Time: Mon Jul 21 16:41:46 1997 by primenet.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id QAA12145 for [address in tool bar]; Mon, 21 Jul 1997 16:29:02 -0700 (MST) by usr06.primenet.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id QAA23006; Mon, 21 Jul 1997 16:16:34 -0700 (MST) Date: Mon, 21 Jul 1997 16:16:04 -0700 To: (Recipient list suppressed) From: Paul Andrew Mitchell [address in tool bar] Subject: SLS: Supreme Court Ruling: Sheriff Mack vs. Brady Bill (fwd) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit <snip> > > SHERIFF RICHARD MACK VS BRADY BILL & SUPREME COURT RULING > >Sheriff Mack was the sheriff in Graham County until the 1996 election. Much >misinformation was spread by special interest groups with a lot of money to >promote his opponent, who in due time, will give up Arizona’s state rights by >endorsing more government control. It is not unusual for special interests >to oppose a person with traditional values and in favor of a smaller >constitutionally represented government. > >While Richard Mack was sheriff, he defied the Brady Act of 1993/94, taking >his plea to the Supreme Court as being unconstitutional. It was recently >ruled upon in his favor with a 5-4 decision after three years. It was a great >victory for all of us in the fifty states for many reasons. > >This was a fight by one man who gave up everything he had, not unlike the >Founding Fathers of our country, who did the same. He put all his resources, >including his home, into this cause, thereby losing re-election as Sheriff in >Graham County, Arizona. On the Lou Epton Radio Talk Show, Thursday, July >17th, he said "I would do it all again, for this one victory is more >meaningful than all the jobs in the world." "We now have a Supreme Court >ruling, in this day and age of federalism and federal intervention and of an >out-of-control government, we now have a ruling that can now stop that, can >completely stop that." > >This ruling by the Supreme Court validates the 2nd, 5th and 10th Amendments >to our Constitution in areas far beyond gun control laws of the Brady Bill. >It should keep the Federal Government from enforcing EPA laws and regulations >in each State, regarding our cars, educational procedures and numerous >unlimited taxes which advances federal government control. However, "should" >and "will" are two different situations unless the people STAND UP to >legislators and demand they comply with our Constitution and its confirmed >ruling. > >Unfortunately, most of our leaders in local, state and federal entities don’t >understand nor have they even read the Constitution, State or Federal. They >will continue to abide by an out-of-control government bent on high taxation >and intervention at every level. THEY NEED TO BECOME AWARE OF THIS RULING AS >SOON AS POSSIBLE AND HAVE NO EXCUSE FOR THEIR ACTIONS. > >The good news is there is something each and every one of us can do to >educate our elected (and non-elected) officials. Get a copy of this 20+ page >Supreme Court ruling, study it and present it to your mayor, city council >members, County Supervisor, School Board Officials (and teachers), your >governor, state and federal representatives. You can write letters to the >editor and call talk radio shows, quoting parts of this documentation. We >must educate what this decision will do FOR the people, their businesses and >personal lifestyles. It is public record, therefore accessible to all of us, >via the Internet, library, your members of congress, etc. Do your homework. > Get involved. Sheriff Richard Mack has paved the way! > >You can also get an (autographed) copy from Sheriff Mack by writing him and >sending $10.00 to cover costs, etc. He has highlighted specific areas which >need special attention. Getting your information from him personally is a >good way to tell him thanks after all he’s done to bring this to the >forefront. He did it alone… no elected official stood by him or the >Constitution of our country. He pursued and persevered what anti-gun control >organizations and others have not managed to do in all this time. He >deserves our praise and even a small donation if possible for his courage and >as mentioned above, he has used everything he had to go all the way to the >Supreme Court. > >Send it to: SHERIFF RICHARD MACK, P.O. BOX 327, SAFFORD, AZ 85548. > >Sheriff Mack said on the radio program "I didn’t expect a big victory and I >was very skeptical about a victory at all, but this ruling went far beyond my >expectations, far beyond anything I anticipated and for that I am extremely >grateful because now we have something in contemporary America, amidst all >this corruption from Washington DC, amidst all this federal usurpation, we >now have something that reinforces fundamental American liberty and >reinforces our Constitution as the Law of the Land." > >The five judges who sided with the Constitution are: Scalia, Renquist, >Thomas, Kennedy and O’Connor. The four who sided with the Federal >Government: Stevens, Ginsburg, Breyer and Suter. [please excuse & correct >spelling of names]. > >"This was a 5-4 split decision, which means we’re one Justice away from >having this type of government as opined by Justice Stevens who wrote the >opinion for the minority. This is a quote: ‘If Congress believes that such a >statute (as the Brady Bill) will benefit the people of the nation, we (the >Supreme Court) should respect both its policy judgment and its appraisal of >its constitutional power.’ In other words, he just negated the purpose of >the Supreme Court." "….in other words we are supposed to respect, and the >Supreme Court is supposed to respect Congress’s own appraisal of their own >authority." > >Read the above opinion again. It means the people in this country should be >at the whim of Congress’s voting power regardless of what they want, >according to Justice Stevens. NO CONSTITUTIONAL LAWS OR RIGHTS! We are very >close to having no rights in America, only privileges which can be taken away >by whatever law is put forth. Just one judge away from losing our >constitution right now. We would then be no different from any other >totalitarian country. Consider our current controlled media, out-of-control >taxation funding immoral, amoral, unethical scandalous politicians and their >hideous bureaucracies. Consider Communist China, Cuba and how they murder >their own. Consider if we had NO Constitution to rely upon. For most, the >thought is incomprehensible ..... >*************************************************************************** *** >****************** >Lou Epton can be heard M-F at 7-10 PM (PST) on KXNT-840AM from Las Vegas, NV >throughout nine states. Call 800-265-9644 for information regarding audio >tapes of his programs. > >Lou Epton's E-mail: <eptonkxnt@aol.com> > >You can also obtain a 12 page excerpt from Michael Reagan’s web site: >http://www.reagan.com (<A HREF="http://www.reagan.com ">Monthly Monitor</A>). > > >Please forward above information and enable everyone to participate in >getting the Supreme Court’s documentation and educate those making laws for >us and our children. This is an urgent request. > >Thank you to Richard Mack and all those who will take part in this most >important endeavor. > >-- Judy Kimball <Judy709366@aol.com> > Riverside, CA > July 20, 1997. > > ======================================================================== Paul Andrew Mitchell : Counselor at Law, federal witness B.A., Political Science, UCLA; M.S., Public Administration, U.C. Irvine tel: (520) 320-1514: machine; fax: (520) 320-1256: 24-hour/day-night email: [address in tool bar] : using Eudora Pro 3.0.3 on 586 CPU website: http://www.supremelaw.com : visit the Supreme Law Library now ship to: c/o 2509 N. Campbell, #1776 : this is free speech, at its best Tucson, Arizona state : state zone, not the federal zone Postal Zone 85719/tdc : USPS delays first class w/o this As agents of the Most High, we came here to establish justice. We shall not leave, until our mission is accomplished and justice reigns eternal. ======================================================================== [This text formatted on-screen in Courier 11, non-proportional spacing.]
Return to Table of Contents for
Supreme Law School: E-mail