Time: Wed Aug 20 21:02:46 1997
	by primenet.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id VAA28339;
	Wed, 20 Aug 1997 21:02:44 -0700 (MST)
Date: Thu, 21 Aug 1997 04:55:56 -0700
To: Charles Pixley <pix108@frontiernet.net>
From: Paul Andrew Mitchell [address in toolbar]
Subject: SLS: MEMO to Frank G. Long and John Oppedahl

Dear Clients,

Mr. Long is an "attorney" who has demanded
that I stop using "ARIZONA REPUBLIC" on my
mailing envelopes and in documents which 
I publish on the Internet.  They have no
registered trademark in this name, although
they have applied for it.  If you have not
already received a copy of my first letter
to Mr. Oppedahl, CEO of the parent company,
I will be happy to re-send it to you here,
upon request.

/s/ Paul Mitchell
http://www.supremelaw.com



[This text is formatted in Courier 11, non-proportional spacing.]


MEMO

TO:       Frank G. Long, Unregistered Foreign Agent
          John Oppedahl, CEO, Phoenix Newspapers, Inc.

FROM:     Paul Andrew, Mitchell, B.A., M.S.
          Counselor at Law

DATE:     August 20, 1997

SUBJECT:  Please Turn Off the Pressure!


Dear Frank:

I have  received your  fax communication  today.   I do not agree
with you  when you  say that  it is  "essential" that I sign your
proposed Settlement  Agreement by  Friday noon.  Since I have not
even read  it, I  am not in any position to cite provisions which
justify such haste.  Your "deadline" is artificial and contrived,
at best.

You are  wrong to  conclude that I am not serious about resolving
our "dispute" amicably.  On the contrary, I have already gone way
out of  my way  to explain  our situation,  and to  take steps to
ensure that your position is also recognized.  If what you say is
true (and  it is not true), I would not have taken the initiative
to begin editing our huge database in honor of your request.

I fail  to see where such excessive pressure tactics are going to
get you  what you want, unless there is, indeed, some real hidden
agenda to your intentions.

What are your true and complete intentions, Mr. Long?

Is it the original Thirteenth Amendment?

Is it the all important difference between the USDC and the DCUS?

Are you,  in fact,  colluding with staff of the federal judiciary
in Phoenix  and/or Tucson,  and with  the Pima  County  Attorneys
office in  Tucson, to  impede, halt,  obstruct, or compromise the
services we are obligated to deliver to our clients?

If you  are, then  you may  be putting  yourself in a position of
liability for  obstructing justice.  But, as a licensed attorney,
I should not need to be telling you these things, should I?

I can  honestly say  to  you  that  I  have  already  made  major
commitments to  more than  one client,  to complete their work as
soon as possible, and hopefully before Friday.  In light of their
paramount needs, I worked all weekend on the editing which I have
already described  to you.   This  good  faith  on  my  part  is,
evidently, not enough for you.  This saddens me deeply.

If you persist in pressuring me in the way that you have today, I
would  have  to  regard  such  pressure  as  an  attempt  by  you
deliberately to  impede the  delivery of  essential  professional
services to clients who are facing imminent incarceration, by the
same hostile  federal judiciary  with  which  you  appear  to  be
colluding and  conspiring.  Is this only an appearance, Mr. Long,
or are  you in  fact colluding with the offices of Mr. Richard H.
Weare in  Phoenix and  Tucson, and  with the  office of  the Pima
County Attorney in Tucson?

You do  not have  any right to impair the obligations of my prior
contracts, in  particular  because  all  licensed  attorneys,  as
officers of  the courts  in which  they are admitted to practice,
must be  able to  demonstrate that  they have  taken an  oath  to
support the  U.S. Constitution.   Have  you?   I have no contract
with you  or Phoenix Newspapers, Inc., verbal or written, at this
point in time;  and, furthermore, if you do not immediately begin
to demonstrate  at least a gram of professional consideration for
my prior commitments and obligations, I will take your refusal in
this regard as seriously as possible.

My clients  have a  fundamental Right to counsel of their choice,
under the Sixth Amendment, and you now given me cause to conclude
that you  are more  than willing  to interfere with my priorities
and obligations  to these  clients.  This is a violation of their
fundamental right  to effective  assistance of  Counsel  and,  as
such, it  constitutes probable cause to charge you with violating
18 U.S.C. 242 -- deprivation of fundamental Rights under color of
law --  and possibly  also 18 U.S.C. 241 -- conspiracy to deprive
fundamental Rights.   This  is a fair gentleman's warning to you,
Mr. Long.

Since you have failed to demonstrate any specific reason why your
artificial deadline  warrants a  total upheaval in my crowded and
pressing  schedule,  I  must  politely  demand  hereby  that  you
immediately cease  and desist  any further  pressure tactics.   I
think you know exactly what I am talking about here.

If you  do not  understand exactly  what I am talking about here,
please advise  in writing,  and I  will elaborate in excruciating
detail, but  only after my other pressing obligations are met, in
a timely and professional manner.

I will look forward to your immediate cooperation in this regard.
Please fax me evidence of your oath of office, no later than noon
on Friday  next (August 22, 1997).  If you do not, I will proceed
on the  basis of  probable cause that you are not who you say you
are, and that you fully intend to continue, and foster, a program
of intentional  harassment,  misrepresentation,  and  retaliation
against a  known federal  witness, in deliberate and premeditated
violation of  18 U.S.C.  1512 and 1513.  Again, you have now been
warned.

Thank you for obeying American Law never repealed.


Sincerely yours,

/s/ Paul Mitchell

Paul Andrew, Mitchell, B.A., M.S.
Counselor at Law and federal witness
c/o 2509 N. Campbell Avenue, #1776
Tucson 85719/tdc
ARIZONA STATE (See USPS Publication #221.)

email:       pmitch@primenet.com (586/Eudora Pro 3.0.3(16):
             preferred, to conserve all resources)
phone:       (520) 320-1514 (private line:
             please get permission to disclose)
fax machine: (520) 320-1256 (dedicated hard copy:
             available 24-hours per day or night)
fax modem:   (520) 320-1513 (switched fax/modem:
             use when fax machine is busy/no answer)
website:     http://www.supremelaw.com


                             #  #  #

========================================================================
Paul Andrew Mitchell                 : Counselor at Law, federal witness
B.A., Political Science, UCLA;  M.S., Public Administration, U.C. Irvine

tel:     (520) 320-1514: machine; fax: (520) 320-1256: 24-hour/day-night
email:   [address in toolbar]        : using Eudora Pro 3.0.3 on 586 CPU
website: http://www.supremelaw.com   : visit the Supreme Law Library now
ship to: c/o 2509 N. Campbell, #1776 : this is free speech,  at its best
             Tucson, Arizona state   : state zone,  not the federal zone
             Postal Zone 85719/tdc   : USPS delays first class  w/o this

As agents of the Most High, we came here to establish justice.  We shall
not leave, until our mission is accomplished and justice reigns eternal.
========================================================================
[This text formatted on-screen in Courier 11, non-proportional spacing.]

      


Return to Table of Contents for

Supreme Law School:   E-mail