PUBLIC LEGAL NOTICE
TO: Hon. Rob McKenna
Washington State Attorney General
1125 Washington Street, S.E.
P.O. Box 40100
Olympia 98504-0100
WASHINGTON STATE, USA
FROM: Paul Andrew Mitchell, B.A., M.S.
Private Attorney General, 18 U.S.C. 1964
DATE: July 18, 2011 A.D.
SUBJECT: impersonating the U.S. Department of the Treasury
Greetings Attorney General McKenna:
I am writing to summarize for your good offices the results of 21 years of investigation which my office has conducted into the origins and operations of the Internal Revenue Service.
For your information and review, enclosed please find a sampling of the most pertinent written results of that long investigation.
Please allow me to summarize just a few of the most significant highlights, as follows:
(1) Of greatest singular significance, in our studied opinion, is the lack of any Federal Statute at Large which creates a specific liability for taxes imposed by subtitle A of the Internal Revenue Code (“IRC”). See Commissioner v. Acker for controlling authority on this point, and 26 CFR 1.1-1 (such Regulations cannot create tax liabilities, absent an underlying Act of Congress).
(2) Not far behind is our verified finding that Congress has fraudulently manipulated the legal definitions of “State” and “United States” to fabricate the false and rebuttable notions that those terms embrace the 50 States of the Union. See in particular the Omnibus Acts where Congress revealed their “special definition of ‘State’” [sic] when Alaska and Hawaii joined the Union.
(3) The latter point is particularly relevant to the government of the State of Washington, chiefly because another “special definition of ‘State’” is also the controlling definition in the Public Salary Tax Act: Washington is not that kind of “State”.
(4) The Internal Revenue Service was never created by any known Act of Congress, and it obviously does not appear in any of the organic statutes “organizing” the de jure U.S. Department of the Treasury that is domiciled in Washington, D.C. See 31 U.S.C. 301 thru 313 inclusive, and Footnote 23 in Chrysler Corp. v. Brown.
(5) This latter point per force renders all mailed IRS correspondence as material evidence of felony mail fraud, for also violating the Federal statute prohibiting any display of “Department of the Treasury” by any entity that is not a de jure service, bureau, office or other subdivision of that Executive Department. See 31 U.S.C. 333 (civil and criminal penalties) and 18 U.S.C. 1341.
(6) After enormous efforts to identify its true origins, we can now confidently say that the IRS is presently what was left over of “The Untouchables” after alcohol Prohibition was repealed. Once the petroleum cartel had perfected their monopoly in automotive fuels, Prohibition was repealed, leaving alcohol high and dry as the preferred fuel for cars and trucks, and leaving a Federal police force inside the several States to continue extorting money from the American People. Here see U.S. v. Constantine (Federal Alcohol Administration no longer had any legal authority inside the several States of the Union).
(7) Subtitle A of the IRC is now proven to be Federal municipal law at best, with a geographic reach that does not extend beyond the area we now call the federal zone i.e. D.C., Guam, Virgin Islands, American Samoa and Puerto Rico. This finding is also true of numerous other Federal statutes, prominent among which is the special definition of “State” at IRC section 3121(e) in “FICA”, as also confirmed by legal experts in the U.S. Offices of the Legislative Counsel and the Congressional Research Service.
(8) The latter finding is emphatically reinforced by our added discovery that there are now two (2) classes of Americans: State Citizens and federal citizens. The term “U.S. Individual” as that term occurs on IRS Forms 1040 embraces only federal citizens and resident aliens; it does not embrace State Citizens as the latter occur in all 3 Qualifications Clauses in the Constitution. See IRC sections 7701(a)(1) and (30) re: “United States person”.
(9) Insofar as IRS officers and employees are pressuring Americans to execute Forms 1040 under penalties of perjury, those officers and employees thereby implicate themselves in subornation of perjury whenever Americans are not “U.S. Individuals” as defined above. See IRC 6065 and 18 U.S.C. 1622; cf. “fraud in the inducement”.
(10) The enclosed documents go into many more of the reasons why the government of the State of Washington should formally notify all of its employees that withholding Federal income taxes is not mandatory, and that a proper withholding exemption certificate should be accepted by State government offices as evidence legally sufficient to justify an immediate cessation of any and all further such withholding(s).
If my office can provide you with any further professional assistance in this matter, please direct a trusted member of your staff to initiate contact with me at email address: supremelawfirm@gmail.com
Thank you again, Attorney General McKenna.
Sincerely yours,
/s/ Paul Andrew Mitchell
Paul Andrew Mitchell, B.A., M.S.
Private Attorney General, 18 U.S.C. 1964(a)
http://www.supremelaw.org/decs/agency/private.attorney.general.htm
Criminal Investigator and Federal Witness: 18 U.S.C. 1510, 1512-13
All Rights
Reserved without Prejudice
Attachments:
“31 Questions and Answers about the Internal Revenue Service”
http://www.supremelaw.org/sls/31answers.htm
http://www.supremelaw.org/sls/31Q&A.in.evidence.htm
http://www.supremelaw.org/fedzone11/fedzone.in.evidence.htm
Press Release: “Let’s Dismantle IRS: This Racket is Busted”
http://www.supremelaw.org/press/rels/dismantle.irs.htm
(incorporating by reference all links at the end)
Further “Reading List”
