Time: Sat Jul 26 06:59:36 1997 by primenet.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id CAA19295 for [address in tool bar]; Sat, 26 Jul 1997 02:06:53 -0700 (MST) by usr08.primenet.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id FAA10406 for <futurework@csf.colorado.edu>; Fri, 25 Jul 1997 05:53:39 -0700 (MST) Date: Fri, 25 Jul 1997 05:53:07 -0700 From: Paul Andrew Mitchell [address in tool bar] To: Designing for POST-INDUSTRIAL REALITIES <futurework@csf.colorado.edu> Subject: SLS: The Heritage Foundation [This text is formatted in Courier 11, non-proportional spacing.] MEMO TO: Dr. Edwin J. Feulner, Jr., President Phillip N. Truluck, Executive Vice President John Von Kannon, Vice President and Treasurer The Heritage Foundation c/o 214 Massachusetts Avenue, N.E. Washington 20002-4999/tdc DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA fax: (202) 546-8328 FROM: Paul Andrew, Mitchell, B.A., M.S. Counselor at Law DATE: July 24, 1997 SUBJECT: Internal Revenue Service [sic] Gentlemen: We learned yesterday of your recent oppression by the IRS, and we would like to help. As the founders of the Supreme Law Firm and Supreme Law School, an Internet-based college for the study and application of constitutional law, we have successfully litigated against the IRS and Department of Justice, with some rather spectacular results. Using the Freedom of Information Act as a spearhead, we have succeeded in isolating their true "authority" to exist within the several states of the Union. The Commissioner of Internal Revenue ("C.I.R.") has, evidently, signed nearly identical contracts with most, if not all, of the state taxing agencies. These contracts are entitled "Agreement on Coordination of Tax Administration". We would recommend that you submit two (2) sets of FOIA requests: one to the C.I.R. for their copy of all such agreements with all 50 states, and a separate one to each of the 50 state taxing agencies. I have attached a copy of my recent letter to the Oklahoma Tax Commission, to give you their mailing location, and to give you some preliminary insights concerning a basic fraud which is evident in all of these agreements. (The agreement is a form, with blanks, which the state taxing agencies complete.) Please let us know if we can provide you with immediate professional assistance. Sincerely yours, /s/ Paul Mitchell Paul Andrew, Mitchell, B.A., M.S. Counselor at Law and federal witness c/o 2509 N. Campbell Avenue, #1776 Tucson 85719/tdc ARIZONA STATE (See USPS Publication #221.) email: pmitch@primenet.com (586/Eudora Pro 3.0.3(16): preferred, to conserve all resources) phone: (520) 320-1514 (private line: please get permission to disclose) fax machine: (520) 320-1256 (dedicated hard copy: available 24-hours per day or night) fax modem: (520) 320-1513 (switched fax/modem: use when fax machine is busy/no answer) website: http://www.supremelaw.com attachments: miscellaneous supporting documents (see infra) # # # MEMO TO: David K. Smith Oklahoma Tax Commission State of Oklahoma c/o 2501 Lincoln Blvd. Oklahoma City 73194-0001/tdc OKLAHOMA STATE FROM: Paul Andrew, Mitchell, B.A., M.S. Counselor at Law DATE: June 2, 1997 SUBJECT: Agreement on Coordination of Tax Administration between Oklahoma Tax Commission and "IRS" [sic] I have recently come to possess a photocopy of your Agreement on Coordination of Tax Administration, executed between the Oklahoma Tax Commission and the Internal Revenue Service, as requested and received by a Citizen of Oklahoma state on May 16, 1997. In Section 2: Definitions, We find the following definition: 2.2 IRS The term "IRS" means the Internal Revenue Service, U.S. Department of the Treasury [sic]. [bold emphasis added] Please provide Us with the exact citation(s) within Title 31, United States Code, which authorize the Internal Revenue Service to exist as a department or bureau within the U.S. Department of the Treasury. Our reading of Title 31 tells Us that the Internal Revenue Service is not listed among those subordinate bureaus and departments, unlike the Bureau of Engraving and Printing, which is listed therein. See 31 C.F.R. 51.2 and 52.2 for regulations. Please also take note of the fact that Title 31, United States Code ("U.S.C."), has been enacted into positive law, rendering it conclusive evidence of the statutes in question. By comparison, Title 26, U.S.C., has not been enacted into positive law, which means that Internal Revenue Code ("IRC") section 7851(a)(6)(A) now controls the applicability of all of subtitle F of the IRC -- Procedure and Administration. The term "this title" as that term is used at IRC 7851(a)(6)(A) refers to Title 26, U.S.C. For proof, compare, in pari materia, the Historical and Statutory Notes following 28 U.S.C. 132, with the original Act dated June 25, 1948, C. 646, Sections 2 to 39, 62 Stat. 985 to 991, as amended, specifically under the sub- heading "Continuation of Organization of Court" [sic]. While you are investigating your answer to this question, please allow Us also to refer you specifically to the California Supreme Court case of People v. Boxer, docket number S-030016, dated December 1992. See Full Faith and Credit Clause for authority. Thank you very much for your consideration. Sincerely yours, /s/ Paul Andrew, Mitchell, B.A., M.S. Counselor at Law and federal witness c/o 2509 N. Campbell Avenue, #1776 Tucson, Arizona state Postal Zone 85719/tdc email: pmitch@primenet.com (586/Eudora Pro 3.0.2: preferred, to conserve all resources) phone: (520) 320-1514 (private line: please get permission to disclose) fax machine: (520) 320-1256 (dedicated hard copy: available 24-hours per day or night) fax modem: (520) 320-1513 (dedicated email line: please call phone: to switch software) web site: http://www.supremelaw.com copy: Supreme Law School The Internet # # #
Return to Table of Contents for
Supreme Law School: E-mail