Paul Andrew, Mitchell, B.A., M.S.
Vice President for Legal Affairs
New Life Health Center Company
An Unincorporated Business Trust
c/o 2509 N. Campbell, #1776
Tucson, Arizona state
zip code exempt


Under Protest and by Special Visitation
On behalf of the Trust




                  UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

                       DISTRICT OF ARIZONA


IN RE GRAND JURY SUBPOENA       ) Case No. GJ-95-1-6
SERVED ON                       )
NEW LIFE HEALTH CENTER COMPANY  ) AFFIDAVIT OF CAUSES AND
                                )
                                ) OBJECTIONS TO O.S.C. AND
                                )
                                ) REQUEST FOR JUDICIAL NOTICE:
                                )
                                ) Federal Rules of Evidence,
                                ) 201(d);  18 U.S.C. 4, 5, 7
________________________________)


COMES NOW  Paul Andrew,  Mitchell, B.A., M.S., Citizen of Arizona

state  (hereinafter  "Counsel")  and  Vice  President  for  Legal

Affairs of  New Life  Health Center  Company,  an  Unincorporated

Business Trust  domiciled in  the Arizona  Republic  (hereinafter

"the Trust")  to submit  this Affidavit of Causes and Objections,

prepared on  behalf of  the Trust,  which  is  domiciled  in  the

Arizona Republic,  outside the jurisdiction of the United States,

explaining why  said Trust  should not  be found  in contempt for

allegedly failing  to "appear"  at the  grand jury  on March  27,

1996, at  9:10 a.m.,  as  directed  by  the  alleged  grand  jury

subpoena allegedly  served on  March  7,  1996,  and  to  request

mandatory judicial notice of said Affidavit.


    Affidavit of Causes and Objections to OSC:  Page 1 of 15


     1.   The service  of said subpoena was defective because the

Trust is domiciled outside the jurisdiction of the United States.

Said subpoena was refused for cause without dishonor, pursuant to

the Uniform  Commercial Code  ("U.C.C.") Section  3-501,  on  the

twenty-first day of the third month of the year one thousand nine

hundred ninety-six Anno Domini, see attached EXHIBIT "A".

     2.   The reasons for said Refusal for Cause without Dishonor

were  documented,   in  part,  in  a  letter,  with  attachments,

addressed to  the Grand  Jury Foreperson  In re:  New Life Health

Center Company,  dated March  20, 1996, and mailed via Registered

United States  Mail,  Return  Receipt  Requested  and  Restricted

Delivery  Requested,   Registered  U.S.  Mail  No.  R-591-643-753

(hereinafter "Registered  letter").   Said letter is incorporated

by reference as if set forth fully in EXHIBIT "B".

     3.   United States  Postal Service  PS Form  3811, "Domestic

Return Receipt,"  was returned  without any  signature,  and  the

spaces for  "Addressee's Address"  and "Received  By:" were  left

blank, despite  the fact  that Counsel  had paid an extra fee for

"Restricted  Delivery"  and  "Return  Receipt"  services.    Said

returned PS  Form 3811  indicated that  the Registered letter had

been delivered on "3-22-96", see EXHIBIT "C".

     4.   When asked  why said  PS Form  3811 did  not  show  any

recipient's signature,  a counter  clerk  of  the  United  States

Postal Service  completed  two  (2)  separate  PS  Forms  3811-A,

REQUEST FOR RETURN RECEIPT, on two separate occasions.  The first

such request,  mailed on April 2, 1996, and delivered on April 5,

1996, indicated  that the  original Registered  letter  had  been

delivered on "3-25-96".  The second such request, mailed on April

17, 1996, and delivered on April 18, 1996, indicated:  "no record


    Affidavit of Causes and Objections to OSC:  Page 2 of 15


found but  cleared reg. rm 3/28".  The Trust took careful note of

the obvious  discrepancies among the three (3) different delivery

dates, to  wit:  3-22-96, 3-25-96, and 3/28, the latter being the

date the  Registered letter "cleared reg. rm" [sic].  See EXHIBIT

"C".

     5.   Even though  the Trust  paid in  full for  the best and

most  secure   method  of   posting  United   States  mail,  said

discrepancies and  the absence of any recipient's signatures have

given the Trust reason to believe that said Registered letter was

intercepted and/or  diverted by  "United  States  Attorney  JANET

NAPOLITANO" and/or  "Assistant U.S.  Attorney Robert L. Miskell",

in a  knowing, intentional,  and voluntary  violation of  federal

law.   The  Trust  has  since  determined  that  the  grand  jury

Foreperson, to  whom the Registered letter was addressed, had not

completed a  United States  Postal Service PS Form 3801: Standing

Delivery Order,  authorizing one  or  more  agent(s)  to  receive

registered, certified, insured, c.o.d., express mail, and special

delivery  mail  addressed  to  or  in  care  of  the  grand  jury

Foreperson.   This Court  will  please  take  mandatory  judicial

notice that  said PS  Form 3801 contains the following qualifying

language on its face, to wit:

     Where RESTRICTED  DELIVERY  MAIL  is  to  be  included,  the
     statement  "This   authorization  is   extended  to  include
     RESTRICTED DELIVERY  MAIL" must  be entered  on the delivery
     order by the person signing it.  This notation is to be made
     on the  part of the form for signatures of authorized agent.
     NOTE:  Unknown signatures must be identified.
                                                [See EXHIBIT "C"]

     6.   The Trust  has empirical  evidence proving that alleged

agents  of   the  United   States,  specifically  "United  States

Attorney" Robert A. Johnson, has proceeded against the Trust with


    Affidavit of Causes and Objections to OSC:  Page 3 of 15


the stated purpose of putting the Trust out of business, in order

to make  an example  of it.   The  AFFIDAVIT of Managing Director

Eugene A.  Burns, D.C., N.D., is attached hereto and incorporated

by reference  as if  set forth fully as EXHIBIT "D".  Paragraph 6

of said  AFFIDAVIT contains the following quotation of Mr. Robert

Johnson, to wit:

     This is  not an  issue of money (Dr. Burns), this is a power
     issue.   We intend  on putting  you and  your Company out of
     business to make you an example.
                                                [See Exhibit "D"]

Because it  believes that  alleged agents  of the  United  States

recently diverted  Registered United States mail, in violation of

federal law,  and because  it believes that alleged agents of the

United States  have, at  least since  March of 1981, stated their

intentions to  destroy the  Trust's business in order to "make an

example" of  it,  and  because  of  a  multitude  of  events  and

discoveries which  workers at  the Trust  have witnessed  in  the

intervening period  of time,  the Trust  now firmly believes that

alleged agents  of the  United States have demonstrated a pattern

of criminal conduct which continues right up to the present time.

The Trust,  therefore, makes  this offer to prove its allegations

of criminal  conduct by means of a detailed AFFIDAVIT OF PROBABLE

CAUSE, which  is currently  in preparation  and will  require  at

least thirty  (30) additional  calendar days  to complete, serve,

and file in the instant case.

     7.   The  Trust   has  researched   relevant  case  law  and

confirmed that  the United  States can be enjoined to prevent the

destruction of a business which might otherwise occur as a direct

consequence of  enforcing the   assessment  and/or collection  of

income taxes  upon the  Trust.  Specifically, the Anti-Injunction


    Affidavit of Causes and Objections to OSC:  Page 4 of 15


Act cannot  be enforced to destroy a business.  See John M. Hirst

& Company  v. Gentsch,  133 F.2d  247 (6th  Cir., 1943),  Midwest

Haulers v.  Brady, 128  F.2d 496  (6th Cir.,  1942), and  Long v.

United States,  148 F.Supp.  758  (1957),  copies  of  which  are

attached and  incorporated by  reference as if set forth fully in

EXHIBIT "E".

     8.   The Trust  has  consummated  a  written  non-disclosure

contract with the Managing Director specifically prohibiting said

Managing Director from divulging any Trust information, books and

records or  any other  property belonging  to the  Trust  to  any

person,  agency,  or  government  entity.    Said  non-disclosure

contract is  incorporated here by reference as if set forth fully

in EXHIBIT  "F".    Specifically,  said  non-disclosure  contract

states that  the Managing  Director will  be subject  to possible

criminal sanctions imposed by the Trustee of Health International

Corporation, should  said Managing  Director turn over any of the

aforementioned  information   pertinent  to   the  Trust  without

authorization.   The names  of Persons mentioned in said contract

have been  redacted to protect their fundamental Right to privacy

in this  matter.   The Trust  argues that no agents of the United

States, including  but not limited to all United States Attorneys

and this  honorable Court,  can impair  the obligations  of  this

contract, in  direct violation of Article I, Section 10, Clause 1

of the Constitution for the United States of America, as lawfully

amended pursuant  to Article  V of said Constitution (hereinafter

"U.S. Constitution").

     9.   The Trust  has never  been served  with actual  Notice,

issued by the de jure Secretary of the Treasury, or by his lawful


    Affidavit of Causes and Objections to OSC:  Page 5 of 15


Delegate, requiring  said Trust  to keep books and records in the

first instance.  In the absence of such a Notice, properly served

upon the authorized agents for service of process upon the Trust,

the existence  of the  books and  records sought by said subpoena

cannot be  proven.   The law  does not recognize impossibilities.

Lex non cogit impossibilia.

     10.  The Trust  argues from all of the above that the agents

of the  United States  who brought  the instant action petitioned

this honorable  Court with  unclean hands  and with  a fraud upon

this Court,  among other  things by misrepresenting to this Court

that the  Trust had  failed  to  "appear"  in  response  to  said

subpoena.   It is  well known  that "appearances"  can be made in

writing, because  an answer  constitutes an "appearance."  Wieser

v. Richter,  247 Mich.  52, 225  N.W. 542,  543.  See the several

definitions of  "appearance" in  Black's Law  Dictionary,  Fourth

Edition with Guide to Pronunciation.  The Registered letter cited

supra was the Trust's "answer" to said subpoena.

     11.  The Trust  objects, for  the record, to the unqualified

use by  the United  States and  any of  its agencies, assigns and

instrumentalities, of  United States  Postal  Service  ZIP  codes

and/or two-letter  federal abbreviations  for the state Republics

which are united by and under the U.S. Constitution.

     12.  Counsel places this honorable Court, and all interested

parties in the instant case, on formal Notice of the fact that He

has witnessed original documents, certified by the official State

Archivist of  Colorado,  proving  that  the  original  Thirteenth

Amendment  to   the  U.S.   Constitution  contains   an  explicit

prohibition against  titles of  nobility and  honor, and explicit


    Affidavit of Causes and Objections to OSC:  Page 6 of 15


penalties for their use, to wit:

     If any  citizen of  the United  States shall  accept, claim,
     receive, or retain any title of nobility or honor, or shall,
     without the  consent of  congress,  accept  and  retain  any
     present, pension,  office or emolument of any kind whatever,
     from any  emperor, king,  prince,  or  foreign  power,  such
     person shall cease to be a citizen of the United States, and
     shall be  incapable of holding any office of trust or profit
     under them, or either of them.
                                           [Thirteenth Amendment]
                                                 [emphasis added]

Counsel concludes  therefrom that  the Appointment  Affidavits of

United  States  agents  associated  with  the  instant  case,  as

required by  5 U.S.C.  3331, contain  an Oath of Office which did

bind  them   to  support   and  defend  a  version  of  the  U.S.

Constitution which was, at the time when they executed said Oath,

incorrectly published  in federal depository libraries and in the

official law  books upon  which this  Court relied for conclusive

evidence of the Law, then as now.

     13.  Counsel  has   also  concluded   from  said  Thirteenth

Amendment  that  the  retention  of  such  titles  as  "Esquire",

"Attorney", and/or  "Lawyer",  after  actual  knowledge  of  said

Amendment has  been demonstrated,  causes all  Persons,  and  all

persons, retaining  such titles to forfeit their Citizenship, and

citizenship, respectively,  and to  become forever  incapable  of

holding any  public office  under the United States, or under any

of the  several states united by and under the U.S. Constitution.

Counsel also concludes therefrom that membership in any state bar

association, and/or  the American Bar Association ("ABA"), and/or

the International  Bar Association, likewise causes such a member

to forfeit  his/her Citizenship/citizenship  forever and  also to

become forever  incapable of  holding any  public office anywhere


    Affidavit of Causes and Objections to OSC:  Page 7 of 15


within the state or federal governments.   Counsel also sincerely

believes  that  His  actual  knowledge  of  the  real  Thirteenth

Amendment obliges  Him to report said Amendment to this honorable

Court as  a true  and correct provision in the U.S. Constitution,

because to  conceal His  actual knowledge of said Amendment would

place him  in jeopardy  of being charged, and possibly convicted,

of misprision  of felony,  in violation of Section 4 of Title 18,

United States Code, the federal criminal code.

     Counsel hereby  certifies, under  penalty of  perjury, under

the laws  of the  United States  of America,  without the "United

States", that  the above statements of fact are true and correct,

to the  best of My current information, knowledge, and belief, so

help Me God, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1746(1).


Executed: twenty-first day of the sixth month of the year
          one thousand nine hundred ninety-six Anno Domini
          (in the year of Our Lord and Savior Jesus Christ),

/s/ Paul Mitchell
___________________________________________________
Paul Andrew, Mitchell, B.A., M.S.
Citizen of Arizona state and
Vice President for Legal Affairs,
New Life Health Center Company,
An Unincorporated Business Trust
domiciled in the Arizona Republic


    Affidavit of Causes and Objections to OSC:  Page 8 of 15


                           EXHIBIT "A"


    Affidavit of Causes and Objections to OSC:  Page 9 of 15


                           EXHIBIT "B"


    Affidavit of Causes and Objections to OSC:  Page 10 of 15


                           EXHIBIT "C"


    Affidavit of Causes and Objections to OSC:  Page 11 of 15


                           EXHIBIT "D"


    Affidavit of Causes and Objections to OSC:  Page 12 of 15


                           EXHIBIT "E"


    Affidavit of Causes and Objections to OSC:  Page 13 of 15


                           EXHIBIT "F"


   Affidavit of Causes and Objections to OSC:  Page 14 of 15


                        PROOF OF SERVICE

I, Paul  Andrew, Mitchell,  B.A.,  M.S.,  hereby  certify,  under

penalty of  perjury, under  the laws  of  the  United  States  of

America, without the "United States", that I am at least 18 years

of age  and a Citizen of one of the United States of America, and

that I personally served the following document(s):

          AFFIDAVIT OF CAUSES AND OBJECTIONS TO O.S.C.
                AND REQUEST FOR JUDICIAL NOTICE:
      Federal Rules of Evidence, 201(d);  18 U.S.C. 4, 5, 7

by placing  said document(s)  with exhibits in first class United

States Mail,  with postage  prepaid and properly addressed to the

following individuals:

ROBERT L. MISKELL                  John M. Roll
Acapulco Building, Suite 8310      U.S. District Court
110 South Church Avenue            55 E. Broadway
Tucson, Arizona                    Tucson, Arizona

JANET NAPOLITANO                   Clerk
Acapulco Building, Suite 8310      U.S. District Court
110 South Church Avenue            55 E. Broadway
Tucson, Arizona                    Tucson, Arizona

Grand Jury Foreperson              Postmaster
In re: New Life Health Center Co.  U.S. Post Office
55 E. Broadway                     Downtown Station
Tucson, Arizona                    Tucson, Arizona

Judge Alex Kozinski                Evangelina Cardenas
Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals     "Internal Revenue Service"
125 S. Grand Avenue, Suite 200     300 West Congress
Pasadena, California               Tucson, Arizona

Attorney General                   Solicitor General
Department of Justice              Department of Justice
10th and Constitution, N.W. !      10th and Constitution, N.W. !
Washington, D.C.                   Washington, D.C.


Dated:  June 21, 1996

/s/ Paul Mitchell
________________________________________
Paul Andrew, Mitchell, B.A., M.S.
Citizen of Arizona state
all rights reserved without prejudice


    Affidavit of Causes and Objections to OSC:  Page 15 of 15


                             #  #  #


Return to the Table of Contents for

IN RE GRAND JURY SUBPOENA SERVED ON NEW LIFE HEALTH CENTER COMPANY