Time: Fri Aug 22 10:38:47 1997 by primenet.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id JAA02003; Fri, 22 Aug 1997 09:14:03 -0700 (MST) Date: Fri, 22 Aug 1997 12:13:54 -0400 Originator: heritage-l@gate.net From: Paul Andrew Mitchell [address in tool bar] To: pmitch@primenet.com Subject: SLF: demand to Morrison & Heckler, Phoenix <snip> > >Subject: SLF: demand to Morrison & Heckler > >[This text is formatted in Courier 11, non-proportional spacing.] > >MEMO > >TO: John Oppedahl, CEO, Phoenix Newspapers, Inc. > and > Frank G. Long, Unregistered Foreign Agent > Morrison & Hecker, L.L.P., Attorneys at Law > 2800 North Central Avenue, Suite 1600 > Phoenix 85004-1047/tdc > ARIZONA STATE > tel: (602) 279-1600 > fax: (602) 240-6925 > >FROM: Paul Andrew, Mitchell, B.A., M.S. > Counselor at Law > >DATE: August 21, 1997 > >SUBJECT: Please Turn Off the Pressure! > > PRELIMINARY COMPLAINT OF ATTORNEY MALPRACTICE > >Dear Frank: > >I have received your fax communication yesterday. I honestly do >not agree with you when you say that it is "essential" that I >sign your proposed Settlement Agreement by Friday noon (i.e. >tomorrow). Since I have not even read it, I am not in any >position to cite provisions which justify such haste. Your >"deadline" is artificial and contrived, at best. > >You are quite wrong to conclude that I am not serious about >resolving our "dispute" amicably. On the contrary, I have >already gone way out of my way to explain our situation, and to >take steps to ensure that your position is also recognized. If >what you say is true (and it is not true), I would not have taken >the initiative to begin editing our huge database in honor of >your request. > >I fail to see where such excessive pressure tactics are going to >get you what you want, unless there is, indeed, some real hidden >agenda grounding your intentions. > >What are your true and complete intentions, Mr. Long? > >Is it the original Thirteenth Amendment? > >Is it the all important difference between the USDC and the DCUS? > >Are you, in fact, colluding with staff of the federal judiciary >in Phoenix and/or Tucson, and with the Pima County Attorneys >office in Tucson, to impede, halt, obstruct, or compromise the >services we are obligated to deliver to our clients? > >If you are, then you may be putting yourself in a position of >liability for obstructing justice. But, as a licensed attorney, >you don't need me to be telling you these things, do you? > >I can honestly say to you that I have already made major >commitments to more than one client, to complete their work as >soon as possible, and hopefully before the end of the business >day on Friday (tomorrow). In light of their paramount needs, I >worked all last weekend on the editing which I have already >described to you. This good faith on my part is, evidently, just >not enough for you. This saddens me deeply. > >If you persist in pressuring me in the way that you have >yesterday, I would have to regard such pressure as an attempt by >you deliberately to impede the delivery of essential professional >services to clients who are facing imminent incarceration, by the >same hostile federal judiciary with which you appear to be >colluding and conspiring. Is this only an appearance, Mr. Long, >or are you in fact colluding with the offices of Mr. Richard H. >Weare in Phoenix and Tucson, and with the office of the Pima >County Attorney in Tucson? > >You do not have any right to impair the obligations of my prior >contracts, in particular because all licensed attorneys, as >officers of the courts in which they are admitted to practice, >must be able to demonstrate that they have taken an oath to >support the U.S. Constitution. Have you? I have no contract >with you or Phoenix Newspapers, Inc., verbal or written, at this >point in time; and, furthermore, if you do not immediately begin >to demonstrate at least a gram of professional consideration for >my prior commitments and obligations, I will take your refusal in >this regard as seriously as possible. > >My clients have a fundamental Right to counsel of their choice, >under the Sixth Amendment, and you now given me cause to conclude >that you are more than willing to interfere with my priorities >and obligations to these clients. This is a violation of their >fundamental right to effective assistance of Counsel and, as >such, it constitutes probable cause to charge you with violating >18 U.S.C. 242 -- deprivation of fundamental Rights under color of >law -- and possibly also 18 U.S.C. 241 -- conspiracy to deprive >fundamental Rights. This is a fair gentleman's warning to you, >Mr. Long. > >Since you have failed to demonstrate any specific reason why your >artificial deadline warrants a total upheaval in my crowded and >pressing schedule, I must politely demand hereby that you >immediately cease and desist any further pressure tactics. I >think you know exactly what I am talking about here. I certainly >hope that you don't make a habit of such unethical behavior. > >If you do not understand exactly what I am talking about here, >please advise in writing, and I will elaborate in excruciating >detail, but only after my other pressing obligations are met, in >a timely and professional manner. > >I will look forward to your immediate cooperation in this regard. >Please fax me evidence of your oath of office, no later than noon >on Monday next (August 25, 1997). That gives you the whole >weekend to locate it. If you do not, I will proceed on the basis >of probable cause that you are not who you say you are, and that >you fully intend to continue, and to foster, a program of >intentional harassment, misrepresentation, and retaliation >against a known federal witness, in deliberate and premeditated >violation of 18 U.S.C. 1512 & 1513. Again, you have been warned. > >Thank you for obeying American Law never repealed. I really >don't want to fight with you, Mr. Long, but I will fight if I >must and if you give me no other alternative. > > >Sincerely yours, > >/s/ Paul Mitchell > >Paul Andrew, Mitchell, B.A., M.S. >Counselor at Law and federal witness >c/o 2509 N. Campbell Avenue, #1776 >Tucson 85719/tdc >ARIZONA STATE (See USPS Publication #221.) > >email: pmitch@primenet.com (586/Eudora Pro 3.0.3(16): > preferred, to conserve all resources) >phone: (520) 320-1514 (private line: > please get permission to disclose) >fax machine: (520) 320-1256 (dedicated hard copy: > available 24-hours per day or night) >fax modem: (520) 320-1513 (switched fax/modem: > use when fax machine is busy/no answer) >website: http://www.supremelaw.com > >copies: Better Business Bureau of Phoenix, Arizona > State Bar of Arizona, Phoenix, Arizona > > > # # # > <snip> ======================================================================== Paul Andrew Mitchell : Counselor at Law, federal witness B.A., Political Science, UCLA; M.S., Public Administration, U.C. Irvine tel: (520) 320-1514: machine; fax: (520) 320-1256: 24-hour/day-night email: [address in tool bar] : using Eudora Pro 3.0.3 on 586 CPU website: http://www.supremelaw.com : visit the Supreme Law Library now ship to: c/o 2509 N. Campbell, #1776 : this is free speech, at its best Tucson, Arizona state : state zone, not the federal zone Postal Zone 85719/tdc : USPS delays first class w/o this As agents of the Most High, we came here to establish justice. We shall not leave, until our mission is accomplished and justice reigns eternal. ======================================================================== [This text formatted on-screen in Courier 11, non-proportional spacing.]
Return to Table of Contents for
Supreme Law School: E-mail