MEMO in reply to Sacramento County Grand Jury

MEMO

TO: Sacramento County Grand Jury

720 Ninth Street, Room 611

Sacramento 95814

CALIFORNIA, USA

FROM: Paul Andrew Mitchell, B.A., M.S.

Private Attorney General

DATE: September 3, 2005 A.D.

SUBJECT: widespread violations of the State Bar Act

by members of The State Bar of California

The letter dated September 1, 2005 A.D. from Mr. Anthony S. Da Vigo convinces me that all of you must be getting more false and misleading legal “advice”.

The attorneys in question have no licenses to practice law.

The requirements for licenses to practice law are spelled out in section 6067 of the California Business and Professions Code (see attached).

“Bar Cards” merely contain a certificate that the Bar member has paid his or her dues; they do not comply even minimally with the requirements imposed by section 6067 –- neither in form, nor in substance.

Willful misrepresentation and deceiving any party are misdemeanor crimes. See sections 6126 and 6128 of the State Bar Act.

And, grand juries certainly have jurisdiction over anyone who commits such crimes within the boundaries of their counties. For example, see California Penal Code section 917 et seq.:

The grand jury may inquire into all public offenses committed or triable within the county and present them to the court by indictment.

Furthermore, being a member of The State Bar for at least 5 full years is a statutory requirement for eligibility to the office of United States magistrate.

Therefore, downtown Sacramento appears to be crawling with impostors who are committing fraudulent concealment, mail fraud and impersonation on a daily basis, in your very same building, no less!

I’ve also enclosed a list of itemized reasons why the Sacramento County Grand Jury has jurisdiction to conduct a diligent investigation of the organized crimes being perpetrated by these impostors.

For all of the reasons stated above, your letter is not an acceptable reply, and it is hereby refused for being flatly wrong.

Can it be that your panel is also infiltrated for purposes of aiding and abetting the widespread conspiracy which I have now established with evidence constituting probable cause?

If true, this is certainly not very good news about your panel.

Sincerely yours,

/s/ Paul Andrew Mitchell

Paul Andrew Mitchell, B.A., M.S.

Private Attorney General, Criminal Investigator and

Federal Witness: 18 U.S.C. 1510, 1512-13, 1964(a)

http://www.supremelaw.org/decs/agency/private.attorney.general.htm