Time: Mon Aug 11 19:44:12 1997
by primenet.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id TAA16648;
Mon, 11 Aug 1997 19:38:46 -0700 (MST)
by usr08.primenet.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id TAA26339;
Mon, 11 Aug 1997 19:33:55 -0700 (MST)
Date: Mon, 11 Aug 1997 19:32:49 -0700
To: (Recipient list suppressed)
From: Paul Andrew Mitchell [address in tool bar]
Subject: SLS: "The Formation of the Noosphere"
.DOC and .ZIP are attached, and encoded in MIME.
I can also encode in BinHex and Uuencode.
Enjoy the essay: it is rough going in places,
but definitely worth the effort.
Pass it on!!
/s/ Paul Mitchell
http://www.supremelaw.com
At 02:35 PM 8/10/97 +0000, you wrote:
>> A magnificently written biological metaphor, for this
>> unprecedented era in computer technology development,
>> is found in Father Pierre Teilhard de Chardin's essay
>> entitled "The Formation of the Noosphere," from his
>> book entitled "The Future of Man." I have the essay
>> in electronic form, if anyone would like a copy.
Attachment Converted: "I:\ATTACH\NOOSPHER.doc"
Attachment Converted: "I:\ATTACH\NOOSPHE1.zip"
========================================================================
Paul Andrew Mitchell : Counselor at Law, federal witness
B.A., Political Science, UCLA; M.S., Public Administration, U.C. Irvine
tel: (520) 320-1514: machine; fax: (520) 320-1256: 24-hour/day-night
email: [address in tool bar] : using Eudora Pro 3.0.3 on 586 CPU
website: http://www.supremelaw.com : visit the Supreme Law Library now
ship to: c/o 2509 N. Campbell, #1776 : this is free speech, at its best
Tucson, Arizona state : state zone, not the federal zone
Postal Zone 85719/tdc : USPS delays first class w/o this
As agents of the Most High, we came here to establish justice. We shall
not leave, until our mission is accomplished and justice reigns eternal.
========================================================================
[This text formatted on-screen in Courier 11, non-proportional spacing.]From ???@??? Mon Aug 11 20:59:50 1997
by primenet.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id TAA21512;
Mon, 11 Aug 1997 19:49:27 -0700 (MST)
id WAA25644; Mon, 11 Aug 1997 22:45:19 -0400 (EDT)
id WAA25530; Mon, 11 Aug 1997 22:45:05 -0400 (EDT)
id AA23472; Mon, 11 Aug 1997 22:45:03 -0400
by usr08.primenet.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id TAA27362
for <snetnews@world.std.com>; Mon, 11 Aug 1997 19:44:58 -0700 (MST)
Date: Mon, 11 Aug 1997 19:43:52 -0700
To: snetnews@world.std.com
From: Paul Andrew Mitchell [address in tool bar]
Subject: SNET: Saturday matinee (Donna)
-> SearchNet's SNETNEWS Mailing List
Killing the messenger is like smashing the radio,
because you don't like what the announcer just said.
This tendency comes from uneducated, and undisciplined,
minds.
I see it all the time, particularly from government
agents who don't want the People to learn the truth
about their manifold frauds, at almost every point
of contact with the state Citizenry.
By criticizing messengers of truth, they dissuade
the gullible from ever considering the truth,
because the gullible would never be caught dead
being "criticized" like that. Goodness, gracious,
never ever!
This is one of the key reasons why education is
much easier said, than done.
It's a variation on "Pygmalion in the Classroom."
Treat people like they're idiots, and they will
become idiots, for all intents and purposes.
Adlai Stevenson once said that the only time he
had ever spoken over people's heads, was the time
he gave an address from an overpass.
/s/ Paul Mitchell
http://www.supremelaw.com
At 07:49 PM 8/11/97 -0600, you wrote:
>
>-> SearchNet's SNETNEWS Mailing List
>
>At 06:55 PM 8/11/97 -0400, you wrote:
>
>>Not really...there's been nothing displayed by the UFOs that show they
>>are capable of interplanetary travel, at least not at speeds above the
>>speed of light...which would make round trips an extremely long
>>prospect...
>>
>>They DO show capability of traveling interdimensionally, tho, and do
>>seem to favor underground and undersea venues...
>
>What capabilities qualify as interdimensional capabilities? And on what do
>you base that qualification, if I may ask? As for there being nothing
>displayed that shows they are capable of interplanetary travel, are you sure
>about that?
>Perhaps you haven't personally seen it or been exposed to it, but that
>doesn't mean that others haven't. The fact that you personally haven't
>experienced it or witnessed it doesn't mean it doesn't exist. Or does it?
>
>>I'm just going by what has been reported...
>
>>And what has been reported, even of ostensibly 'friendly' alien races,
>>shows that even the 'friendly' ones show little concern or respect for
>>humanity...their platitudes are more the sign of psyops of
>>infiltrating spies than of beings truly concerned for the Earth and
>>her inhabitants...else they would be encouraging humanity to take
>>responsibility for itself, than encouraging humanity to wait for the
>>'loving space brothers and sisters' to 'save' them...
>
>I guess that depends on who is doing the reporting and what reports you're
>listening to. I would suggest possibly considering the source a bit more?
>Or at least investigating it before taking it as gospel?
>
>>>Well, if any of them happen to monitor this email echo, I can understand
why
>>>they don't show themselves openly.
>>
>>Why? What are they afraid of? A little flaming?
>
>How do you know they understand the concept of "flaming"? Most of the time,
>it makes no sense to me. And I've lived on this planet all my life.
>Perhaps they don't understand the apparent need to lash out at others in
>response to fear, or they don't comprehend the "kill the messenger"
>mentality that seems to be prevalent in a lot of people who profess an
>interest in the ufo phenomenon.
>
>>
>>If their feelings are so sensitive, they should have stayed at home
>>and meditatated to Zanni instead of taking on the rigours of
>>'interspace' travel...
>>
>>>Statements like yours above (There
>>>doesn't seem to be ANY 'race' of alien being which doesn't seem intent on
>>>conducting a covert psyop against humanity...) don't exactly encourage one
>>>to show themselves.
>>
>>Again, why? Seems to me any being who was TRULY concerned with
>>humanity would be bending over backwards to show themselves and to
>>PROVE themselves...
>>
>>Again, why do they insist on such covert ops?
>
>Ever think maybe its not "them" insisting on the covert nature of their ops?
>
>>
>>>Why do we assume that any alien race would act as we
>>>would in a given situation?
>>
>>I don't know how anyone, let alone any BEING, would act in any
>>situation...I just know what continuing reports state is the nature
>>of the interactions, and even the supposedly 'friendly' ones reek of
>>covert ops, especially psyops...
>>
>>One could ask why YOU are so willing to turn the Earth over to them
>>without question...
>
>Excuse me? Did I say that's what I wanted to do? Seems to me that I've
>asked quite a few questions about this whole matter. Is questioning and
>trying to see a subject from all possible sides now considered treason
>against the Earth or something? Is seeking to uncover the truth by
>examining all possible motives tantemount to selling one's race down the
>intergalactic river?
>
>
>>>While a human might be more prone to reveal
>>>themeselves openly, as well as their actions and intent, why do we assume
>>>that this should be the behavioral norm for an ET race? Who wants to walk
>>>up and say "Hey, how you doing?" knowing that they are suspected of being
>>>intent on harming an entire race, or accused of being spies here to spread
>>>sedition?
>>
>>I would, and I'd suspect anyone else who's motives were
>>straightforward would, also...
>
>Oh, I see. So if someone's behavior isn't in line with what you would do
>under a given situation, then that makes their motivations suspect in your
>eyes? Not only should all humans act in a way that mirrors your actions,
>but all intelligent life, regardless of place of origin, should do likewise?
>For to do otherwise apparently, at least in your eyes, constitutes an
>untrustworthy nature and should breed suspicion?
>>
>>
>>>We sent out a deep space probe (I forget the name) with messages
>>>in gobs of languages that said bascially "Ya'll come and see us sometime."
>>>Yet the general overall feelings on the subject of an ET presence on Earth
>>>seems to be one of fear, mistrust, suspicion, hatred, and good ole human
>>>racial prejudice.
>>
>>No racial prejudice on my part, or fear, either, since I feel the
>>aliens are in reality in a disadvantaged position vis-a-vis human
>>beings...but I definitely feel mistrust and suspicion, due to their
>>own actions...and possibly hatred, if what I suspect is their TRUE
>>motive is in fact reality...
>
>Do you categorize all ETs this way, based on the reports of a few? And may
>I ask what you suspect is their true motivation and why?
>>
>>
>>>I could be wrong, but I don't see a lot of people making
>>>statements of this nature: "Why don't we reserve judgement until we
actually
>>>meet one, and then decide if this or that race of ET is something we
need to
>>>fear or worry about."
>>
>>I'd love to meet one...but I wouldn't be all starry-eyed over the
>>meeting...and I'd be on my toes for any platitudes of theirs
>>masquerading as 'universal truth'...
>
>And how would you go about determining if their "universal truth" was merely
>masqueraded platitudes?
>
>
>>
>>And if any alien race DOES show up because of our 'invitation', then
>>I'd expect them to conduct themselves like any other guest...when I
>>invite anyone over to my house, I don't expect them to hide in the
>>shadows, and then pop out and kidnap me, try to brainwash me, and give
>>me a gynecological exam....(at least, not without bringing a cold
>>bottle of good wine! <bg>)
>
>Oh, I see. You expect them to conduct themselves like a human would. My,
>my...that's fair....how could anyone argue with that? I suppose you expect
>someone from another country, another culture here on Earth to act as you
>would also in a social situation like you describe.
>
>>>Just kinda makes me wonder....not so much about ETs, but about humans.
>>
>>Me too...especially the humans who don't use the critical thinking
>>skills God gave them, but just blinding accept bland platitudes from
>>supposed 'space brothers'...
>>
>>
>>Donna ;-)
>
>People accept as reality what they are comfortable with. No one wants their
>little concept of reality shattered, or their comfortably numb little world
>rocked to the core. That's called self-preservation. That's what, in my
>opinion, leads to narrow-mindedness, a lack of questioning, and an inability
>to examine an issue from all possible angles before drawing any conclusions
>as to the true nature of said issue. Fear is a powerful motivator, and it
>comes in many shapes and forms.
>
>See ya around :)
>
>Jilain
>
>
> ~~~Tell me not, in mournful numbers,
> Life is but an empty dream!
> For the soul is dead that slumbers,
> And things are not what they seem.~~~
>
>
>====Jilain can be reached via email at jilain@rt66.com
> or via IRC undernet channel #blackvault====
>
>
>-> Send "subscribe snetnews " to majordomo@world.std.com
>-> Posted by: Jilain <jilain@rt66.com>
>
>
>
========================================================================
Paul Andrew Mitchell : Counselor at Law, federal witness
B.A., Political Science, UCLA; M.S., Public Administration, U.C. Irvine
tel: (520) 320-1514: machine; fax: (520) 320-1256: 24-hour/day-night
email: [address in tool bar] : using Eudora Pro 3.0.3 on 586 CPU
website: http://www.supremelaw.com : visit the Supreme Law Library now
ship to: c/o 2509 N. Campbell, #1776 : this is free speech, at its best
Tucson, Arizona state : state zone, not the federal zone
Postal Zone 85719/tdc : USPS delays first class w/o this
As agents of the Most High, we came here to establish justice. We shall
not leave, until our mission is accomplished and justice reigns eternal.
========================================================================
[This text formatted on-screen in Courier 11, non-proportional spacing.]
-> Send "subscribe snetnews " to majordomo@world.std.com
-> Posted by: Paul Andrew Mitchell [address in tool bar]
Return to Table of Contents for
Supreme Law School: E-mail