ELECTRONIC LEGAL NOTICE
TO:
Kenneth R. Stone
UNlicensed ATTORNey
c/o Hefner Stark
& Marois
2150 River Plaza Drive, Suite 450
Sacramento
95833-3883
CALIFORNIA, USA
Mr. Stone:
I regret to inform you that you are now under
formal investigation on
suspicion of mail fraud,
defamation per se, witness retaliation,
obstruction
of justice, and racketeering, to name a few.
See 18 U.S.C.
1961 et seq.
Your letter to me, dated June 20, 2005, is hereby
refused for fraud and
all of the above.
No one in your law firm has produced any evidence
of the certificate of
oath which each member must
indorse upon his license to practice law, as
expressly
required by section 6067 of the State Bar Act:
Therefore, all are now in violation of sections 6126,
6127 and
6128:
You do know how to read, don't you?
You compound your crimes, Mr. Stone, by propagating
another vicious lie
that feudal personnel in the USDC in
downtown Sacramento had any jurisdiction
over the
matter of my Civil RICO case #GIC807057 as filed
in the Superior
Court of California. See:
Ms. Gonzalez and Messrs. Drozd, Shubb and England
have all been formally
charged with multiple felony
federal offenses, and proper CITIZEN'S ARREST
WARRANTs
have also been issued for the apprehension of same,
in addition
to Jack L. Wagner. See 5 U.S.C. 2906,
for example (clerk is legal
custodian of all missing
Appointment Affidavits imposed by 5 U.S.C.
3331).
State courts have original jurisdiction of Civil RICO
actions.
And, all of the defense counsels who attempted
to appear in that case, also
did so withOUT the licenses
to practice law required by section 6067.
Therefore,
none had any powers of attorney to file any answers
or
responsive pleadings whatsoever:
Therefore, any so-called "orders" allegedly issued by those
named
Defendants are obviously bogus: named defendants
have no authority to
dismiss the cases filed against them.
Perhaps you might wish to return to Lie School,
to confirm this
obvious point (it's called "conflict of interest,"
Mr. Stone, not "due process". See 28 U.S.C. 455.)
A federal SUBPOENA IN A CIVIL CASE is now outstanding for
all licenses
of all State Bar members going back ten years;
the State Bar's failure to
answer necessarily also implicates you
now for having failed to comply with
sections 6067 and 6068
during the period in question:
And, as you know or should know, a separate SUBPOENA
was issued and
served upon Mr. Giberson in your office
by the Clerk of the Solano County
Superior Court.
The record in that case contains extensive evidence
proving that Mr.
Giberson prefers lies and fraud
over obedience to California State laws, just
like you.
The State Bar has not denied our claims: on the contrary,
they
have replied with letters attempting to certify that
one or the other
UNlicensed attorney is a Bar "member".
However, after we explained the meaning and legislative
intent of
controlling terms used in sections 6067 and 6068,
their staff fell silent, as
they have also done in the
matter of Mr. Giberson's missing license.
And, their staff
have also refused to produce the Oaths of Office
required
by 4 U.S.C. 101. These acts also implicate the the
State
Bar as accessories, if not also as principals, in racketeering.
18 U.S.C. 2, 3, 4, 912, 1001, 1341, 1951, 1962.
You do need to reply to our Notices, because my office
represents the
People of California State in an ongoing
statewide investigation of
impersonation and infiltration
of the federal courts, by people like you who
snub your
noses at State laws, while hypocritically requiring
your victims
strictly to obey all of those laws:
Finally, this message will also serve to notify you that
you are now in
default, for having failed to obey sections
6067 and 6068 of the State Bar
Act, and for violating
sections 6126 (misdemeanor), 6127 (contempt of
court)
and 6128 (misdemeanor), in addition to 18 U.S.C. 1962.
You didn't obey 6067 when you joined the Bar, and now
you have refused to cure your omission at any time after
that law was placed right before your eyes.
You are a vicious liar, Mr. Stone, and I will repeat
this to your face,
as soon as I get the chance to do so.
Competent law enforcement authorities will receive a
courtesy copy of
this message.
All Rights Reserved without Prejudice
hard copy: via U.S. Mail
