Time: Sun Jun 29 10:29:01 1997
by primenet.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id KAA18275;
Sun, 29 Jun 1997 10:29:01 -0700 (MST)
by usr05.primenet.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id KAA28110;
Sun, 29 Jun 1997 10:28:55 -0700 (MST)
Date: Sun, 29 Jun 1997 10:27:15 -0700
To: snetnews@world.std.com
From: Paul Andrew Mitchell [address in tool bar]
Subject: SLS: Creator's comeback in Public Schools (fwd)
References: <3.0.1.32.19970628230809.0069a574@clark.net>
<33B67AFE.25CA@mail.ld.centuryinter.net>
Einstein was into destruction:
E = M x C x C
The Most High is into creation:
M = E / (C x C) (divide both sides by the quantity (C x C))
This is a formulaic metaphor for
the Acts of the Most High.
/s/ Paul Mitchell
http://www.supremelaw.com
At 10:39 AM 6/29/97 -0600, you wrote:
>
>-> SearchNet's SNETNEWS Mailing List
>
>Ray Earnest wrote:
>
>xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
>Ray,
>
>I have to agree. Here's a part of an essay I wrote a few years ago on
>the subject of Creationism:
>
> I remain perplexed that so many of my colleagues at the university
>level are so reluctant to subscribe to any sort of religious explanation
>of the development of life. Rather, they blandly assume that life began
>through a random series of coincidences. The contemplation of the
>unfathomable and abstruse complexities of the human organism lends
>itself poorly to the theory that, at a primordial instant in time, a
>congenial cluster of amino acids and other organic chemicals
>concatenated to a living, self-replicating creature, which eventuated,
>just by chance, into a complex and intelligent life form. I marvel at
>such faith!
> The Anthropic Principle, as set forth by Brandon Carter, points out
>that without a large number of astonishing coincidences, such as the
>remarkable exactitude among the universal constants-values such as
>Planck's (h), or the gravitational constant, G, a universe that was
>hospitable to the development of life would have been impossible!
>Surely, as an unbiased observer, a scientist may begin to suspect the
>presence of a supreme and existential INTELLIGENCE behind it all,
>especially after attempting to unravel the labyrinthine interstices of
>the human genome! In point of fact, there are literally thousands of
>preexistent preconditions in the universe, without which life of any
>complexity would be impossible.
> On the other hand, while it does seem absurd to imagine that a god
>created the earth in seven days, could it not have been a Master
>Designer, a Celestial Biologist--Geophysicist who did the job over
>billions of years, or perhaps seven periods of God-time, through the
>calculated overcontrol of evolution? Science may, one day, assemble all
>of the chemical ingredients of protoplasm, but they shall never find a
>way to breath the spark of life into dead organic matter. For that, my
>friends, is the domain of the Gods.
>
>Byron T. Weeks, MD
>>
>Big Snip)
>> Having studied the Bible for twenty years or more, I can find nothing
>> therein which detracts from either the evolutionary or the crea-
>> tionism arguments. What I find is that both sides of the argument
>> fail to establish exactly what the time frames are as mentioned
>> in the bible, i.e., a day three or four billion years ago may just
>> be millions of our current twenty-four hour 'days,' which would
>> make both sides of the argument correct, overall.
>> The translation of the original manuscripts which created the bible is
>> the choosing of the translator. Day, in Hebrew-Chaldee language,
>> can mean from sunrise to sunset, or from one sunset to the next.
>> Or (and this is the key) it can mean 'a space of time defined by
>> an associated term.' Creationists want all terms to be 24 hour
>> days, which defies science and logic, and evolutionists add fuel to
>> the heat of argument by failing to understand that 'day' has dif-
>> ferent meanings for different situations and connect these mean-
>> ings to God's idea of creation.
>> >From Genesis we read 'In the beginning God created the heaven and the
>> earth.' If there were no earth before this creation then we most
>> certainly had no twenty-four hour sunset to sunset days, and the
>> argument that ALL days are such is absurd. On the otherhand,
>> scientific belief that all of the wonderful things we see and en-
>> joy on this earth 'just happened' is also absurd. Time, to God, is
>> nonexistent, or unimportant. Before the beginning He had in mind
>> what he wanted to happen, and he ordained that it happen. It
>> started happening at that instant and will continue to happen until
>> His intent is fulfilled. We are in constant evolution, and this
>> cannot be denied. We are a part of God's creation, and this nei-
>> ther can be denied. The acceptance of these correlations by both
>> sides would end the discussion; however, God foresaw the humdrum
>> life His human creation would lead and left a few things unsaid,
>> thereby giving us something for which to while away our 'time'
>> known now as argument, and this is where we stand today, and will
>> always be until we reach the end of our evolution, whatever and
>> whenever that may be.
>>
>> Ray Earnest
>>
>> -> Send "subscribe snetnews " to majordomo@world.std.com
>> -> Posted by: Ray Earnest <cen11156@mail.ld.centuryinter.net>
>
>-> Send "subscribe snetnews " to majordomo@world.std.com
>-> Posted by: "Byron Weeks, MD" <doc777@cyberhighway.net>
>
>
>
========================================================================
Paul Andrew Mitchell : Counselor at Law, federal witness
B.A., Political Science, UCLA; M.S., Public Administration, U.C. Irvine
tel: (520) 320-1514: machine; fax: (520) 320-1256: 24-hour/day-night
email: [address in tool bar] : using Eudora Pro 3.0.2 on 586 CPU
website: http://www.supremelaw.com : visit the Supreme Law Library now
ship to: c/o 2509 N. Campbell, #1776 : this is free speech, at its best
Tucson, Arizona state : state zone, not the federal zone
Postal Zone 85719/tdc : USPS delays first class w/o this
As agents of the Most High, we came here to establish justice. We shall
not leave, until our mission is accomplished and justice reigns eternal.
========================================================================
[This text formatted on-screen in Courier 11, non-proportional spacing.]
Return to Table of Contents for
Supreme Law School: E-mail