Quoting:

>  We do not give out copies of the Oath or Registration cards to the public.

We are not required to supply this information

as we are not subject to the California Public Records Act.

The State Bar of California is a constitutional entity

established in the judicial branch of state government.

The claim that The State Bar of California is not subject to the
Public Records Act may be correct IF the State Bar is established
in the judicial branch of the California State government.

HOWEVER ...
Ms. Lambert cited no authority(s) for that claim;  and,
the latter claims are also fraudulent, because they fail to disclose that
The State Bar of California was served with a SUBPOENA IN A CIVIL CASE,
and they are now PAST DUE and also IN DEFAULT by failing to answer
that SUBPOENA:

http://www.supremelaw.org/cc/statebar/


"Fraud"  noun  a failure to disclose what should have been disclosed.


Moreover, by claiming that The State Bar is established in the judicial branch
of the State government, that necessarily implies that its officers must also
execute a valid OATH OF OFFICE as required by 4 U.S.C. 101 and
by the Oath of Office Clause in the U.S. Constitution.

Therefore, you would do well to DEMAND the Oath of Office for:
Kathan Lambert, Senior Administrative Supervisor, Member Services Center.

And, you should also REFUSE her letter dated October 15, 2012,
because it failed to disclose the SUBPOENA discussed above
and the fact that The State Bar are now IN DEFAULT and IN CONTEMPT
of said SUBPOENA.


>  All California attorneys take the same oath in order to be admitted to the State Bar of California.

The latter claim is very misleading, because it confuses law and fact:
drivers are required to stop for red lights, but that does not mean
that all drivers do stop for red lights.

Yes, CBPC section 6067 requires certain things of all California attorneys,
BUT that law does not mean that all California attorneys have complied!!

It is much more accurate to state that all California attorneys are required
to take the same oath in order to be admitted to the State Bar of California;
moreover, section 6067 also requires that they indorse a CERTIFICATE OF OATH
on the back ("in dorso" in Latin).

It is the latter requirement for which we are demanding PROOF of compliance,
as elaborated in this pleading:

http://www.supremelaw.org/cc/aol/contest.ehlers.htm

cf.  "Certificate" as legally defined in Black's Law Dictionary
e.g. birth certificate, stock certificate, certificate of authenticity, etc.

 

--
Sincerely yours,
/s/ Paul Andrew Mitchell, B.A., M.S.
Private Attorney General, 18 U.S.C. 1964
http://www.supremelaw.org/decs/agency/private.attorney.general.htm
http://www.supremelaw.org/reading.list.htm
http://www.supremelaw.org/index.htm (Home Page)
http://www.supremelaw.org/support.policy.htm (Support Policy)
http://www.supremelaw.org/guidelines.htm (Client Guidelines)
http://www.supremelaw.org/support.guidelines.htm (Policy + Guidelines)

All Rights Reserved without Prejudice