Time: Sun Jun 22 00:22:50 1997
by primenet.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id AAA22354;
Sun, 22 Jun 1997 00:21:43 -0700 (MST)
by usr02.primenet.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id AAA20357;
Sun, 22 Jun 1997 00:21:39 -0700 (MST)
Date: Sun, 22 Jun 1997 00:20:05 -0700
To: PMichel431@aol.com
From: Paul Andrew Mitchell [address in tool bar]
Subject: SLF: Fingerprinting in Alabama (fwd)
Whether or not you have a clean slate,
fingerprinting is a violation of privacy,
and privacy is a fundamental Right,
as recognized by Congress in Title 5,
United States Code. Fundamental Rights
are unalienable. In pari materia, see
18 U.S.C. 242 and 241, concerning
deprivations of fundamental Rights,
under color of law.
End of story.
/s/ Paul Mitchell
http://www.supremelaw.com
At 07:52 AM 6/21/97 -0400, you wrote:
>If you have nothing to hide, then fingerprinting should not be a problem.
>
>Only those with a 'colorful' past, or are anticipating one, need be
>concerned.
>
>Those of us who have a clean slate cannot get excited about this.
>
>
>
========================================================================
Paul Andrew Mitchell : Counselor at Law, federal witness
B.A., Political Science, UCLA; M.S., Public Administration, U.C. Irvine
tel: (520) 320-1514: machine; fax: (520) 320-1256: 24-hour/day-night
email: [address in tool bar] : using Eudora Pro 3.0.2 on 586 CPU
website: http://www.supremelaw.com : visit the Supreme Law Library now
ship to: c/o 2509 N. Campbell, #1776 : this is free speech, at its best
Tucson, Arizona state : state zone, not the federal zone
Postal Zone 85719/tdc : USPS delays first class w/o this
As agents of the Most High, we came here to establish justice. We shall
not leave, until our mission is accomplished and justice reigns eternal.
========================================================================
[This text formatted on-screen in Courier 11, non-proportional spacing.]
Return to Table of Contents for
Supreme Law School: E-mail