Gmail

Paul Andrew Mitchell <supremelawfirm@gmail.com>


Please Forward to Rep. Burchett re: COURTESY REMINDER: Routine Request to Inspect license to practice law in the State of California


Paul Andrew Mitchell, B.A., M.S. <supremelawfirm@gmail.com>

Fri, Jun 20, 2025 at 3:51 PM

To:  GreenandGold@mail.house.gov

Cc:  jennifer.linginfelter@mail.house.gov, Sarah.Fansler@mail.house.gov, communications@mail.whitehouse.gov

 

Re:  Section 6064, California Business and Professions Code:

"A certificate of admission thereupon shall be given to the applicant by the clerk of the court."

 

 

Greetings Rep. Burchett:

 

Please add all of the following as a supplement to our

recent unsolicited proposal for new Federal legislation

governing all 50 State BAR and 1 D.C. BAR organizations.

 

We have still not received any reply(s) from Yvette D. Roland,

dba Hearing Judge in the matter of Dr. John C. Eastman.

 

That Section 6064 makes it very clear that "licensees"

are the legal custodians of their certificates of admission,

NOT The State Bar of California.

 

We asked 3 x AI software programs the same question;

see also an unsigned email message received today from 

The State Bar of California, appended below:

 

[BEGIN QUOTES]

 

 

ChatGPT

Q:  is a "certificate of admission" to The State Bar of California subject to the Public Records Act?

Yes, a "certificate of admission" to The State Bar of California is generally considered a public record and is subject to disclosure under the California Public Records Act (CPRA).

Here's why:

1.   Public Agency:  The State Bar of California is a public corporation within the judicial branch of state government and is subject to the CPRA (Government Code § 6250 et seq.).

2.   Public Records Defined:  Under the CPRA, public records include "any writing containing information relating to the conduct of the public’s business prepared, owned, used, or retained by any state or local agency regardless of physical form or characteristics" (Gov. Code § 6252(e)).

3.   State Bar Records Are Public Unless Exempt:  The State Bar must disclose records unless they fall under a specific exemption. A certificate of admission, which confirms a person’s status as a licensed attorney, is not exempt under the CPRA.

4.   Attorney Admission Status Is Public:  The State Bar already publicly provides attorney admission status, bar number, and date of admission through its attorney search portal. This indicates that such information is considered public.

5.   Case Law and Precedent:  Courts have generally upheld that professional licensing information maintained by public agencies (including the State Bar) is public, unless it involves sensitive personal data (like home addresses or SSNs).

Conclusion:

Yes, a certificate of admission to The State Bar of California is subject to the CPRA and may be requested by the public, though certain personal details may be redacted to protect privacy.

If you’re planning to request such a document, let me know and I can help you draft a CPRA request.

 

 

Gemini

Q:  is a "certificate of admission" to The State Bar of California subject to the Public Records Act?

Yes, the State Bar of California is generally subject to the California Public Records Act (CPRA). California Business and Professions Code section 6026.11 explicitly states that "The State Bar is subject to the California Public Records Act (Division 10 (commencing with Section 7920.000) of Title 1 of the Government Code) and all public records and writings of the State Bar are subject to the California Public Records Act."12

However, there are exemptions to the CPRA, and some types of records are specifically protected from disclosure.3 A "certificate of admission" itself, as a document verifying an attorney's admission to practice, contains publicly available information such as the attorney's name, bar number, and admission date. This information is typically searchable through the State Bar's online Attorney Search tool.

Records related to the process of admission, especially those that "may identify an individual applicant," are often exempt.4 For example:

  • Applicant Information:  Business and Professions Code section 6060.25 exempts certain State Bar records containing data that "may identify an individual applicant" from CPRA disclosure.5 This was a key point in the Sander v. State Bar of California case, which affirmed that the State Bar was not required to disclose individual-level applicant data (like race, law school, GPAs) if doing so would require creating new records or would violate applicant privacy.
  • Moral Character Records:  Investigations or proceedings concerning the moral character of an applicant are confidential unless the applicant waives confidentiality.6
  • Test Administration Records:  These are also generally exempt.

While the fact of admission and basic identifying details (name, bar number, admission date) are public, the underlying confidential information related to the application and examination process is generally protected.

Therefore, while the existence of a "certificate of admission" and the core information on it are public, the application materials and sensitive data that led to that admission are largely protected by CPRA exemptions.

 

 

Claude.ai

Q:  is a "certificate of admission" to The State Bar of California subject to the Public Records Act?

Let me search for more specific information about State Bar records and the Public Records Act. Based on my research, a certificate of admission to the State Bar of California would likely be subject to the California Public Records Act (CPRA), but with some important nuances.

The State Bar of California is a public corporation that acts as the administrative arm of the California Supreme Court in matters involving the admission, regulation, and discipline of attorneys. As a public entity, the State Bar is generally subject to the California Public Records Act.

However, there are specific protections for certain bar admission information. The State Bar is prohibited from disclosing any identifying information submitted by an applicant for admission and provides that all such information is protected, according to legislation that addresses bar admission disclosures.

The distinction likely lies in what type of "certificate of admission" you're referring to:

1.   Individual admission certificates issued to attorneys upon admission would likely contain public information, as attorney admission status is generally public record -- you can search for attorney licenses on the State Bar's website.

2.   Application materials and supporting documents submitted during the admission process would likely be protected from disclosure under specific statutory protections for applicant information.

3.   The fact of admission itself (that someone was admitted as an attorney) appears to be public information, as this is searchable through the State Bar's public attorney search function.

For a definitive answer about a specific certificate, you would need to submit a formal Public Records Act request to the State Bar, as they maintain a public records portal specifically for such requests. The State Bar would then make the determination about what portions, if any, are subject to disclosure versus protected by specific statutory exemptions.

[END QUOTES]

 

 

Sincerely yours,

/s/ Paul, Relator / Damaged Party

All Rights Reserved

 

 

---------- Forwarded message ---------
From: StateBarCourt <StateBarCourt@statebarcourt.ca.gov>
Date: Fri, Jun 20, 2025 at 2:34 PM
Subject: RE: COURTESY REMINDER: Routine Request to Inspect license to practice law in the State of California
To: Paul Andrew Mitchell, B.A., M.S. <supremelawfirm@gmail.com>

 

Thank you for your inquiry.

 

The State Bar Court can only provide you with State Bar Court case records.

 

If you wish to request copies of State Bar Court case records,

please follow the instructions linked here:

 

https://www.statebarcourt.ca.gov/Public-Records-Information

 

For other information, including license status of an attorney,

you may wish to use the Attorney Search function on the State Bar website,

or you can contact the State Bar.

 

Yours,

State Bar Court

 

 

From: Paul Andrew Mitchell, B.A., M.S. <supremelawfirm@gmail.com>
Sent: Friday, June 20, 2025 8:12 AM
To: StateBarCourt <StateBarCourt@statebarcourt.ca.gov>
Cc: ExecutiveDirector <ExecutiveDirector@calbar.ca.gov>; merrill.balassone@jud.ca.gov; blaine.corren@jud.ca.gov
Subject: COURTESY REMINDER: Routine Request to Inspect license to practice law in the State of California

 

CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.

 

June 14 + 10  =  June 24, 2025 A.D.

 

 

---------- Forwarded message ---------
From: Paul Andrew Mitchell, B.A., M.S. <supremelawfirm@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, Jun 17, 2025 at 12:54 PM
Subject: Re: Routine Request to Inspect license to practice law in the State of California
To: <ExecutiveDirector@calbar.ca.gov>
Cc: Hon. Yvette D. Roland c/o <statebarcourt@statebarcourt.ca.gov>

 

Greetings Executive Director:

 

Please acknowledge receipt of our routine request below.

 

See also Business and Professions Code section 6064:

"A certificate of admission thereupon shall be given to the applicant by the clerk of the court."

 

We infer from the latter that all registered "members" are

the legal custodians of their own certificates of admission,

designated as such by section 6064 supra.

 

Also, we have been unsuccessful locating a valid email address

for the Clerk of the California Supreme Court, which prevents

us from forwarding a copy of the following to that Supreme Court.

 

Thank you for your professional consideration.

 

/s/ Paul, Relator / Damaged Party

 

All Rights Reserved

 

---------- Forwarded message ---------
From: Paul Andrew Mitchell, B.A., M.S. <supremelawfirm@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, Jun 14, 2025 at 5:20 PM
Subject: Routine Request to Inspect license to practice law in the State of California
To: Hon. Yvette D. Roland c/o <statebarcourt@statebarcourt.ca.gov>

 

Routine Request to Inspect license to practice law in the State of California

 

TO:  Hon. Yvette D. Roland, Hearing Judge, The State Bar Court of California, SBN 120311
https://apps.calbar.ca.gov/attorney/Licensee/Detail/120311

Admitted:  12/10/1985

 

Greetings Your Honor:

 

Please reply within ten (10) calendar days with a true and correct electronic copy

of your license to practice law in the State of California, for purposes of

routine inspection and compliance with applicable laws and regulations:

 

 

Thank you for your timely consideration.

 

 

Bcc:  U.S. Department of Justice, c/o Deputy Attorney General

 

--

Sincerely yours,
/s/ Paul Andrew Mitchell, B.A., M.S., Relator / Damaged Party
Private Attorney General, Civil RICO:  18 U.S.C. 1964;

Agent of the United States as Qui Tam Relator (4X),

Federal Civil False Claims Act:  31 U.S.C. 3729 et seq.


All Rights Reserved ( cf. UCC 1-308 https://www.law.cornell.edu/ucc/1/1-308 )

 

--