“Paul Mitchell Calls for Immediate Cease Fire in Iraq”

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE March 23, 2003 A.D.

6:00 p.m. Pacific

San Diego, California. “It’s a trap, Mr. Bush!” In a strident voice, Paul Andrew Mitchell, Private Attorney General and Founder of the Supreme Law Library on the Internet, moments ago urged President Bush to order an immediate cease‑fire in the undeclared war on the nation of Iraq.

“A 50 mile-per-hour sandstorm is now moving across the Sinai, and it could choke the American advance towards Iraq,” Mitchell stressed. “American military vehicles, particularly high-performance aircraft, are easily disabled by these adverse foreign elements,” he added.

According to recent news reports, American soldiers will begin reaching the outskirts of Baghdad within 48 hours, if all goes according to plans currently being executed by the Pentagon. This is also the time when a fast-moving sandstorm is projected to reach Baghdad as well.

Mitchell also warned of possible enemy plans to lure large numbers of American troops into a very vulnerable position in Iraq. Although not a qualified military planner, Mitchell raised the possibility of nuclear retaliation by Hussein forces who have been running underground breeder reactors for many years now.

“We believe the reason why U.N. inspectors were unable to locate weapons-grade materials is because they have been expertly hidden, or camouflaged. It is already quite clear that American warplanes are expending ordnance shooting at decoy radar installations.”

Mitchell also stressed that Western media propaganda are missing the point when they characterize Saddam Hussein as a madman. On the contrary, his resume is replete with indications that he is a very intelligent man, who has planned for this day for many years now.

“Most Americans can not even conceive that plans may exist in this world completely to destroy, or seriously incapacitate all active American military personnel.” Mitchell here referred to the aborted attempt in December of 1997 to inoculate those military with a tainted anthrax vaccine.

Mitchell took enormous risks at that time to rise up and challenge the Secretary of Defense to drop the Pentagon’s plans to inject a questionable vaccine into all American soldiers, with potentially disastrous consequences for the nation’s civilian population as well.

Details of Pentagon experimentation on GI’s, using chemical and biological substances, are now published in “The Rockefeller Report” and available in the Supreme Law Library on the Internet. The vaccine that would have been administered in 1997 was suspected of carrying deadly neurotoxic agents.

“This program is the essential prong of what we are calling the Eugenics Hypothesis,” explained Mitchell. “Remnants of National Socialism, or Nazism, within our federal government still believe that poisoning an army is the surest way of inflicting permanent biological damage on an entire nation.”

“There are many enemies of freedom around the world,” Mitchell added. “Unfortunately, some of them happen to have infiltrated the command and control positions in all branches of our government.”

Mitchell also urged that a special grand jury be convened to evaluate evidence that the Pentagon was hit with a smaller jet fighter packed with C‑6 plastic explosives and armed with a powerful air‑to‑ground missile that was mounted under the fighter’s left wing.

This rocket can be seen trailing a helix-shaped plume of white exhaust smoke, on a videotape made by a Pentagon security camera seconds before that fatal explosion.

Mitchell theorizes now that this rocket was placed tactically to penetrate the hardened exterior façade of the Pentagon, where Mitchell studied military waste as a UCLA political science intern during the summer of 1969. This rocket softened the outer wall enough for the plastic explosive to reach the Pentagon’s inner corridors.

Also, the explosion appears to have a single epicenter, totally unlike the fireballs which would have erupted if two nearly full wing tanks of jet fuel had smashed against the Pentagon’s exterior walls.

During the past 6 months, an officer of the day at a nearby U.S. military base requested Paul Andrew Mitchell to maintain channels of communication in his ongoing investigation of probable treason that preceded the Pentagon attack. Numerous forensic experts are now in agreement that the damage to the Pentagon can not be explained by the impact of a Boeing 757 or 767 carrying eighty percent of its maximum fuel load.

Mitchell has been keen to direct the nation’s attention to a 3‑by‑2 matrix of 6 windows immediately to the left of the missile impact zone. There, the upper 4 windows were completely intact after the fires were extinguished.

Also, confidential contacts within a San Francisco civil engineering firm have now directed Mitchell to a published and fully illustrated report of structural damages to the Pentagon: the pattern of structural penetration can only be explained by a fast-moving aircraft with a single jet engine unlike the ones that power modern Boeing passenger jets.

“We believe that a Boeing 757 did coast overhead and land moments later at National Airport,” Mitchell elaborates, “to create a visual alibi. What happened to that plane after it landed is a matter which I now believe a qualified grand jury should investigate immediately, using its subpoena powers to command the testimony of important witnesses we are now busy enumerating.”

“The missiles that hit the Pentagon and the World Trade Center were remotely controlled,” Mitchell concluded. The technology for such a thing is called Global Hawk by Pentagon program managers.

Mitchell’s judicial activism, litigation, and extensive publications documenting that litigation, are in the public domain and can be viewed in the Supreme Law Library at Internet URL:

http://www.supremelaw.org/index.htm

# # #