Time: Thu Jul 03 06:50:07 1997 by primenet.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id GAA29850; Thu, 3 Jul 1997 06:40:03 -0700 (MST) by usr04.primenet.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id GAA03462; Thu, 3 Jul 1997 06:39:57 -0700 (MST) Date: Thu, 03 Jul 1997 06:38:12 -0700 To: (Recipient list suppressed) From: Paul Andrew Mitchell [address in tool bar] Subject: SLS: Political Use of the IRS (fwd) <snip> > >Tuesday, June 24, 1997 > >Just how political has IRS become? > >At least 20 groups >critical of Clinton targeted > > >BY JOSEPH FARAH AND SARAH FOSTER >1997, Western Journalism Center > >SACRAMENTO, Calif.--At least 20 non-profit organizations >"unfriendly" to the Clinton administration have >faced Internal Revenue Service audits since 1993, >a survey by the Western Journalism Center, one >of the groups targeted, has found. > >Coincidence? Many conservative leaders and attorneys >familiar with IRS practices laugh at that suggestion. >Groups of all sizes and purpose are currently under >audit, have gone through the process or are threatened >with it--from large, well-known organizations >such as the Heritage Foundation, Citizens Against >Government Waste and the National Rifle Association >to small, local pro-life and patriot groups. Even >the two most popular conservative magazines-- >American Spectator and National Review--are feeling >the inquisitorial wrath of the IRS. > >Though officially no one at National Review will >even confirm the audit, sources close to the journal >say the audit is the first in the magazine's history. > >"We're not talking about an attack on conservative >philosophy, per se," says attorney William Wewer, >a specialist in nonprofit law. "Clinton doesn't >care about ideas. He cares about power and he's >using the most feared enforcement tool in the government >to attack people who are opposing him politically. >He's using government to achieve personal political >goals." > >The IRS denies any political motivations for its >choices. Yet not a single prominent public policy >organization friendly to the Clinton administration >has apparently been targeted for audit in the same >period, according to two random samples and research >into the non-profit community. Many tax-exempt >organizations are, however, loath to discuss such >matters because of its potentially devastating >impact on fund-raising efforts. > >According to Wewer, who represents about a thousand >charities, the groups singled out include many >which have challenged the Clinton administration >in a "high-profile fashion." > >"Every one of our clients who is under audit has >taken on the Clinton administration vigorously, >usually through a direct mail campaign," he says. >His observation applies to most of the groups so >far identified. > >For example, there was the American Policy Center >and its "Fire Jocelyn Elders" campaign in 1993. >In addition to a request for contributions, would- >be donors were asked to mail an enclosed card to >President Clinton demanding prompt dismissal of >the former surgeon general. About six months ago, >the group was notified that it was being audited. > >"The idea that someone can write to them and say >'I don't like their politics, so go investigate >them' is outrageous," says APC President Tom DeWeese, > >The IRS claims it is increasingly dependent on >these "citizen complaints" and maintains the ongoing >investigation and audit of APC is simply normal >routine checking. Wewer dismisses that idea as >"bogus." > >"I know of many citizen complaints that never get >acted on," he says. "I've filed several myself >against organizations that were promoting terrorism >-- some of the extreme green groups and animal >rights groups. Nothing was done, not even when >I laid out the entire case for them." > >Then there's the strange case of the newly formed >Wisconsin non-profit Fortress America. Just last >November the group received its 501(c)4 tax-exempt >status--a classification that entitles the organization >to engage in some lobbying and political activities. >A month later Fortress America sent out a fund- >raising letter that was critical of Hillary Clinton. >In January, two IRS agents began investigating >the group. > >Fortress America is so new it hadn't even filed >its first tax return, hence, no actual audit was >possible. Washington attorney Alan Dye, who represents >the targeted group, says he can't recall being >involved in a case where the IRS began investigating >an organization before an audit was even begun. > >"The coincidence of this occurring within 30 days >of a negative letter about Hillary Clinton is pretty >striking," Dye observes. "If the IRS doesn't mean >to be biased, they're doing everything they can >to make it look like they are." > >Another IRS target was Amy Moritz Ridenour's National >Center for Public Policy Research. The group played >a prominent role in the political defeat of the >Clinton health-care plan in 1993 and 1994, focusing >public attention on Hillary Clinton's role withe >the president's advisory task force and its secret >meetings. In 1995, the group was audited. The group >also challenged the first lady's access to classified >information, secured without a security clearance. >The group called for congressional hearings to >determine guidelines about such unprecendented >clearances. > >By IRS standards, the group's ordeal was brief >-- about two weeks. At one point during the examination, >Ridenour asked the IRS field agent why the group >was targeted. The disturbing answer: "You probably >made someone mad." > >"Now why would he say, 'probably'?" Ridenour wonders. >"You'd figure he'd say oh, it's just a routine >audit, even if that weren't true. To me it shows >there's an assumption at the IRS that decisions >[like who gets audited] are made for political >reasons. It must be part of the environment." > >The Western Journalism Center shared a similar >experience. When an IRS field agent began asking >questions about the content of the group's work, >the motivations for investigative reporting about >White House scandals and suggesting that the center >should be reclassified from an educational 501(c)3 >status to a 501(c)4, group's accountant protested. > >"Look," said Thomas Cederquist, the IRS auditor, >"this is a political case and the decision is going >to be made at the national level." Asked what he >meant by that statement, Cederquist repeated it. >Only recently, months after the center went public >with accusations that the audit was politically >inspired was Cederquist replaced as the lead investigator >on the case. > >None of this is surprising to Wewer who has been >involved in conservative political activism for >33 years. > >"They're trying to destroy the very warp and woof >of what makes us work as a country," he said. "The >democratic system is a robust system, but it can >be very fragile when it comes to this type of attack." > >In response to the Western Journalism Center's >story of apparently politically motivated IRS audits >broken last fall in the Wall Street Journal, Congress' >Joint Committee on Taxation began an investigation. >Hearings are set to begin some time next month >and a final report will be issued in September. > >Last February, IRS Commissioner Margaret Milner >Richardson, a long-time political ally and friend >of the Clintons and a self-described "yellow-dog >Democrat," announced she was stepping down from >her post to pursue other interests. The New York >Post, however, suggested in an editorial that the >revelations of politically motivated audits may >have been a central factor in her decision. No >replacement for Richardson has yet been named. > > >-> Send "subscribe snetnews " to majordomo@world.std.com >-> Posted by: kalliste@aci.net (J. Orlin Grabbe) > > > ======================================================================== Paul Andrew Mitchell : Counselor at Law, federal witness B.A., Political Science, UCLA; M.S., Public Administration, U.C. Irvine tel: (520) 320-1514: machine; fax: (520) 320-1256: 24-hour/day-night email: [address in tool bar] : using Eudora Pro 3.0.2 on 586 CPU website: http://www.supremelaw.com : visit the Supreme Law Library now ship to: c/o 2509 N. Campbell, #1776 : this is free speech, at its best Tucson, Arizona state : state zone, not the federal zone Postal Zone 85719/tdc : USPS delays first class w/o this As agents of the Most High, we came here to establish justice. We shall not leave, until our mission is accomplished and justice reigns eternal. ======================================================================== [This text formatted on-screen in Courier 11, non-proportional spacing.]
Return to Table of Contents for
Supreme Law School: E-mail