Time: Thu Sep 11 09:10:25 1997 by primenet.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id JAA12871; Thu, 11 Sep 1997 09:04:43 -0700 (MST) by usr04.primenet.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id JAA23297; Thu, 11 Sep 1997 09:02:45 -0700 (MST) Date: Thu, 11 Sep 1997 09:02:36 -0700 To: (Recipient list suppressed) From: Paul Andrew Mitchell [address in tool bar] Subject: SLS: "Count me out of the NWO," by Charley Reese Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit <snip> > >Article located at: http://www.orlandosentinel.com/opinion/0831rees.htm > >The Orlando Sentinel, Sunday, August 31, 1997 > > >Count me out if a New World Order is what world is coming to > >By Charley Reese >of The Sentinel Staff > >Want to know what's weird? > >It's weird that an out-of-work ex-dictator of the Soviet Union, such as >Mikhail Gorbachev, tools around the United States, forms a tax-exempt >foundation and hosts state-of-the-world forums attended by various new-left >and in-power utopians. > >One should remember, shouldn't one, that Gorbachev worked his way through >college ratting out his professors and fellow students to the KGB -- >condemning them to torture and/or death -- and did not (and never did >intend to) bring democracy to the Soviet Union. He intended to save >communism by putting on a few cosmetic reforms. He blew it. > >It's also weird that, unlike the Nazis, former Communist leaders who killed >millions have never been brought to justice, except for a token guy here or >there. It's even weirder that America's raving moralists don't seem to give >a hoot. That's probably because they are more left than moral. > >I think that we ought to file a complaint with the Russians. They should >keep their former dictators at home. > >I understand that there is plenty of room in Siberia, and what would be a >more fitting retirement home for a Communist tyrant than the place where >communism doomed millions to hard labor and death? > >Instead, this Communist ex-dictator sets up a foundation at The Presidio, a >former U.S. Army base. > >Old Spot's putting on a series of state-of-the-world forums to develop >ideas for a global civilization. Given Gorbachev's background and >experience, I don't want to have anything to do with any civilization he >plans, but a lot of American political, business and news-media bigwigs >turn out for his hoop-de-doos for a New World Order. Al Gore, who aspires >to be the Utopian-in-Chief, was at the '95 shindig along with Jane Fonda >and other assorted leftists. The whole affair was subsidized by Bob Dole's >favorite agribusiness, Archer Daniels Midland. > >Someone called the 1995 forum a meeting of new-left socialists and >utopians. I would call it a meeting of new-left socialists and saps. The >way so many prominent Americans lust after socialism and its necessary loss >of liberty makes me think of a line from an old Western movie. > >''If God did not intend for them to be sheared, then why did he make them >sheep?'' an inquiring Mexican outlaw wanted to know. > >Good question, Calvaro. > >It seems to me that either the Cold War was a phony deal or the end of the >Cold War is a phony deal. Instead of being brought to justice, Communists >in Eastern Europe and the former Soviet Union are either still in power or >getting rich running capitalist enterprises. > >And what does it say about capitalists when they pick Communists to run >their enterprises? > >It says that a no-goodnik is a no-goodnik regardless of what language he >speaks or what economic or political system he pays lip service to. There >is a worldwide brotherhood of indecent men who would sell their mothers to >the devil, let alone their countrymen, to make a buck. > >Well, I don't want any part of a New World Order or global civilization. >I'll settle for the plain, old constitutional republic our revolution >produced. That no longer exists either, except in form, but it, at least, >is worth restoring. > >I hope you notice that all these folks who talk about globalism or new >world orders never seem to get around to talking about the principles of >the American Revolution -- liberty, inalienable rights and self-government. > >There are no elected delegates to the United Nations. They are all >appointed by their governments. Therefore rule by the United Nations -- if >that's what people have in mind -- would be dictatorial rule by an >oligarchy of the more powerful nation-states. No thanks. > >[Posted 08/29/97 11:27 PM EST] > >© 1997 Orlando Sentinel Online > ># # # ======================================================================== Paul Andrew Mitchell : Counselor at Law, federal witness B.A., Political Science, UCLA; M.S., Public Administration, U.C. Irvine tel: (520) 320-1514: machine; fax: (520) 320-1256: 24-hour/day-night email: [address in tool bar] : using Eudora Pro 3.0.3 on 586 CPU website: http://www.supremelaw.com : visit the Supreme Law Library now ship to: c/o 2509 N. Campbell, #1776 : this is free speech, at its best Tucson, Arizona state : state zone, not the federal zone Postal Zone 85719/tdc : USPS delays first class w/o this As agents of the Most High, we came here to establish justice. We shall not leave, until our mission is accomplished and justice reigns eternal. ======================================================================== [This text formatted on-screen in Courier 11, non-proportional spacing.]
Return to Table of Contents for
Supreme Law School: E-mail