Time: Fri Jul 04 09:39:21 1997 by primenet.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id JAA10699; Fri, 4 Jul 1997 09:39:45 -0700 (MST) by usr10.primenet.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id JAA01235; Fri, 4 Jul 1997 09:39:02 -0700 (MST) Date: Fri, 04 Jul 1997 09:37:16 -0700 To: amadeus@adnc.com From: Paul Andrew Mitchell [address in tool bar] Subject: SLS: Two Classes of Citizens -- The PROOF! References: <3.0.2.16.19970704051825.1ea7d822@pop.primenet.com> Ex parte Knowles, 5 Cal. 300, California Supreme Court (1855), held that the states can naturalize: Briefly, Congress makes the INS rules, the states implement the rules. Moreover, Ex parte Knowles is crucial, because they also held that there was no such thing as a "citizen of the United States" at that time (1855)! I hope this helps. Happy Fourth of July to you and yours too!! /s/ Paul Mitchell http://www.supremelaw.com At 09:05 AM 7/4/97 -0800, you wrote: >Paul Andrew Mitchell wrote: >> >> [This text is formatted in Courier 11, non-proportional spacing.] >> >> It is quite clear, then, that there is a citizenship of >> the United States** and a citizenship of a State, which >> are distinct from each other and which depend upon >> different characteristics or circumstances in the >> individual. >> >> [Slaughter House Cases, 83 U.S. 36 (1873)] >> [emphasis added] >> >> We have in our political system a Government of the >> United States** and a government of each of the several >> States. Each one of these governments is distinct from >> the others, and each has citizens of its own .... >> Slaughter-House Cases >> >> [United States v. Cruikshank, 92 U.S. 542 (1875)] >> [emphasis added] >> >> A person who is a citizen of the United States** is >> necessarily a citizen of the particular state in which >> he resides. But a person may be a citizen of a >> particular state and not a citizen of the United >> States**. To hold otherwise would be to deny to the >> state the highest exercise of its sovereignty, -- the >> right to declare who are its citizens. >> >> [State v. Fowler, 41 La. Ann. 380] >> [6 S. 602 (1889), emphasis added] >> >> There are, then, under our republican form of >> government, two classes of citizens, one of the United >> States** and one of the state. One class of citizenship >> may exist in a person, without the other, as in the >> case of a resident of the District of Columbia; but >> both classes usually exist in the same person. >> >> [Gardina v. Board of Registrars, 160 Ala. 155] >> [48 S. 788, 791 (1909), emphasis added] >> >> As quoted in the Preface of "The Federal Zone: Cracking the >> Code of Internal Revenue," electronic Seventh Edition. >> >> # # # >> >> ======================================================================== >> Paul Andrew Mitchell : Counselor at Law, federal witness >> B.A., Political Science, UCLA; M.S., Public Administration, U.C. Irvine >> >> tel: (520) 320-1514: machine; fax: (520) 320-1256: 24-hour/day-night >> email: [address in tool bar] : using Eudora Pro 3.0.2 on 586 CPU >> website: http://www.supremelaw.com : visit the Supreme Law Library now >> ship to: c/o 2509 N. Campbell, #1776 : this is free speech, at its best >> Tucson, Arizona state : state zone, not the federal zone >> Postal Zone 85719/tdc : USPS delays first class w/o this >> >> As agents of the Most High, we came here to establish justice. We shall >> not leave, until our mission is accomplished and justice reigns eternal. >> ======================================================================== >> [This text formatted on-screen in Courier 11, non-proportional spacing.] > > >Just a note from my experience... > >A casual meeting with a federal judge on imigration to wit:... The >states do not grant citizenship anymore. It's a federal task... > >It seems to me that the federal/state compact agreement has removed this >option... possibly based on the 14th amendment. Would you have anything >more definitive? > >Have a great Independence Day celebration. > >- Richard > > ======================================================================== Paul Andrew Mitchell : Counselor at Law, federal witness B.A., Political Science, UCLA; M.S., Public Administration, U.C. Irvine tel: (520) 320-1514: machine; fax: (520) 320-1256: 24-hour/day-night email: [address in tool bar] : using Eudora Pro 3.0.2 on 586 CPU website: http://www.supremelaw.com : visit the Supreme Law Library now ship to: c/o 2509 N. Campbell, #1776 : this is free speech, at its best Tucson, Arizona state : state zone, not the federal zone Postal Zone 85719/tdc : USPS delays first class w/o this As agents of the Most High, we came here to establish justice. We shall not leave, until our mission is accomplished and justice reigns eternal. ======================================================================== [This text formatted on-screen in Courier 11, non-proportional spacing.]
Return to Table of Contents for
Supreme Law School: E-mail