Time: Mon Jul 14 21:49:30 1997 by primenet.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id VAA26063; Mon, 14 Jul 1997 21:48:29 -0700 (MST) by usr01.primenet.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id VAA15033; Mon, 14 Jul 1997 21:48:21 -0700 (MST) Date: Mon, 14 Jul 1997 21:48:00 -0700 To: (Recipient list suppressed) From: Paul Andrew Mitchell [address in tool bar] Subject: SLS: Truth in Media's GLOBAL WATCH Bulletin 97/7-6 (11-Jul-97) (fwd) <snip> > >FROM PHOENIX, ARIZONA > > -------------------------------------------------------------------- > Truth in Media's GLOBAL WATCH Bulletin 97/7-6 11-Jul-97 > -------------------------------------------------------------------- > >INTERNATIONAL JUSTICE "PROGRESSES" FROM KIDNAPPING TO MURDER > * * * >The "Official" Story... and the Other (Serb) Side of the Coin > * * * >Was the New York Times Tipped Off About the NATO Raids? > * * * >But Who Will Guard the Guards? > * * * >Clinton Move Over, Bring Back Capone > * * * > >INTERNATIONAL JUSTICE "PROGRESSES" FROM KIDNAPPING TO MURDER > >PHOENIX - Some 20 masked gunmen kidnap a person after luring him to a >meeting using deceitful tricks. They whisk him across several >international borders into a foreign country where they lock him up (see >TIM GW Bulletin 97/6-8, 6/29/97). The masked gang's leaders publicly >gloat over this "feat," seemingly unperturbed that such kidnapping and >entrapment are considered criminal acts in most civilized countries. > >Al Capone's Chicago gangland reincarnated? > >No. The New World Order's "international justice" at work. And at >that, the relatively benign variety - the United Nations'. > >What happened on July 10 was a progression from benign to a deadly >strain of "international justice." The NATO "peacekeepers" (what an >oxymoron!) in Bosnia, killed one person in the Bosnian Serb Republic, >while kidnapping three others. None publicly indicted! > >"It's 2-0 to us," a British diplomat boasted to Canada's Globe and Mail >(July 11), as if killing and kidnapping people was some sort of a >sporting event. "I'm bloody proud it was a British effort." > >"Bloody proud" of spilling blood in cold blood? Doubt that even Don >Capone would have rejoiced at something like that. After all, killing >to Don Capone was settling business, not soccer, scores. > >Yet President Bill Clinton, the British and German defense ministers, >along with scores of other NWO cheerleaders, including the Canadian War >Crimes Tribunal's prosecutor, Louise Arbour, cheered NATO's July 10 >raids. But the Russian government, which also has U.N. "peacekeepers" >in Bosnia, took a dim view of the NATO assaults. "Such cowboy raids >threaten the whole Dayton peace process," said the Russian foreign >ministry, in a July 11 statement. > >Amazingly perhaps, some of the NWO's self-appointed "human rights" >organizations also gave thumbs-up for such blatant violations of human >rights by the NATO troops. Amnesty International, Human Rights Watch >and the Institute for War and Peace called on NATO countries to speed up >the capture of indicted war criminals in former Yugoslavia. > >"What happened yesterday was hugely important, but it is just the >beginning,'' said Amnesty's Director of Legal and International >Organizations Program, Nicholas Howen. > >The "Official" Story... >---------------------- >So what did happen on Thursday, July 10 in Bosnia? There are >conflicting stories about it, to be sure, although you'd never get that >impression if you only read the Western press... > >The Western media told us that an unspecified number of the British >Special Air Service troops assaulted a party of Serbs who were about to >go fishing at a lake near the town of Prijedor, in northwestern Bosnia. >One of the men, the former chief of police in Prijedor, Simo Drljaca, >drew a gun and fired as the threatening NATO troops ran toward him. He >wounded one of the soldiers in the leg, according to the British defense >secretary, George Roberts. > >We are also told that Drljaca was killed in the gun fight which ensued. >His son, Sinisa, 17, and his brother-in-law, Spiro Milanovic, were taken >prisoner and transported to The Hague. They were returned to Prijedor >the following day (July 11), after the U.S. Secretary of state Madeleine >Albright intervened, at the Bosnian Serb President's, Biljana Plavsic's >request. > >The raid, code-named "Operation Tango" during the planning stage, was >staged with prior approvals by President Bill Clinton and the British >Prime Minister, Tony Blair. And although no U.S. troops took part in >the assault, the American military provided logistical support. "It was >the right thing to do," Clinton told the media on July 11 aboard the Air >Force One. > >...And the Other (Serb) Side of the Coin >----------------------------------------- >The above was the "official" NATO version of the July 10 incident. And >now, here is the other side of the coin, the side which the NWO media >would not let us see. The story you're about to read is based on >eyewitness accounts. If these testimonies are true, what happened in >Prijedor, Bosnia, on July 10 was a gangland-style premeditated murder, a >"hit," in the mob's terminology. > >An eyewitness to the Drljaca shoot-out, a man whose back was turned to >the camera to avoid identification, told the Bosnian Serb TV (SRT) in >the evening of July 10, that Drljaca was at first only wounded, and that >one of the NATO assailants then "finished him off." > >The following day (July 11), Drljaca's son, Sinisa and Milanovic, the >brother-in-law, both of whom were with him at the time of the shooting, >provided additional details about what happened. Their accounts of what >they saw and heard follow below. They were recorded almost verbatim by >the Truth in Media's Belgrade correspondent, who watched their SRT >interview, which aired at about 10 p.m. local time the evening of July >11 (4 p.m. EDT): > > The three Serbs were having breakfast when six men, five in NATO > uniforms and one wearing his civvies, dashed out of the nearby woods > yelling (in Serbian), "Simo lezi, Simo lezi" (in translation - > "Simo (Drljaca) drop down, Simo drop down"). > > The boy (Sinisa, 17) and Milanovic immediately dropped to the ground. > But Drljaca (the father) began running toward the lake. The NATO > soldiers started after him. Three of them eventually caught up to > Drljaca and jumped on his back. But he managed to throw them off for > a moment, before being eventually overpowered with the help of > additional NATO troops. > > At that moment a black man walked toward the two Serbs who were lying > on the ground (Drljaca's son and Milanovic), and ordered them to look > straight down into the dirt. A shot was fired. The young Sinisa > could not resist the temptation and turned his head to see what was > happening. He saw the man in his civvies fire twice into his father > and yell some obscenities at him. > > Two NATO soldiers then lifted the dead man and threw his body over > the fence. A NATO helicopter showed up on the scene. The soldiers > loaded the body and the two prisoners into it. > >Milanovic, Drljaca's brother-in-law, provided the following >additionalimportant details to the SRT viewers: > > Milanovic said that Sinisa and he only wore swimming suits at the > time of the NATO raid. Drljaca (the shooting victim) was wearing a > track suit. None of the three were armed. The only shots fired > were fired exclusively by the NATO assailants. > >NATO spokesman, Maj. Chris Riley, said on July 11 that the Serb >allegations that Drljaca had been "murdered" were totally false. >---- > >Another Serb, Milan Kovacevic, was also apprehended July 10 in Prijedor >by the four British soldiers pretending that hey were delivering a Red >Cross parcel to him at the Prijedor hospital, of which Kovacevic was >director. Like Drljaca, Kovacevic was not on the published list of >people indicted by the International War Crimes Tribunal, but was said >to have been secretly indicted in March. > >One day after the shooting, thousands of people marched in Prijedor and >Banja Luka to protest the NATO brutality. The funeral of Simo Drljaca >is planned for Monday, July 14, although his body has not yet been >returned to the family. The Serb authorities are appealing for calm, >but many fear the events of July 10 may cause spontaneous violence, or >maybe even spawn guerrilla warfare against the NATO troops, whom the >Serbs see as foreign occupation forces. >---- > >Was the New York Times Tipped Off About the NATO Raids? >----------------------------------------------------------------- >The fact that we have not heard nor seen "the other (Serb) side of the >coin" in the Western media at all, exemplifies the NWO government and >media collusion in crafting stories their way. > >The British soldier, for example, who was alleged to have been shot in >the leg, was never identified in a any of the U.S. or British media >reports we have seen. > >Why not? We can only hope that some poor British grunt won't have to be >shot in the leg by the NWO criminals to save face of the Western >leaders, just in case they can't find an injured British soldier on the >NATO payroll whom they could parade for the occasion. > >Furthermore, the NATO Bosnia-Prijedor story was NOT a front page news in >any of the U.S. regional papers we've checked out. Yet it was the top >of the front page story in the New York Times. It rated a total of >about 100 inches of ink (about 3,300 words) in its July 11 edition, far >more than many bigger stories rate, the day after. > >Why so much focus on a relatively obscure event, from a local American >perspective? > >The Times also dispatched its reporter, Chris Hedges, who wrote the >47-inch cover story, to the former Yugoslavia only days prior to the >Prijedor raids. > >And the New York daily even had a color photo of Drljaca, the shooting >victim, ready in time for its early editions. > >How would the New York Times editors explain such an extraordinary >prescience? Or the amazing quickness and breadth with which they >reacted, including an editorial and an OpEd piece by Richard Holbrooke, >no less, the former chief Dayton agreement negotiator? To be published >on July 11, all these pieces had to have been written the same day the >NATO raids took place. Or were they written before, with just the >dates, names and details inserted? > >Justice, the U.N. Variety >------------------------- >Slavko Dokmanovic, 47, the former Serb mayor of Vukovar, a town in >Eastern Slavonia, former Yugoslavia, which gained notoriety during the >civil war in Croatia in 1991, was invited by Jacques Klein, the head of >UNTAES (a United Nations authority policing this predominantly >Serb-populated region), to a meeting. As he crossed the Danube (river) >on June 27, Dokmanovic was seized and handcuffed by about 20 masked >gunmen, according to the education minister in the Republic of Serb >Krajina government, Milan Knezevic, who was with Dokmanovic at the time. > >Later the same day, the U.N. reported that Dokmanovic was taken to the >war crimes tribunal in The Hague, Netherlands. "He was lured into >(Eastern) Slavonia with false promises," said Toma Fila, a Belgrade >lawyer who took up Dokmanovic's defense at The Hague, according to a >July 4 issue of NIN, a weekly magazine. "They lured him there by >deceitful tricks. Their (U.N.) conduct was a textbook case of using >gangster methods." > >Worse, it was only then that we learned the suspect was supposedly >indicted by the U.N, "Kangaroo Court" on March 26, 1996. Dokmanovic's >indictment was issued secretly, according to the Associated Press. No >details of the charges against Dokmanovic were available. Fila (the >lawyer) said that "there is no factual evidence," either, to support the >indictment. > >But Who Will Guard the Guards? >---------------------------------- >Ever heard of secret indictments? Arrest on unspecified charges? > >We hadn't. Not until June 27. Given such new "law enforcement" >practices, anybody, including you and I, might be on the list of the >"secretly indicted" enemies of the NWO. What if what's happening in the >former Yugoslavia is only a warm up, a trial balloon for the kind of >international justice we can expect right here, in the U.S., should the >NWO succeed in hijacking the American Constitution? > >An exaggeration? > >Let's flash back to World War II, the images of which are still very >much alive in the minds of the Bosnian Serb families who were massacred >by the tens of thousands by the Axis powers. > >Let's imagine the man in the civvies, who allegedly killed Simo Drljaca >in cold blood, as a Gestapo agent. > >Let's imagine the British NATO soldiers who assisted him as the dreaded >Nazi "SS" troops. > >Let's imagine the New York Times as one of Herr Goebbels' famed >mouthpieces (probably the easiest thing to imagine :-) ). > >We don't have to imagine the consequences of this kind of "justice" - >two bullets in the chest. > >In other words, we see frightful similarities between the New World >Order, circa 1997, as the one circa 1937. Which should give mankind of >plenty of reason to worry. For, we all know what happened after 1937 - >World War II. > >With the increasing concentration of power in the hands of an ever >smaller number of people, just as in the Nazi Germany, or the Soviet >Union, one cannot help but recall what Juvenal (a.d. 60-130) said about >a similar situation some 21 centuries ago: "But who is going to guard >the guards themselves?" > >The U.S. Constitution has been such a guardian of American liberties for >over 220 years. But some people want to change that. They want to take >away our liberties. We must not let them. Lest we want to end up like >the Germans or the Russians. > >Clinton Move Over, Bring Back Capone >----------------------------------------- >Let's recap: A man was killed in Bosnia on July 10. Some say he was >murdered in cold blood. Three men were kidnapped. None of them had >been publicly accused of any wrongdoing. And the "Dayton Holbrooke" >gloats that the "news was good indeed." Yet the United States President >says that's "the right thing to do." And the "international community" >applauds. >Bring back Al Capone. At least he didn't use taxpayers' money to fund >his crimes. > >-- >Bob Djurdjevic >TRUTH IN MEDIA >Phoenix, Arizona >e-mail: bobdj@djurdjevic.com > >LINKS: http://www.forbes.com/tool/html/97/july/returns0708/einstein.htm > > (Djurdjevic's July 1997 FORBES column, "Move Over Einstein, > Signor Da Vinci Is Back") > > http://www.forbes.com/tool/html/returns0610.htm > (Djurdjevic's June 1997 FORBES column, "Is Big Blue Back?") > > http://www.beograd.com/truth/index.html > (Truth in Media home page - 'under construction') > > http://www.djurdjevic.com > (Annex Research home page) > > ======================================================================== Paul Andrew Mitchell : Counselor at Law, federal witness B.A., Political Science, UCLA; M.S., Public Administration, U.C. Irvine tel: (520) 320-1514: machine; fax: (520) 320-1256: 24-hour/day-night email: [address in tool bar] : using Eudora Pro 3.0.3 on 586 CPU website: http://www.supremelaw.com : visit the Supreme Law Library now ship to: c/o 2509 N. Campbell, #1776 : this is free speech, at its best Tucson, Arizona state : state zone, not the federal zone Postal Zone 85719/tdc : USPS delays first class w/o this As agents of the Most High, we came here to establish justice. We shall not leave, until our mission is accomplished and justice reigns eternal. ======================================================================== [This text formatted on-screen in Courier 11, non-proportional spacing.]
Return to Table of Contents for
Supreme Law School: E-mail