Time: Fri Jul 18 15:34:40 1997 by primenet.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id NAA00117 for [address in tool bar]; Fri, 18 Jul 1997 13:15:38 -0700 (MST) by usr09.primenet.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id NAA29069; Fri, 18 Jul 1997 13:10:44 -0700 (MST) Date: Fri, 18 Jul 1997 13:10:18 -0700 To: (Recipient list suppressed) From: Paul Andrew Mitchell [address in tool bar] Subject: SLS: Truth in Media's GLOBAL WATCH Bulletin 97/7-8 (17-Jul-97) (fwd) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit <snip> > >FROM PHOENIX, ARIZONA > > -------------------------------------------------------------------- > Truth in Media's GLOBAL WATCH Bulletin 97/7-8 17-Jul-97 > -------------------------------------------------------------------- > >AN ANCIENT BOOK REVIEW: "THE IRON CURTAIN OVER AMERICA," by John Beaty > * * * >The "Russ" and the "Khazars" - Historical Enmities > * * * >The "Russian Revolution" Was Not Russian At All > * * * >Clinton and FDR: Birds of a Feather > * * * >The "Unnecessary War:" How America PROVOKED the War with Hitler > * * * >"Where Did Hitler Get His Six Million Jews?" > * * * >Appeasing Stalin > * * * >Warning to Americans: The U.N. Charter is NOT the U.S. Constitution > * * * >---- > >This 1951 book by Col. John Beaty, a distinguished scholar and a U.S. >military intelligence officer in World War II, warned Americans about an >impending peril: Some 46 years ago, this patriotic American foresaw the >threat which a Clinton-type "Amerika" would pose for the Christians in >the United States, just as the Soviet state did for the Russian >Christians. > ---- > "And ye shall know the truth, > and the truth shall make you free" > > Jesus Christ, speaking in Jerusalem > ---- > >PHOENIX - A book by a former high-ranking U.S. military intelligence >officer and a Columbia University historian covers the Communist >infiltration and subversion of America. It begins with early history of >the Jews and ends in 1952. > >Here is what some prominent Americans, Beaty's contemporaries, had said >about it: > >Senator William A. Langer, former Chairman, Judiciary Committee: "I >think it ought to be compulsory reading in every public school in >America." > >Lt. Gen., George E. Stratemeyer, USAF Ret.: "I congratulate you on your >book and the service you have performed for our country. If my health >would permit it I would go on a continuous lecture tour gratis and >preach your book and recommendations. My 'Iron Curtain Over America' >will be on loan continuously and I intend to recommend its reading in >every letter I write. > >Lt. Gen. Edward M. Almond, US Army Ret.: "It is an inspiration to me to >find an author with the courage and energy to research and to secure the >publication of such information as you have assembled in order that the >poorly informed average American may know wherein the real threats to >our Country lurk. Your book is a magnificent contribution to those who >would preserve our American ideals." > >Vice Admiral T. G. W. Settle, U.S.N. Ret.: "'The Iron Curtain Over >America' is a most pertinent and excellently presented treatise on the >cancer on our national set-up. "I hope this book has had, and will have, >the widest possible dissemination, particularly to our leaders-in >Washington, and in industry and the press,—and that our leaders who are >"uncontaminated" will have their serious attention engaged by it." > >Lt., General P. A. Del Valle, USMC Ret.: "I am impelled to write to you >to express my admiration of your great service to the Nation in writing >this truly magnificent book. No American who has taken the oath of >allegiance can afford to miss it, and I heartily recommend it as an >honest and courageous despeller of the fog of propaganda in which most >minds seem to dwell." >---- > >So if a U.S. Senator and four generals from four different branches of >the U.S. military give a book such a ringing endorsement, chances are >it's a "must read," right? > >It is. But we have to warn you - it may also be a "musty read" for >those of you who do manage to get a copy. For, the book is 46 years >old. We've tried to find out what happened to the author - without >success, as the publisher, Chestnut Mountain Books, Barboursville, VA, >seems to be no longer in business. Considering the author's age at the >time he wrote the book (see the photo below which depicts a man in his >60s), it seems reasonable to presume that he has since died. > >But his work lives on. For, much of what Col. Beaty wrote back in 1951, >still applies today. Like the corruption of our political system by the >leftist liberals. Or that the globalist U.N. sympathizers attempts to >usurp the U.S. Constitution. Or the NWO's assault on Christianity in >America, which seems to have intensified, rather than lessened, in the >last 46 years. > >A Short Biographical Sketch of the Book's Author >------------------------------------------------ >Col. John Beaty, the author of "The Iron Curtain Over America" had >written, or collaborated on, a dozen books. His texts have been used in >more than seven hundred colleges and universities. His historical >novel, "Swords in the Dawn," published originally in New York, also had >London and Australian editions. It was adopted for state-wide use in the >public schools of Texas. His education (M.A., University of Virginia; >Ph.D., Columbia University; post-graduate study, University of >Montpellier, France ), his travel in Europe and Asia, and his five years >with the Military Intelligence Service in WW II, rounded out the >background for the research (1946-1951) which led to "The Iron Curtain >Over America." > >Col. Beaty, a distinguished scholar and a proud American, spent most of >his life, including the five years of intensive research (1946-1951), >gathering the information upon which this book is based. Keep in mind, >therefore, that "The Iron Curtain Over America" is the culmination of >serious research by a respected expert, not propaganda, such as the >half-truths or outright falsehoods which the anti-Christian NWO has been >feeding us. > >No wonder Sen. Langer said - the book "ought to be compulsory reading in >every public school in America." > >Well... it isn't. On the contrary. The book was hard to find. Which >is why some of you may find this review a shocking revelation. And see >what they didn't tell us in the supposedly "liberal" public school >education in America. >---- > >The "Russ" and the "Khazars" - Historical Enmities >-------------------------------------------------- >The book opens up with a historical perspective of the distant region of >the world which we today call European Russia. It explains how the >Khazars, "a belligerent tribe of half-Mongolian people, similar to the >modern Turks, conquered the territory of what is now Southern Russia." >In the eighth or ninth century, Khazars' leader wanted a religion for >his pagan people. He adopted a form of the Jewish religion. Thereupon >he and about 4,000 Khazars were circumcised. > >Also in the Middle Ages, Viking warriors pushed from the Baltic area >into the low hills west of Moscow. These immigrants from the North and >West were principally "the 'Russ'—a Varangian tribe in ancient annals >considered to be related to the Swedes, Anglos, and Northmen." > >>From the local Slavic tribes, they organized (c. 862) a state, known >subsequently from their name as Russia, which embraced the territory of >the upper Volga and Dnieper rivers and reached down the latter river to >the Black Sea and to the Crimea. Russ and Slav languages, though quite >different, had common Indo-Germanic origin. They accepted Christianity >as their religion. > >The "Russ" were absorbed into the Slav population which they organized >into statehood. The people of the new state devoted themselves >energetically to consolidating their territory and extending its >boundaries. The Slavs, especially those in the area now known as the >Ukraine, were engaged in almost constant warfare with the Khazars. >Finally, by 1016 A.D., they destroyed the Khazar government and took a >large portion of Khazar territory. > >Relations between Slavs and the Judaized Khazars in their midst were >never happy. The reasons were not racial—for the Slavs had absorbed many >minorities—but were ideological. > >The original imported rabbis were zealots for the Babylonian Talmud, >completed on December 2, 499. Their successors were in complete control >of the political, social, and religious thought of their people. The >intransigent attitude of the rabbis was increased by their realization >that their power would be lost if their people accepted controls other >than Talmudic. > >It has been frequently stated by writers on the subject that the >"ghetto" was the work not of Russians or other Slavs, but of rabbis. > >Under the Romanovs of the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries, there >was no change in attitude toward the Judaized Khazars, who scorned >Russian civilization and stubbornly refused to enter the fold of >Christianity. > >When Nicholas I died, his son Alexander II [reign, 1855-1881] decided to >try a new way of winning the Khazar minority to willing citizenship in >Russia. He granted his people, including the Khazars, so many liberties >that he was called the "Czar Liberator." His "reward" was death. The >"Czar Liberator" was assassinated in St. Petersburg in 1881 by "a bomb >thrown at his carriage." Some of the assassins were of Jewish Khazar >origin. > >The "Russian Revolution" Was Not Russian At All >----------------------------------------------- >In Russia and abroad in the late nineteenth century, not many Khazar >Jews had been attracted to the writings of Karl Marx (1818-1883), >partly, it seems, because he was Jewish in origin. "On both paternal and >maternal sides Karl Marx was descended from rabbinical families" (Univ. >Jew. Encyc., Vol.VII, p. 289). > >The Marxist program of drastic controls, so repugnant to the free >western mind, was no obstacle to the acceptance of Marxism by many >Khazar Jews, for the Babylonian Talmud under which they lived had taught >then to accept authoritarian dictation on everything from their >immorality to their trade practices. Since the Talmud contained more >than 12,000 controls, the regimentation of Marxism was >acceptable—provided that the Khazar politician, like the Talmudic rabbi, >exercised the power of the dictatorship. > >Various elements of this restless aggressive minority nurtured the >amazing quadruple aims: > > 1. International Communism > 2. Seizure of power in Russia > 3. Zionism > 4. Continued migration to America (with a fixed purpose to retain >their nationalistic separatism.) > >The name Bolshevik means majority (from Russian "Bolshe," the larger). >It commemorates the fact that at the Brussels-London conference of the >party in late 1902 and in early 1903, the violent Marxist program of >Lenin was adopted by a 25 to 23 vote. The less violent Menshevik >Marxists (meaning the minority of 23 who lost the vote), faded from the >picture after revolution started in October, 1917. After 1918, the >Bolsheviki called their organization the Communist Party. > >In 1917, the Germans, not realizing that he would be anything more than >a trouble maker for their WW I enemy, Russia, passed Lenin and his party >in a sealed train from Switzerland to the Russian border. In Lenin's >sealed train, "Out of a list of 165 names published, 23 are Russian, 3 >Georgian, 4 Armenian, 1 German, and 128 Jewish" (The Surrender of an >Empire, Nesta H. Webster, Boswell Printing and Publishing Co. Ltd., >London, 1931). > >"At about the same time, Trotsky arrived from the United States, >followed by over 300 Jews from the East End of New York and joined up >with the Bolshevik Party." > >According to the data furnished by the Soviet press, out of 556 >important officials of the Bolshevik State... there were in 1918-1919, >17 Russians, 2 Ukrainians, 11 Armenians, 35 Letts, 15 Germans, 1 >Hungarian, 10 Georgians, 3 Poles, 3 Finns, 1 Karaim, and 457 Jews. > >The triumphant Khazars, aided by other "converts" to Communism, >strengthened their grasp on Russia by a succession of "purges" in which >many millions of Russians lost their lives. > >Clinton and FDR: Birds of a Feather >----------------------------------- >The new rulers of Russia promptly and effectively penetrated the >countries of Western Europe, Canada and the United States. Their first >spectacular triumph was (President) Roosevelt's recognition, less than >nine months after his inauguration, of the Soviet government of Russia. > >A lengthy article, "Moscow's RED LETTER DAY in American History," by >William La Varre in the American Legion Magazine (August, 1951) says the >move was arranged by "Litvinoff, of deceitful smiles," and by "Henry >Morgenthau and Dean Acheson, both proteges of Felix Frankfurter." > >Acheson, sometimes referred to as the "Frankfurter's boy," was one of >Stalin's paid American lawyers. "Acheson was on Stalin's payroll even >before the Soviet Union was recognized by the United States," writes >Felix Wittner in the American Mercury magazine (April, 1952). Yet that >did not prevent Acheson from becoming President Truman's Secretary of >State. > >[Switching for the moment back to America of 1997, just as Acheson was a >paid lobbyist for Stalin, today we have the likes of Henry Kissinger, >Alexander Haig et. al. lobbying for the Communist China. Add to it a >high concentration of Jewish-Americans in the Clinton administration's >foreign policy and defense teams, and one begins to appreciate why we >may have greater reasons to worry today about the lives of our children, >than did the Americans in the 1930s. Luckily, we have the benefit of >hindsight they didn't have. Forewarned-forearmed? > >Another similarity between the Clinton and FDR is a low regard for the >U.S. Constitution which the two presidents had sworn to protect. FDR, >for example, made an actual treaty with the Soviets, giving them the >right to establish a communist embassy and consulates in the United >States, granting full diplomatic immunities for Stalin's agents, the >bloody bolsheviki - all without the approval of Congress! > >Sound familiar? Just as the Clinton administration signed the Dayton >agreement in 1995, for example, and committed the American troops to >Bosnia - without the approval of Congress! And has been cozying up to >China in recent years. > >It would not surprise us, therefore, if Manhattan's West Side Highway >(now known as the Henry Hudson Drive) became the Bill Clinton Drive in a >couple of decades from now, completing a symbolic conquest of New York >by the "reds" - from East to West. (The East River Drive, which passes >by the United Nations site, was renamed FDR Drive after Roosevelt's >death.) > >A more frightening thought, however, is - how many Americans may have to >die before Clinton gets his name on a New York freeway? If the nation's >casualties during the FDR years are any indication, we are in for a real >bloodbath. The American Christians may be 46 years closer to their >Holocaust than they were when the book was written, as the >anti-Christian NWO wages its neo-colonial wars.] > >The "Unnecessary War:" How Roosevelt PROVOKED the War with Hitler >----------------------------------------------------------------- >In a speech before the Dallas, Texas Alumni Club of Columbia University >on Armistice Day, 1950, General of the Army Dwight D. Eisenhower stated >that as Supreme Commander in Europe he made a habit of asking American >soldiers why they were fighting the Germans and 90% of the boys said >they a had no idea. > >The American soldier is not the only one who wondered and is still >wondering about the purposes of World War II." Winston Churchill has >called it "The Unnecessary War." In view of our legacy of deaths, debt, >and danger, Churchill's term nay be considered an understatement. > >In late July, 1933, an International Jewish Boycott Conference (New York >Times, August 7, 1933) was held in Amsterdam to devise new means of >bringing Germany to heel. Samuel Untermeyer of New York presided over >the Boycott Conference and was elected President of the World Jewish >Economic Federation. > >Yet, the 1930s economic sanctions against Germany were a benign >precursor of the NWO's murderous economic sanctions of the 1990s, which >killed millions of innocent civilians in Serbia, Bosnia, Iraq, North >Korea, etc.. > >Back in the U.S. from Europe, Untermeyer described the planned Jewish >move against Germany as a "holy war—a war that must be waged >unremittingly" (speech over WABC, as printed in New York Times of August >7, 1933). > >A "holy war that must be waged unremittingly" against the "gentiles?" >Keep in mind that was back in 1933, when Hitler was still a relative >newcomer on the political map of the world. > >[Today (1997), it is interesting to note that the Muslims use the same >hateful rallying cry for their "holy war" (the "jihad") against the >"infidels." > >It would appear, therefore, that one thing the "Semites" (both Jews and >Muslims) have in common is a zeal to exterminate the "less worthy" >humans of other persuasions - be it other Semites (respectively) or >Christians. Theirs seems to be the philosophy of exclusion and >separatism, not of inclusion and tolerance. Which is why they preach >inclusion and tolerance in America - in the form of globalism and >multiculturalism, while practicing exclusion and separatism while - by >enslaving the Christians or other non-Semites.] > >War seems to have suited the purposes of the powerful Judaized Khazars >element, dominant in the inner circles of the Democratic Party in >America, Col. Beaty says. They regarded with enthusiasm the killing of >as many as possible of the native stock Americans of English, Irish, >Scotch, Welsh, German, Dutch, Scandinavian, Latin, and Slavic descent. >This non-Christian power bloc therefore endorsed "Unconditional >Surrender" and produced the Morgenthau Plan, both of which were certain >to stiffen and prolong the German resistance at the cost of many more >American lives, and many more German lives, too. > >Unfortunately, President Roosevelt became obsessed with the idea of >killing Germans (and Japanese? Bob Dj.) rather than defeating Hitler (or >Japan). Perhaps taking his cue from his Commander-in-Chief—a term >Roosevelt loved—General Mark Clark told American soldiers of the Fifth >Army that, "it is open season on the Anzio bridgehead. There is no >limit to the number of Germans you can kill" (New York Times, February >13, 1944). > >Such a stress on "killing" or "kill" rather than on a "cause" or on >"victory" is definitely at variance with the traditions of Western >Christian civilization, Col. Beaty says.. It is also costly in the life >blood of America, for "killing" is a two-edged sword. An enemy who would >surrender in the face of certain defeat will fight on to the end when >truculently promised a "killing"—and more Americans will die with him. > >[No wonder some 75 million humans perished in the 20th century alone, >according to Gen. Alexander Lebed, a former Russian presidential >candidate, as a result of such policies.] > >"Where Did Hitler Get His Six Million Jews?" >-------------------------------------------- >A Reuters dispatch of March 13, 1951 from Tel Aviv (Washington >Times-Herald) stated that notes delivered yesterday [March 12] in >Washington, London, and Paris and to the Soviet Minister at Tel Aviv >urged the occupying powers of Germany not to "hand over full powers to >any German government" without express reservations for the payment of >reparations to Israel in the sum of $1,500,000,000. > >This compensation was said to be for 6,000,000 Jews killed by Hitler. >This figure has been used repeatedly. But if one consults statistics and >ponders the known facts, Col. Beaty wonders how it was arrived at. >First of all, back in 1939, he says, there were only 600,000 Jews out of >Germany's 69 million population. The World Almanac for 1940 gives the >world's Jewish population as 15,319,359. > >According to The World Almanac for 1949, the number of Jews in the world >was 15,713,638. If the World Almanac figures are correct, the world's >Jewish population did not decrease in the war decade, but showed a small >increase. > >Such wide discrepancies prompted the author to ask the question of >"where Hitler got the 6,000,000 Jews he is said to have killed?" >Meanwhile, some 5,000,000 Germans were unaccounted for—4,000,000 >civilians, and 1,000,000 soldiers who never returned from Soviet labor >camps, he noted. [Over 20 million Russians and other Christians also >perished in WW II]. > >But just in case you may suspect from the preceding that Col. Beaty may >have been some sort of a "closet Nazi sympathizer," Beaty also wrote >that state controls "may produce a dictator. And once a dictator is in >power no one (as shown in the case of Hitler) can chart his mad course." > >Appeasing Stalin >---------------- >The Prime Minister of Britain, the Right Honorable Winston Churchill, >was alarmed at President Roosevelt's silly infatuation for Stalin and >the accompanying mania for serving the interests of world Communism. "It >would be a measureless disaster if Russian barbarism overlaid the >culture and independence of the ancient states of Europe," he wrote on >Oct. 21, 1942, to the British Foreign Secretary, Anthony Eden. > >Churchill also wanted an invasion of the Balkans, which Roosevelt and >Marshall opposed apparently to please Stalin. Col. Beaty wonders why, >except for appeasing Stalin, were the Allied forces devoted to >strategically unimportant Italy, the winning of which left the Alps >between our armies and Germany. Why did they not land, for instance, in >the Salonika area - a springboard for the historic Vardar Valley >invasion route? This route leads without major geographic obstacles >through Yugoslavia to the heart of Europe. It would have helped the >Allies defeat Hitler without giving Stalin all of Christian Eastern >Europe as a compensation. > >Officially, Gen. Marshall stated to a Congressional Committee that the >"purpose" of the Italian campaign was to draw "German forces away from >the Russian front." > >At (the) Potsdam (international conference), Truman maintaining intact >Roosevelt's iron curtain of secret diplomacy, played fast and loose with >American honor and security. He agreed to an enlargement of the >boundaries of a Poland already delivered by Roosevelt and Churchill to >Russian control through addition of areas that had for centuries been >occupied by Germans or people of German origin. > >Some 14 million persons were brutally expelled from their homes with the >confiscation of virtually all their property, Col. Beaty notes. Only 10 >million finally reached the American, French, and British zones of >Germany. Four million mysteriously disappeared. Thus Truman approved one >of the greatest mass deportations in history, which for sheer cruelty is >a dark page in the annals of history. > >[Nowadays, we would abhor such policy as "ethnic cleansing."] > >Warning to Americans: The U.N. Charter is NOT the U.S. Constitution >------------------------------------------------------------------- >Patriotic Americans should be warned against spurious attempts to draw >parallels between the United States Constitution and United Nations >regulations. The Constitution, with its first ten amendments, was >designed specifically to curb the power of the Federal government and to >safeguard the rights of states and individuals, the author writes. > >On the other hand, the United Nations appears to have the goal of >destroying many of the sovereign rights of the member nations and of >putting individuals in jeopardy everywhere—particularly in the United >States. > >We must not forget the iron curtain over America, which has blacked out >the truth that Russia was founded by the Russians, who were men of the >West, men from Scandinavia, whence sprang the whole Nordic race, >including the great majority of all Western Europeans, Col. Beaty warns. > >Consequently, we should never speak in a derogatory manner of Russia or >Russians. "Each time we attack 'Russia' or 'the Russians' when we mean >the Bolshevik hierarchy, or speak contemptuously of 'Asiatic hordes,' or >identify world communism as a 'Slav menace,' we are providing grist for >the Kremlin mills," he says. > >Finally, we must not forget that leaders in Russia since 1917 have been >not patriotic Russians, but are a hated coalition of renegade Russians >with the remnants of Russia's old territorial and ideological enemy, the >Judaized Khazars. >---- > >A final note to the Truth in Media readers: For any of you who are >Jewish-Americans, or of Jewish descent anywhere else in the world, and >who may be tempted to switch to "auto-pilot," and accuse us of >anti-Semitism for having done this book review: > >Don't! Nothing would be further from the truth than levying such an >accusation at us. This writer is a Serbian-American. During WW II, >many Jews were saved from the Nazi pogroms by the Serbs, who often times >risked or lost their lives doing it. They include the Jewish-Americans, >like Maj. Richard Felman, USAF Ret., whose life the Serbs saved along >with the lives of over 500 other American pilots' (see TIM GW Bulletin >97/6-9, 6/30/97). > >Our sole purpose in reviewing this book was to reveal the truth which >our public school system has withheld from us. "And ye shall know the >truth, and the truth shall make you free." >---------------------------- > >-- >Bob Djurdjevic >TRUTH IN MEDIA >Phoenix, Arizona >e-mail: bobdj@djurdjevic.com > >LINKS: http://www.forbes.com/tool/html/97/july/returns0708/einstein.htm > (Djurdjevic's July 1997 FORBES column, "Move Over Einstein, > Signor Da Vinci Is Back") > > http://www.forbes.com/tool/html/returns0610.htm > (Djurdjevic's June 1997 FORBES column, "Is Big Blue Back?") > > http://www.beograd.com/truth/index.html > (Truth in Media home page - 'under construction') > > http://www.djurdjevic.com > (Annex Research home page) > > ======================================================================== Paul Andrew Mitchell : Counselor at Law, federal witness B.A., Political Science, UCLA; M.S., Public Administration, U.C. Irvine tel: (520) 320-1514: machine; fax: (520) 320-1256: 24-hour/day-night email: [address in tool bar] : using Eudora Pro 3.0.3 on 586 CPU website: http://www.supremelaw.com : visit the Supreme Law Library now ship to: c/o 2509 N. Campbell, #1776 : this is free speech, at its best Tucson, Arizona state : state zone, not the federal zone Postal Zone 85719/tdc : USPS delays first class w/o this As agents of the Most High, we came here to establish justice. We shall not leave, until our mission is accomplished and justice reigns eternal. ======================================================================== [This text formatted on-screen in Courier 11, non-proportional spacing.]
Return to Table of Contents for
Supreme Law School: E-mail