Time: Sun Jun 15 20:20:34 1997
by primenet.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id UAA13468
for [address in tool bar]; Sun, 15 Jun 1997 20:20:51 -0700 (MST)
by usr06.primenet.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id UAA12037;
Sun, 15 Jun 1997 20:18:44 -0700 (MST)
Date: Sun, 15 Jun 1997 20:17:22 -0700
To: (Recipient list suppressed)
From: Paul Andrew Mitchell [address in tool bar]
Subject: SLS: OKC had jury problems (fwd)
>Date: Sun, 15 Jun 1997 23:15:07 -0400 (EDT)
>From: Norman Olson <nolso@sunny.ncmc.cc.mi.us>
>To: Paul Andrew Mitchell [address in tool bar]
>Subject: Re: OKC had jury problems
>
>
>Sure, Send it along, Paul... I hope it
>will help give a different point of view.
>
>Kind Regards,
>
>Norm Olson
>
>
>
>On Sun, 15 Jun 1997, Paul Andrew Mitchell wrote:
>
>> Norm,
>>
>> Terrific insights here! May I forward your
>> comments to clients of the Supreme Law School?
>> Please response with this message, so I can
>> forward the whole thing, if your answer is "yes".
>>
>> I am standing by.
>>
>> /s/ Paul Mitchell
>> http://www.supremelaw.com
>>
>>
>> At 09:13 AM 6/15/97 -0400, you wrote:
>> >
>> >The war between the DOJ and the American people continue
>> >according to the principle that power corrupts. The cycle
>> >cannot be broken by the justice system if the justice system
>> >is itself contaminated with corruption. To ask the courts
>> >to rectify the wrong is like asking the fox to find out why
>> >the chickens are missing.
>> >
>> > Keys and others MUST pursue the grand jury objective and
>> >have a trial. Regardless of the absurd theater of bleeding
>> >hearts who don't want the emotional trauma revisited. We must
>> >search and discover what were the full causes of the OKC
>> >tragedy. The DOJ KNOWS that proximate cause and responsibility
>> >will echo in any such trial and will further discredit the
>> >regime in Washington. Such a trial must be avoided.
>> >
>> > It's going to be an interesting year.
>> >
>> >Kind Regards,
>> >
>> >Norm Olson
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >On Sat, 14 Jun 1997, Paul Andrew Mitchell wrote:
>> >
>> >> Norm,
>> >>
>> >> Great insights! Here's my take,
>> >> to a BBC reporter, infra.
>> >>
>> >> What's your take on the Oklahoma
>> >> state grand jury, convened by
>> >> Rep. Charles Key?
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> /s/ Paul Mitchell
>> >> http://www.supremelaw.com
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> At 02:54 AM 6/15/97 +0100, you wrote:
>> >> >>Dear Clients,
>> >> >
>> >> >Me too?
>> >>
>> >> Of course!
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> >>I would like to poll all of you on a
>> >> >>proposal that has tenaciously stayed
>> >> >>in my head for 72 hours and running.
>> >> >
>> >> >Your concentration span is to be admired.
>> >> >
>> >> >>On the theory that McVeigh is really
>> >> >>working the other side of the fence,
>> >> >
>> >> >Specifics?
>> >>
>> >> The theory is that McVeigh is BATF.
>> >> The Pentagon expert proved that there
>> >> were charges drilled in the bearing
>> >> columns. Radiate your research
>> >> outwards from that point of origin.
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> >>I would like to prepare a formal proposal
>> >> >>to Oklahoma state Representative Charles
>> >> >>Key, as follows:
>> >> >
>> >> >>Federal jury selection is fatally flawed
>> >> >>because of the class discrimination which
>> >> >>is evident in 28 U.S.C. 1865.
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> >You mean they all were for capital punishment or they all came
>> >> >from a certain class? You dont have class juries do you? "Selection"
>> >> >is a real threat. Please explain "flawed" in this context.
>> >>
>> >> Visit the Supreme Law Library at URL:
>> >>
>> >> http://www.supremelaw.com
>> >>
>> >> and read "Juries in Check around the Nation"
>> >> and "State Citizens Cannot Vote." This will
>> >> give you the background you need.
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> >>The flaw exists for selection of federal
>> >> >>grand and petit (trial) juries.
>> >> >>
>> >> >>McVeigh was indicted by such a flawed grand
>> >> >>jury, and he was convicted by such a flawed
>> >> >>trial jury. Therefore, his conviction is
>> >> >>null and void.
>> >> >>
>> >> >
>> >> >>The Oklahoma state special grand jury has
>> >> >>been approved by the state Supreme Court.
>> >> >>
>> >> >>The People would intervene in McVeigh's
>> >> >>appeal, requesting an indefinite stay of
>> >> >>proceedings, pending the outcome of the
>> >> >>JSSA challenge now before the 8th Circuit.
>> >> >
>> >> >You've lost me with jargonism
>> >>
>> >> "Intervention of Right" is a procedure under
>> >> American jurisprudence, allowing a third party
>> >> to join the action. In this case, the third
>> >> party would be the "People of the United
>> >> States of America," the Plaintiffs in the
>> >> Billings federal case in which I am the
>> >> private attorney general.
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> >>I would bring the Request for Intervention,
>> >> >>as a private attorney general.
>> >> >
>> >> >For?
>> >>
>> >> McVeigh was indicted and convicted by federal
>> >> juries that were not legal bodies. The People
>> >> have a vested interest in fixing the problem
>> >> with the Jury Selection and Service Act,
>> >> Title 28, United States Code, section 1865,
>> >> because it conflicts directly with section 1861.
>> >> Think of the first and last years of the American
>> >> Civil War, and you will remember the section
>> >> numbers. You can view these laws right on
>> >> the Internet: use Alta Vista to search for
>> >> "United States Code", then go to Title 28,
>> >> then sections 1861 and 1865. It's all right
>> >> there, in plain English.
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> >
>> >> >>Along with this stay request, the People
>> >> >>would request judicial notice of the
>> >> >>state grand jury proceeding in Oklahoma.
>> >>
>> >> A "stay" is a temporary suspension, or halt,
>> >> in the proceedings, until something else is
>> >> settled, finally, usually by the U.S.
>> >> Supreme Court.
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >
>> >> >judicial notice?
>> >> >What does that mean?
>> >>
>> >> If a separate law suit is proceeding,
>> >> the court may not know about it, and
>> >> would not need to do anything about it anyway,
>> >> unless a litigant brings it to the attention
>> >> of the court, formally, and asks the court to
>> >> do something about the implications of a
>> >> decision, one way or the other, in that other
>> >> court.
>> >>
>> >> For example, we have a major challenge to the
>> >> Jury Selection and Service Act now before the
>> >> 8th Circuit Court of Appeals in St. Louis,
>> >> Missouri state. If this case is decided in
>> >> favor of the defendant/appellant, then it will
>> >> have the side-effect of overturning McVeigh's
>> >> indictment and conviction too, because he was
>> >> born within one of the several states of the
>> >> Union, if I am not mistaken.
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> >>If the Oklahoma jury selection procedure
>> >> >>is similarly flawed, then their state
>> >> >>law should be challenged, and corrected,
>> >> >>at once, so that they can proceed with their
>> >> >>investigation.
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> >So what are you "looking for" in a jury?
>> >>
>> >> Impartiality, and a body drawn at random.
>> >> Imagine if American juries only selected
>> >> women as candidates! That would be an
>> >> unconstitutional discrimination based on
>> >> "class", a gender-based class.
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> >Why?
>> >>
>> >> The U.S. Supreme Court has already ruled,
>> >> several times, that such class discrimination
>> >> causes the jury to be an illegal body. Many of these
>> >> cases arose from civil rights cases, in which
>> >> some 150 juries in a row were all white,
>> >> within a district which had a mixture of
>> >> blacks and whites. The blacks were being
>> >> discriminated against "as a class." So,
>> >> any "class" discrimination, even if not racial,
>> >> is still unconstitutional, according to the
>> >> U.S. Supreme Court decisions we have located.
>> >>
>> >> As it turns out, if you are qualified under the
>> >> U.S. Constitution to serve in our Congress,
>> >> then you are NOT qualified to serve on a
>> >> federal grand or petit jury. THAT's how serious
>> >> the flaw is. See Article I, Section 2, Clause 2,
>> >> and Article I, Section 3, Clause 3.
>> >>
>> >> "Citizen of the United States" in those provisions
>> >> means "Citizen of ONE OF the States United."
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> >
>> >> >>Rep. Key would be on the leading edge of
>> >> >>this movement, particularly if the Oklahoma
>> >> >>state law(s) need amending.
>> >> >
>> >> >I would support Charles right down the line,
>> >> >but Whew.... the timing of this?
>> >>
>> >> It would take someone with a firm grasp of
>> >> American law, both federal and state, to
>> >> create some order out of this chaos. The
>> >> leading case is U.S.A. v. Gilbertson, which
>> >> I wrote. The OPENING BRIEF was mailed on
>> >> Wednesday, so it is technically filed,
>> >> several days ahead of the deadline. This
>> >> means that the 8th Circuit will HAVE to rule
>> >> on it. They are only one level below the
>> >> U.S. Supreme Court, so the stakes have now
>> >> become rather large, to put it mildly.
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> >
>> >> >>This would be a wedge into exposing federal
>> >> >>manipulation of federal grand juries,
>> >> >
>> >> >As? Specifics? lotsa questions as to "how"...this would
>> >> >expose and the result of such an exposure.
>> >>
>> >> See "The Kick-Back Racket" in the Supreme Law
>> >> Library. U.S. Attorneys are getting rewarded
>> >> for obtaining "politically correct" indictments --
>> >> $25,000 to the Attorneys, $35,000 to Clinton.
>> >> This violates 41 U.S.C. 51 et seq. -- the
>> >> Anti-Kickback Act of 1986; the penalty is stiff
>> >> for accepting kick-backs like this. The
>> >> Constitution also forbids the President from
>> >> accepting any additional emolument during
>> >> his term in office; so, we are talking
>> >> high treason here, at least. The "authority"
>> >> for these "performance rewards" was repealed
>> >> in 1993: see the Performance Management and
>> >> Recognition System Termination Act of 1993.
>> >>
>> >> >
>> >> > and also
>> >> >>federal trial juries as well, a la "The Kick-
>> >> >>Back Racket" and other related themes.
>> >> >
>> >> >Every trial in the US compromised?
>> >>
>> >> Most federal criminal trials are being
>> >> brought in federal courts which have
>> >> NO CRIMINAL JURISDICTION whatsoever.
>> >> See "Karma and the Federal Courts"
>> >> in the Supreme Law Library.
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> All high level trials
>> >> >never come to court? The ratio?
>> >>
>> >> DOJ is warring on the American People,
>> >> while their employees are entrained in
>> >> a massive criminal conspiracy themselves.
>> >> Violating any fundamental Rights is a
>> >> felony violation of Title 18, United
>> >> States Code, Sections 241 and 242.
>> >> We are talking "conspiracy" with a
>> >> small "c" here! :)
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> >Dept of Justice vendetta tactics against the People?
>> >>
>> >> Yes. I call it an extortion racket.
>> >> The "United States" is an organized
>> >> criminal extortion racket, and they
>> >> are using the courts and juries to
>> >> perpetrate this racket. Couple this
>> >> with the perjury and property conversion
>> >> rackets now rampant within the Department
>> >> of Justice, and you have a field day
>> >> as a private attorney general.
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> >MOVE? Abu-Jamal? Cabazon? PROMIS? Casolaro?
>> >>
>> >> Yes, Casolaro broke the Inslaw scan, in which
>> >> the Department of Justice stole some very
>> >> sophisticated record matching, database, and
>> >> bank telecommunications software, and then
>> >> bribed a federal judge to block the inevitable
>> >> law suit which resulted. Talk to the president
>> >> of Inslaw; he can brief you. DOJ is using
>> >> a successor to PROMIS to track commercial liens
>> >> and other commercial paper through the banking
>> >> system; as those records travel through the
>> >> Internet, they pick up lots of "leads" to
>> >> other assets, e.g. bank accounts, credit
>> >> card accounts, etc. Piece-a-cake for a
>> >> good computer programmer (I have 26 years in
>> >> advanced computer systems development).
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> >Bush? Shackley? Wackenhut? Skull and Bones?
>> >>
>> >> Yes. The banking syndicate is behind it all --
>> >> Brussels, London, Amsterdam, Hong Kong --
>> >> mostly European families; New York City too,
>> >> of course -- International Monetary Fund and
>> >> their cohorts. Powerful computers are really
>> >> C-H-E-A-P now. I just bought 16 megabytes of
>> >> RAM for $100. In 1980, we had to pay $45,000
>> >> for a one megabyte upgrade to a super minicomputer.
>> >> That CPU was one million instructions per second.
>> >> Now, Digital Equipment is up to 500 million
>> >> instructions per second, with their Alpha chip.
>> >> That may even be low, because the latest CPU's
>> >> are doing more than one instruction per
>> >> clock cycle. The alpha is cycling at 500 MHz!
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> >
>> >> >>I would like to get your feedback on this
>> >> >>proposal. This idea has the potential to
>> >> >>thrust jury selection into the limelight,
>> >> >>and buy time for the Oklahoma state grand
>> >> >>jury to get their act together.
>> >> >
>> >> >I heard that a jury (may have been possible to provide) its own
>> >> >lawyer to the foreman, that would clarify issues?
>> >>
>> >> Yes. They are called "runaway juries," because
>> >> they oust the prosecutor and take over everything
>> >> they can get their hands on, including private
>> >> counsel. They have that power, under our
>> >> Tenth Amendment, because juries predated the
>> >> Declaration of Independence; their roots are
>> >> in British common law, remember?
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> >
>> >> >Paul,
>> >> >I would like to see an investigation not a trial in oklahoma
>> >> >and an appeal to the international community to assist
>> >> >tracking down strassmeir and friends and seal'em up once
>> >> >and for all.
>> >>
>> >> Then you must interview Rep. Key, and fill him
>> >> in. I will be trying to reach him by telephone
>> >> next week.
>> >>
>> >> Roger, if that OKC federal building had been FILLED
>> >> with fertilizer, it still would not have melted
>> >> structural steel that way; such an intense
>> >> explosion, which blew OUTWARDS, had to have been
>> >> detonated inside the building, at the base of
>> >> those I-beams; they were decapitated right at
>> >> their bases, and then all that weight came crashing
>> >> down on top of them. My active hypothesis is that
>> >> C-4 was drilled into the I-beams, and then pressure
>> >> detonators were affixed to the outsides of the
>> >> beams. The fertilizer bomb was the trigger --
>> >> it generated enough pressure to detonate the C-4.
>> >> Makes perfect sense.
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> >
>> >> >Anything that would serve those ends, i would buy.
>> >> >
>> >> >with my ten cents.
>> >> >
>> >> >Rr
>> >>
>> >> Many thanks, Roger. You can help us, because
>> >> the American press are bought and sold down the
>> >> river. Be careful with this story, because you
>> >> may experience real heat yourself. BBC has its
>> >> limits, as we both know. Also, watch your back,
>> >> and be careful with whom you share this stuff.
>> >> This is explosive stuff in more ways than one.
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> >
>> >> >>I am standing by. Hmmmm Me too.........
>> >> >
>> >> >Policy Office
>> >> >Music Industry Human Rights Association
>> >> >
>> >> >email mihra@styx.cerbernet.co.uk
>> >> >
>> >> >Founded in respect of UN50, MIHRA INTERNATIONAL
>> >> >represents all areas of music, its industry and its cultural
>> >> >and economic activities.
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >>
>> >> ========================================================================
>> >> Paul Andrew Mitchell : Counselor at Law, federal witness
>> >> B.A., Political Science, UCLA; M.S., Public Administration, U.C. Irvine
>> >>
>> >> tel: (520) 320-1514: machine; fax: (520) 320-1256: 24-hour/day-night
>> >> email: [address in tool bar] : using Eudora Pro 3.0.2 on 586 CPU
>> >> website: http://www.supremelaw.com : visit the Supreme Law Library now
>> >> ship to: c/o 2509 N. Campbell, #1776 : this is free speech, at its best
>> >> Tucson, Arizona state : state zone, not the federal zone
>> >> Postal Zone 85719/tdc : USPS delays first class w/o this
>> >>
>> >> As agents of the Most High, we came here to establish justice. We shall
>> >> not leave, until our mission is accomplished and justice reigns eternal.
>> >> ========================================================================
>> >> [This text formatted on-screen in Courier 11, non-proportional spacing.]
>> >>
>> >
>> >
>>
>> ========================================================================
>> Paul Andrew Mitchell : Counselor at Law, federal witness
>> B.A., Political Science, UCLA; M.S., Public Administration, U.C. Irvine
>>
>> tel: (520) 320-1514: machine; fax: (520) 320-1256: 24-hour/day-night
>> email: [address in tool bar] : using Eudora Pro 3.0.2 on 586 CPU
>> website: http://www.supremelaw.com : visit the Supreme Law Library now
>> ship to: c/o 2509 N. Campbell, #1776 : this is free speech, at its best
>> Tucson, Arizona state : state zone, not the federal zone
>> Postal Zone 85719/tdc : USPS delays first class w/o this
>>
>> As agents of the Most High, we came here to establish justice. We shall
>> not leave, until our mission is accomplished and justice reigns eternal.
>> ========================================================================
>> [This text formatted on-screen in Courier 11, non-proportional spacing.]
>>
>
>
========================================================================
Paul Andrew Mitchell : Counselor at Law, federal witness
B.A., Political Science, UCLA; M.S., Public Administration, U.C. Irvine
tel: (520) 320-1514: machine; fax: (520) 320-1256: 24-hour/day-night
email: [address in tool bar] : using Eudora Pro 3.0.2 on 586 CPU
website: http://www.supremelaw.com : visit the Supreme Law Library now
ship to: c/o 2509 N. Campbell, #1776 : this is free speech, at its best
Tucson, Arizona state : state zone, not the federal zone
Postal Zone 85719/tdc : USPS delays first class w/o this
As agents of the Most High, we came here to establish justice. We shall
not leave, until our mission is accomplished and justice reigns eternal.
========================================================================
[This text formatted on-screen in Courier 11, non-proportional spacing.]
Return to Table of Contents for
Supreme Law School: E-mail