Time: Thu Jul 31 06:02:54 1997 by primenet.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id FAA13659; Thu, 31 Jul 1997 05:53:19 -0700 (MST) by usr02.primenet.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id FAA21243; Thu, 31 Jul 1997 05:52:41 -0700 (MST) Date: Thu, 31 Jul 1997 05:51:55 -0700 To: (Recipient list suppressed) From: Paul Andrew Mitchell [address in tool bar] Subject: SLS: AID AND ABET NEWSLETTER re: INFIGHTING (fwd) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Status: RO <snip> > >"Aid and Abet" is Jack McLamb's law enforcement newsletter which is >trying to reach out to law enforcment across America and alert them to >the way they are being trained to turn on and persecute loyal, >freedom-loving Americans mislabeled as "terrorists" or "seditionists" >for supporting the very principles our country was founded upon. > >Suggestion: perhaps each of us could print out this article and give >it to at least one police officer in his or her town, possibly a police >officer you know or see around from time to time. Express yourself to >the officer in a non-accusing and pleasant manner. Tell the officer how >much you would appreciate his reading the article and, perhaps, in a >week or so, meeting with you again to discuss his reactions and opinions >about what he has read. If you're more bold, you might even present or >mail the article to the Chief of Police for your town and then make a >followup appointment with his office to discuss the article with him. >This might even be more effective if done in a small group. Again, a >friendly yet serious, nonconfrontational approach is essential here. > >Harold > <snip> > >CRUSH THOSE SEDITIONISTS!" BUT, WHO ARE THEY? >Posted by: Cynthis Eleazer (independence@southtech.net) > > AID & ABET POLICE NEWSLETTER > Constitutional Issues for Lawmen > Volume 3, Number 4 > > "By deliberate, evil design of the global manipulators, the very best > patriots in the private sector are to be violently pitted against the > very best patriots in uniform, in hopes that they will kill each other > off and that this "brother killing brother" violence will scare the > American people into begging for martial law. This is the hope and > the plan of those who benefit from, and even instigate, horrors like > bombings, crime and anarchy. Such is intended to cause great > FEAR and an outcry from the majority, for the suspension of the > Constitution." > >"CRUSH THOSE SEDITIONISTS!" BUT, WHO ARE THEY? > >KNOW YOUR TARGET! We police officers and soldiers are being given increased >in-service training, and tactical "terrorist"/"seditionist" warfare training, >from our government "leaders," and their leftist propaganda instructors in >the private sector, to psychologically prepare us to crush >all those troublesome anti-World Government and pro-Constitution >"seditionists." We therefore must define our "targets" well, and this >article should help. > >Upon evaluation we find that those crazy American "seditionists/terrorists" >believe that our nation is coming under a socialist totalitarian system. >There are a number of ways that free nations have been able to tell when >they are coming under totalitarian despotism. Thomas Payne pointed to >one of these ways in his statement, "When the government fears the >people there is Freedom, when the people fear the government there is >tyranny." And James Madison, another, when he said, "A government >that does not trust its law-abiding citizens to keep and bear arms is itself >unworthy of trust." But perhaps one of the best sure-fire ways to size up >the current political "lay of the land" would be to note very carefully just >who it is that the government/media conglomerate is listing as the >"seditionists" of the present day. If they are fingering good, moral, >honorable and patriotic citizens, then the people should know that they >are coming under tyranny. This was one of the bet tests in our nation's >early history and it is one of the best tests now to discern what condition >our Republic is in. > > Sedition: "…tumultuous (noisy, riotous) assembly in opposition > to lawful authority; the stirring up of such opposition." > --1943 >Webster's Dictionary > >You are right if you noticed that these definitions could fit most any >persons or groups that have stood up, spoken out, or taken action >against any policy or activity of governmental authority, with which there >was disagreement. Interestingly however, the term "seditionist" is never >used by our government on true radical leftist, communist-style >individuals or groups that are secret political bedfellows, sponsored by >those who control our government from behind the scenes. Believe it >not? Just remember the statement of U.S. Supreme Court Justice Felix >Frankfurter to the effect that, "The real rulers in Washington are invisible >and exercise power from behind the scenes." F.D. Roosevelt, Winston >Churchill, Barry Goldwater, and others have said basically the same >thing. > > (See our police/military manual, OPERATION VAMPIRE KILLER 2000.) > >Notice, if you will, that the American Marxist war-resister seditionists - >those demonstrating against our soldiers in Vietnam, or the American >Marxists opposing any U.S. assistance to nationalistic, anti-communist >causes around the world, such as that of the anti-Communist Cubans or >the Contra freedom fighters of Central America - were never labeled >such. Notice, too, how today's U.S., tax-funded, anti-American and >pro-Marxist U.S. seditionist movements such as El Plan De Aztlan, La-Raza, >our government school MEChA groups or others of the 300-plus similarly >active Communist or Communist front/sympathizer groups, receive >NO HEAT at all from our government. On the contrary, they receive >government moral support and our tax dollars, as they work the >globalist plan to bring our Republic to its knees. > >In a nutshell, what is certain and a matter of record, looking back over >the past 50 years, is that ANY GROUP which has stood against our >CONSTITUTIONAL REPUBLIC or for the destruction of our FREE >ENTERPRISE system, or for the removal of our property rights and the >enslavement of our people, is never called "seditionist" by our >government. This term is reserved solely for pro-God, pro-sovereignty, >and pro-America individuals or groups. Simple, isn't it? To find "our >target," we just look for those who love the God of the Bible, who love >America and who stand in defense of America first - these are the targets >that we sworn officers will soon be ordered to destroy. > >For those police and military colleagues who doubt what is said here, >think about the things that are happening in our professional lives today: >Can we not see that every day now our military organizations, federal, >state and local police agencies, the media propagandist (affectionately >called "prostitutes" by one of their own peers, New York Times Chief of >Staff, John Swinton in 1953), and our socialist government's in-service >training specialists (socialist private sector provocateurs and propagan- >dists) are defining FOR us our targets? Yes, the target has been >identified for us ENFORCERS as being any minority group of independent >Americans (of any and all races and religions) possessing these "wild" >thoughts and ideas about freedom, property ownership, God & Country, >America First, etc. These, we police and soldiers are taught to look upon >as "despicable anti-government seditionists." Various other identifying >terminology is taught to us as well, in the course of the ongoing in-service >"training" provided for us by government-sponsored, private-sector, >leftist, hate-promoting, propagandists. Some of the descriptive terms >used, and given a negative connotation, are: "right wing," >"anti-government," "extremists," "anti-Semitic," "racist," "white >separatists," "white supremists," "freemen," "constitutionalists," "radical," >"violence-prone," "militia-types," "anarchists," "homophobic," >"Fundamentalist Christians," "tax protestors," etc. And notice how all these >buzz words >are picked up by the government-controlled media and schools, and >used to turn all uniformed citizens against these "seditious" individuals >and groups that are supposedly trying to disrupt our "utopian," >"progressive" (i.e., socialist) new world order. > >SEDITIONISTS" OF THE PAST > >To better recognize and understand our targets of today, let's take a >look at some statements from a few "seditionists" of our nation's past: > >"If there be a principle that ought not to be questioned within the United >States, it is that every man has a right to abolish an old government and >establish a new one. This principle is not only recorded in every public >archive, written in every American heart, and sealed with the blood of a >host of American martyrs, but is the only lawful tenure by which the >united States hold their existence as a nation." > > "A government that does not trust its law-abiding citizens to keep > and bear arms is itself untrustworthy of trust." > -- "Seditionist" James Madison, >1751-1836 > > "The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the > blood of patriots and tyrants. It is its natural manure." > -- "Seditionist" Thomas Jefferson to William Smith, 11/13/1787 > > "Find out just what the people will submit to and you have found > out the exact amount of injustice and wrong which will be imposed > upon them; and these will continue until they are resisted with > either words or blows, or with both. The limits of tyrants are > prescribed by the endurance of those whom they oppress." > -- "Seditionist" Frederick >Douglas, 1857 > > "No man shall be de-barred the use of arms. The strongest reason > for the people to retain their right to keep and bear arms is as a > last resort to protect themselves against tyranny in government." > -- "Seditionist" >Thomas Jefferson > > "If the representatives of the People betray their constituents, there > is then no recourse left but in the exertion of that original right of > self-defense." - "Seditionist" Alexander >Hamilton > >And here is "an evil seditionist" from our time, discussing a well known >"utopian peace enforcement system" being erected today in America, >one very similar to that described in the writer's book, GULAG ARCHIPELAGO: > > "How we burned in the prison camps later thinking: What would > things have been like if every (soviet) police operative, when he > went out at night to make an arrest, had been uncertain whether > he would return alive? "…if during periods of mass arrests people > had not simply sat there in their lairs (apartments), paling with > terror at every bang of the downstairs door and at every step on the > staircase, but had understood they had nothing to lose and had > boldly set up in the downstairs hall an ambush of half a dozen > people with axes, hammers, pokers, or whatever else was at hand? > …the organs (police) would very quickly have suffered a shortage > of officers…and, notwithstanding all of Stalin's thirst, the cursed > (Communist government) machine would have ground to a halt." > "Seditionist" Alexander Solzhenitsyn, Nobel Prize winner, who > spent 11 years in communist concentration camps. > >As "peace enforcers" of today we military and police officers cry, >"HOW OUTRAGEOUS! Surely this man and all before him should have >been put to death for even thinking, much less writing, such seditious, >anti-government thoughts." But might we not suppose that the Jews >probably had similar, "seditious" thoughts as they stood and awaited >their fate in those "lawful," expedient and "politically correct" lines?? > >"New age" cops and soldiers today ask: "Is not anyone who would have such >"horrendously anti-government thoughts" - and surely anyone who might one day >ACT UPON such thoughts - our government's enemy, and therefore our avowed >target for destruction? After all, are we not >blessed to be the ones our "omnipotent (government) deities" depend on >to protect them from such protagonists so that they can complete their >program for the "SAVING OF THE WORLD"? > >No question about it: If Madison, Jefferson, or any others of our >"anti-government" founding fathers were alive in America today, we brother >and sister officers and soldiers would be assigned to see to it that they >were surveilled, persecuted, maligned, arrested, imprisoned and maybe killed >by those presently in power. The Disciples of Christ Jesus were >some of the most flagrant "seditionists" of their day. They and others >like them, such as that impossible, hard-headed Moses before them >started all this "anti-government" stuff in the first place. (Or did they?) > Anyway, 'serves them right that they were arrested, tortured and killed >for speaking against the legal authorities of the time, making "seditious," >"anti-government" remarks like, > > "We should obey God rather than men." (Acts 5:29) > >Whereas the Christian ministers of revolutionary times actually LED the >war against Britain (the then "lawful" government), today America's >"Christian" ministers preach that it is not biblical to stand against the >lawful government; that we should obey even evil governments >because, they say, "All government is of God." This attitude is of great >assistance to us New Age "peace" enforcement troops. For example >then, a Christian of today should know that it's "against the 'law'" to hide >a family of Jews in his attic. So, if you and I as the legal government >representatives were to come to the door and inquire of such, this >"good Christian" would tell us "peace enforcers" the truth and turn the >fugitives in, right?! Therefore, with the Christian ministers assisting >government control of the masses, it will be even easier and better >accepted for us ENFORCERS to crush all "anti-government seditionists" >when given the command. Think about it: Would our government >leaders tell us to do anything wrong? > >Perhaps we should be thankful that these kinds of intolerant, lawless >"rabble," such as Jesus' disciples and the Founding Fathers, are not >around today; yet we'd better not relax, for we Enforcers are being >instructed that there are signs - signs that some men and women are >rising up today as in the past, against "lawful" governments all around >the world, aspiring to please the Author of Liberty Himself, rather than >the "thoughtful and kind" government leaders you and I serve and >protect. Yes, there is a worrisome, dangerous, rag-tag movement >growing, made up of allegedly God-loving, law-abiding, non-violent >and patriotic Americans of all races and creeds, which is truly upsetting >the plans of our government leaders who have succeeded to a great >extent in socializing and communizing America. But, who are they? > >See WHO ARE AMERICA'S TP SEDITIONISTS TODAY? to find out... > >Aid & Abet Police Newsletter >Published for members of Law Enforcement, Military, National and Coast Guard. > >Public is welcome. >Publisher: Police Officer Jack McLamb, Ret. >Editor: Police Officer A. Rick Dalton >Writers: National Guardsman Fred Willoughby, Mr. Louis E. Stradling >Marketing: Peter Giordano >http://www.police-against-nwo.com/ >e-mail at: vampkil@police-against-nwo.com >FAX (602) 237-2444 Ph. (602) 237-2533 >World HQ: Arizona USA > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > Liberty's Educational Advocacy Forum, > Indiana's Fully Informed Jury Association, Inc. > http://www.drtavel.com/ > ************************* > Not a high-tech law firm brochure. > Dr. Tavel's Self Help Clinic and Sovereign Law Library > promotes "action that raises the cost of state violence > for its perpetrators (and) that lays the basis for > institutional change " -- Noam Chomsky > > "The law should surely be accesible at all times > and to everyone" -- Franz Kafka > > For Liberty in Our Lifetime, R.J. Tavel, J.D. > ************************** > Updated Daily by > The OtherOne Computer Consulting International, Ltd. > http://www.drtavel.com/TOOCCI.html > mailto:rj@drtavel.com > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > <snip> ======================================================================== Paul Andrew Mitchell : Counselor at Law, federal witness B.A., Political Science, UCLA; M.S., Public Administration, U.C. Irvine tel: (520) 320-1514: machine; fax: (520) 320-1256: 24-hour/day-night email: [address in tool bar] : using Eudora Pro 3.0.3 on 586 CPU website: http://www.supremelaw.com : visit the Supreme Law Library now ship to: c/o 2509 N. Campbell, #1776 : this is free speech, at its best Tucson, Arizona state : state zone, not the federal zone Postal Zone 85719/tdc : USPS delays first class w/o this As agents of the Most High, we came here to establish justice. We shall not leave, until our mission is accomplished and justice reigns eternal. ======================================================================== [This text formatted on-screen in Courier 11, non-proportional spacing.]
Return to Table of Contents for
Supreme Law School: E-mail