice