Time: Tue Jul 22 12:04:00 1997 by primenet.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id MAA16682 for [address in tool bar]; Tue, 22 Jul 1997 12:00:19 -0700 (MST) by usr01.primenet.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id LAA05981; Tue, 22 Jul 1997 11:46:56 -0700 (MST) Date: Tue, 22 Jul 1997 11:46:26 -0700 To: (Recipient list suppressed) From: Paul Andrew Mitchell [address in tool bar] Subject: SLS: school-to-work and arbitrary authority of bureaucrats (fwd) <snip> > >Friends, > >This came from a fellow I know on another list. Things just get scarier and >scarier all the time. > >Shep > >>From: XXXXXX >>Subject: school-to-work and the arbitrary authority of bureaucrats >>Date: Mon, 21 Jul 1997 19:34:45 -0400 (EDT) >>BestServHost: lists.best.com >>To: sepschool@lists.best.com >> >>I have seen the future of school-to-work, and it ain't pretty. (Having left >>public school teaching, I'm currently looking for work.) In my job hunting, >>I discovered that a couple of companies here in Arizona no longer take >>applications at their place of business, but direct you to the State of >>Arizona's Department of Economics. Everyone applies for work through them. >> >>I went to their offices to apply. I had to register with the state before I >>could do so. Then, after scheduling interviews with the two companies, I >>tapped into the computer system (not clandestinely) to see who else wanted to >>hire a mind. The system demands that job-seekers write down the number of >>each job for which they want more information, like names and addresses and >>contact persons. There is a nationwide database, and there were ninety-five >>companies nationwide that were looking for technical writers, something I >>believe I could transition into in order to pay the bills while I do my own >>writing. I believe I fit about 30 of the job descriptions fairly well, and >>brought their numbers to the desk so I could get started on mailing resumes. >> >>HA! >> >>A policy of the state is to give no more than three referrals to any one >>person on any one day, and the two local interviews I had scheduled left me >>with one more possible request for Monday, July 21st! I was informed that I >>could bring in the next three tomorrow morning, bright and early, and they'd >>be happy to give me the information I was seeking at that time! >> >>I was incredulous! I asked them to explain the reasoning behind the policy. >> The person "helping" me couldn't explain, so he got his supervisor. The >>supervisor informed me that there needed to be some sort of orderly control, >>otherwise everyone would want to know all of the jobs for which they were >>qualified immediately. This three referral/day policy also ensured that >>everyone has an even chance at the job! He actually asked, "Would it be fair >>for you to have a crack at all thiry jobs today, when someone equally >>qualified for one of the positions might not know about it until tomorrow?" >> I responded, "Yes!" He was taken aback. Then, perhaps because I was a >>little perturbed, we found ourselves no longer discussing the policy, but >>shouting at each other. >> >>He aquiesced, and allowed me two more referrals beyond the maximum, to show >>he was a man of good faith. (???) But, he lorded over me by reading the >>qualifications for each job, asking me to declare whether I was competent in >>all of the requirements -- one requirement at a time. i.e. "This here says >>you need to have a four year degree in a technical field. Do you? It also >>says you need to have a broad understanding of science and technology. Do >>you? You also need to have strong communications skills. And you need to >>know the following software applications...." The man could sound out much >>of what he was reading from the computer, but he didn't know what half of it >>meant. However, he did manage to change his own job, that of a clerk, into a >>middleman between the potential employer and a potential employee, attempting >>to screen out potentially bad applicants on the basis of criteria that were >>largely at his own discretion. >> >>This is frightening. Can you imagine a world dictated by bureaucrats who >>take it upon themselves to deny you access to information on job openings >>based upon their assessments of you -- much of which, in the future, will be >>an accumulation of entries into your file by teachers and other government >>care-givers? "It says here you didn't stop wetting your bed until you were >>four.....I don't think think this company is looking for your type. There >>are some openings, however, in Yuma, Arizona for lettuce-pickers." >> >>XXXXXXX ======================================================================== Paul Andrew Mitchell : Counselor at Law, federal witness B.A., Political Science, UCLA; M.S., Public Administration, U.C. Irvine tel: (520) 320-1514: machine; fax: (520) 320-1256: 24-hour/day-night email: [address in tool bar] : using Eudora Pro 3.0.3 on 586 CPU website: http://www.supremelaw.com : visit the Supreme Law Library now ship to: c/o 2509 N. Campbell, #1776 : this is free speech, at its best Tucson, Arizona state : state zone, not the federal zone Postal Zone 85719/tdc : USPS delays first class w/o this As agents of the Most High, we came here to establish justice. We shall not leave, until our mission is accomplished and justice reigns eternal. ======================================================================== [This text formatted on-screen in Courier 11, non-proportional spacing.]
Return to Table of Contents for
Supreme Law School: E-mail