Sheila Terese, Wallen, Sui Juris
c/o General Delivery
Arivaca [zip code exempt]
ARIZONA STATE

In Propria Persona

Under Protest, Necessity, and
by Special Visitation Only






                  UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

                  JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF ARIZONA


UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,       )  Case No. 95-484-WDB
                                )
     Plaintiff,                 )  NOTICE AND DEMAND FOR
                                )  THE RIGHT TO ENJOY
     v.                         )  THE ASSISTANCE OF
                                )  COUNSEL OF CHOICE:
Sheila Terese, Wallen,          )  Sixth Amendment
                                )
     Defendant.                 )
________________________________)


COMES NOW  Sheila Terese,  Wallen, Sui  Juris, Citizen of Arizona

state and  Defendant in  the above  entitled matter  (hereinafter

"Defendant"), to  demand this  honorable Court  to recognize  Her

fundamental Right to enjoy the assistance of either Counsel(s) or

Co-Counsel(s) of  Her choice  who are  not necessarily members of

the State  Bar of  Arizona and  who are  not necessarily licensed

attorneys, for the following reasons:

     1.   The Constitutional guarantee of right to "assistance of

counsel" is not qualified.

     2.   The Constitution  of the State of Arizona, ordained and

established by  the People  for Their  protection, shall  not  be

superseded or  amended by  any  act  of  the  Legislature  or  by

anything in the Constitution or laws of any State.


Notice and Demand to Enjoy the Assistance of Counsel:  Page 1 of
                                4


     3.   Defendant has  the fundamental  Right to  the effective

assistance of  Counsel of  Her choice, to stand by, and to advise

the Defendant  while proceeding  In Propria  Persona.   People v.

Hill, (1969)  70 C.2d 678,  76 Cal.Rptr. 225, 452 P.2d 329, cert.

denied 406  U.S.   971;   People v.  Zamora, (1944) 66 Cal.App.2d

166, 152 P.2d 180.

     4.   Within the  unambiguous language  of the  Constitution,

the assistance  of Counsel  does not restrict it to any state bar

associations.

     5.   Defendant refuses  to waive  any fundamental  Rights or

Immunities in order to assert another Right or Immunity.

     6.   The Right  to Counsel  has been deeply embedded in true

American tradition since the foundation of this Republic, and has

been most  recently set  forth by the United States Supreme Court

in Faretta v. State of California, 422 U.S. 806 (1975).

     The U.S.  Supreme Court  has ruled  as follows:    "If  this

requirement of  the Sixth  Amendment is  not complied  with,  the

court no longer has jurisdiction to proceed."  Johnson v. Zerbst,

304 U.S. 458, 468 (1938).

     In addition,  if this Court fails to notify the Defendant of

its fundamental "Rights Sua Sponte" or those declared or demanded

by the  Defendant, then  the Court  of its  own  volition  denies

itself jurisdiction.


                        RELIEF REQUESTED

     Therefore, the  Defendant moves  the  Court  to  grant  this

demand for  the right  of assistance  of Counsel  or  Co-Counsel,
whichever  the  Defendant  wishes  to  have,  to  insure  to  the

Defendant fair  proceedings and  justice, which  Rights are  more


Notice and Demand to Enjoy the Assistance of Counsel:  Page 2 of
                                4


fully set forth in the attached brief in support of the absolute,

unalienable Right to unfettered Counsel.


Executed on July 22, 1996


/s/ Sheila Wallen

Sheila Terese, Wallen, Sui Juris
Citizen of Arizona state
all rights reserved without prejudice


/s/ Paul Mitchell

Paul Andrew, Mitchell, B.A., M.S.
Citizen of Arizona state,
Counselor at Law and federal witness
all rights reserved without prejudice


Notice and Demand to Enjoy the Assistance of Counsel:  Page 3 of
                                4


                        PROOF OF SERVICE

I, Sheila  Terese,  Wallen,  Sui  Juris,  hereby  certify,  under

penalty of  perjury, under  the laws  of  the  United  States  of

America, without  the United  States, that I am at least 18 years

of age  and a Citizen of one of the United States of America, and

that I personally served the following document:

            NOTICE AND DEMAND FOR THE RIGHT TO ENJOY
              THE ASSISTANCE OF COUNSEL OF CHOICE:
                        Sixth Amendment

by placing  said document  in first class U.S. Mail, with postage

prepaid and properly addressed to the following individuals:
Office of the United States Attorney  [hand-delivered]
110 South Church Avenue, Suite 8310
Tucson [85701]
ARIZONA STATE

Attorney General
Department of Justice
10th and Constitution, N.W.
Washington
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Solicitor General
Department of Justice
10th and Constitution, N.W.
Washington
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA


Dated:  July 22, 1996

/s/ Sheila Wallen
________________________________________
Sheila Terese, Wallen,
Citizen of Arizona state
all rights reserved without prejudice


Notice and Demand to Enjoy the Assistance of Counsel:  Page 4 of
                                4


                             #  #  #


Return to the Table of Contents for

U.S.A. v. Wallen