Time: Sun Jul 20 12:37:18 1997
by primenet.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id MAA08879
for [address in tool bar]; Sun, 20 Jul 1997 12:36:21 -0700 (MST)
by usr01.primenet.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id MAA10217;
Sun, 20 Jul 1997 12:33:57 -0700 (MST)
Date: Sun, 20 Jul 1997 12:33:30 -0700
To: (Recipient list suppressed)
From: Paul Andrew Mitchell [address in tool bar]
Subject: SLS: The Environmental Establishment (fwd)
For good background, read:
"En Route to Global Occupation"
by author Gary Kah.
/s/ Paul Mitchell
http://www.supremelaw.com
<snip>
>
>THE ENVIRONMENTAL ESTABLISHMENT VS. PRIVATE PROPERTY RIGHTS
> by: Richard Weyand
>
>
>Who would ever thought that a Mexican spotted owl, the brown gizzly bear
>or gray wolf would present one of the biggest threats to the American way
>of life? Who would have imagined thirty years ago that the personal
>automobile, commercial, residential developments and manufacturing firms
>would be attacked by those considered virtuous in the public eye? Who
>would dare believe that Americans would alter their thinking and behaviour
>conforming to the many changes that local, state and federal governments
>desire to meet their new standardsfor proper citizenship? What were the
>reasons to severely restrict and to eventually eradicate the free market
>system of economy?
>
>Is it ironic that the very best system of economy and the legal protection
>of private property should be destroyed by opponents that are served by
>that particular system? In reality, these opponents have no such interest
>to protect your property rather they would plunder or regulate your
>property. Currently, the evolutionary process of statism in this country
>has taken the form of outright theft of property and the subsequent loss
>of economic vitality.
>
>The ability to redistribute property from the have nots and haves to the
>superhaves could not come about from a full frontal assault on property.
>It would be very unlikely that the American public would ever stand for a
>military coup d'etat from the superwealthy to take property away from a
>ferociously independent mass of individuals. Perhaps in a South American
>country or Russia where they have no concept of a Republican form of
>government can a violent upheaval of the state and a transfer of property
>rights be accomplished. Even though it has been tried, bolshevik methods
>in changing the state have never worked in western industrial countries.
>Success in transforming a constitutional Republican state into a socialist
>democracy has come about through the 'rule of law'. By utilizing the
>legal institutions of the courts and the legislature, the Establishment
>has methodically and systematically turn the tables of absolute
>constitutional rule to one of anarchy. No longer are institutions of
>government, which are operated by the Establishment desires is a wholesale
>transfer of property from one class to another without due compensation at
>the market rate by using the rule of law or the Menshevik process.
>
>In the effort to shift assests from one group to another, no full scale,
>physical war could be waged against the American public. What common
>denominator would the American public accept in the war to transfer
>property? The Establishment chose the environment as their idelogical
>message. By pressing an educational assault on the hearts and minds of
>gullible Americans, who witnessed the ravaging of streams, oceans, airways
>and the land by conspicuously avaracious corporations, the public was
>ready for a shift in public policy. Interestingly, big business observed
>that this was an opportunity to stiff their competition. By using the
>force of law, big business could exempt itself from the very laws that
>were intentioned by an angry public, while smaller companies were
>compelled to operate under these tougher regulations.
>
>Americans are barraged with environmental messages as to educate who are
>villains and who are the paragons in the battle for property. As all
>successful movements discover disgust, anger and guilt are especially
>useful in changing behaviours and galvanizing reaction. Americans feel
>sorry when they observe films of baby harp seals being brutely murdered
>for their fur. An uneasy feeling comes across when we see the burning of
>large tracts of Brazilian rain forest. It is a smooth shift for the
>purveyors of environmental statism to demostrate not only the
>international perdition of the environment, but the domestic side of
>wreck-loose corporations stealing our national heritage.
>
>Take for example, the New World Mine incident where the company in the
>1990's found gold reserves outside of Yellowstone National Park. In a
>weekly radio address in August 1995, Bill Clinton complained that the
>goldmining company was prepared to take away America's great natural
>heritage. The President ordered a ban on the issuance of mining permits
>near Yellowstone. Mind you the construction of such a project would employ
>an additional 150 people at an average of $35,000 per year doubling the
>per capita income in that region. The local economy would experience a
>generation of come $15 million; a real shot in the arm.
>
>Sadly, the Interior Department enlisted the help of UNESCO, the United
>Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization to declare that
>Yellowstone Park was now a World Heritage site. Apparently, Bruce Babbitt,
>the Interior Secretary, could not utilize the existing domestic laws to
>force out the Noranda Corporation who owned the New World Mine. It was the
>Department of Agriculture's Forest Service that had control of the land
>near the site. So Babbitt used the secular arm of the United Nations to
>prevents the development of this land.
>
>The environmentalist's jihad has pread to every part of the country, but
>more specifically to the west, where the Federal government owns over 50%
>of the property and in some states nearly 90% of the land as is the case
>in Nevada.
>
>What little private property is left, the Federal government has invoked
>the Environment Species Act. The ecosocialists have used the canine teeth
>of such legislation to erode the purchase, sale and use of private
>property parcels. Once the bureaucrat makes the claim of a privilege
>creature, the owner must set aside or reserve a portion for the creature's
>habitat. At their discretion BLM, Fish & Wildlife or Forest Service may
>give you the privilege to use the other portion of land. However, they may
>decide to confiscate it outright if the property is choice or their find
>the owner little more outspoken about their policies.
>
>In a case close to home, prior to NAFTA, the U.S. and Mexico signed the La
>Paz Agreement or Border 21, which would protect and improve the
>environment at the border region 60 miles on both sides of the border. As
>part of the NAFTA agreement an environmental side provision was signed
>that would make Border 21 a reality. This agreement provides funding for
>the creation of the Border Environment Cooperation Project and the North
>American Development Bank. This will literally create a new region
>combining Mexico and the U.S., Ten million people living in the region
>will be at the mercy of various agencies. In fact, 75% of private land
>must be reserved for endangered species in this region and remaining 25%
>will be allowed for development. A combination of Mexican and American
>agencies will monitor and enforce the provisions of Border 21. Biolators
>will receive stiff penalties: jail time, fines and possible loss of
>property.
>
>After the Rio Earth Summit in 1992, Clinton vowed to pursue a vigorous
>plan implementing the ideas reached at the conference. Part of this
>implementing plan was the creation of the President's Council on
>Sustainable Development. The Council's reports provide for how the
>domestic policy can be integrated with the achievements toward "economic
>progress, environmental protection and social equity". I won't go into
>the massive educational program that Washington policy wants to promote
>instilling these socialist values into young and impressionable minds.
>However, it is vital for the Establishment to inculcate the new generation
>into believing that Sustainable Development is not only workable, but
>necessary for the continuance of the planet, while they becomes the slaves
>to the Establishment.
>
>On the state level, last year I spoke on SMOG CHECK II or California's
>execution of the 1990 Clean Air Act. This is another method in which to
>alter the behaviour of Americans. Not only will the loss of an automobile
>to state or local agencies or an oil company mean property seizure, but a
>tremendous attenuation of freedom.
>
>May I say, if you have not called your state sneator or assemblyman on
>this subject may I implore that you do tomorrow. Autos four years and
>older will not pass the new emission regulations. And though there is no
>direct legal link between the United Nation's agenda and the laws passed
>in the state, there is considerable influence from United Nation's
>conferences and various environmental groups. What you are witnessing
>here in this state has an indirect connection to what is promted at for
>example the United Nation's Earth Summit II held in June 1997 in New York
>City. Because this Summit was discussing reductions in 'green-house
>gases' by industrial nations and since our President declared that the
>United States was not performing to the determination at the first Earth
>Summit in Rio, governmental and non-governmental organizations will work
>diligently to accomplish these resolutions. We have already seen the ban
>of distributing and selling of freon for consumers, the placement of MTBE
>in the gasoline to supposedly reduce carbon monoxide pollution, the EPA's
>new particulate standards that go into effect July which will end the life
>of many trucking firms. What new rules will these governing bodies think
>of next when they attend global conferences such as Earth Summit II.
>Translation of this monstrous imposition are losses of freedom, property
>and livelihood for most Americans.
>
>To advance the property transfer agenda further, the Establishment aspires
>to employ the Wildlands Project. The brainchild of environmentalist
>journalist Reed Noss, Earth First's David Foreman and the United Nations
>Environmental Programme, they propose a network of wildlife reserves,
>human buffer zones and wildlife corridors across the continent. They are
>speaking of millions of acres reserved for animals without human
>habitation. This prodigious project requires 23% for only animal use and
>another 26% for very limited human use. Most roads would be closed, some
>would be ripped out; nothing less than the transformation into wilderness
>with an archipelago of human inhabited islands. A forced relocation of
>tens of millions of people would be requisite. A scheme to create an
>American Kampuchea in the name of "biodiversity" has been endorsed by a
>number organizations such as the World Resources Institute and the Nature
>Conservancy.
>
>>From the face of it Americans are quite attracted to anything that will
>improve the conditions of their environment, but can the American public
>swallow a vision to take us back to a period that we so struggled for
>thousands of years to escape.
>
>Let me show on videotape what that vision entails. "Behind the Green
>Curtain" gives one of the better accounts where ecosocialism and
>Establishment want to take us.
>
>As a final thought on this subject of environmentalism, the Protestant
>church has taken the cudgels to protect the environment through the
>destruction of private property. A movement toward Christian
>environmentalism being called by various names such as Evangelical
>Environmental Network, the Noah Congregation and the Creation Care
>Theology. Basically this movement places animals at par or above human
>existence in contradiction to the Genesis account. Surprisingly, many
>unwitting Christian Churches over the spectrum of Protestantism support
>such views from this cause. Apparently organizations such as World Vision,
>Fuller Theological Seminary, Youth for Christ and prominent leftist
>evangelicals like Ronald Sider, Calvin DeWitt, Donald McKenna accept this
>movement's tenets. Actually, this foolishness and demagogery is coming
>from the Environmental Protection Agency and Secretary of Interior Bruce
>Babbitt manipulating the Christian Bible tofit the projection of an
>eco-socialist society. To receive an entirely different view of
>humanity's role on earth you can call Evangelicals for Environmental
>Stewardship at (202) 543-1286. Or you can read Genesis 1:27-29 on our
>role. As to the protection of property read Exodus 20:15 and Exodus
>22:1-14.
>
>Tomorrow, I want you to call your Congressman and other Congressmen to get
>Don Young's (R-AK) H.R. 1146 or the American Sovereignty Restoration Act
>which would take us out of the United Nations. If you read the John Birch
>Society Bulletin, you would find that this bill was attached to a State
>Department authorization bill H.R. 1757 and as an amendment it was
>defeated handily on June 4th. However, 54 courageous congressment did
>vote in favor. Sonny Bono was not one, though he co-sponsored the
>measure. Get on his tail for not voting on this measure. It will be
>brought up again at a latter date, if it gets out of committee.
>
>Richard Weyand
>Hemet, CA
>
>
>=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
>Unsub info - send e-mail to majordomo@majordomo.pobox.com, with
>"unsubscribe liberty-and-justice" in the body (not the subject)
>Liberty-and-Justice list-owner is Mike Goldman <whig@pobox.com>
>
>
========================================================================
Paul Andrew Mitchell : Counselor at Law, federal witness
B.A., Political Science, UCLA; M.S., Public Administration, U.C. Irvine
tel: (520) 320-1514: machine; fax: (520) 320-1256: 24-hour/day-night
email: [address in tool bar] : using Eudora Pro 3.0.3 on 586 CPU
website: http://www.supremelaw.com : visit the Supreme Law Library now
ship to: c/o 2509 N. Campbell, #1776 : this is free speech, at its best
Tucson, Arizona state : state zone, not the federal zone
Postal Zone 85719/tdc : USPS delays first class w/o this
As agents of the Most High, we came here to establish justice. We shall
not leave, until our mission is accomplished and justice reigns eternal.
========================================================================
[This text formatted on-screen in Courier 11, non-proportional spacing.]
Return to Table of Contents for
Supreme Law School: E-mail