Gmail

Paul Andrew Mitchell <supremelawfirm@gmail.com>

COURTESY REMINDER: Routine Request to Inspect license to practice law in the State of California

Paul Andrew Mitchell, B.A., M.S. <supremelawfirm@gmail.com>

Sat, Jun 21, 2025 at 9:09 AM

To:  "Hon. Yvette D. Roland c/o" <StateBarCourt@statebarcourt.ca.gov>

Cc:  "Hon. Yvette D. Roland c/o" <ExecutiveDirector@calbar.ca.gov>

Bcc:  

 

REFUSED FOR CAUSES AND RETURNED TO SENDER:

 

TO:  "State Bar Court" 

 

We regret to inform you that we must refuse your anonymous email reply below,

for reasons including but not limited to the following:

 

(1)  We do not accept anonymous email messages;

all written communications sent to us must identify the sender(s);

 

(2)  We have no need to request any "case records" because

we already have documentation for one case in question;

 

(3)  Your anonymous email message below made no mention

whatsoever of Business and Professions Code section 6064:

 

 

(4)  Although repeating the key sentence in that section should not be necessary,

certainly not to legal professionals who are required to maintain knowledge of the law,

said section 6064 states in pertinent part:

 

"A certificate of admission thereupon shall be given to the applicant by the clerk of the court."

 

(5)  Also, section 6067 states in pertinent part:

 

 

"A certificate of the oath shall be indorsed upon his license."

 

(6)  Our good faith search for applicable definitions of the term "license"

discovered the Act of February 19, 1851, in which Sec. 3 states

in pertinent part:

 

"certificate shall be his license"

 

(7)  The margin note adjacent to that Sec. 3 clarifies as follows:

 

"Certificates of admission."

 

(8)  Consequently, we believe it is entirely and legally correct

to equate "license" with "certificate of admission" in all

current provisions of the State Bar Act, unless otherwise

expressly defined;

 

(9)  We infer from all the above that the Clerk of the California Supreme Court

is not the designated legal custodian of "certificates of admission"

after said certificates "shall be given" to licensees;

 

(10)  We infer from all the above that the State Bar Court is also 

not the designated legal custodian of "certificates of admission"

after said certificates "shall be given" to licensees;

 

(11)  We infer from all the above that The State Bar of California is also

not the designated legal custodian of "certificates of admission"

after said certificates "shall be given" to licensees;

 

(12)  We further conclude from all the above that Ms. Yvette D. Roland

must be the legal custodian of a valid "license", aka "certificate of admission"

and "certificate of the oath", designated as such by sections including

but not limited to 6064 and 6067 in the State Bar Act;

 

(13)  Other relevant California State laws also require 

authorized officials to administer all oath(s) required 

of all such licensees;  this requirement is also true

of current administrative procedures for admission

of licensees;

 

(14)  A proper inspection of all "certificates of the oath"

duly "indorsed" upon all licenses to practice law

requires correct identification of the licensee and

the authorized official administering that licensee's oath;

 

(15)  Failure to disclose all information required

to perform a routine inspection of all such

licenses to practice law may constitute probable cause

of withholding evidence, violating Penal Code section 153

if not also other applicable California State laws and regulations;

 

(16)  Moreover, applicable case law has clearly held that

without taking the required oath, such an individual 

is without authority to act, all acts as such are void, and

such an individual cannot become a judge either de jure

or de facto.  [cites omitted here].

 

 

Your anonymous email message below is hereby refused for causes supra

and returned to sender.

 

 

Cc:  Ms. Yvette D. Roland, dba Hearing Judge  (no available email address)

 

Bcc:  U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, D.C.

 

 

Sincerely yours,
/s/ Paul Andrew Mitchell, B.A., M.S., Relator / Damaged Party
Private Attorney General, Civil RICO:  18 U.S.C. 1964;

Agent of the United States as Qui Tam Relator (4X),

Federal Civil False Claims Act:  31 U.S.C. 3729 et seq.


All Rights Reserved ( cf. UCC 1-308 https://www.law.cornell.edu/ucc/1/1-308 )

 

On Fri, Jun 20, 2025 at 2:34 PM StateBarCourt <StateBarCourt@statebarcourt.ca.gov> wrote:

 

Thank you for your inquiry. 

 

The State Bar Court can only provide you with State Bar Court case records.  If you wish to request copies of State Bar Court case records, please follow the instructions linked here:  https://www.statebarcourt.ca.gov/Public-Records-Information 

 

For other information, including license status of an attorney, you may wish to  use the Attorney Search function on the State Bar website, or you can contact the State Bar.

 

Yours,

State Bar Court

 

 

From: Paul Andrew Mitchell, B.A., M.S. <supremelawfirm@gmail.com>
Sent: Friday, June 20, 2025 8:12 AM
To: StateBarCourt <StateBarCourt@statebarcourt.ca.gov>
Cc: ExecutiveDirector <ExecutiveDirector@calbar.ca.gov>; merrill.balassone@jud.ca.gov; blaine.corren@jud.ca.gov
Subject: COURTESY REMINDER: Routine Request to Inspect license to practice law in the State of California

 

CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.

 

June 14 + 10  =  June 24, 2025 A.D.

 

 

---------- Forwarded message ---------
From: Paul Andrew Mitchell, B.A., M.S. <supremelawfirm@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, Jun 17, 2025 at 12:54 PM
Subject: Re: Routine Request to Inspect license to practice law in the State of California
To: <ExecutiveDirector@calbar.ca.gov>
Cc: Hon. Yvette D. Roland c/o <statebarcourt@statebarcourt.ca.gov>

 

Greetings Executive Director:

 

Please acknowledge receipt of our routine request below.

 

See also Business and Professions Code section 6064:

"A certificate of admission thereupon shall be given to the applicant by the clerk of the court."

 

We infer from the latter that all registered "members" are

the legal custodians of their own certificates of admission,

designated as such by section 6064 supra.

 

Also, we have been unsuccessful locating a valid email address

for the Clerk of the California Supreme Court, which prevents

us from forwarding a copy of the following to that Supreme Court.

 

Thank you for your professional consideration.

 

/s/ Paul, Relator / Damaged Party

 

All Rights Reserved

 

 

---------- Forwarded message ---------
From: Paul Andrew Mitchell, B.A., M.S. <supremelawfirm@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, Jun 14, 2025 at 5:20 PM
Subject: Routine Request to Inspect license to practice law in the State of California
To: Hon. Yvette D. Roland c/o <statebarcourt@statebarcourt.ca.gov>

 

Routine Request to Inspect license to practice law in the State of California

 

TO:  Hon. Yvette D. Roland, Hearing Judge, The State Bar Court of California, SBN 120311
https://apps.calbar.ca.gov/attorney/Licensee/Detail/120311

Admitted:  12/10/1985

 

Greetings Your Honor:

 

Please reply within ten (10) calendar days with a true and correct electronic copy

of your license to practice law in the State of California, for purposes of

routine inspection and compliance with applicable laws and regulations:

 

 

Thank you for your timely consideration.

 

 

Bcc:  U.S. Department of Justice, c/o Deputy Attorney General

 

--

Sincerely yours,
/s/ Paul Andrew Mitchell, B.A., M.S., Relator / Damaged Party
Private Attorney General, Civil RICO:  18 U.S.C. 1964;

Agent of the United States as Qui Tam Relator (4X),

Federal Civil False Claims Act:  31 U.S.C. 3729 et seq.


All Rights Reserved ( cf. UCC 1-308 https://www.law.cornell.edu/ucc/1/1-308 )

 

--