Time: Fri Jun 20 05:50:40 1997 by primenet.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id FAA19423; Fri, 20 Jun 1997 05:42:57 -0700 (MST) by usr07.primenet.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id FAA07146; Fri, 20 Jun 1997 05:42:42 -0700 (MST) Date: Fri, 20 Jun 1997 05:41:12 -0700 To: tedb@idt.net From: Paul Andrew Mitchell [address in tool bar] Subject: SLS: Internal equals Municipal References: <3.0.2.16.19970619200425.3eff25c8@pop.primenet.com> At 12:51 PM 8/27/70 +0000, you wrote: >Dear Mr. Mitchell, >I don't know how I got on your mailing list, but I am on it. One >thing mentioned was your suit against Senator Barbara Boxer. Since I >will be Boxer's Libertarian opponent in the '98 election, I would like >to learn more about this case. Please advise. >Thank you, >Ted Brown Hello Ted, I was Counsel to the Plaintiffs in that Petition for Peremptory Writ of Mandamus, to compel Boxer to witness the evidence proving that the 16th amendment was never lawfully ratified. It was case number S-030016 in the California Supreme Court, December 1992. You can update yourself on recent developments in this debate by visiting the Supreme Law Library at URL: http://www.supremelaw.com and reading "Congresswoman Suspected of Income Tax Evasion." Please tell everyone about this website. A tremendous amount of difficult research went into the essays and articles you will find there, particularly "The Cooper File," the most recent addition. You can purchase the pleadings in People v. Boxer in electronic form from Us, for $25 prepaid in cash or blank U.S. Postal Money Order. ("Blank" means the "PAY TO:" line is left blank, so we can fill in any payee we choose.) The foundation for that law suit was the book I wrote entitled "The Federal Zone: Cracking the Code of Internal Revenue" which was an exhibit. It is also available in electronic form for $25 from Us. IRS stole the money we were saving to reprint the bound hard-copy version. I hope this helps. Good luck with your campaign. /s/ Paul Mitchell http://www.supremelaw.com p.s. Here's a sample of our work: [This text is formatted in Courier 11, non-proportional spacing.] FIRST AMENDMENT PETITION TO CONGRESS FOR REDRESS OF GRIEVANCES Dear Representative/Senator ____________________________________: This is a formal Petition to Congress for redress of a major grievance which I have with the federal government. Recent research has disclosed that the original motive for Prohibition (the Volstead Act), was to give oil companies an unfair jump on their monopoly over automotive fuels. It also appears that the BATF were created to disperse an unlawful police force throughout the several States, under the guise of controlling commerce in alcohol. Once the monopoly was in place, Prohibition was repealed, leaving alcohol high and dry as the preferred fuel for automobiles, and leaving this unlawful police force in place to extort money from the American People. This research also proves that the "Internal Revenue Service" [sic] is actually an alias for the Federal Alcohol Administration domiciled at Trust #62 in Puerto Rico, under an Act of Congress which was held to be unconstitutional in 1935. The proof is found, among other places, in all the references to Title 27 which can be found in the regulations for Title 26. None of these regulations is lawful, because IRC 7851(a)(6)(A) states that the provisions of subtitle F shall take effect on the day after the date of enactment of Title 26. Unfortunately for the federal government, Title 26, as such, has never been enacted into positive law, rendering ALL the enforcement provisions of subtitle F null and void. For example, the authority to issue regulations in the first instance is found in subtitle F. From the research cited above, I have come to believe that the United States federal government is now engaged in a criminal syndicate of extortion, perjury, mail fraud, theft, conversion, fraud, and conspiracy involving all of the above. I therefore demand immediate hearings on the relations between the "Internal Revenue Service" and the Federal Alcohol Administration domiciled in Puerto Rico and operating elsewhere on this planet. If these hearings should prove that the Internal Revenue Service is not a lawful organization within the United States Department of the Treasury, then it is time for a major shift in the wind, because every piece of mail they are sending these days is one count of mail fraud by the sender. I think you will agree that We, as a Nation, have a very big problem here. I will look forward to your immediate response to this formal, verified Petition for Redress of this major grievance which I, and millions of other Americans, now have against the United States (federal government). I never thought I would see the day when I would be forced to define the "United States" as a criminal enterprise, but sadly that day has now arrived. VERIFICATION I hereby certify, under penalty of perjury, under the laws of the United States of America, without the "United States", that the above statements of fact are true and correct, to the best of my current information, knowledge, and belief, so help Me God, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1746(1). Executed on the ____________ day of ______________________, 1997. Signed and printed, Citizen of __________________________ state all rights reserved without prejudice First Amendment Petition to Congress Follow These Fun Instructions: 1. Make 12 copies of your original and save it. You will need it tomorrow. Don't forget to print these instructions on the back side, so others like you will know what to do. 2. Complete 1 form for each U.S. Senator from your state, and 1 for your U.S. Representative. If you don't already know, their names are available at your local public library; just ask the Librarians, they will be happy to help you. 3. Post them via first class U.S. Mail, without return address, to the House of Representatives and United States Senate, Washington, D.C. [zip code exempt]. They will get there. 4. Give 3 blank forms to each of 3 others who are willing to follow through. This will propagate faster than 2x2x2 = 8, because 3x3x3 = 27! 5. Make as many extras as you are willing to disseminate, e.g. state Governor, county grand jury foreperson, any body, every body, and then some (don't forget Mom). You will get extra credit for doing this step. 6. Print the blank form and instructions in local newspapers, flyers, electronic bulletin board systems, Internet email, any way, every way, best way you can think of (we may want to imitate you, ok?). Lots of extra credit for doing this step too. 7. If you have a computer, get your hands on the original file VOLSTAD.DOC from Paul Andrew, Mitchell, B.A., M.S. (pmitch@primenet.com) written in MS-WORD for DOS, Version 5.0B, upward compatible with almost ALL word processors. 8. Send $1 cash to Paul Andrew, Mitchell, B.A., M.S., c/o 2509 N. Campbell, #1776, Tucson, Arizona state [zip code exempt], to support additional research, writing, communication, and political action like this. This is a fee for services tendered, rendered, and retained. Extra funds mean extra credits. 9. Call late night talk shows and read the First Amendment Petition to the hosts, right on the air. Try reading it in the mirror first, when nobody is looking or listening, to give yourself confidence. You might also practice it in speech classes, to get expert feedback on subtle things, like inflection, emphasis, and emotion. Weeping is okay. This is a nationwide catharsis we must overcome. 10. It is perfectly okay to use a pen name, if you need some additional privacy and security. 11. Rejoice and be glad, for the day of your deliverance is now at hand. # # # [This text is formatted in Courier 11, non-proportional spacing.] Everett C. Gilbertson, Sui Juris Citizen of Minnesota state and federal witness c/o Rural Route 1, Box 140 Battle Lake [zip code exempt] MINNESOTA STATE In Propria Persona Under Protest and by Special Visitation UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS EIGHTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA [sic], ) Case No. 97-2099-MNST ) Plaintiff [sic]/ ) USDC Minneapolis #CR-4-96-65 Appellees, ) v. ) ) EVERETT C. GILBERTSON [sic], ) ) Defendant [sic]/ ) Appellant. ) ________________________________) ) Everett C. Gilbertson, ) DCUS Minneapolis #4-96-65 ) Plaintiff/Appellant, ) ) v. ) APPELLANT'S OPENING BRIEF ) United States, ) (first impression) James M. Rosenbaum, ) and Does 2-99, ) ON APPEAL FROM CONVICTION ) AND JUDGMENT IN THE USDC Respondents. ) ________________________________) Prepared on Behalf of Appellant by Paul Andrew Mitchell, B.A., M.S. Counselor at Law, federal witness and Counsel to Appellant (2) Table of Contents Page (1) Summary .................................................. 1 (2) Table of Contents (this page) ............................ 2 (A) Table of Cases ...................................... 3 (B) Statutes ............................................ 4 (C) Other Authorities ................................... 5 (3) Preliminary Statement .................................... 7 Verification by Appellant ........................... 7 (4) Statement of Issues: ..................................... 8 (A) Jury Selection and Service Act ("JSSA") ............. 8 (B) Minnesota Voter Registration Practices ............. 11 (C) Apportionment of Congressional Districts ........... 15 (D) Blanket FOIA Exemption for Judiciary ............... 19 (E) Federal Removal Statutes ........................... 27 (F) Downes Doctrine Revisited .......................... 40 (G) Vagueness in the Internal Revenue Code ("IRC") ..... 44 (5) Statement of the Case ................................... 48 (6) Summary of Argument ..................................... 49 (7) Proof of Service ........................................ 50 (8) Appendices, by docket date/entry (under separate cover): 5/16/97 MOTION FOR REHEARING EN BANC (8th Circuit) 4/17/97 COMPLAINT FOR DECLARATORY AND INJUNCTIVE RELIEF 4/17/97 AFFIDAVIT OF APPLICABLE LAW & DENIAL OF LIABILITY 4/14/97 PETITION FOR WARRANT OF REMOVAL BY 3-JUDGE PANEL 4/09/97 AFFIDAVITS OF DEFAULT AND OF PROBABLE CAUSE 4/02/97 MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION OF STAY MOTION (2 of 3) 4/02/97 VERIFIED STATEMENT IN SUPPORT OF CHALLENGE TO JSSA 3/20/97 NOTICE & DEMAND FOR PROOF OF POWER, STANDING, JURISDIC. 3/20/97 NOTICE & DEMAND TO DISMISS FOR LACK OF CRIMINAL JURIS. 3/20/97 MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT OF CHALLENGE TO CRIMINAL JURIS. 2/18/97 NOTICE & DEMAND FOR MANDATORY JUDICIAL NOTICE (FOIA) 10/31/96 MOTION TO STAY PROCEEDINGS/CHALLENGE TO JSSA (1 of 3) 10/31/96 MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT OF MOTION TO STAY PROCEEDINGS 7/17/96 MEMORANDUM: CITIZENSHIP STATUS OF USDC JURORS 6/06/96 STATUS REPORT & CITIZEN'S GUIDE TO THE FOIA/PRIVACY ACT library The Federal Zone: Cracking the Code of Internal Revenue (A) Table of Cases U.S. Supreme Court: American Insurance Co. v. 356 Bales of Cotton:........ 30, 31, 33 Atkins v. Texas:.............................................. 10 Baker v. Carr:................................................ 13 Balzac v. Porto Rico [sic]:............................... 31, 33 Brushaber v. Union Pacific Railroad Company:.................. 25 Cassell v. Texas:............................................. 10 Cohen v. Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp.:..................... 7 Connally v. General Construction Co.:......................... 45 Downes v. Bidwell:................................ 12, 26, 40, 42 Evans v. Gore:............................................ 40, 41 Gregory v. Ashcroft:.......................................... 12 Helstoski v. Meanor:........................................... 7 Hooven & Allison v. Evatt:................................ 24, 43 International Longshoremen's & Warehousemen's Union v. Juneau Spruce Corp.:..................................... 31 Marbury v. Madison:........................................... 13 Miranda v. Arizona:........................................... 13 Mookini v. U.S.:.............................................. 28 New York v. United States:.................................... 12 Norton v. Shelby County:...................................... 13 O'Donoghue v. U.S.:........................................... 28 O'Malley v. Woodrough:........................................ 41 Pierre v. Louisiana:.......................................... 10 Slaughter House Cases:......................................... 8 South Carolina v. Katzenbach:................................. 13 Spreckles Sugar Refining Co. v. McLain:....................... 46 U.S. v. Cruikshank:........................................ 8, 44 U.S. v. Lopez:..................................... 9, 30, 42, 43 U.S. v. Wigglesworth:......................................... 45 Waltz v. Tax Commission of New York City:..................... 27 U.S. Court of Appeals: Denison v. Commissioner (8th Cir.):........................... 23 Graves v. Snead (6th Cir.):................................... 29 Hubbard v. Ammerman (5th Cir.):............................... 29 International Longshoremen's and Warehousemen's Union v. Wirtz (9th Cir.):........................................ 31 Lively v. Commissioner (8th Cir.):............................ 23 U.S. v. Griffin (9th Cir.):.................................... 7 U.S. v. Hicks (9th Cir.):..................................... 40 U.S. v. Johnson (4th Cir.):................................... 32 U.S. v. Layton (9th Cir.):..................................... 7 U.S. v. Saunders (9th Cir.):.................................. 29 U.S. v. Tweel (5th Cir.):..................................... 20 U.S. v. Woodley (9th Cir.):................................... 27 U.S. v. Yellows Freight Systems, Inc. (9th Cir.):.............. 7 Valley Broadcasting Co. v. USDC (9th Cir.):................... 20 Federal District Courts: In Re Grand Jury Subpoena Served on New Life Health Center, (USDC, D. Arizona):..................................... 18, 43 Lord v. Kelley (USDC, D. Massachusetts):...................... 41 U.S. v. De Cadena (USDC, N.D. California):.................... 44 U.S. v. One 1972 Cadillac Coupe de Ville (USDC, E.D.Ky.):..... 28 State Courts: Alexander v. R.D. Geier & Sons Co. (Maryland Appeals):........ 14 Carmine v. Bowen (Maryland Appeals):...................... 17, 20 Carter v. Commission on Qualifications (California Supreme):.. 13 Crosse v. Board of Supervisors (Maryland Appeals):............. 8 Dyett v. Turner (Utah Supreme):............................... 24 Erdahl v. Spannaus (Minnesota District):...................... 11 Ex parte Knowles (California Supreme):......................... 9 Fort v. Civil Service Commission: (California Supreme):....... 13 Gardina v. Board of Registrars (Alabama Supreme):.......... 8, 10 People v. Boxer (California Supreme):..................... 23, 27 People v. Pablo De La Guerra (California Supreme):............. 9 People v. Washington (California Supreme):................. 13-14 Respublica v. Wray (Pennsylvania Supreme):.................... 20 State v. Bernoudy (Missouri Supreme):......................... 20 State v. Christensen (Utah Supreme):.......................... 20 State v. Fowler (Louisiana Supreme):........................... 8 State v. Jones (Hawaii Supreme):.............................. 10 Other Courts Roa v. Collector (Philippine Supreme):........................ 11 (B) Statutes Federal Statutes: 1 U.S.C.:.................................................... 44 1 U.S.C. 1:.............................................. 28, 32 5 U.S.C. 551(A), (B):........................................ 20 5 U.S.C. 552 et seq.:........................................ 35 5 U.S.C. 552(a)(4)(B):........................... 18, 35, 36, 38 5 U.S.C. 552(f):............................................. 19 5 U.S.C. 3331:........................................... 20, 38 18 U.S.C. 242:................................................ 14 18 U.S.C. 1962:............................................... 32 18 U.S.C. 1964:............................................... 32 18 U.S.C. 3241:............................................... 31 26 U.S.C.:............................................ 29, 44, 45 26 U.S.C. 7206(1):............................................. 7 26 U.S.C. 7401:............................................... 28 28 U.S.C.:........................................ 17, 29, 30, 45 28 U.S.C. 132:............................................ 29, 45 28 U.S.C. 297:................................................ 12 28 U.S.C. 453:............................................ 20, 38 28 U.S.C. 951:............................................ 20, 38 28 U.S.C. 1291:................................................ 7 28 U.S.C. 1346(1):............................................ 22 28 U.S.C. 1441 et seq.:................................... 32, 33 28 U.S.C. 1441(a):............................................ 35 28 U.S.C. 1441(b):.................................... 34, 35, 39 28 U.S.C. 1441(e):.................................... 27, 38, 39 28 U.S.C. 1443:............................................... 37 28 U.S.C. 1446(c)(1):......................................... 36 28 U.S.C. 1447(d):............................ 27, 36, 37, 38, 39 28 U.S.C. 1451(2):........................................ 34, 39 28 U.S.C. 1631:........................................... 22, 39 28 U.S.C. 1652:............................................... 40 28 U.S.C. 1738-1742:.......................................... 19 28 U.S.C. 1746(1):......................................... 7, 21 28 U.S.C. 1861:............................................... 16 28 U.S.C. 1865(b)(1):............................... 8, 9, 10, 16 28 U.S.C. 1867(d):........................................ 16, 45 28 U.S.C. 2284:............................................... 15 28 U.S.C. 2402:............................................... 22 Act June 25, 1948, 62 Stat. 895:.......................... 29, 30 Act November 13, 1963, 77 Stat. 331:.......................... 29 Act September 13, 1994:....................................... 14 Civil Rights Act (1866):....................................... 9 Expatriation Statute:......................................... 12 Freedom of Information Act ("FOIA"):............................. .......................18, 19, 21, 27, 33, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40 Internal Revenue Code ("IRC"):.................... 23, 24, 44, 46 IRC section 1(c):............................................. 23 IRC section 7206:............................................. 44 IRC section 7401:......................................... 27, 44 IRC section 7402:..................................... 28, 29, 44 IRC section 7851(a)(6)(A):.................................... 44 IRC subtitle F:............................................... 44 Jury Selection and Service Act ("JSSA"):.................. 11, 15 P.L. 92-310, P.L. 103-322:................................ 28, 14 State Statutes Minnesota Statute 201.014:.................................... 11 (C) Other Authorities Federal Constitution: U.S. Constitution:.10, 14, 18, 19, 20, 21, 24, 28, 29, 40, 42, 43 Article I:................................................ 28, 41 Article I, Section 2, Clause 2 ("1:2:2"):...................... 9 Article I, Section 2, Clause 3 ("1:2:3"):................. 23, 24 Article I, Section 3, Clause 3 ("1:3:3"):...................... 9 Article I, Section 8:......................................... 23 Article I, Section 8, Clause 17 ("1:8:17"):............ 9, 40, 43 Article I, Section 9, Clause 4 ("1:9:4"):................. 23, 24 Article II, Section 1, Clause 5 ("2:1:5"):..................... 9 Article III:.............................. 18, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32 Article III, Section 1 ("3:1"):................... 40, 41, 42, 43 Article III, Section 2, Clause 1 ("3:2:1"):.................... 9 Article IV:........................................... 28, 32, 41 Article IV, Section 1 ("4:1"):............................ 10, 19 Full Faith and Credit Clause ("4:1"):.................. 10, 19 Article IV, Section 2, Clause 1 ("4:2:1"):................. 9, 41 Privileges and Immunities Clause ("4:2:1"):............. 9, 41 Article IV, Section 3, Clause 2 ("4:3:2"):............. 9, 31, 34 Territory Clause ("4:3:2"):......................... 9, 31, 34 Article IV, Section 4 ("4:4"):.................... 11, 12, 13, 15 Guarantee Clause ("4:4"):...................... 11, 12, 13, 15 Article VI, Clause 2 ("6:2"):..................... 12, 13, 19, 20 Supremacy Clause ("6:2"):...................... 12, 13, 19, 20 Article VI, Clause 3 ("6:3"):..................... 19, 20, 21, 38 Oath of Office Clause ("6:3"):................. 19, 20, 21, 38 Preamble, Bill of Rights:..................................... 14 First Amendment:.......................................... 11, 15 Petition Clause:....................................... 19, 34 Fifth Amendment:...................................... 21, 34, 37 Due Process Clause:.................................... 27, 37 Sixth Amendment:.............................................. 44 Nature and Cause Clause:................................... 44 Seventh Amendment:............................................ 22 Ninth Amendment:.......................................... 21, 43 Tenth Amendment:.......................... 11, 15, 16, 21, 34, 43 Thirteenth Amendment (1819):.............................. 10, 20 Fourteenth amendment (1868):.......................... 13, 23, 24 Sixteenth amendment (1913):................... 23, 24, 40, 46, 47 Declaration of Independence:.................................. 14 United States Treaties:............................... 27, 35, 40 International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights:..... 27, 40 Universal Declaration of Human Rights:.................... 27, 40 State Constitutions:.......................................... 21 Minnesota state Constitution:............................. 11, 15 Article VII, Sections 1, 6:................................ 11 Code of Federal Regulations: 26 CFR 1.1-1(a)(1):........................................... 23 26 CFR 1.1-1(a) thru (c):..................................... 23 31 CFR 51.2:.............................................. 34, 37 31 CFR 52.2:.............................................. 34, 37 Federal Rules of Procedure: Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure, Local Rule 28A(j):...... 25 Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Rule 38:.................... 22 Federal Rules of Evidence, Rule 201(d):....................... 19 U.S. Treasury Decisions: Treasury Decision 2313:................................... 24, 25 Legal Maxims/Doctrines: Downes Doctrine:...................................... 24, 40, 43 Equal Footing Doctrine:....................................... 13 Inclusio unius est exclusio alterius:.............. 9, 10, 29, 35 In pari materia:.............................................. 22 Lex non cogit impossibilia:................................... 25 Nunc pro tunc:................................................ 22 Reductio ad absurdum:.......................................... 9 Other Sources: A Citizen's Guide on Using the Freedom of Information Act and the Privacy Act of 1974 to Request Government Records, 1993 Edition, H. Rep. 103-104, 103rd Cong., 1st Sess.:...... 18 American Digest System:....................................... 21 American Jurisprudence:....................................... 13 Black's Law Dictionary, Sixth Edition:.. 8, 9, 10, 12, 13, 14, 29 Corpus Juris:................................................. 20 Corpus Juris Secundum:........................................ 20 The Federal Zone: Cracking the Code of Internal Revenue:......... ............................................... 9, 24, 25, 42, 47 Merritt, "The Guarantee Clause and State Autonomy: Federalism for a Third Century," 88 Columbia Law Review 1 (1988):...... 12 Sutherland, Statutes and Statutory Construction:.............. 45 UCLA Law Review, Vol. 24, No. 2, Dec. 1976:................... 41 # # # ======================================================================== Paul Andrew Mitchell : Counselor at Law, federal witness B.A., Political Science, UCLA; M.S., Public Administration, U.C. Irvine tel: (520) 320-1514: machine; fax: (520) 320-1256: 24-hour/day-night email: [address in tool bar] : using Eudora Pro 3.0.2 on 586 CPU website: http://www.supremelaw.com : visit the Supreme Law Library now ship to: c/o 2509 N. Campbell, #1776 : this is free speech, at its best Tucson, Arizona state : state zone, not the federal zone Postal Zone 85719/tdc : USPS delays first class w/o this As agents of the Most High, we came here to establish justice. We shall not leave, until our mission is accomplished and justice reigns eternal. ======================================================================== [This text formatted on-screen in Courier 11, non-proportional spacing.]
Return to Table of Contents for
Supreme Law School: E-mail