Paul Mitchell Asks Gore to Stand Down
 
 
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE                             11/11/2000 A.D.
 
 
San Francisco
 

Paul Andrew Mitchell, the Private Attorney General in People v. United States, today asked Vice President Albert Gore to concede the general election to his rival, Texas Governor George W. Bush.

 

As Florida contemplates another recount and still more delays, Mitchell announced the People's intent to petition the U.S. Supreme Court for leave to institute Quo Warranto proceedings against the voter registration practices of all 50 States.

 

"There is a lot of talk now about the Constitution, but few if any informed Americans know that the high Court has original jurisdiction of actions in which a Union State is a party," Mitchell explained.

 

"If the People sue the United States of America, the Constitution requires such a case to commence in the Supreme Court."

 

Mitchell recently utilized the Internet to broadcast a notice of intent to institute Quo Warranto proceedings against all 50 States.  "Quo Warranto" is a Latin term meaning "by what authority."

 

Mitchell claims to have discovered a major fraud on the voter registration affidavits in every State.  Major fraud is prohibited by the federal criminal Code.

 

The fraud is thoroughly documented in numerous pleadings now published in the Supreme Law Library, a public domain library which Mitchell created and maintains, with private donations.

 

"Attorneys and lawyers for the government have now twisted our laws to such an extent," Mitchell complains, "Americans who are qualified to make federal Law cannot vote, or serve on juries;  and, Americans who can vote and serve on juries, are not qualified to make federal Laws."

 

There are two classes of citizens under American law never repealed.  The first, or primary class are Citizens of the several States;  this class has existed ever since the U.S. Constitution was first ratified.  They are Citizens of ONE OF the States united by, and under the Constitution.

 

The second class, actually an inferior class, are federal citizens, also known as "citizens of the United States";  this class was first created by the 1866 Civil Rights Act.  Mitchell's research has now confirmed a court decision which held that federal citizens were not even contemplated when the U.S. Constitution was first ratified.

 

"This decision, Pannill v. Roanoke, is not only definitive, it is dispositive," Mitchell says.

 

"Congress and the States are to blame for labeling federal citizenship with language deliberately designed to sound the same as the primary class identified in the Qualifications Clauses," Mitchell elaborated.  "Deliberate vagueness is fraud," he argues.

 

The Qualifications Clauses are the provisions in the U.S. Constitution which define the lawful qualifications for eligibility to serve in the House, Senate, and White House.  These are the only 3 elective offices in the entire federal government.

 

The term "United States" as found in these Clauses means "States united".  This meaning was explained by Judge Pablo De La Guerra in a case which reached the California Supreme Court more than a century ago;  De La Guerra was a signatory on the California Constitution of 1849, enacted when California first joined the Union.

 

"Gore is tipping his hand with his obsession over Florida's electoral votes," Mitchell continued.

 

"It's a case of missing the forest for the trees.  As President of the U.S. Senate, Gore has received written notice from me, several times, of the two classes and the many violations of equal protection that are now occurring."

 

Mitchell was prevented from voting in the last two general elections, because he declines to accept federal citizenship.

 

"It would be the ultimate irony if their own voter registration affidavits ended up disqualifying both candidates from serving in the White House," Mitchell speculates.

 

"The so-called 14th amendment tried to make federal citizens also citizens of the States where they reside, but that amendment was never properly ratified.  There is now no constitutional authority for the proposition that federal citizens are also citizens of the States in which they reside," Mitchell concluded.

 

The population of federal citizens now living and working inside the 50 States is technically a legislative democracy, which is subject to the municipal jurisdiction of the Congress due to their voter registration affidavits.  State Citizens are not subject to the municipal jurisdiction of Congress, however.

 

 

Contact:  Webmaster, Supreme Law Library

          http://www.supremelaw.org/index.htm

 

 

 

#  #  #