Time: Thu Aug 21 09:29:41 1997 by primenet.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id IAA08363; Thu, 21 Aug 1997 08:15:26 -0700 (MST) by usr01.primenet.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id HAA04695; Thu, 21 Aug 1997 07:28:10 -0700 (MST) Date: Thu, 21 Aug 1997 07:11:47 -0700 To: (Recipient list suppressed) From: Paul Andrew Mitchell [address in tool bar] Subject: SLF: Criminal Complaint in Grand Jury case <snip> > >Subject: SLF: Criminal Complaint in Grand Jury case > >[This text is formatted in Courier 11, non-proportional spacing.] > > >Paul Andrew Mitchell, Sui Juris >Citizen of Arizona state >c/o general delivery at: >2509 North Campbell Ave., #1776 >Tucson [zip code exempt] >ARIZONA STATE > >In Propria Persona > >All Rights Reserved >without prejudice > > > > > JUDICIAL COUNCIL > > FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT > > >In re Charge of ) No. 96-80380 > ) >Judicial Misconduct ) NOTICE AND DEMAND > ) TO APPEAR BEFORE A > ) COMPETENT AND QUALIFIED > ) FEDERAL GRAND JURY; > ) VERIFIED CRIMINAL COMPLAINT; > ) NOTICE OF REFUSAL FOR CAUSE: > ) > ) 18 U.S.C. 4, 1504, 1512, 1513; >________________________________) Petition & Due Process Clauses > >COMES NOW Paul Andrew Mitchell, Sui Juris, Citizen of Arizona > >state, federal witness (hereinafter "Complainant"), and Vice > >President for Legal Affairs of New Life Health Center Company, an > >Unincorporated Business Trust domiciled in the Arizona Republic > >(hereinafter the "Trust"), formally to demand an opportunity to > >appear before a competent and qualified federal grand jury, > >pursuant to the second paragraph of 18 U.S.C. 1504; to bring and > >file a verified CRIMINAL COMPLAINT in the matter of the judicial > >misconduct which is the subject of the instant case; to refuse > >the ORDER AND MEMORANDUM for fraud by Mr. Procter Hug, as filed > >in the instant case on August 14, 1997, which ORDER allegedly > >dismissed the instant Complaint of Judicial Misconduct; and to > >provide formal Notice of the above to all interested party(s). > > >Notice/Demand to Appear, Criminal Complaint, Refusal for Cause: > Page 1 of 9 > > > DEMAND TO APPEAR BEFORE A > COMPETENT AND QUALIFIED FEDERAL GRAND JURY > > Complainant hereby demands an opportunity to appear before a > >competent and qualified federal grand jury, lawfully convened > >under auspices of the United States Court of Appeals for the > >Ninth Circuit, to provide sworn testimony concerning the events, > >alleged misconduct, and voluminous supporting documentation which > >have given rise to the instant Complaint. Complainant demands > >that said opportunity be created, and that said appearance occur, > >no later than November 30, 1997. The instant DEMAND is made > >pursuant to the second paragraph in 18 U.S.C. 1504, to wit: > > Nothing in this section shall be construed to prohibit the > communication of a request to appear before the grand jury. > > [bold emphasis added] > > Complainant constructs said paragraph to mean that employees > >of all branches of the United States (federal government) are > >barred from obstructing such a request, delaying such a request, > >or otherwise preventing a request to appear before the federal > >grand jury from reaching the foreperson of the federal grand jury > >via first class, certified, and/or registered United States Mail. > > Complainant offers to prove that there are no statutes > >codified anywhere in the United States Code, or otherwise enacted > >by the Congress, which authorize federal judges, United States > >Attorneys, and/or clerks of the federal district courts, to > >delay, obstruct, or otherwise prevent the delivery of > >correspondence transmitted via United States Mail to the > >foreperson of a lawfully convened grand jury, particularly when > >said correspondence contains a lawful, and proper, request to > >appear before same and is transmitted with return receipt and > >restricted delivery services requested and purchased. > > >Notice/Demand to Appear, Criminal Complaint, Refusal for Cause: > Page 2 of 9 > > > VERIFIED CRIMINAL COMPLAINT > > Complainant hereby formally charges the following named > >individuals, both jointly and severally, with the corresponding > >crimes enumerated infra: > > >Mr. John M. Roll with: > >(1) obstructing correspondence transmitted via first class, > certified, and registered United States Mail, under color of > law (25 counts), in violation of 18 U.S.C. 1702; > >(2) tampering with a federal grand jury (25 counts), in > violation of 18 U.S.C. 1512; > >(3) obstruction of criminal investigations (25 counts), in > violation of 18 U.S.C. 1510; > >(4) deprivation of fundamental Rights under color of law, > specifically the Right to Petition a federal grand jury for > a formal investigation (25 counts), in violation of 18 > U.S.C. 242; > >(5) conspiracy to commit all of the above (25 counts), in > violation of 18 U.S.C. 241 and 371; > >(6) perjury before a judicial proceeding in the United States > District Court (2 counts), in violation of 18 U.S.C. 1623. > > >Mr. Robert L. Miskell with: > >(1) obstructing correspondence transmitted via first class, > certified, and registered United States Mail, under color of > law (25 counts), in violation of 18 U.S.C. 1702; > >(2) tampering with a federal grand jury (25 counts), in > violation of 18 U.S.C. 1512; > >(3) obstruction of criminal investigations (25 counts), in > violation of 18 U.S.C. 1510; > >(4) deprivation of fundamental Rights under color of law, > specifically the Right to Petition a federal grand jury for > a formal investigation (25 counts), in violation of 18 > U.S.C. 242; > >(5) conspiracy to commit all of the above (25 counts), in > violation of 18 U.S.C. 241 and 371; > >(6) perjury before a judicial proceeding in the United States > District Court (2 counts), in violation of 18 U.S.C. 1623; > >(7) contempt of a United States District Court in the matter of > enforcing a federal grand jury subpoena (2 counts), in > violation of 18 U.S.C. 402. > > >Notice/Demand to Appear, Criminal Complaint, Refusal for Cause: > Page 3 of 9 > > >Ms. Janet Napolitano with: > >(1) aiding and abetting the obstruction of correspondence > transmitted via first class, certified, and registered > United States Mail, under color of law (25 counts), in > violation of 18 U.S.C. 2 and 1702; > >(2) aiding and abetting the act of tampering with a federal > grand jury (25 counts), in violation of 18 U.S.C. 2 and > 1512; > >(3) aiding and abetting obstruction of criminal investigations > (25 counts), in violation of 18 U.S.C. 2 and 1510; > >(4) deprivation of fundamental Rights under color of law, > specifically the Right to Petition a lawfully convened > federal grand jury for a formal investigation (25 counts), > in violation of 18 U.S.C. 242; > >(5) conspiracy to commit all of the above (25 counts), in > violation of 18 U.S.C. 241 and 371. > > >Mr. Richard H. Weare with: > >(1) aiding and abetting the obstruction of correspondence > transmitted via first class, certified, and registered > United States Mail, under color of law (25 counts), in > violation of 18 U.S.C. 2 and 1702; > >(2) aiding and abetting the act of tampering with a federal > grand jury (25 counts), in violation of 18 U.S.C. 2 and > 1512; > >(3) aiding and abetting obstruction of criminal investigations > (25 counts), in violation of 18 U.S.C. 2 and 1510; > >(4) deprivation of fundamental Rights under color of law, > specifically the Right to Petition a lawfully convened > federal grand jury for a formal investigation (25 counts), > in violation of 18 U.S.C. 242; > >(5) conspiracy to commit all of the above (25 counts), in > violation of 18 U.S.C. 241 and 371. > > >Ms. Evangelina Cardenas with: > >(1) aiding and abetting the obstruction of correspondence > transmitted via first class, certified, and registered > United States Mail, under color of law (25 counts), in > violation of 18 U.S.C. 2 and 1702; > >(2) aiding and abetting the act of tampering with a federal > grand jury (25 counts), in violation of 18 U.S.C. 2 and > 1512; > > >Notice/Demand to Appear, Criminal Complaint, Refusal for Cause: > Page 4 of 9 > > >(3) aiding and abetting obstruction of criminal investigations > (25 counts), in violation of 18 U.S.C. 2 and 1510; > >(4) deprivation of fundamental Rights under color of law, > specifically the Right to Petition a lawfully convened > federal grand jury for a formal investigation (25 counts), > in violation of 18 U.S.C. 242; > >(5) conspiracy to commit all of the above (25 counts), in > violation of 18 U.S.C. 241 and 371; > > >Does 1 thru 10: > >(1) aiding and abetting the obstruction of correspondence, > transmitted via first class, certified, and registered > United States Mail, under color of law (one or more counts), > in violation of 18 U.S.C. 2 and 1702; > >(2) aiding and abetting the act of tampering with a federal > grand jury (one or more counts), in violation of 18 U.S.C. 2 > and 1512; > >(3) aiding and abetting obstruction of criminal investigations > (one or more counts), in violation of 18 U.S.C. 2 and 1510; > >(4) deprivation of fundamental Rights under color of law, > specifically the Right to Petition a lawfully convened > federal grand jury for a formal investigation (one or more > counts), in violation of 18 U.S.C. 242; > >(5) conspiracy to commit all of the above (one or more counts), > in violation of 18 U.S.C. 241 and 371; > >(6) retaliating against a witness, victim, or an informant (12 > counts), in violation of 18 U.S.C. 1513; > >(7) misprision of felony (one or more counts), in violation of > 18 U.S.C. 4. > > NOTICE OF REFUSAL FOR FRAUD > > Complainant hereby formally refuses Mr. Procter Hug's > >alleged dismissal of the instant Complaint of Judicial > >Misconduct, for all of the following reasons, to wit: > > (1) Mr. Hug's judicial compensation is presently being > >diminished unlawfully by federal income taxes, in violation of > >Article III, Section 1, of the Constitution for the United States > >of America, as lawfully amended; this diminution is evidence of > >a bias, and of an unlawful conflict of interest, because of the > > >Notice/Demand to Appear, Criminal Complaint, Refusal for Cause: > Page 5 of 9 > > >existence of a prior contract with a real party of interest -- > >the "Internal Revenue Service" [sic], as represented by suspect > >Evangelina Cardenas alleging falsely to be a Special Agent [sic]. > > (2) Mr. Hug committed a serious error by merely insinuating > >that Complainant had violated one or more of the prohibitions of > >18 U.S.C. 1504, without specifically enumerating any further > >details, when the second paragraph of said statute very clearly > >reserves to Complainant the Right to petition a competent and > >qualified federal grand jury for an opportunity to appear, and > >also for a formal investigation into testimony and documentary > >evidence which Complainant sought, and still seeks, to bring > >before said grand jury. It was not appropriate for Mr. John M. > >Roll either to keep, or to forward, communications to Mr. Robert > >L. Miskell, because said acts contributed directly to the > >obstruction of said communications and permanently prevented same > >from ever reaching the foreperson of said grand jury, in repeated > >and premeditated violations of 18 U.S.C. 241, 242, 371, and 1510. > > (3) Complainant has challenged officials of the United > >States Postal Service ("USPS") to produce all statutory and > >constitutional authorities which might otherwise permit, with > >impunity, a federal judge permanently to obstruct correspondence > >directed to the foreperson of a federal grand jury, and no such > >authorities were ever produced. On the contrary, every single > >employee of the USPS whom Complainant has approached with this > >question, has answered in the negative, namely, there are no > >authorities whatsoever which permit federal judges to obstruct > >first class, certified and/or registered United States Mail, when > >said mail was directed to the foreperson of a federal grand jury, > >and when return receipt and restricted delivery services were > >also requested and purchased from the USPS counter clerks. > > >Notice/Demand to Appear, Criminal Complaint, Refusal for Cause: > Page 6 of 9 > > > (4) Mr. Hug admits to having made at most a "limited > >inquiry" into the voluminous documentation which Complainant has > >filed with the Clerk of the United States Court of Appeals for > >the Ninth Circuit, and which Complainant incorporated into the > >instant Complaint by reference, as if set forth fully herein. > >Moreover, Mr. Hug never made a judicial determination that the > >instant Complaint was extraordinary in any way, and yet Mr. Hug > >violated the Ninth Circuit's own rules for expeditious review of > >proper Complaints of Judicial Misconduct or Disability, by > >exceeding the guidelines for same. This "limited inquiry," and > >these unnecessary delays, in processing the instant Complaint, > >have combined to work an irreparable prejudice upon Complainant, > >in violation of Complainant's fundamental Rights to due process > >of law, as guaranteed by the Fifth Amendment in the Bill of > >Rights, and to Petition the Government for Redress of Grievances, > >in violation of the First Amendment in the Bill of Rights. > >Silence can be equated with a fraud where there is a legal or a > >moral duty to speak. Complainant hereby charges that Mr. Hug > >abused discretion by waiting an inordinate and unjustified amount > >of time, before alleging to dismiss the instant Complaint. > > > VERIFICATION > > Complainant hereby verifies, under penalty of perjury, under > >the laws of the United States of America, without the "United > >States", that the foregoing statement of facts is true and > >correct, to the best of Counsel's current information, knowledge, > >and belief, so help Me God, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1746(1). > > >Notice/Demand to Appear, Criminal Complaint, Refusal for Cause: > Page 7 of 9 > > > PROOF OF SERVICE > >I, Paul Andrew, Mitchell, B.A., M.S., hereby certify, under > >penalty of perjury, under the laws of the United States of > >America, without the "United States", that I am at least 18 years > >of age and a Citizen of one of the United States of America, and > >that I personally served the following document(s): > > NOTICE AND DEMAND TO APPEAR BEFORE A > COMPETENT AND QUALIFIED FEDERAL GRAND JURY; > VERIFIED CRIMINAL COMPLAINT; NOTICE OF REFUSAL FOR CAUSE: > 18 U.S.C. 4, 1504, 1512, 1513; Petition & Due Process Clauses > >by placing said document(s) with exhibits in first class United > >States Mail, with postage prepaid and properly addressed to the > >following individuals: > > >ROBERT L. MISKELL [sic] John M. Roll [sic] >Acapulco Building, Suite 8310 U.S. District Court >110 South Church Avenue 55 E. Broadway >Tucson, Arizona state Tucson, Arizona state > >JANET NAPOLITANO [sic] Clerk of Court >Acapulco Building, Suite 8310 United States District Court >110 South Church Avenue 55 E. Broadway >Tucson, Arizona state Tucson, Arizona state > >Grand Jury Foreperson Postmaster >In re: New Life Health Center Co. U.S. Post Office >55 E. Broadway Downtown Station >Tucson, Arizona state Tucson, Arizona state > >Judge Alex Kozinski Evangelina Cardenas [sic] >Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals "Internal Revenue Service" >125 S. Grand Avenue, Suite 200 300 West Congress >Pasadena, California state Tucson, Arizona state > >Attorney General Solicitor General >Department of Justice Department of Justice >10th and Constitution, N.W. 10th and Constitution, N.W. >Washington, D.C. Washington, D.C. > >Thomas H. Basham Eugene A. Burns >Federal Bureau of Investigation New Life Health Center Company >201 East Indianola 4500 East Speedway, Suite 27 >Phoenix, Arizona state Tucson, Arizona state > >Chief Judge >Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals >c/o P.O. Box 193939 >San Francisco, California > > >Notice/Demand to Appear, Criminal Complaint, Refusal for Cause: > Page 8 of 9 > > >Executed on August 21, 1997: > >/s/ Paul Mitchell >_______________________________________________________ >Paul Andrew, Mitchell, B.A., M.S. >Citizen of Arizona state, federal witness, >Counselor at Law, and Vice President for Legal Affairs, >New Life Health Center Company, Tucson, Arizona state > >All Rights Reserved without prejudice > > >Notice/Demand to Appear, Criminal Complaint, Refusal for Cause: > Page 9 of 9 > > > # # # ======================================================================== Paul Andrew Mitchell : Counselor at Law, federal witness B.A., Political Science, UCLA; M.S., Public Administration, U.C. Irvine tel: (520) 320-1514: machine; fax: (520) 320-1256: 24-hour/day-night email: [address in tool bar] : using Eudora Pro 3.0.3 on 586 CPU website: http://www.supremelaw.com : visit the Supreme Law Library now ship to: c/o 2509 N. Campbell, #1776 : this is free speech, at its best Tucson, Arizona state : state zone, not the federal zone Postal Zone 85719/tdc : USPS delays first class w/o this As agents of the Most High, we came here to establish justice. We shall not leave, until our mission is accomplished and justice reigns eternal. ======================================================================== [This text formatted on-screen in Courier 11, non-proportional spacing.]
Return to Table of Contents for
Supreme Law School: E-mail