Ramona Kaye Simons, Sui Juris

4620 South Washington Road

Saginaw 48601

MICHIGAN, USA

989-777-6869

 

In Propria Persona

 

All Rights Reserved

Without Prejudice

 

 

 

 

 

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 

SIXTH CIRCUIT

 

Ramona Kaye Simons,                      Appeal Case No. 05-2460

 

     Plaintiff/Appellant                 APPELLANT’S NOTICE OF MOTION

                                         AND MOTION FOR THREE

                                         ORDERS TO SHOW CAUSE:

     v.                                  Article III;  FRAP Rule 44;

                                          5 U.S.C. §§ 2906, 3331;

                                         28 U.S.C. §§ 453, 955, 1291,

                                          1292, 1654, 1691, 1746(1),

Credit-Based Assets Servicing             2072; and Seventh Amendment.

and Securitization et al.,

 

     Respondents/Defendants/Appellees.

______________________________________/

 

COMES NOW the Appellant Ramona Kaye Simons, to petition this honorable Court for three (3) ORDERS TO SHOW CAUSE, and to provide formal NOTICE to all interested parties of same.

By way of introducing the three ORDERS TO SHOW CAUSE respectfully requested herein, Appellant wishes to stress timely that evidence of extensive infiltration of the federal judiciary has already been certified and filed in the instant appeal, without verified rebuttal.

Now, federal causes of action have arisen necessarily from proper and timely FOIA requests, in addition to an outstanding SUBPOENA IN A CIVIL CASE, issued by a DCUS, that remains unanswered to this day.

Accordingly, in honor of Article III in the Constitution for the United States of America, as lawfully amended, Appellant formally petitions this honorable Court of Appeals for three (3) separate but related ORDERS TO SHOW CAUSE, itemized as follows:

 

(1)           to the Administrative Office of the United States Courts in Washington, D.C., to show cause why all personnel should not be held in contempt of the outstanding SUBPOENA IN A CIVIL CASE now archived in the Supreme Law Library on the Internet here:

http://www.supremelaw.org/cc/aouscourts/

Courtesy copies of said SUBPOENA are attached hereto and incorporated by reference, as if set forth fully here.

 

(2)           to all Clerks and Deputy Clerks currently employed by the Federal District Court located in Bay City, Michigan State, to show cause why all required APPOINTMENT AFFIDAVIT(s) are not currently in their legal custody, as required by the statutes at 5 U.S.C. 2906 and 3331, including also the APPOINTMENT AFFIDAVITS required by same of all Clerks and Deputy Clerks currently employed there:

http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/5/2906.html

http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/5/3331.html

 

(3)  to Mr. Richard Welke, Counsel of record, to show cause why he should not be held in contempt of currently standing decisions of the Supreme Court of the United States, which have now been duly cited and quoted correctly in proper context by Appellant in the instant appeal;  and, to show cause also why sanctions should not be imposed by this Court upon Mr. Welke for repeatedly describing said decisions as “frivolous” [sic].  See U.S. v. Mason, 412 U.S. 391, 399-400 (1973) (re: meaning of “stare decisis”).

 

REMEDY REQUESTED

All premises having been duly considered, Appellant respectfully moves this honorable Court of Appeals to command the Circuit Clerk to issue and serve the three (3) ORDERS TO SHOW CAUSE as itemized above, with all deliberate speed.

Thank you very much for your professional consideration in this historic matter.

 

VERIFICATION

I, Ramona Kaye Simons, Sui Juris, hereby verify, under penalty of the perjury, under the laws of the United States of America, without the “United States” (federal government), that the above statement of facts and laws is true and correct, according to the best of My current information, knowledge, and belief, so help me God, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1746(1).  See Supremacy Clause (Constitution, Laws and Treaties are all the supreme Law of the Land).

 

Dated:    January ____ 2006

 

 

 

Signed:   _______________________________________/

Printed:  Ramona Kaye Simons, Appellant Sui Juris


PROOF OF SERVICE

I, Ramona Kaye Simons, Sui Juris, hereby certify, under penalty of perjury, under the laws of the United States of America, without the “United States” (federal government), that I am at least 18 years of age, a Citizen of ONE OF the United States of America, and that I personally served the following document(s):

 

APPELLANT’S NOTICE OF MOTION

AND MOTION FOR THREE ORDERS TO SHOW CAUSE:

Article III:  FRAP Rule 44;

5 U.S.C. §§ 2906, 3331;

28 U.S.C. §§ 453, 955, 1291, 1292, 1654, 1691, 1746(1), 2072;

and Seventh Amendment

by placing one true and correct copy of said document(s) in first class United States Mail, with postage prepaid and properly addressed to the following:

 

Leonard Green, Clerk of Court  (5x)

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

532 Potter Stewart U.S. Courthouses

100 East Fifth Street

Cincinnati 45202-3988

OHIO, USA

 

Office of the Director  (2x)

Administrative Office of the U.S. Courts

One Columbus Circle, N.E.

Washington 20544

DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, USA

 

Clerk of Court  (2x)

District Court of the United States

Eastern Judicial District of Michigan

Northern Division

1000 Washington Ave., Room 214

Bay City 48706

MICHIGAN, USA

 

Richard Welke  (3x)

Trott & Trott

Attorney for C-BASS and Litton Loan

30400 Telegraph Road, Suite 200

Bingham Farms 48025

MICHIGAN, USA

 

 

Dated:    January ____ 2006

 

 

 

Signed:   _______________________________________/

Printed:  Ramona Kaye Simons, Appellant Sui Juris

 

[Please see USPS Publication #221 for addressing instructions:

http://www.supremelaw.org/rsrc/uspsdocs/pb221.pdf]