Registered U.S. Mail No. ________________________________________
Return Receipt Requested
Restricted Delivery Requested


                FORMAL REQUEST FOR INVESTIGATION


FROM:     Paul Andrew, Mitchell, B.A., M.S.
          Counselor at Law and federal witness
          c/o 2509 North Campbell, #1776
          Tucson, Arizona state

TO:       Grand Jury Foreperson and the Grand Jury
          In re:  New Life Health Center Company
          Grand Jury Room, Fourth Floor
          U.S. DISTRICT COURTHOUSE
          55 E. Broadway
          Tucson, Arizona state

DATE:     April 28, 1996


Dear Foreperson:

     This is our formal request that you and the other members of
the federal grand jury conduct a full and immediate investigation
into our  allegations that  U.S.  Attorney  Robert  Miskell,  and
possibly also  other accomplices  of his within the Department of
Justice and  the "Internal  Revenue Service", have committed Mail
Fraud, Jury  Tampering, and  Obstruction of Justice in the matter
of the New Life Health Center Company (see U.S.D.C. #GJ-95-1-6).

     We have  attached a considerable amount of written materials
to substantiate  the fact  that, on September 25, 1989, Assistant
U.S. Attorney  Robert Miskell  was sanctioned  $4,797 by the U.S.
District Court  Judge in the case of U.S. v. Nordbrock et al. for
repeatedly lying  to that  Court.   We argue that such a sanction
should give  this grand  jury pause  to consider the credibility,
and motives,  of Robert Miskell whenever he approaches you in the
matter of  the New  Life Health Center Company, and possibly also
other cases  which he  may bring  before you,  including but  not
limited to "illegal tax protestor" cases.

     We have  also attached  a  considerable  amount  of  written
materials to  substantiate our  allegation that  Mr. Miskell, and
possibly other  accomplices  of  his  within  the  Department  of
Justice and  also the  "Internal Revenue  Service",  have  either
delayed, diverted, and/or obstructed our PRIVILEGED COMMUNICATION
to you,  dated March 20, 1996, and sent via Registered U.S. Mail,
USPS serial  number #R-591-643-753,  Return Receipt Requested and
Restricted Delivery Requested.  This PRIVILEGED COMMUNICATION was
subsequently incorporated  by reference  as  an  exhibit  in  our
AFFIDAVIT OF  CAUSES AND  OBJECTIONS TO  O.S.C., which  was filed
with the Clerk of the U.S. Distict Court, District of Arizona, on
April 25,  1996.   A copy of the completed AFFIDAVIT of April 25,
1996, is attached for your information.


         Formal Request for Investigation:  Page 1 of 9


     One of  the Exhibits  attached to  our  original  PRIVILEGED
COMMUNICATION to  you included  a  page  from  the  IRS  Internal
Revenue Manual,  Handbook of  Delegation  Orders,  page  1229-80,
(dated 4-3-91), Delegation of Personnel-Related Matters, Chart 2,
in which the Deputy Commissioner is delegated authority to do the
following:

     Approve monetary  awards and  exceptions to  monetary  award
     scales up to and including $10,000 for any one individual or
     group, and  incur necessary  expenses for the recognition of
     contributions

     Approve monetary  awards and  exceptions to  monetary  award
     scales of  $5,000-$10,000 (excluding  PMRS Cash  Awards) for
     any one individual or group

     As Chairperson,  Executive Resources  Board, to  review  and
     concur in recommendations for all awards for executives

     Recommend to  Treasury, monetary  awards of  $10,001-$25,000
     ($5,001 or  more for  Performance Management and Recognition
     System (PMRS) Cash Awards) for any one individual or group

     Recommend an  additional monetary  award of  $10,000  (total
     $35,000) to the President through Treasury.

                                                 [Emphasis added]

     We are  prepared to  recommend  witnesses  to  you  who  are
willing to  testify, under  oath,  that  these  PMRS  awards  are
specifically reserved for the President of the United States, and
for U.S. Attorneys, upon obtaining grand jury indictments against
"illegal tax  protestors".   On this  point,  we  would  like  to
emphasize  that,   under  the   First  Amendment   in  the   U.S.
Constitution, protest  has never  been illegal  in America.   The
term "illegal  protestor" is, therefore, an oxymoron which cannot
survive a challenge on constitutional grounds.

     Accordingly, to  be consistent  with the  Constitution,  the
term "illegal tax protestor" as found in various Acts of Congress
must be  interpreted to mean that the "tax" is "illegal", and not
the "protest".   Upon  request, we  can provide you with numerous
Supreme Court  authorities for the proposition that Congressional
statutes must be construed in harmony with the fundamental Law.

     Thus,  it  now  appears  that  there  are  substantial  cash
incentives for  U.S.  Attorneys  to  lie,  tamper,  and  obstruct
evidence in  seeking and  obtaining indictments  requested by the
"Internal  Revenue  Service",  all  in  violation  of  applicable
federal law  (see Title 18 United States Code) and the principles
established in the Constitution for the United States of America.

     We have also enclosed materials which show that the Internal
Revenue Service has, since the year 1981, conducted an aggressive
campaign to  harass and intimidate people affiliated with the New
Life Health  Center Company,  in order  to "make  an example"  of


         Formal Request for Investigation:  Page 2 of 9


them.   Specifically, we  would like  to draw  your attention  to
Exhibit 1  from the AFFIDAVIT OF NEIL NORDBROCK REGARDING NOTICES
OF DEFICIENCY  IN SUPPORT  OF PLAINTIFFS'  RESPONSE TO MOTION FOR
SUMMARY JUDGMENT.  This Exhibit 1 is entitled [see next page]:

                        COMPARISON CHART
            AMOUNTS ASSESSED IN NOTICES OF DEFICIENCY
                              WITH
    CORRECTED AMOUNTS OF DEFICIENCY COMMISSIONER NOW ASSERTS
              BURNS AND RELATED BUSINESS ENTITIES:

     This chart  shows quite  a dramatic  discrepancy between, on
the one  hand, the  total from  IRS Notices of Deficiency for the
calendar years  1978 thru  1982 ($721,572.00)  and the  corrected
amounts which  total only  $24,978.00.  The arithmetic difference
between these  two amounts is almost $700,000.  According to said
AFFIDAVIT  OF   NEIL  NORDBROCK,  "The  most  flagrant  violation
occurred in  Burns' case for 1983, where the IRS now acknowledges
that the  original assessment  is more than 99.5% incorrect.  See
Chart."

     In support  of our allegation that there has been systematic
abuse of  the grand  jury in the matter of New Life Health Center
Company and its workers, we attach a copy of PLAINTIFFS' RESPONSE
TO MOTION  FOR SUMMARY  JUDGMENT in  the  case  of  Nordbrock  v.
Jensen, case  number  CIV-86-687-PHX-CLH  in  the  United  States
District Court  for the District of Arizona.  See, in particular,
the following pages in this document:  6, 9, 10, 12, 14, and 18.

     Ladies and gentleman of the federal grand jury in the matter
of the New Life Health Center Company, we are prepared to provide
you with  additional expert  testimony  concerning  the  subjects
discussed above,  and other  matters which are closely related to
those subjects.  This expert testimony will give you much insight
into what  has recently been proven, by authors and investigators
around the country, to be the greatest fiscal fraud that has ever
been perpetrated  upon any  people at  any time in the history of
the world.   We  now look  forward  with  eager  anticipation  to
testifying before  you, because the time has now come for a shift
in the wind.


         Formal Request for Investigation:  Page 3 of 9


Sincerely yours,

/s/ Paul Mitchell

Paul Andrew, Mitchell, B.A., M.S.
Counselor at Law and federal witness

copies:   New Life Health Center Company
          U.S. District Judge John M. Roll
          Ninth Circuit Judge Alex Kozinski

enclosures:

     proof of $4,797 court sanction against Robert Miskell
     AFFIDAVIT OF CAUSES AND OBJECTIONS TO O.S.C.
     AFFIDAVIT OF NEIL NORDBROCK REGARDING NOTICES OF DEFICIENCY
     PLAINTIFFS' RESPONSE TO MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
     23 copies of CITIZENS RULE BOOK and JURY HANDBOOK


         Formal Request for Investigation:  Page 4 of 9


                 PROOF OF $4,797 COURT SANCTION
              AGAINST U.S. ATTORNEY ROBERT MISKELL


         Formal Request for Investigation:  Page 5 of 9


                       AFFIDAVIT OF CAUSES
                               AND
                      OBJECTIONS TO O.S.C.


         Formal Request for Investigation:  Page 6 of 9


                   AFFIDAVIT OF NEIL NORDBROCK
                 REGARDING NOTICES OF DEFICIENCY


         Formal Request for Investigation:  Page 7 of 9


                      PLAINTIFFS' RESPONSE
                 TO MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT


         Formal Request for Investigation:  Page 8 of 9


                          23 copies of
                       CITIZENS RULE BOOK
                               and
                          JURY HANDBOOK
                     (under separate cover)


         Formal Request for Investigation:  Page 9 of 9


                             #  #  #


Return to the Table of Contents for

IN RE GRAND JURY SUBPOENA SERVED ON NEW LIFE HEALTH CENTER COMPANY