Donald E. Wishart, Sui Juris

Citizen of California State

and Federal Witness

c/o 5150 Graves Avenue, Suite 12-C

San Jose [ZIP code exempt]

CALIFORNIA, USA

 

In Propria Persona

 

All Rights Reserved

without Prejudice

 

 

 

 

DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

 

NORTHERN JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

 

 

Donald E. Wishart,         )   Case No. CR-00-20227-JF

                           )

          Cross-Plaintiff, )   VERIFIED CROSS-COMPLAINT FOR

     v.                    )   DECLARATORY AND INJUNCTIVE RELIEF

                           )   AND MONETARY DAMAGES:

United States,             )   18 U.S.C. 241, 242, 1512, 1513,

Billy Brown,               )      1962, 1964(a), 3231 and 3691;

Paul Camacho,              )   28 U.S.C. 1331, 1346(a)(1), 1746,

Don Hallenbeck,            )      2201, and 2202

Mel Steiner,               )

Dan Sutherland,            )

Colbert Tang,              )   JURY TRIAL DEMANDED:

Brian Watson,              )

Ken Whitmore,              )   Arising Under Clause;

Bay View Federal Bank,     )   Supremacy Clause;

and Does 1 thru 100,       )   First Amendment;

                           )   Fifth Amendment;  and,

          Cross-Defendants.)   Seventh Amendment.

 

 

This is a civil action for declaratory and injunctive relief, and for monetary damages, arising under the Constitution, Laws, and Treaties of the United States, specifically for numerous violations of 18 U.S.C. 242, 241, 1962, and other criminal statutes specified infra.  Cross-Plaintiff hereby petitions this honorable Court for declaratory and injunctive relief, and monetary damages to be awarded by jury verdict.  Proceeding in His Proper Person, Cross-Plaintiff timely demands trial by a jury lawfully convened.  See Seventh Amendment.

 

JURISDICTION

     This District Court of the United States (“DCUS”) has original jurisdiction over this action, under 18 U.S.C. §§ 1512, 1513, 1964(a), 3231, 3691 and 28 U.S.C. §§ 1331, 1346(a)(1), 1652, 2201, and 2202.  Also, there is extraterritorial federal jurisdiction over an offense against 18 U.S.C. §§ 1512 and 1513.

Cross-Plaintiff hereby formally reserves His fundamental Right to petition this honorable Court for leave to institute criminal proceedings, as Private Attorney General, pending final judgment(s) and civil verdict(s) in the instant civil action.

Cross-Plaintiff also wishes to inform this honorable Court of the imminent likelihood that the People of the United States of America ex relatione Paul Andrew Mitchell, B.A., M.S. (“Applicant”), will apply for Intervention of Right in the instant civil case, due in part to Applicant’s specific intent to challenge the constitutionality of the accommodation provisions in the Uniform Commercial Code (“U.C.C.”), enacted as federal municipal law on December 30, 1963, 77 Stat. 630, P.L. 88-243.  See 16 Stat. 419, 426, Sec. 34 (1871);  18 C.J. 1358.

The United States is a named Cross-Defendant in the instant civil case because of an apparent conflict between said accommodation provisions and the Fifth Amendment in the Constitution for the United States of America, as lawfully amended (“U.S. Constitution”).  See Supremacy Clause.  For this reason, the Office of Solicitor General has been served with a courtesy copy of this initial COMPLAINT, although the Solicitor General has not yet been formally summoned to appear.  Cross-Plaintiff hereby waives any objection to formal intervention by the Solicitor General in the instant case.

 

INCORPORATION OF AFFIDAVITS

Cross-Plaintiff hereby attaches each of the following Affidavits and incorporates same by reference, as if set forth fully herein:

 

Exhibit “A”:

Date                       Description

3/15/1995  Affidavit of Donald E. Wishart in Donald E. Wishart v.

           Agents for International Monetary Fund et al., USDC,

N.D. Calif. (San Jose), Admiralty Case No. C-95-20178

 

 

Exhibit “B”:

Date       Description

7/23/1996  Written Request for Verified Determination of Status

for Tax Purposes, with attachment:

 

           Affidavit of Points and Authorities Supporting Claim

that Absolute Sovereignty in these United States of

           America Resides in the People/Citizens

 

 

Exhibit “C”:

Date       Description

9/6/1996   Appeal Alleging Procedural Errors in the Filing of

Notice of Tax Lien;  Demand for Release of Erroneously

Filed Tax Lien

 

 

Exhibit “D”:

Date       Description

9/26/1996  Affidavit of Contents and Exhibits Submitted as a part

of and in Support of Refusal for Fraud and in Support

of Information for Criminal Prosecution, Pursuant

Title 18 USC Rule 7, and Title 18 § 4 (first edition)

 

 

Exhibit “E”:

Date       Description

9/26/1996  Affidavit of Tax-Exempt Foreign Status;  Actual and

Constructive Notice and Demand Under Title 42 U.S.C.

1986 for Knowledge of the Law

 

 

Exhibit “F”:

Date       Description

9/26/1996  Letter to Billy Brown, District Director, IRS,

           Re: “Comptroller Warrants” submitted to Discharge

           alleged “IRS Tax Debt” and/or “Other Debt”

 

 

Exhibit “G”:

Date                       Description

10/3/1996  Letter to the Following Entities:

 

           House Committee on Governmental Reform and Oversight,

           Sub-committee on National Security;  Department of the

Inspector General;  Senator Diane Feinstein;  Senator Barbara Boxer, with attachment:

 

Affidavit of Contents and Exhibits Submitted as a part

of and in Support of Refusal for Fraud and in Support

Information for Criminal Prosecution, Pursuant

Title 18 USC Rule 7, and Title 18 § 4 (second edition)

 

 

Exhibit “H”:

Date       Description

4/28/1997  Certified Copy of Complete Docket File in Donald Wishart, Whistleblower v. Paul Camancho [sic] and Brian Watson, DCUS, N.D. Calif. (San Jose), Case No.

C-97-20389-JW

 

 

Cross-Plaintiff hereby formally charges the following named Cross-Defendants with the corresponding criminal offenses enumerated infra:

 

Billy Brown with:

 

(1)  Deprivation of Cross-Plaintiff’s fundamental Rights, in violation of 18 U.S.C. 242 (one count);

 

(2)  Conspiracy to deprive Cross-Plaintiff’s fundamental Rights, in violation of 18 U.S.C. 241 (one count);

 

(3)           Racketeering and conspiracy to engage in a pattern of racketeering activity through collection of an unlawful debt, in violation of 18 U.S.C. 1962(a) & (d) (one count);

 

(4)  Using the mail and a facility in interstate commerce, with intent to distribute the proceeds of an unlawful activity, and otherwise promote, manage, establish, carry on, and facilitate the promotion, management, establishment, and carrying on, of an unlawful activity, by extortion in violation of the laws of the State of California and of the United States, in violation of 18 U.S.C. 1952 (one count);

 

(5)           Having devised a scheme or artifice to defraud and obtain money or property by means of false or fraudulent pretenses, representations, or promises, for the purpose of executing such scheme or artifice or attempting so to do, placing in a post office or authorized depository for mail, matters or other things to be sent or delivered by the Postal Service, in violation of 18 U.S.C. 1341 (one count);

 

(6)           Falsely assuming or pretending to be an officer or employee acting under the authority of the United States or any department, agency or officer thereof, in violation of 18 U.S.C. 912 (one count);  and,

 

 

Paul Camacho with:

 

(1)  Deprivation of Cross-Plaintiff’s fundamental Rights, in violation of 18 U.S.C. 242 (one count);

 

(2)  Conspiracy to deprive Cross-Plaintiff’s fundamental Rights, in violation of 18 U.S.C. 241 (one count);

 

(3)           Racketeering and conspiracy to engage in a pattern of racketeering activity through collection of an unlawful debt, in violation of 18 U.S.C. 1962(a) & (d) (one count);

 

(4)  Falsely assuming or pretending to be an officer or employee acting under the authority of the United States or any department, agency or officer thereof, in violation of 18 U.S.C. 912 (one count);  and,

 

 

Don Hallenbeck with:

 

(1)  Deprivation of Cross-Plaintiff’s fundamental Rights, in violation of 18 U.S.C. 242 (one count);

 

(2)  Conspiracy to deprive Cross-Plaintiff’s fundamental Rights, in violation of 18 U.S.C. 241 (one count);

 

(3)  Racketeering and conspiracy to engage in a pattern of racketeering activity through collection of an unlawful debt, in violation of 18 U.S.C. 1962(a) & (d) (one count);

 

(4)  Falsely assuming or pretending to be an officer or employee acting under the authority of the United States or any department, agency or officer thereof, in violation of 18 U.S.C. 912 (one count);  and,

 

 

Mel Steiner with:

 

(1)  Deprivation of Cross-Plaintiff’s fundamental Rights, in violation of 18 U.S.C. 242 (one count);

 

(2)  Conspiracy to deprive Cross-Plaintiff’s fundamental Rights, in violation of 18 U.S.C. 241 (one count);

 

(3)          Racketeering and conspiracy to engage in a pattern of racketeering activity through collection of an unlawful debt, in violation of 18 U.S.C. 1962(a) & (d) (one count);

 

(4)           Using the mail and a facility in interstate commerce, with intent to distribute the proceeds of an unlawful activity, and otherwise promote, manage, establish, carry on, and facilitate the promotion, management, establishment, and carrying on, of an unlawful activity, by extortion in violation of the laws of the State of California and of the United States, in violation of 18 U.S.C. 1952 (one count);

 

(5)  Having devised a scheme or artifice to defraud and obtain money or property by means of false or fraudulent pretenses, representations, or promises, for the purpose of executing such scheme or artifice or attempting so to do, placing in a post office or authorized depository for mail, matters or other things to be sent or delivered by the Postal Service, in violation of 18 U.S.C. 1341 (one count);

 

(6)  Falsely assuming or pretending to be an officer or employee acting under the authority of the United States or any department, agency or officer thereof, in violation of 18 U.S.C. 912 (one count);  and,

 

 

Dan Sutherland with:

 

(1)  Deprivation of Cross-Plaintiff’s fundamental Rights, in violation of 18 U.S.C. 242 (one count);

 

(2)  Conspiracy to deprive Cross-Plaintiff’s fundamental Rights, in violation of 18 U.S.C. 241 (one count);

 

(3)          Racketeering and conspiracy to engage in a pattern of racketeering activity through collection of an unlawful debt, in violation of 18 U.S.C. 1962(a) & (d) (one count);

 

(4)  Using the mail and a facility in interstate commerce, with intent to distribute the proceeds of an unlawful activity, and otherwise promote, manage, establish, carry on, and facilitate the promotion, management, establishment, and carrying on, of an unlawful activity, by extortion in violation of the laws of the State of California and of the United States, in violation of 18 U.S.C. 1952 (one count);

 

(5)           Making a false declaration, verification, or statement under penalty of perjury as permitted under section 1746 of title 28, United States Code, in a case under title 11, in violation of 18 U.S.C. 152 (one count);

 

(6)           Having devised a scheme or artifice to defraud and obtain money or property by means of false or fraudulent pretenses, representations, or promises, for the purpose of executing such scheme or artifice or attempting so to do, placing in a post office or authorized depository for mail, matters or other things to be sent or delivered by the Postal Service, in violation of 18 U.S.C. 1341 (one count);

 

(7)  Knowingly depositing in a post office or authorized depository for mail matter, or causing to be delivered by the Postal Service according to the direction thereon, a written communication addressed to Cross-Plaintiff containing a threat to injure His property and reputation, with the intent to extort money from Cross-Plaintiff, violation of 18 U.S.C. 876 (one count);

 

(8)  Falsely assuming or pretending to be an officer or employee acting under the authority of the United States or any department, agency or officer thereof, in violation of 18 U.S.C. 912 (one count);  and,

 

 

Colbert Tang with:

 

(1)  Deprivation of Cross-Plaintiff’s fundamental Rights, in violation of 18 U.S.C. 242 (one count);

 

(2)  Conspiracy to deprive Cross-Plaintiff’s fundamental Rights, in violation of 18 U.S.C. 241 (one count);

 

(3)           Racketeering and conspiracy to engage in a pattern of racketeering activity through collection of an unlawful debt, in violation of 18 U.S.C. 1962(a) & (d) (one count);

 

(4)  Using the mail and a facility in interstate commerce, with intent to distribute the proceeds of an unlawful activity, and otherwise promote, manage, establish, carry on, and facilitate the promotion, management, establishment, and carrying on, of an unlawful activity, by extortion in violation of the laws of the State of California and of the United States, in violation of 18 U.S.C. 1952 (one count);

 

(5)  Making a false declaration, verification, or statement under penalty of perjury as permitted under section 1746 of title 28, United States Code, in a case under title 11, in violation of 18 U.S.C. 152 (one count);

 

(6)  Falsely assuming or pretending to be an officer or employee acting under the authority of the United States or any department, agency or officer thereof, in violation of 18 U.S.C. 912 (one count);  and,

 

 

Brian Watson with:

 

(1)  Deprivation of Cross-Plaintiff’s fundamental Rights, in violation of 18 U.S.C. 242 (one count);

 

(2)  Conspiracy to deprive Cross-Plaintiff’s fundamental Rights, in violation of 18 U.S.C. 241 (one count);

 

(3)           Racketeering and conspiracy to engage in a pattern of racketeering activity through collection of an unlawful debt, in violation of 18 U.S.C. 1962(a) & (d) (one count);

 

(4)           Using the mail and a facility in interstate commerce, with intent to distribute the proceeds of an unlawful activity, and otherwise promote, manage, establish, carry on, and facilitate the promotion, management, establishment, and carrying on, of an unlawful activity, by extortion in violation of the laws of the State of California and of the United States, in violation of 18 U.S.C. 1952 (one count);

 

(5)           Falsely assuming or pretending to be an officer or employee acting under the authority of the United States or any department, agency or officer thereof, in violation of 18 U.S.C. 912 (one count);  and,

 

 

Ken Whitmore with:

 

(1)  Deprivation of Cross-Plaintiff’s fundamental Rights, in violation of 18 U.S.C. 242 (one count);

 

(2)  Conspiracy to deprive Cross-Plaintiff’s fundamental Rights, in violation of 18 U.S.C. 241 (one count);

 

(3)          Racketeering and conspiracy to engage in a pattern of racketeering activity through collection of an unlawful debt, in violation of 18 U.S.C. 1962(a) & (d) (one count);

 

(4)  Using the mail and a facility in interstate commerce, with intent to distribute the proceeds of an unlawful activity, and otherwise promote, manage, establish, carry on, and facilitate the promotion, management, establishment, and carrying on, of an unlawful activity, by extortion in violation of the laws of the State of California and of the United States, in violation of 18 U.S.C. 1952 (one count);

 

(5)  Making a false, fictitious, or fraudulent statement or representation in a matter within the jurisdiction of a department or agency of the United States, in violation of 18 U.S.C. 1001 (one count);

 

(6)  Having devised a scheme or artifice to defraud and obtain money or property by means of false or fraudulent pretenses, representations, or promises, for the purpose of executing such scheme or artifice or attempting so to do, placing in a post office or authorized depository for mail, matters or other things to be sent or delivered by the Postal Service, in violation of 18 U.S.C. 1341 (one count);

 

(7)  Falsely assuming or pretending to be an officer or employee acting under the authority of the United States or any department, agency or officer thereof, in violation of 18 U.S.C. 912 (one count);  and,

 

 

Bay View Federal Bank with:

 

(1)  Deprivation of Cross-Plaintiff’s fundamental Rights, in violation of 18 U.S.C. 242 (one count);

 

(2)  Conspiracy to deprive Cross-Plaintiff’s fundamental Rights, in violation of 18 U.S.C. 241 (one count);

 

(3)           Racketeering and conspiracy to engage in a pattern of racketeering activity through collection of an unlawful debt, in violation of 18 U.S.C. 1962(a) & (d) (one count);

 

(4)  Publishing, divulging, disclosing and making known, in a manner and extent not authorized by law, information coming to bank officers and employees in the course of their employment or official duties, concerning Cross-Plaintiff’s identity, confidential statistical data, amount and source(s) of gross receipts, income, profits, losses, and expenditures, in violation of 18 U.S.C. 1905 (one count);  and,

 

 

Does 1 thru 100 with:

 

     18 U.S.C. 4.    Misprision of felony

                (one or more counts);

 

     18 U.S.C. 152.  Concealment of assets;  false oaths and

                     claims;  bribery (one or more counts);

 

     18 U.S.C. 241.  Conspiracy against Rights

                (one or more counts);

 

     18 U.S.C. 242.  Deprivation of Rights under color of law

                     (one or more counts);

 

     18 U.S.C. 471.  Obligations or securities of United States

                     (one or more counts);

 

     18 U.S.C. 472.  Uttering counterfeit obligations or

                     securities (one or more counts);

 

     18 U.S.C. 473.  Dealing in counterfeit obligations or

                     securities (one or more counts);

 

     18 U.S.C. 513.  Securities of the States and private entities

                     (one or more counts);

 

     18 U.S.C. 872.  Extortion by officers or employees of the

                     United States (one or more counts);

 

     18 U.S.C. 876.  Mailing threatening communications

                     (one or more counts);

 

     18 U.S.C. 912.  Officer or employee of the United States

                     (one or more counts);

 

     18 U.S.C. 951.  Agents of foreign governments

                     (one or more counts);

 

     18 U.S.C. 1001. Statements or entries generally

                     (one or more counts);

 

     18 U.S.C. 1016. Acknowledgement of appearance or oath

                     (one or more counts);

 

     18 U.S.C. 1018. Official certificates or writings

                     (one or more counts);

 

     18 U.S.C. 1091. Genocide (one or more counts);

 

     18 U.S.C. 1341. Frauds and swindles

                (one or more counts);

 

     18 U.S.C. 1505. Obstruction of proceedings before

                     departments, agencies, and committees

                     (one or more counts);

 

     18 U.S.C. 1512. Tampering with a witness, victim, or an

                     informant (one or more counts);

 

     18 U.S.C. 1513. Retaliating against a witness, victim, or an

                     informant (one or more counts);

 

     18 U.S.C. 1621. Perjury generally

                (one or more counts);

 

     18 U.S.C. 1622. Subornation of perjury

                (one or more counts);

 

     18 U.S.C. 1623. False declarations before grand jury or court

                     (one or more counts);

 

     18 U.S.C. 1905. Disclosure of confidential information

                     generally (one or more counts);

 

     18 U.S.C. 1962. Prohibited activities (racketeering);

                     (one or more counts);

 

     18 U.S.C. 2236. Searches without warrant

                (one or more counts);  and,

 

     18 U.S.C. 2320. Trafficking in counterfeit goods or services

                     (one or more counts).

 

MIRANDA WARNING

     Messrs. Billy Brown, Paul Camacho, Don Hallenbeck, Mel Steiner, Dan Sutherland, Colbert Tang, Brian Watson, and Ken Whitmore, pursuant to the holding of the U.S. Supreme Court in Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436 (1966), formal NOTICE is hereby given to you that you have the Right to remain silent, under the Fifth Amendment;  you have the right to assistance of Counsel, under the Sixth Amendment;  and, any thing which you say, or do, from this point forward, can and will be held against you in this Court of Law.  See 18 U.S.C. 3231, in chief.

 

VERIFICATION

I, Donald E. Wishart, Sui Juris, hereby verify, under penalty of perjury, under the laws of the United States of America, without the “United States” (federal government), that the above statement of facts and laws is true and correct, according to the best of My current information, knowledge, and belief, so help Me God, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1746(1).  See Supremacy Clause in pari materia with all provisions of Title 28, U.S.C. (Constitution, Laws and Treaties of the United States).

 

Dated:  September 19, 2000 A.D.

 

 

Respectfully submitted,

 

/s/ Donald E. Wishart

 

Donald E. Wishart, Sui Juris

Citizen of California State and

Federal Witness (18 U.S.C. 1512, 1513)

(expressly not a “citizen of the United States” [sic])

 

See Pannill v. Roanoke, 252 F. 910, 914;  42 USCS 1983;

    and Wadleigh v. Newhall, 136 F. 941 (CC Cal, 1905)

 

All Rights Reserved without Prejudice

 

 

PROOF OF SERVICE

I, Donald E. Wishart, Sui Juris, hereby certify, under penalty of perjury, under the laws of the United States of America, without the “United States” (federal government), that I am at least 18 years of age, a Citizen of ONE OF the United States of America, and that I personally served the following document(s):

 

VERIFIED CROSS-COMPLAINT FOR

DECLARATORY AND INJUNCTIVE RELIEF

AND MONETARY DAMAGES:

18 U.S.C. 241, 242, 1512, 1513, 1962, 1964(a), 3231 and 3691;

28 U.S.C. 1331, 1346(a)(1), 1746, 2201, 2202

JURY TRIAL DEMANDED:

Arising Under Clause;  Supremacy Clause;

First Amendment;  Fifth Amendment;

and Seventh Amendment.

 

by placing one true and correct copy of said document(s) in first class United States Mail, with postage prepaid and properly addressed to the following:

 

Robert S. Mueller III             John S. Gordon

Office of the U.S. Attorney       Office of the U.S. Attorney

280 South First St., Ste. 371     312 North Spring Street

San Jose [ZIP code exempt]        Los Angeles [ZIP code exempt]

CALIFORNIA, USA                   CALIFORNIA, USA

 

Thomas S. DiLeonardo              Ronald A. Cimino

Department of Justice, Tax Div.   Department of Justice, Tax Div.

Western Criminal Enforcement Sec. West. Criminal Enforcement Sec.

600 “E” St., N.W., Room 5712      600 “E” St., N.W., Room 5712

Washington [ZIP code exempt]      Washington [ZIP code exempt]

DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, USA         DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, USA

 

John Paul Reichmuth               Billy Brown

Federal Public Defender’s Office  Internal Revenue Service

160 W. Santa Clara St., Ste. 575  55 South Market Street

San Jose [ZIP code exempt]        San Jose [ZIP code exempt]

CALIFORNIA, USA                   CALIFORNIA, USA

 

Paul Camacho                      Don Hallenbeck

Internal Revenue Service          Internal Revenue Service

55 South Market Street            55 South Market Street

San Jose [ZIP code exempt]        San Jose [ZIP code exempt]

CALIFORNIA, USA                   CALIFORNIA, USA

 

Mel Steiner                       Colbert Tang

Internal Revenue Service          Internal Revenue Service

55 South Market Street            55 South Market Street

San Jose [ZIP code exempt]        San Jose [ZIP code exempt]

CALIFORNIA, USA                   CALIFORNIA, USA

 

Brian Watson                      Ken Whitmore

Internal Revenue Service          Internal Revenue Service

55 South Market Street            55 South Market Street

San Jose [ZIP code exempt]        San Jose [ZIP code exempt]

CALIFORNIA, USA                   CALIFORNIA, USA

 

Dan Sutherland                    Solicitor General

Internal Revenue Service          U.S. Dept. of Justice

55 South Market Street            10th & Constitution, N.W.

San Jose [ZIP code exempt]        Washington [ZIP code exempt]

CALIFORNIA, USA                   DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, USA

 

Bay View Federal Bank

Attention:  Legal Department

2121 South El Camino Real

San Mateo [ZIP code exempt]

CALIFORNIA, USA

 

 

Executed on September 19, 2000 A.D.

 

/s/ Donald E. Wishart

 

Donald E. Wishart, Sui Juris

Citizen of California State and

Federal Witness (18 U.S.C. 1512, 1513)

(expressly not a “citizen of the United States” [sic])

 

See Pannill v. Roanoke, 252 F. 910, 914;  42 USCS 1983;

    and Wadleigh v. Newhall, 136 F. 941 (CC Cal, 1905)

 

All Rights Reserved without Prejudice

 

 

Exhibit “A”:

 

Date                       Description

3/15/1995  Affidavit of Donald E. Wishart in Donald E. Wishart v.

           Agents for International Monetary Fund et al., USDC,

N.D. Calif. (San Jose), Admiralty Case No. C-95-20178

 

 

Exhibit “B”:

 

Date       Description

7/23/1996  Written Request for Verified Determination of Status

for Tax Purposes, with attachment:

 

           Affidavit of Points and Authorities Supporting Claim

that Absolute Sovereignty in these United States of

           America Resides in the People/Citizens

 

 

Exhibit “C”:

 

Date       Description

9/6/1996   Appeal Alleging Procedural Errors in the Filing of

Notice of Tax Lien;  Demand for Release of Erroneously

Filed Tax Lien

 

 

Exhibit “D”:

 

Date       Description

9/26/1996  Affidavit of Contents and Exhibits Submitted as a part

of and in Support of Refusal for Fraud and in Support

of Information for Criminal Prosecution, Pursuant

Title 18 USC Rule 7, and Title 18 § 4 (first edition)

 

 

Exhibit “E”:

 

Date       Description

9/26/1996  Affidavit of Tax-Exempt Foreign Status;  Actual and

Constructive Notice and Demand Under Title 42 U.S.C.

1986 for Knowledge of the Law

 

 

Exhibit “F”:

 

Date       Description

9/26/1996  Letter to Billy Brown, District Director, IRS,

           Re: “Comptroller Warrants” submitted to Discharge

           alleged “IRS Tax Debt” and/or “Other Debt”

 

 

Exhibit “G”:

 

Date       Description

10/3/1996  Letter to the Following Entities:

 

           House Committee on Governmental Reform and Oversight,

           Sub-committee on National Security;  Department of the

Inspector General;  Senator Diane Feinstein;  Senator Barbara Boxer, with attachment:

 

Affidavit of Contents and Exhibits Submitted as a part

and in Support of Refusal for Fraud and in Support

of Information for Criminal Prosecution, Pursuant

Title 18 USC Rule 7, and Title 18 § 4 (second edition)

 

 

Exhibit “H”:

 

Date       Description

4/28/1997  Certified Copy of Complete Docket File in Donald Wishart, Whistleblower v. Paul Camancho [sic] and Brian Watson, DCUS, N.D. Calif. (San Jose), Case No.

C-97-20389-JW