Time: Sun Jun 22 18:06:14 1997 by primenet.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id PAA10465; Sun, 22 Jun 1997 15:32:39 -0700 (MST) by usr05.primenet.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id PAA28663; Sun, 22 Jun 1997 15:32:34 -0700 (MST) Date: Sun, 22 Jun 1997 15:30:58 -0700 To: fwolist@sportsmen.net From: Paul Andrew Mitchell [address in tool bar] Subject: SLS: a challenge to all bar members my comments infra: /s/ Paul Mitchell http://www.supremelaw.com >fwolist@sportsmen.net said on 6/22/97 2:31 PM: > >>2. retain your bar license, >> forfeit your citizenship and >> eligibility for public office, >> and apply for a green card. I didn't say deportation. BUT, we are on "first impression" here, and I am arguing on the basis of logic. If you lose your citizenship (state and federal), the only option left is the status of an alien. If aliens do not have green cards, they are illegal aliens. So, I guess there is a logical path to deportation. I would have to agree with this outcome, despite the political furor it would create among licensed bar members. However, read on ... > >Forfeiture of citizenship does not equate to >deportation. A native American can NOT be >deported. Authority please. /s/ Paul Mitchell http://www.supremelaw.com His nationality can never be taken from >him, although he CAN lose 'citizenship', which >simply entails the priveleges of being eligible >to public office and for 'benefits' provided by >the state to 'qualified' applicants. > >In other words, there is a huge difference between >NATIONALITY and CITIZENSHIP. The former is acquired >by reason of the land on which one is brought forth >from one's Mother's womb, and the latter is simply a >political status. > >See the Articles of Confederation for recognition >of the different classes of people in this country. >Note the use of 'free inhabitants' and 'citizens' >in the same sentence: > >" Article IV. The better to secure and perpetuate >mutual friendship and intercourse among the people of >the different states in this union, *** the free >inhabitants *** of each of these states, paupers, vagabonds, >and fugitives from justice excepted, shall be entitled to >all privileges and immunities of *** free citizens *** in the >several states; and the people of each state shall have >free ingress and regress to and from any state, and shall >enjoy therein all the privileges of trade and commerce, >subject to the same duties, impositions and restrictions >as the inhabitants thereof respectively, provided that >such restriction shall not extend so far as to prevent >the removal of property imported into any state, to any >other state, of which the Owner is an inhabitant; provided >also that no imposition, duties or restriction shall be >laid by any state, on the property of the united states, >or either of them." > >This clause explains a lot about why most people are treated >as slaves: paupers HAVE NO RIGHTS. What do you become, in law, >when you apply for public charity? PAUPERS. The possession >and use of a SSN makes one a pauper, and totally regulateable >at law. I do agree with everything you have written here. You are making a strong case that Citizenship implies participation; inhabitants have opted not to participate, which is their Right, under the Tenth Amendment. We are now complaining about Citizens who are deprived of their Right to participate, because they have been deprived of all three voices in the management of their government: grand jury, trial jury, and voting booth. Of couse, the feds insist on taxing these very same people. This is one of the major issues we raised in Gilbertson's OPENING BRIEF: no taxation without representation! Moreover, limiting jury participation to federal citizens creates a logical absurdity: the People who can vote in Congress/Senate, canNOT vote on a jury, or in a general election. Go figure!! Reductio ad absurdum! /s/ Paul Mitchell http://www.supremelaw.com ======================================================================== Paul Andrew Mitchell : Counselor at Law, federal witness B.A., Political Science, UCLA; M.S., Public Administration, U.C. Irvine tel: (520) 320-1514: machine; fax: (520) 320-1256: 24-hour/day-night email: [address in tool bar] : using Eudora Pro 3.0.2 on 586 CPU website: http://www.supremelaw.com : visit the Supreme Law Library now ship to: c/o 2509 N. Campbell, #1776 : this is free speech, at its best Tucson, Arizona state : state zone, not the federal zone Postal Zone 85719/tdc : USPS delays first class w/o this As agents of the Most High, we came here to establish justice. We shall not leave, until our mission is accomplished and justice reigns eternal. ======================================================================== [This text formatted on-screen in Courier 11, non-proportional spacing.]
Return to Table of Contents for
Supreme Law School: E-mail