Paul Andrew, Mitchell, B.A., M.S.
Counselor at Law and federal witness
c/o 2509 N. Campbell, #1776
Tucson, Arizona state
zip code exempt

Under Protest and by Special Visitation
On behalf of the Managing Director







                  UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

                       DISTRICT OF ARIZONA


IN RE GRAND JURY SUBPOENA       )  Case No. GJ-95-1-6
SERVED ON                       )
NEW LIFE HEALTH CENTER COMPANY  )  AFFIDAVIT OF CAUSES AND
                                )
________________________________)  OBJECTIONS TO O.S.C.


COMES NOW Paul Andrew, Mitchell, B.A., M.S., Counselor at Law and

agent acting under limited authorization to prepare and file this

Affidavit of  Causes and  Objections, submitted  on behalf of the

New Life  Health Center Company, an Unincorporated Business Trust

organization domiciled  in  the  Arizona  Republic,  outside  the

jurisdiction of  the United  States (hereinafter  the "Company"),

explaining why  said Company  should not be found in contempt for

allegedly failing  to "appear"  at the  grand jury  on March  27,

1996, at  9:10 a.m.,  as  directed  by  the  alleged  grand  jury

subpoena allegedly served on March 7, 1996.

     1.   The service  of said subpoena was defective because the

Company is  domiciled outside  the  jurisdiction  of  the  United

States.   Said subpoena  was refused  for cause without dishonor,

pursuant to the Uniform Commercial Code ("U.C.C.") Section 3-501,

on the  twenty-first day  of the  third month  of  the  year  one

thousand   nine  hundred   ninety-six Anno Domini,  see  attached

EXHIBIT "A".


    Affidavit of Causes and Objections to OSC:  Page 1 of 14


     2.   The reasons for said Refusal for Cause without Dishonor

were  documented,   in  part,  in  a  letter,  with  attachments,

addressed to  the Grand  Jury Foreperson  In re:  New Life Health

Center Company,  dated March  20, 1996, and mailed via Registered

United States  Mail,  Return  Receipt  Requested  and  Restricted

Delivery  Requested,   Registered  U.S.  Mail  No.  R-591-643-753

(hereinafter "Registered  letter").   Said letter is incorporated

by reference as if set forth fully in EXHIBIT "B".

     3.   United States  Postal Service  PS Form  3811, "Domestic

Return Receipt,"  was returned  without any  signature,  and  the

spaces for  "Addressee's Address"  and "Received  By:" were  left

blank, despite  the fact  that the  Undersigned had paid an extra

fee for  "Restricted Delivery"  and  "Return  Receipt"  services.

Said returned  PS Form  3811 indicated that the Registered letter

had been delivered on "3-22-96", see EXHIBIT "C".

     4.   When asked  why said  PS Form  3811 did  not  show  any

recipient's signature,  a counter  clerk  of  the  United  States

Postal Service  completed  two  (2)  separate  PS  Forms  3811-A,

REQUEST FOR RETURN RECEIPT, on two separate occasions.  The first

such request,  mailed on April 2, 1996, and delivered on April 5,

1996, indicated  that the  original Registered  letter  had  been

delivered on "3-25-96".  The second such request, mailed on April

17, 1996, and delivered on April 18, 1996, indicated:  "no record

found but  cleared reg.  rm 3/28".  The Company took careful note

of the  obvious  discrepancies  among  the  three  (3)  different

delivery dates,  to wit:   3-22-96, 3-25-96, and 3/28, the latter


    Affidavit of Causes and Objections to OSC:  Page 2 of 14


being the  date the  Registered letter  "cleared reg.  rm" [sic].

See EXHIBIT "C".

     5.   Even though  the Company  paid in full for the best and

most  secure   method  of   posting  United   States  mail,  said

discrepancies and  the absence of any recipient's signatures have

given the  Company reason  to believe that said Registered letter

was intercepted  and/or diverted by "United States Attorney JANET

NAPOLITANO" and/or  "Assistant U.S.  Attorney Robert L. Miskell",

in a  knowing, intentional,  and voluntary  violation of  federal

law.   The Company is unable to determine, at this point in time,

whether or  not the grand jury Foreperson, to whom the Registered

letter was  addressed,  had  completed  a  United  States  Postal

Service PS Form 3801: Standing Delivery Order, authorizing one or

more agent(s)  to receive registered, certified, insured, c.o.d.,

express mail,  and special  delivery mail addressed to or in care

of the  grand jury  Foreperson.   This  Court  will  please  take

judicial notice  that said  PS Form  3801 contains  the following

qualifying language on its face, to wit:

     Where RESTRICTED  DELIVERY  MAIL  is  to  be  included,  the
     statement  "This   authorization  is   extended  to  include
     RESTRICTED DELIVERY  MAIL" must  be entered  on the delivery
     order by the person signing it.  This notation is to be made
     on the  part of the form for signatures of authorized agent.
     NOTE:  Unknown signatures must be identified.

                                                [See EXHIBIT "C"]

     6.   The Company has empirical evidence proving that alleged

agents  of   the  United   States,  specifically  "United  States

Attorney" Robert  Johnson, has proceeded against the Company with

the stated  purpose of  putting the  Company out  of business, in

order to  make an  example of  it.   The  AFFIDAVIT  of  Managing

Director Eugene  A. Burns,  D.C., N.D.,  is attached  hereto  and


    Affidavit of Causes and Objections to OSC:  Page 3 of 14


incorporated by  reference as  if set forth fully as EXHIBIT "D".

Paragraph 6 of said AFFIDAVIT contains the following quotation of

Mr. Robert Johnson, to wit:

     This is  not an  issue of money (Dr. Burns), this is a power
     issue.   We intend  on putting  you and  your Company out of
     business to make you an example.
                                                [See Exhibit "D"]

Because it  believes that  alleged agents  of the  United  States

recently diverted  Registered United States mail, in violation of

federal law,  and because  it believes that alleged agents of the

United States  have, at  least since  March of 1981, stated their

intentions to destroy the Company's business in order to "make an

example" of  it,  and  because  of  a  multitude  of  events  and

discoveries which  workers at  the Company  have witnessed in the

intervening period  of time, the Company now firmly believes that

alleged agents  of the  United States have demonstrated a pattern

of criminal conduct which continues right up to the present time.

The Company, therefore, makes this offer to prove its allegations

of criminal  conduct by means of a detailed AFFIDAVIT OF PROBABLE

CAUSE, which  is currently  in preparation  and will  require  at

least thirty  (30) additional  calendar days  to complete, serve,

and file in the instant case.

     7.   The  Company  has  researched  relevant  case  law  and

confirmed that  the United  States can be enjoined to prevent the

destruction of a business which might otherwise occur as a direct

consequence of  enforcing the   assessment  and/or collection  of

income taxes upon the Company.  Specifically, the Anti-Injunction

Act cannot  be enforced to destroy a business.  See John M. Hirst

& Company  v. Gentsch,  133 F.2d  247 (6th  Cir., 1943),  Midwest

Haulers v.  Brady, 128  F.2d 496  (6th Cir.,  1942), and  Long v.


    Affidavit of Causes and Objections to OSC:  Page 4 of 14


United States,  148 F.Supp.  758  (1957),  copies  of  which  are

attached and  incorporated by  reference as if set forth fully in

EXHIBIT "E".

     8.   The Company  has consummated  a written  non-disclosure

contract with the Managing Director specifically prohibiting said

Managing Director  from divulging  any Company information, books

and records or any other property belonging to the Company to any

person,  agency,  or  government  entity.    Said  non-disclosure

contract is  incorporated here by reference as if set forth fully

in EXHIBIT  "F".    Specifically,  said  non-disclosure  contract

states that  the Managing  Director will  be subject  to possible

criminal sanctions imposed by the Trustee of Health International

Corporation, should  said Managing  Director turn over any of the

aforementioned  information  pertinent  to  the  Company  without

authorization.   The names  of Persons mentioned in said contract

have been  redacted to protect their fundamental Right to privacy

in this  matter.  The Company argues that no agents of the United

States, including  but not limited to all United States Attorneys

and this  honorable Court,  can impair  the obligations  of  this

contract, in  direct violation of Article I, Section 10, Clause 1

of the Constitution for the United States of America, as lawfully

amended pursuant to Article V of said Constitution.

     9.   The Company  has never  been served with actual Notice,

issued by  the Secretary  of the  Treasury, or  by his  Delegate,

requiring said  Company to  keep books  and records  in the first

instance.   In the  absence of  such a Notice, properly served on

the authorized  agents for  service of process of the Company who

are domiciled  outside the jurisdiction of the United States, the


    Affidavit of Causes and Objections to OSC:  Page 5 of 14


existence of the books and records sought by said subpoena cannot

be proven.   The law does not recognize impossibilities.  Lex non

cogit impossibilia.

     10.  The Company  argues from  all of  the  above  that  the

agents of  the United  States  who  brought  the  instant  action

petitioned this  honorable Court  with unclean  hands and  with a

fraud upon  this Court,  among other things by misrepresenting to

this Court that the Company had failed to "appear" in response to

said subpoena.   It  is well known that "appearances" can be made

in  writing,  because  an  answer  constitutes  an  "appearance."

Wieser v.  Richter, 247  Mich. 52,  225 N.W.  542, 543.   See the

several definitions  of "appearance"  in Black's  Law Dictionary,

Fourth Edition  with Guide  to  Pronunciation.    The  Registered

letter cited supra was the Company's "answer" to said subpoena.

     11.  The Company objects, for the record, to the unqualified

use by  the United  States and  any of  its agencies, assigns and

instrumentalities, of  United States  Postal  Service  ZIP  codes

and/or two-letter  federal abbreviations  for the state Republics

which are  united by  and under  the Constitution  for the United

States of  America, as  lawfully amended pursuant to Article V of

said Constitution.

     12.  The Undersigned  places this  honorable Court,  and all

interested parties  in the  instant case, on formal Notice of the

fact that  He has  witnessed original documents, certified by the

official State  Archivist of  Colorado, proving that the original

Thirteenth Amendment to the Constitution for the United States of

America contains  an explicit  prohibition of  titles of nobility

and honor, and explicit penalties for their use, to wit:


    Affidavit of Causes and Objections to OSC:  Page 6 of 14


     If any  citizen of  the United  States shall  accept, claim,
     receive, or retain any title of nobility or honor, or shall,
     without the  consent of  congress,  accept  and  retain  any
     present, pension,  office or emolument of any kind whatever,
     from any  emperor, king,  prince,  or  foreign  power,  such
     person shall cease to be a citizen of the United States, and
     shall be  incapable of holding any office of trust or profit
     under them, or either of them.
                                           [Thirteenth Amendment]

     13.  The Undersigned  has  concluded  from  said  Thirteenth

Amendment  that  the  retention  of  such  titles  as  "Esquire",

"Attorney", and/or  "Lawyer",  after  actual  knowledge  of  said

Amendment has  been demonstrated,  causes all  Persons,  and  all

persons, retaining  such titles to forfeit their Citizenship, and

citizenship, respectively,  and to  become forever  incapable  of

holding any  public office  under the United States, or under any

of the  several states  United by  and under the Constitution for

the  United   States  of  America,  as  lawfully  amended.    The

Undersigned also concludes therefrom that membership in any state

bar association,  and/or the  American Bar  Association  ("ABA"),

and/or the  International Bar Association, likewise causes such a

member to  forfeit his/her  Citizenship/citizenship  forever  and

also to  become forever  incapable of  holding any  public office

anywhere  within   the  state  or  federal  governments.      The

Undersigned also  sincerely believes that His actual knowledge of

the  real   Thirteenth  Amendment  obliges  Him  to  report  said

Amendment to this honorable Court as a true and correct provision

in the Constitution for the United States of America, as lawfully

amended,  because   to  conceal  His  actual  knowledge  of  said

Amendment would  place him  in jeopardy  of  being  charged,  and

possibly convicted,  of misprision  of felony,  in  violation  of

Title 18 United States Code, the federal criminal code.


    Affidavit of Causes and Objections to OSC:  Page 7 of 14


     The Undersigned  hereby certifies, under penalty of perjury,

under the  laws of  the United  States of  America,  without  the

"United States",  that the above statements are true and correct,

to the  best of  His current  information, knowledge, and belief,

pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1746(1).


Executed: twenty-fourth day of the fourth month of the year
          one thousand nine hundred ninety-six Anno Domini
          (in the year of Our Lord and Savior Jesus Christ)

/s/ Paul Mitchell
___________________________________________________
Paul Andrew, Mitchell, B.A., M.S.
Counselor at Law and federal witness


    Affidavit of Causes and Objections to OSC:  Page 8 of 14


                           EXHIBIT "A"


    Affidavit of Causes and Objections to OSC:  Page 9 of 14


                           EXHIBIT "B"


    Affidavit of Causes and Objections to OSC:  Page 10 of 14


                           EXHIBIT "C"


    Affidavit of Causes and Objections to OSC:  Page 11 of 14


                           EXHIBIT "D"


    Affidavit of Causes and Objections to OSC:  Page 12 of 14


                           EXHIBIT "E"


    Affidavit of Causes and Objections to OSC:  Page 13 of 14


                           EXHIBIT "F"


    Affidavit of Causes and Objections to OSC:  Page 14 of 14


                             #  #  #


Return to the Table of Contents for

IN RE GRAND JURY SUBPOENA SERVED ON NEW LIFE HEALTH CENTER COMPANY