NOTICE OF INTENT TO SUE FOR
RACKETEERING AND RELATED CLAIMS
TO: Christopher Kankel
c/o The California Institute of Technology
1200 East California Boulevard, M/C 201-85
FROM: Paul Andrew Mitchell, B.A., M.S.
DATE: January 20, 2003 A.D.
SUBJECT: racketeering, conspiracy to engage
in a pattern of racketeering activity,
and related claims
On the questions which arise from associating with an enterprise engaged in a pattern of racketeering activity, conspiracy to engage in a pattern of racketeering activity, and all applicable predicate acts, in violation of 18 U.S.C. 1961 et seq., and from deprivations of My fundamental Rights as secured by the Constitution, Laws, and Treaties of the United States, in violation of 18 U.S.C. 241, 242, 1512 and 1513, please be advised of My specific intent to sue you and all known accomplices for all actual, consequential, and exemplary (punitive) damages, and for all other relief which an unbiased court of competent jurisdiction deems just and proper under the circumstances including, but not limited to, all predicate acts and associated racketeering (“RICO”) violations, and all other related deprivation(s) of this Author’s fundamental Rights and conspiracy(s) to deprive this Author’s fundamental Rights as secured by the Constitution, Laws and Treaties of the United States. See holdings in Tafflin v. Levitt, 493 U.S. 455 (1990) and Lou v. Belzberg, 834 F.2d 730, hn. 4 (9th Cir. 1987) (State courts have original jurisdiction of Civil RICO claims).
Notice to principals is notice to agents.
Notice to agents is notice to principals.
Paul Andrew Mitchell, B.A., M.S.
Author, Damaged Party and Plaintiff/Appellant
c/o Forwarding Agent
MBE PMB #332
501 West Broadway, Suite “A”
San Diego 92101